The PS3's Blu-Ray format wont really matter for games this gen.

  • 68 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

Lets not get confused with upscaled DVDs with orignal DVDs. They're different. Or this is true. "My PS2 games (DVD) = 360 games (DVD), Woot!" So DVD-1 1.5GB...... DVD-9 7.95GB......HD DVD 15 or 30GB......Blu-ray 25 or 50GB

More content space wont matter for games this gen.

Avatar image for too_much_eslim
too_much_eslim

10727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 too_much_eslim
Member since 2006 • 10727 Posts
[QUOTE="too_much_eslim"][QUOTE="Twig978"] You didnt even read my post. The last paragraph talks about this. PS3 exclusives wont be held back but the thing is that PS3 exclusives dont represent the industry. The industry as a whole will try and accommodate as many systems as possible. Most games are multiplat, in fact the industry basically does multiplat games. And when you do this you cant take advantage of something that only one system has and the others dont. And even if the devs ship multiple discs, they will try and keep the discs as low as possible and the games as small as possible.Twig978
Um I read every bit of your post. What I was saying is that even some PS3 exclusives don't take advantage of blu-ray. Believe it or not the only games that really get affected by disc space is JRPGs. There are only a small amount of games that use multiple discs on the 360. Having the space is great when it is needed, but it is not needed 95% the time.

I think that we are just on the edge of having a bunch of nonRPG games (even non PS3) that use more data than a DVD9 but that's just me. And if you really look at some PS3 games, they certainly take advantage of it and I think that more PS3 exclusive games such as this will follow. The deva are just begining to get use to the hardware. Just look at the games at the end of the PS2's life cycle. But if you want to say that even some PS3 games don't take advantage of Blu-Ray then I guess that you could say that it Blu-Ray doesn't matter from that view point.

In this day and age of priced DLC. Blu-ray is will not matter. Why put more content on the disk when the greedy publishers can make more money off it. Think about it. Look at NBA 2k10. They made a xbla game that could have easily been apart of NBA 2k10. However they wanted to make more revenue.
Avatar image for DonPerian
DonPerian

3773

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#53 DonPerian
Member since 2005 • 3773 Posts
well it wont matter for 360 owners that for sure. ReaperV7
I'm a PS3 owner, and it doesn't matter to me.
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

Your (OP) logic is flawed. Why? The article below smacks you in the face that's why.

Contrary to what Square Enix would have us believe: FFXIII PS3 is COMPROMISED

Edit- opps! I forgot to copy & paste the link for the article. Just in case someone wanted to see where it is from.

http://xbox360.qj.net/Contrary-to-what-Square-Enix-would-have-us-believe-FFXIII-PS3-IS-compromised/pg/49/aid/134299

envybianchi

Dang. Thanks for the terrible news. Maybe the wave of DLC had an influence on Square Enix. The "chopped up" portions of the game could be DLC approved. :|

Avatar image for Twig978
Twig978

557

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Twig978
Member since 2009 • 557 Posts

[QUOTE="Twig978"][QUOTE="too_much_eslim"]Um I read every bit of your post. What I was saying is that even some PS3 exclusives don't take advantage of blu-ray. Believe it or not the only games that really get affected by disc space is JRPGs. There are only a small amount of games that use multiple discs on the 360. Having the space is great when it is needed, but it is not needed 95% the time.TheDuffman26
PS3 devs will take advantage of Blu-Ray big time in the future (as many are now). But the industry won't in general as most games are mulitplat; I really feel like the 360 having only DVD9 will hold back this gen in the future. I think that we are just on the edge of having a bunch of nonRPG games (even non PS3) that use more data than a DVD9 but that's just me. And if you really look at some PS3 games, they certainly take advantage of it and I think that more PS3 exclusive games such as this will follow. The deva are just begining to get use to the hardware. Just look at the games at the end of the PS2's life cycle. But if you want to say that even some PS3 games don't take advantage of Blu-Ray then I guess that you could say that it Blu-Ray doesn't matter from that view point.

We can both agree that Devs are just starting to take advantage of bluray, but the ps3 has 7 more years left in it. It's safe to say that only more games will be taking advantage of bluray during that time. I also predict that some of the best games during the next 7 years will take full advantage of bluray. So to say that bluray doesn't matter this gen is not really true.

PS3 devs will take advantage of Blu-Ray big time in the future (as many are now). But the industry won't in general as most games are mulitplat; I really feel like the 360 having only DVD9 will hold back this gen in the future

Avatar image for g0ddyX
g0ddyX

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 g0ddyX
Member since 2005 • 3914 Posts

What else is there thats better or just the same as Blu-ray?
Not everyone can download games.


When is the super 100gb discs coming out?

Avatar image for Brendissimo35
Brendissimo35

1934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 1

#57 Brendissimo35
Member since 2005 • 1934 Posts

I must agree. Still it's useful to have for the future when games get even bigger.

Avatar image for CajunShooter
CajunShooter

5276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 CajunShooter
Member since 2006 • 5276 Posts

Ok so the point of this thread was that Blu Ray will make a difference for Sony exlcusive games, but for multiplat games it won't make a difference since the game can only have 9 GB

This has been known about since 2006 so what was the point in making a topic about this? Some kind of revelation you just came up with that 99% of the rest of the people on this forum already know.

Avatar image for dotWithShoes
dotWithShoes

5596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#59 dotWithShoes
Member since 2006 • 5596 Posts
[QUOTE="too_much_eslim"]So what held back Heavenly Sword?Twig978
You didnt even read my post. The last paragraph talks about this. PS3 exclusives wont be held back but the thing is that PS3 exclusives dont represent the industry. The industry as a whole will try and accommodate as many systems as possible. Most games are multiplat, in fact the industry basically does multiplat games. And when you do this you cant take advantage of something that only one system has and the others dont. And even if the devs ship multiple discs, they will try and keep the discs as low as possible and the games as small as possible.

so I'm not understanding your response. You said ps3 exclusives wont be held back by DVD like multiplats will.. what held back Heavenly Sword, a ps3 exclusive?
Avatar image for dotWithShoes
dotWithShoes

5596

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#60 dotWithShoes
Member since 2006 • 5596 Posts

Ok so the point of this thread was that Blu Ray will make a difference for Sony exlcusive games, but for multiplat games it won't make a difference since the game can only have 9 GB

This has been known about since 2006 so what was the point in making a topic about this? Some kind of revelation you just came up with that 99% of the rest of the people on this forum already know.

CajunShooter
You do know DVD9 doesn't hold 9 gb of game data right?
Avatar image for masterpinky2000
masterpinky2000

1955

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 95

User Lists: 0

#61 masterpinky2000
Member since 2004 • 1955 Posts
I agree to some extent. But it will "matter" in the sense that it will benefit the PS3. Games like Uncharted 2, Heavy Rain, Final Fantasy XIII are turning heads, and for good reason, they're gorgeous games. Gamers will be attracted because of these exclusive titles (or in FFXIII's case, non-exclusive but more convenient thanks to lack of multiple discs). Multiplats will definitely be constrained by DVD9's limits, thanks to the 360's strong market share.
Avatar image for zaibutzu
zaibutzu

1277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 1

#62 zaibutzu
Member since 2004 • 1277 Posts
Hopefully developers will see the light and make more ps3-exclusive games. Until then i'll settle for the occasional sony made games that come out, like GOD OF WAR 3. Oh yea can't wait baby.
Avatar image for abd_alazeez2002
abd_alazeez2002

328

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 abd_alazeez2002
Member since 2005 • 328 Posts
what about 4-discs FF14 for x360?
Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts

...so your excuse to why game won't be first developed for on the PS3 is because of "packaging" multiple disks? ...:| I'm sure that's not one of the top reasons on the list: "why not to make games with more than one disk."

"360 having more user base" theory is why the games are devloped on the 360 first. We will see if this is correct when and if the PS3 passes the 360 user base. Probably not thanks to DLC. And probably not because, it's not true.

Avatar image for envybianchi
envybianchi

1155

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 envybianchi
Member since 2004 • 1155 Posts

[QUOTE="envybianchi"]

Your (OP) logic is flawed. Why? The article below smacks you in the face that's why.

Contrary to what Square Enix would have us believe: FFXIII PS3 is COMPROMISED

Edit- opps! I forgot to copy & paste the link for the article. Just in case someone wanted to see where it is from.

http://xbox360.qj.net/Contrary-to-what-Square-Enix-would-have-us-believe-FFXIII-PS3-IS-compromised/pg/49/aid/134299

LOXO7

Dang. Thanks for the terrible news. Maybe the wave of DLC had an influence on Square Enix. The "chopped up" portions of the game could be DLC approved. :|

Sorry dude...... I hate to be the bearer of bad news but it is what it is. I knew somehow the game would be affected in some way but my "friend" said it was the fanboy in me that was thinking that way. I'm glad my "hunch" wasn't wrong. I know I'm not a crazy PS3 fanboy because I enjoy my Nintendo & PC games plus I don't even have all the exclusives for the PS3 or play it as much as the other 2 consoles mentioned. I'm still gonna get FFXIII on 1st day but I'm not gonna have any high expectations of it. Regardless, I know I'm gonna enjoy it.

Avatar image for wooooode
wooooode

16666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 wooooode
Member since 2002 • 16666 Posts
Advantages are usually only seen on exclusive titles. Blu Ray has allowed the PS3 to have games with amazing 7.1 audio something no 360 or PC game has.
Avatar image for thirdykal
thirdykal

302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 thirdykal
Member since 2009 • 302 Posts

TC is right, the vast majority of games this generation are multiplats, therefore developers want to make sure their games run on both systems. If it doesn't fit on DVD9, it won't be put into the game. Only Sony exclusives will even begin to take advantage of the massive storage space (but so far most of what we're seeing is uncompressed audio).

Avatar image for santoron
santoron

8584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#68 santoron
Member since 2006 • 8584 Posts

Sure it does, and will continue.

TC wants to downplay Exclusives, but when you have as many Developers as Sony, that's gonna be a significant number of titles coming your way without any chance of going multiplat, even before you talk about any 3rd party exclusives. And all of those games get to focus on making a game complete and not worrying how to fit it on the disc as much.

I also think in the multiplat arena you'll see more and more larger than 1 DVD games as we get late into this (heavily considered to be longer than normal) console cycle. That isn't a huge disadvantage for the 360, because you could either switch a disc at some point, or just install to the increasingly large HDD. On the PS3, you may not (but might)need to bother with an install, and you certainly won't need to change a disc.

I guess since the 360 is more than capable of addressing the challenge of handling an increasing number of multi-disc games, I could agree with TC that the lack of BluRay on the 360 certainly isn't gonna be a deal breaker for any game. But it's a nice feature nonetheless.