They dont need to. They already won next gen.If they show the order gameplay footage @ Gamescom, Microsoft shouldn't even try to have a gaming conference, because they would be done
Davekeeh
This topic is locked from further discussion.
agreed MS better stay homeIf they show the order gameplay footage @ Gamescom, Microsoft shouldn't even try to have a gaming conference, because they would be done
Davekeeh
defending NSA you say ? :lol:Think I just found a pic of you[QUOTE="legalize82"][QUOTE="mems_1224"] Then you're just an idiot that makes terrible decisions? Thats much worse. :lol:mems_1224
[QUOTE="mems_1224"]Its not nearly as bad as Flopzone Shadow Flop[QUOTE="Davekeeh"]
Those Titanfall textures look horrible, just look at those legs, it's a blurry mess
legalize82
[QUOTE="Davekeeh"]They dont need to. They already won next gen. wuuuuuuhahahahaIf they show the order gameplay footage @ Gamescom, Microsoft shouldn't even try to have a gaming conference, because they would be done
mems_1224
wuuuuuuhahahaha[QUOTE="legalize82"][QUOTE="mems_1224"] They dont need to. They already won next gen. mems_1224
[QUOTE="Davekeeh"]They dont need to. They already won next gen.If they show the order gameplay footage @ Gamescom, Microsoft shouldn't even try to have a gaming conference, because they would be done
mems_1224
They dont need to. They already won next gen.[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="Davekeeh"]
If they show the order gameplay footage @ Gamescom, Microsoft shouldn't even try to have a gaming conference, because they would be done
Davekeeh
They dont need to. They already won next gen.[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="Davekeeh"]
If they show the order gameplay footage @ Gamescom, Microsoft shouldn't even try to have a gaming conference, because they would be done
Davekeeh
[QUOTE="Davekeeh"][QUOTE="mems_1224"] They dont need to. They already won next gen. mems_1224
[QUOTE="Davekeeh"][QUOTE="mems_1224"] They dont need to. They already won next gen. legalize82
[QUOTE="Davekeeh"][QUOTE="mems_1224"] They dont need to. They already won next gen. legalize82
just goes to show you cows do not even care who makes the game or what it is even about. They are hyping a game they know nothing about, made by a psp developer, and have seen zero gameplay screens. Hell the only thing known about the game is that it is a filmic linear experience.
just goes to show you cows do not even care who makes the game or what it is even about. They are hyping a game they know nothing about, made by a psp developer, and have seen zero gameplay screens. Hell the only thing known about the game is that it is a filmic linear experience.
CanYouDiglt
Santa Monica and Ready at Dawn are amazing devs that have made lots of quality titles before. Besides, the game has an interesting setting. You on the other hand base your criticism on nothing and don't even know who this is developed by: it's made by both Ready at Dawn and Santa Monica.
Try again.
[QUOTE="Davekeeh"][QUOTE="legalize82"] BAHAHAHAHAHAmems_1224
[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]
just goes to show you cows do not even care who makes the game or what it is even about. They are hyping a game they know nothing about, made by a psp developer, and have seen zero gameplay screens. Hell the only thing known about the game is that it is a filmic linear experience.
R4gn4r0k
Santa Monica and Ready at Dawn are amazing devs that have made lots of quality titles before. Besides, the game has an interesting setting. You on the other hand base your criticism on nothing and don't even know who this is developed by: it's made by both Ready at Dawn and Santa Monica.
Try again.
[QUOTE="Davekeeh"]
Meanwhile Lems were guilty of hyping quantum break after E3, how hypocritical
R4gn4r0k
Exactly, both sides hype stuff for which they have seen zero gameplay. And lemmings even hype a game of which they know it has zero gameplay: Ryse.
Ryse isn't any different than God of Bore and cows have been hyping that shit for years.[QUOTE="CanYouDiglt"]
just goes to show you cows do not even care who makes the game or what it is even about. They are hyping a game they know nothing about, made by a psp developer, and have seen zero gameplay screens. Hell the only thing known about the game is that it is a filmic linear experience.
R4gn4r0k
Santa Monica and Ready at Dawn are amazing devs that have made lots of quality titles before. Besides, the game has an interesting setting. You on the other hand base your criticism on nothing and don't even know who this is developed by: it's made by both Ready at Dawn and Santa Monica.
Try again.
[QUOTE="Davekeeh"]
Meanwhile Lems were guilty of hyping quantum break after E3, how hypocritical
R4gn4r0k
Exactly, both sides hype stuff for which they have seen zero gameplay. And lemmings even hype a game of which they know it has zero gameplay: Ryse.
As with those Killzone shots they mean fvck all until I see them in real time in a game environment along with details like the res and framerate it's running at.
If the game actually looks like that then great work on their part, that would look awesome but for now it feels like they're blowing smoke up our asses to hype the game
Aww yeah, incoming pages of Lem tears! #ThankYouBasedOP
Shewgenja
Ryse amd Quantum break look better. That's what we're doing right? Hyping tech demos that aren't real time in game?
They dont need to. They already won next gen.[QUOTE="mems_1224"][QUOTE="Davekeeh"]
If they show the order gameplay footage @ Gamescom, Microsoft shouldn't even try to have a gaming conference, because they would be done
Davekeeh
Lol, PS4 got beaten by Xbox Live 3 month Gold membershit. :lol:
[QUOTE="Davekeeh"]
[QUOTE="mems_1224"] They dont need to. They already won next gen. SchnabbleTab
Lol, PS4 got beaten by Xbox Live 3 month Gold membershit. :lol:
Ryse isn't any different than God of Bore and cows have been hyping that shit for years. mems_1224
LMAO. GOW is more than just QTEs, Ryse is nothing but QTEs.
Mark my words: GOW got a lot of praise, got high scores and influenced other games. Meanwhile Ryse will score a 4.0 or less and influence nothing !
I thought it was only Ready at Dawn and no they have not proven to be anything special. Sony Santa Monica I agree are good devs. As far as the rest I am correct. Hyping a game as if it will be amazing when so little is know is dumb. If I had given any criticism my criticism based on nothing would be because that is all that is known about the game. I actually did not say the game was bad or good since there is no info to judge either way. Now go ahead and act as if the game is OMG amazing because you saw a pretty trailer with zero gameplay and it is a exclusive.
CanYouDiglt
I didn't do that. Read my comment in this thread, or any of the other The Order-thread: I'm always saying I want to see gameplay.
But I know this game will be good (without screaming OMG AMAZING) because I loved RAD and Santa Monicas previous games. I loved the GOW games on PSP and the re-releases on PS3.
You criticised cows, I was pointing at that. And like Davekeeh said: aren't lemmings doing the exact same thing with Quantum Break ? ;)
Which is actually another game I know will be good because I loved Remedy's previous games :P
[QUOTE="Shewgenja"]
Aww yeah, incoming pages of Lem tears! #ThankYouBasedOP
seanmcloughlin
Ryse amd Quantum break look better. That's what we're doing right? Hyping tech demos that aren't real time in game?
Everything we've seen from this game has been done from the game engine. Sony also wasn't gumming up the works with stupidly overpowered PCs running their stuff.[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"][QUOTE="Shewgenja"]
Aww yeah, incoming pages of Lem tears! #ThankYouBasedOP
Shewgenja
Ryse amd Quantum break look better. That's what we're doing right? Hyping tech demos that aren't real time in game?
Everything we've seen from this game has been done from the game engine. Sony also wasn't gumming up the works with stupidly overpowered PCs running their stuff.False advertising?
[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"][QUOTE="Shewgenja"]
Aww yeah, incoming pages of Lem tears! #ThankYouBasedOP
Shewgenja
Ryse amd Quantum break look better. That's what we're doing right? Hyping tech demos that aren't real time in game?
Everything we've seen from this game has been done from the game engine. Sony also wasn't gumming up the works with stupidly overpowered PCs running their stuff."In the game engine" is a vague term. The Last of Us' cutscenes were done in the game engine and they look a LOT better than the actual in game real time stuff.
Everything we've seen from this game has been done from the game engine. Sony also wasn't gumming up the works with stupidly overpowered PCs running their stuff.[QUOTE="Shewgenja"][QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]
Ryse amd Quantum break look better. That's what we're doing right? Hyping tech demos that aren't real time in game?
seanmcloughlin
"In the game engine" is a vague term. The Last of Us' cutscenes were done in the game engine and they look a LOT better than the actual in game real time stuff.
you are messing up 2 different terms
in engine = made with the game engine, but might not be done in the console hardware (higher spec pc, gaming rig, etc)
in game = game engine running on the final hardware
Hopefully this gen we have characters that aren't so damn ugly. Last gen we saw character models with a major increase in quality but the majority of them were rendered terribly. The best ones were when they gave up trying to add detail and smoothed things out.
[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]
[QUOTE="Shewgenja"] Everything we've seen from this game has been done from the game engine. Sony also wasn't gumming up the works with stupidly overpowered PCs running their stuff.ManatuBeard
"In the game engine" is a vague term. The Last of Us' cutscenes were done in the game engine and they look a LOT better than the actual in game real time stuff.
you are messing up 2 different terms
in engine = made with the game engine, but might not be done in the console hardware (higher spec pc, gaming rig, etc)
in game = game engine running on the final hardware
How is "In engine" any different to "in the game engine" ?
in engine MEANS in the game's engine
[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]
[QUOTE="Shewgenja"] Everything we've seen from this game has been done from the game engine. Sony also wasn't gumming up the works with stupidly overpowered PCs running their stuff.ManatuBeard
"In the game engine" is a vague term. The Last of Us' cutscenes were done in the game engine and they look a LOT better than the actual in game real time stuff.
you are messing up 2 different terms
in engine = made with the game engine, but might not be done in the console hardware (higher spec pc, gaming rig, etc)
in game = game engine running on the final hardware
The stuff shown are individual, now show me that detail in a full environment with several NPCs. NOT gonna happen. Doesn't matter if it's in the game engine, or even in the engine at all, if it's not gameplay then it isn't representative of anything but maybe cutscene quality.[QUOTE="ManatuBeard"][QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]
"In the game engine" is a vague term. The Last of Us' cutscenes were done in the game engine and they look a LOT better than the actual in game real time stuff.
parkurtommo
you are messing up 2 different terms
in engine = made with the game engine, but might not be done in the console hardware (higher spec pc, gaming rig, etc)
in game = game engine running on the final hardware
The stuff shown are individual, now show me that detail in a full environment with several NPCs. NOT gonna happen. Doesn't matter if it's in the game engine, or even in the engine at all, if it's not gameplay then it isn't representative of anything but maybe cutscene quality.Not quite, its all to do with the distance, just as the KZ SF models.
Up close, the model fills most of the screen and will have that detail, the further you move away from him/her the detail level lowers. Like current gen really, but the close model will look a lot better than anything we saw current gen.
Its not nearly as bad as Flopzone Shadow Flop[QUOTE="Davekeeh"]
Those Titanfall textures look horrible, just look at those legs, it's a blurry mess
mems_1224
[QUOTE="mems_1224"]Its not nearly as bad as Flopzone Shadow Flop[QUOTE="Davekeeh"]
Those Titanfall textures look horrible, just look at those legs, it's a blurry mess
gpuking
Titanfall looks great for a multiplayer game.
Not as good as KZSF, but still looks great.
[QUOTE="mems_1224"]Its not nearly as bad as Flopzone Shadow Flop[QUOTE="Davekeeh"]
Those Titanfall textures look horrible, just look at those legs, it's a blurry mess
gpuking
I hope next gen devs finally get hair right. This gen there was a big improvement in animations, I hope next gen we get real hair! Im replaying LA Noire right now and the facial animations are great but everything else in the game is so damn ugly.Hopefully this gen we have characters that aren't so damn ugly. Last gen we saw character models with a major increase in quality but the majority of them were rendered terribly. The best ones were when they gave up trying to add detail and smoothed things out.
Wasdie
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment