...is really a false statment. Why people tend to say this is because well, to put it short, it's the sony games. In other words, we're giving just as much attention and have just as much info on some 2009 titles as we have on games that are coming in a few months.
You know, you shouldn't be comparing Killzone 2 to gears even. That's dumb really. Obviously we're going to see graphical progression.
Look at Star Ocean 4 for instance. It looks fantabulous graphically, but it seems way off to us, despite the fact that it's coming out around the same time as killzone 2. http://scrawlfx.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/star-ocean-the-last-hope-famitsu-scans-oct-1-02.jpg
And then what about Halo: Keep it Clean. Don't you think that Bungie, especially after the whole view of Halo 3's graphics suck (despite the fact that they really don't) they're going to go beserk on you fanboys? Yea, they'll pump it up. Bungie is known for great graphics. Halo 3 showed it imo. Why did people say it looked like crap? Well... uhh... that's the forums for you, not the gamers.
Same even with the whole GT thing. Yea, it looked better than Forza 2, but Forza 3 and PGR5 will probably have released by the time the next GT comes out. So why were we comparing Forza 2 to GT when they're not going up against each other?
Log in to comment