The PS4 is Only Stronger on Paper

  • 90 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for IshmaelSonata
IshmaelSonata

979

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 IshmaelSonata
Member since 2008 • 979 Posts

images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQzvwcKZsKi1ENCFdEQAma

 

There are a ton of people throwing around the catch phrase "stronger on paper" as if hardware differences are all theoretical, and the xbox one and the PS4 will actually have equivalent real performance.

Stronger on paper happens when hardware specifications isn't translated to performance, it happened with the PS3 where developers had alot of difficulties accessing it's processing capabilities. With the xbox one and PS4, they have almost the same architecture, developers are essentially programming on the same platform. "Stronger on paper" is irrelevant here, because if developers can't leverage hardware on the PS4, the same will happen on the xbox one. In every other case, assuming developers knows what they're doing, you will see a performance difference that translate roughly to the difference in hardware, which is: the PS4 has a GPU~7850, and Xbox one ~7770. This is a MUCH MUCH bigger difference compared to xbox 360 vs PS4.

Avatar image for Badosh
Badosh

12774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#2 Badosh
Member since 2011 • 12774 Posts
Cool.
Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts
 .
Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts

It's ridiculously more powerful and it has the system bandwidth to move that data tangibly.  We're also seeing a 256-bit bus versus 128.  It won't be very long before the difference between the games is noticable.

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

Did I upset you bro? 

Avatar image for IshmaelSonata
IshmaelSonata

979

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 IshmaelSonata
Member since 2008 • 979 Posts

Did I upset you bro? 

seanmcloughlin

who are you

Avatar image for clr84651
clr84651

5643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 clr84651
Member since 2010 • 5643 Posts

PS4 has more power and better memory. Multi plats wont show any difference between the 2 because there's no reason to make one better than the other. PS4 exclusives will be made to harness all of it's power.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

Did I upset you bro? 

IshmaelSonata

who are you

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

who are you?

IshmaelSonata

The one who prompted you to write that post

On paper the PS4 is stronger but I think they will be evry similar in terms of what they produce. Except for PS4 exclusives because they have talented dev teams like SSM and ND, not necessarily because it's stronger

seanmcloughlin

There are a ton of people throwing around the catch phrase "stronger on paper". Do you even know what that term implies? 

Stronger on paper happens when hardware specifications isn't translated to performance, it happened with the PS3 where developers had alot of difficulties accessing it's processing capabilities. With the xbox one and PS4, they have almost the same architecture, developers are essentially programming on the same platform. "Stronger on paper" is irrelevant here, because if developers can't leverage hardware on the PS4, the same will happen on the xbox one. In every other case, assuming developers knows what they're doing, you will see a performance difference that translate roughly to the difference in hardware, which is: the PS4 has a GPU~7850, and Xbox one ~7770. This is a MUCH MUCH bigger difference compared to xbox 360 vs PS4.

IshmaelSonata

http://uk.gamespot.com/forums/topic/29408570/xbox-one-vs-ps4-power

Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
lems have to come up with some bullsh!t since they have nothing.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#11 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

In this case stronger on paper means pretty much everything because the hardware in the Xbox One and the PS4 is practically the same. The PS4 just has a straight up more power GPU (50% more stream processors) and lower latency RAM. Their CPUs are practically identical. If the XOne's OS is taking 2 cores away and 3 gigs of RAM then they are making that gap even larger.

This isn't some Cell vs. Xenon debate like back last gen. The PS4 and XBox one are built using the same core technologies. The biggest difference is that the XOne went with DDR3 ram and 32 mbs of ESRAM to make up for the lower latency and Sony went for GDDR5 ram which is DDR3 ram tuned for latency so they didn't need some cash of low-latency ram. 

This is pretty clear. The PS4 is going to be clearly and noticeably more powerful throughout the next generation. We'll really start seeing the difference in a year or two. 

Avatar image for LOXO7
LOXO7

5595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 LOXO7
Member since 2008 • 5595 Posts
Is stronger on paper the new saying for paper weight?
Avatar image for IshmaelSonata
IshmaelSonata

979

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 IshmaelSonata
Member since 2008 • 979 Posts

The one who prompted you to write that post

seanmcloughlin

It seems that all lemmings do now is throw this term around, so even if you've made the same arguement in the past, you're not special in anyway, sorry to dissappoint.  

Avatar image for Douevenlift_bro
Douevenlift_bro

6804

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Douevenlift_bro
Member since 2013 • 6804 Posts

Saying stronger on paper is just like saying its stronger period lol. What does that even mean? Is that supposed to undermine the power gap? lol Ignore the loser lemmings. They got nothing better to do

 

Anybody with a brain will tell you that, with similar architecture, the PS4 is significantly more powerful. This means: Better looking multiplats by a big margin, better looking exclusives.

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

The one who prompted you to write that post

IshmaelSonata

It seems that all lemmings do now is throw this term around, so even if you've made the same arguement in the past, you're not special in anyway, sorry to dissappoint.  

Pfff more special than you :cool:

Oh and I'm not a lemming

Avatar image for IshmaelSonata
IshmaelSonata

979

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 IshmaelSonata
Member since 2008 • 979 Posts

[QUOTE="IshmaelSonata"]

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

The one who prompted you to write that post

seanmcloughlin

It seems that all lemmings do now is throw this term around, so even if you've made the same arguement in the past, you're not special in anyway, sorry to dissappoint.  

Pfff more special than you :cool:

Oh and I'm not a lemming

ok ok, if you're not a lemming, my mistake for bundling, you sure talk like one though :?.

Avatar image for Malta_1980
Malta_1980

11890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Malta_1980
Member since 2008 • 11890 Posts

In this case stronger on paper means pretty much everything because the hardware in the Xbox One and the PS4 is practically the same. The PS4 just has a straight up more power GPU (50% more stream processors) and lower latency RAM. Their CPUs are practically identical. If the XOne's OS is taking 2 cores away and 3 gigs of RAM then they are making that gap even larger.

This isn't some Cell vs. Xenon debate like back last gen. The PS4 and XBox one are built using the same core technologies. The biggest difference is that the XOne went with DDR3 ram and 32 mbs of ESRAM to make up for the lower latency and Sony went for GDDR5 ram which is DDR3 ram tuned for latency so they didn't need some cash of low-latency ram. 

This is pretty clear. The PS4 is going to be clearly and noticeably more powerful throughout the next generation. We'll really start seeing the difference in a year or two. 

Wasdie

not bad considering PS4 will launch at $100 cheaper :)

Avatar image for casharmy
casharmy

9388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 casharmy
Member since 2011 • 9388 Posts

In this case stronger on paper means pretty much everything because the hardware in the Xbox One and the PS4 is practically the same. The PS4 just has a straight up more power GPU (50% more stream processors) and lower latency RAM. Their CPUs are practically identical. If the XOne's OS is taking 2 cores away and 3 gigs of RAM then they are making that gap even larger.

This isn't some Cell vs. Xenon debate like back last gen. The PS4 and XBox one are built using the same core technologies. The biggest difference is that the XOne went with DDR3 ram and 32 mbs of ESRAM to make up for the lower latency and Sony went for GDDR5 ram which is DDR3 ram tuned for latency so they didn't need some cash of low-latency ram. 

This is pretty clear. The PS4 is going to be clearly and noticeably more powerful throughout the next generation. We'll really start seeing the difference in a year or two. 

Wasdie

A year or 2 you say?  

I believe we will see it at launch.

Avatar image for Ravenlore_basic
Ravenlore_basic

4319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#19 Ravenlore_basic
Member since 2003 • 4319 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

In this case stronger on paper means pretty much everything because the hardware in the Xbox One and the PS4 is practically the same. The PS4 just has a straight up more power GPU (50% more stream processors) and lower latency RAM. Their CPUs are practically identical. If the XOne's OS is taking 2 cores away and 3 gigs of RAM then they are making that gap even larger.

This isn't some Cell vs. Xenon debate like back last gen. The PS4 and XBox one are built using the same core technologies. The biggest difference is that the XOne went with DDR3 ram and 32 mbs of ESRAM to make up for the lower latency and Sony went for GDDR5 ram which is DDR3 ram tuned for latency so they didn't need some cash of low-latency ram. 

This is pretty clear. The PS4 is going to be clearly and noticeably more powerful throughout the next generation. We'll really start seeing the difference in a year or two. 

Malta_1980

not bad considering PS4 will launch at $100 cheaper :)

^ yes, Stronger, less DRM and $100.00 dollars cheaper.... Lems are going mad, foaming at the mouth about any thing they can make up to say that their console is somehow better.  

Avatar image for NationProtector
NationProtector

1609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#20 NationProtector
Member since 2013 • 1609 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

In this case stronger on paper means pretty much everything because the hardware in the Xbox One and the PS4 is practically the same. The PS4 just has a straight up more power GPU (50% more stream processors) and lower latency RAM. Their CPUs are practically identical. If the XOne's OS is taking 2 cores away and 3 gigs of RAM then they are making that gap even larger.

This isn't some Cell vs. Xenon debate like back last gen. The PS4 and XBox one are built using the same core technologies. The biggest difference is that the XOne went with DDR3 ram and 32 mbs of ESRAM to make up for the lower latency and Sony went for GDDR5 ram which is DDR3 ram tuned for latency so they didn't need some cash of low-latency ram. 

This is pretty clear. The PS4 is going to be clearly and noticeably more powerful throughout the next generation. We'll really start seeing the difference in a year or two. 

casharmy

A year or 2 you say?  

I believe we will see it at launch.

Not if the games keep freezing
Avatar image for NFJSupreme
NFJSupreme

6605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 NFJSupreme
Member since 2005 • 6605 Posts
we already know this.
Avatar image for Shewgenja
Shewgenja

21456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 Shewgenja
Member since 2009 • 21456 Posts
[QUOTE="NationProtector"][QUOTE="casharmy"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="casharmy"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

In this case stronger on paper means pretty much everything because the hardware in the Xbox One and the PS4 is practically the same. The PS4 just has a straight up more power GPU (50% more stream processors) and lower latency RAM. Their CPUs are practically identical. If the XOne's OS is taking 2 cores away and 3 gigs of RAM then they are making that gap even larger.

This isn't some Cell vs. Xenon debate like back last gen. The PS4 and XBox one are built using the same core technologies. The biggest difference is that the XOne went with DDR3 ram and 32 mbs of ESRAM to make up for the lower latency and Sony went for GDDR5 ram which is DDR3 ram tuned for latency so they didn't need some cash of low-latency ram. 

This is pretty clear. The PS4 is going to be clearly and noticeably more powerful throughout the next generation. We'll really start seeing the difference in a year or two. 

NationProtector

A year or 2 you say?  

I believe we will see it at launch.

Not if the games keep freezing

Like EA's games at the Xbox stage?
Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

if there is some kind of huge difference then i didn't see it.

games on both looked about equal.

maybe it will become more clear once both consoles are out and we can do side by side comparisons of the multiplats and gfx effects in exclusives and whatnot.. 

Avatar image for dream431ca
dream431ca

10165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 dream431ca
Member since 2003 • 10165 Posts

In this case stronger on paper means pretty much everything because the hardware in the Xbox One and the PS4 is practically the same. The PS4 just has a straight up more power GPU (50% more stream processors) and lower latency RAM. Their CPUs are practically identical. If the XOne's OS is taking 2 cores away and 3 gigs of RAM then they are making that gap even larger.

This isn't some Cell vs. Xenon debate like back last gen. The PS4 and XBox one are built using the same core technologies. The biggest difference is that the XOne went with DDR3 ram and 32 mbs of ESRAM to make up for the lower latency and Sony went for GDDR5 ram which is DDR3 ram tuned for latency so they didn't need some cash of low-latency ram. 

This is pretty clear. The PS4 is going to be clearly and noticeably more powerful throughout the next generation. We'll really start seeing the difference in a year or two. 

Wasdie

Take this with a grain of salt but a developer seems to think the difference will be noticeable day one:

In talking to a developer who wished to remain anonymous, gamers will see a difference on Day One when they compare third party PS4 games to Xbox One head-to-head. The developer told me the PS4 is 40 percent more powerful than Xbox One and games like Call of Duty Ghosts will be noticeably different out of the gate.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/johngaudiosi/2013/06/15/sony-playstation-4-launch-edition-already-sold-out-at-amazon/

Avatar image for cheesie253
cheesie253

1014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 cheesie253
Member since 2003 • 1014 Posts
It's stronger on paper means its stronger in actual hardware too. If that makes a big difference remains to be seen but yes the PS4 is the strongest tech wise.
Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60833 Posts
This is pretty clear. The PS4 is going to be clearly and noticeably more powerful throughout the next generation. We'll really start seeing the difference in a year or two. Wasdie
and thus SDC.
Avatar image for dogfather76
dogfather76

589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 dogfather76
Member since 2009 • 589 Posts
Thanks for the thought provoking post OP.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#30 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

In this case stronger on paper means pretty much everything because the hardware in the Xbox One and the PS4 is practically the same. The PS4 just has a straight up more power GPU (50% more stream processors) and lower latency RAM. Their CPUs are practically identical. If the XOne's OS is taking 2 cores away and 3 gigs of RAM then they are making that gap even larger.

This isn't some Cell vs. Xenon debate like back last gen. The PS4 and XBox one are built using the same core technologies. The biggest difference is that the XOne went with DDR3 ram and 32 mbs of ESRAM to make up for the lower latency and Sony went for GDDR5 ram which is DDR3 ram tuned for latency so they didn't need some cash of low-latency ram. 

This is pretty clear. The PS4 is going to be clearly and noticeably more powerful throughout the next generation. We'll really start seeing the difference in a year or two. 

casharmy

A year or 2 you say?  

I believe we will see it at launch.

At the most multiplats will run a bit better on the PS4. It's really early in the dev cycle for both consoles. Devleoper's haven't had the proper exposure to the hardware for them to really start utilizing it properly. Right now they are probably using more PC oriented engines. The performance of the two consoles will come off roughly the same until they really start optimizing for the hardware.

I guess the hardware differences could be enough, but given what I saw at E3 with Ryse, the Xbox One isn't a slouch. 

Remember even the consoles are hitting diminshing returns now. 40% difference in hardware isn't as large as it used to be. 

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

In this case stronger on paper means pretty much everything because the hardware in the Xbox One and the PS4 is practically the same. The PS4 just has a straight up more power GPU (50% more stream processors) and lower latency RAM. Their CPUs are practically identical. If the XOne's OS is taking 2 cores away and 3 gigs of RAM then they are making that gap even larger.

This isn't some Cell vs. Xenon debate like back last gen. The PS4 and XBox one are built using the same core technologies. The biggest difference is that the XOne went with DDR3 ram and 32 mbs of ESRAM to make up for the lower latency and Sony went for GDDR5 ram which is DDR3 ram tuned for latency so they didn't need some cash of low-latency ram. 

This is pretty clear. The PS4 is going to be clearly and noticeably more powerful throughout the next generation. We'll really start seeing the difference in a year or two. 

dream431ca

Take this with a grain of salt but a developer seems to think the difference will be noticeable day one:

In talking to a developer who wished to remain anonymous, gamers will see a difference on Day One when they compare third party PS4 games to Xbox One head-to-head. The developer told me the PS4 is 40 percent more powerful than Xbox One and games like Call of Duty Ghosts will be noticeably different out of the gate.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/johngaudiosi/2013/06/15/sony-playstation-4-launch-edition-already-sold-out-at-amazon/

i would say it could easily be 40% more powerful but it would mean almost nothing because in computer graphics you don't  really see big difference until you have huge jumps in computing power.

so although 40% sounds important and will in fact be a bit  better you will not see any more of a real difference than we saw between ps3 and 360.

Avatar image for subyman
subyman

1719

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#32 subyman
Member since 2005 • 1719 Posts

FWIW, Xbox One will use DirectX while PS4 will use OpenGL.  So, they won't be direct ports.

Avatar image for cheesie253
cheesie253

1014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 cheesie253
Member since 2003 • 1014 Posts

[QUOTE="dream431ca"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

In this case stronger on paper means pretty much everything because the hardware in the Xbox One and the PS4 is practically the same. The PS4 just has a straight up more power GPU (50% more stream processors) and lower latency RAM. Their CPUs are practically identical. If the XOne's OS is taking 2 cores away and 3 gigs of RAM then they are making that gap even larger.

This isn't some Cell vs. Xenon debate like back last gen. The PS4 and XBox one are built using the same core technologies. The biggest difference is that the XOne went with DDR3 ram and 32 mbs of ESRAM to make up for the lower latency and Sony went for GDDR5 ram which is DDR3 ram tuned for latency so they didn't need some cash of low-latency ram. 

This is pretty clear. The PS4 is going to be clearly and noticeably more powerful throughout the next generation. We'll really start seeing the difference in a year or two. 

Riverwolf007

Take this with a grain of salt but a developer seems to think the difference will be noticeable day one:

In talking to a developer who wished to remain anonymous, gamers will see a difference on Day One when they compare third party PS4 games to Xbox One head-to-head. The developer told me the PS4 is 40 percent more powerful than Xbox One and games like Call of Duty Ghosts will be noticeably different out of the gate.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/johngaudiosi/2013/06/15/sony-playstation-4-launch-edition-already-sold-out-at-amazon/

i would say it could easily be 40% more powerful but it would mean almost nothing because in computer graphics you don't  really see big difference until you have huge jumps in computing power.

so although 40% sounds important and will in fact be a bit  better you will not see any more of a real difference than we saw between ps3 and 360.

Anyone who has dealt with upgrading PC hardware knows this. I also don't see a 40% or bigger advantage here. The two systems are much closer to eachother than some people will admit. It's the law of diminishing returns. Something anyone who buys the newest line of graphics cards will know about. At what point does product A perform better than B and at what cost. The two architectures are pretty much even par.
Avatar image for Obviously_Right
Obviously_Right

5331

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Obviously_Right
Member since 2011 • 5331 Posts

[QUOTE="seanmcloughlin"]

Did I upset you bro? 

IshmaelSonata

who are you

lol

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#35 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Who gives a fvck about power? Didn't we just learn this past gen that it means absolutely dick-fvcking all for consoles?
Avatar image for 2scoopsofempty
2scoopsofempty

923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 2scoopsofempty
Member since 2005 • 923 Posts

the differences are astounding. I cant wait to see how PS4 games evolve this gen.

Avatar image for Gargus
Gargus

2147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 Gargus
Member since 2006 • 2147 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

In this case stronger on paper means pretty much everything because the hardware in the Xbox One and the PS4 is practically the same. The PS4 just has a straight up more power GPU (50% more stream processors) and lower latency RAM. Their CPUs are practically identical. If the XOne's OS is taking 2 cores away and 3 gigs of RAM then they are making that gap even larger.

This isn't some Cell vs. Xenon debate like back last gen. The PS4 and XBox one are built using the same core technologies. The biggest difference is that the XOne went with DDR3 ram and 32 mbs of ESRAM to make up for the lower latency and Sony went for GDDR5 ram which is DDR3 ram tuned for latency so they didn't need some cash of low-latency ram.

This is pretty clear. The PS4 is going to be clearly and noticeably more powerful throughout the next generation. We'll really start seeing the difference in a year or two.

Malta_1980

not bad considering PS4 will launch at $100 cheaper :)

It helped they didnt make the ps4 camera mandatory, which means if you dont want one, you dont have to buy one and it isnt mandatory for the system which is cool. I love being able to make my own choices. Its sold seperately and it sells seperate for 60 dollars, which still makes the package 40 dollars cheaper than a xbox one.

But yeah, its more powerful in a few key areas and its running ddr5 ram instead of ddr3 ram.

And its still cheaper.

Who gives a fvck about power? Didn't we just learn this past gen that it means absolutely dick-fvcking all for consoles?foxhound_fox

I care about power because more power means newer games and a wider variety.

A powerful system does not mean automatically it will have great games. But more power allows a wider variety of games. If all we had was a wii as our most powerful system it would have great games, but we wouldnt have games that are more complex.

When the super nintendo was out and everyone just said "We dont need more power to make good games!" and it never evolved beyond that then you wouldnt be playing all the thousands of great games to come out since then. Hell you wouldnt even have voice acting in games let alone even online multiplayer.

Avatar image for deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd

12449

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 deactivated-5acbb9993d0bd
Member since 2012 • 12449 Posts
Wtf this makes no sense. Their architecture is the same, so they CAN utiilize the power differences....
Avatar image for IshmaelSonata
IshmaelSonata

979

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 IshmaelSonata
Member since 2008 • 979 Posts

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]

[QUOTE="dream431ca"]

Take this with a grain of salt but a developer seems to think the difference will be noticeable day one:

In talking to a developer who wished to remain anonymous, gamers will see a difference on Day One when they compare third party PS4 games to Xbox One head-to-head. The developer told me the PS4 is 40 percent more powerful than Xbox One and games like Call of Duty Ghosts will be noticeably different out of the gate.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/johngaudiosi/2013/06/15/sony-playstation-4-launch-edition-already-sold-out-at-amazon/

cheesie253

i would say it could easily be 40% more powerful but it would mean almost nothing because in computer graphics you don't  really see big difference until you have huge jumps in computing power.

so although 40% sounds important and will in fact be a bit  better you will not see any more of a real difference than we saw between ps3 and 360.

Anyone who has dealt with upgrading PC hardware knows this. I also don't see a 40% or bigger advantage here. The two systems are much closer to eachother than some people will admit. It's the law of diminishing returns. Something anyone who buys the newest line of graphics cards will know about. At what point does product A perform better than B and at what cost. The two architectures are pretty much even par.

It's very simple, you just have to look at benchmarks for the two different graphics cards. The 7850 consistently performs ~20 fps better @1080p for games like crysis 3, battlefield 3, etc. 

At what cost you say? Well, the xbox one is $100 more.

Avatar image for IshmaelSonata
IshmaelSonata

979

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 IshmaelSonata
Member since 2008 • 979 Posts

Who gives a fvck about power? Didn't we just learn this past gen that it means absolutely dick-fvcking all for consoles?foxhound_fox

I do. I want better quality multiplats and better quality exclusives.

You sound like a mad MS fanboy.

Avatar image for cheesie253
cheesie253

1014

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 cheesie253
Member since 2003 • 1014 Posts

[QUOTE="cheesie253"][QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]i would say it could easily be 40% more powerful but it would mean almost nothing because in computer graphics you don't really see big difference until you have huge jumps in computing power.

so although 40% sounds important and will in fact be a bit better you will not see any more of a real difference than we saw between ps3 and 360.

IshmaelSonata

Anyone who has dealt with upgrading PC hardware knows this. I also don't see a 40% or bigger advantage here. The two systems are much closer to eachother than some people will admit. It's the law of diminishing returns. Something anyone who buys the newest line of graphics cards will know about. At what point does product A perform better than B and at what cost. The two architectures are pretty much even par.

It's very simple, you just have to look at benchmarks for the two different graphics cards. The 7850 consistently performs ~20 fps better @1080p for games like crysis 3, battlefield 3, etc.

At what cost you say? Well, the xbox one is $100 more.

I am not saying that isnt true. By what cost I was simply talking about the developers end. Just because one system has a slight advantage it doesnt mean that will translate into better software in the real world. Look at the current gen, the PS3 had much better hardware but never really took a huge advantage. When two GPU are similar like they are with the new systems it will be a small difference. What I do know is DX11 is used more so than Open GL. I am not going into compairing the two but it is something that will affect the way the two systems are utilized and also what comes out of the fact that one card may have more power than another. Ease and convenience of the programming language has a lot to do with the performance of a GPU. It actually is not as simple looking at benchmarks. All that proves is on a platform where no one person shares the exact hardware one card can have an advantage. I can show you some benchmarks where one system with a GTX 660 can outperform a system with a GTX 680. When two system are very close in spec to each other like these two are, small differences in a GPU will yield an advantage but to what extent. The law of diminishing returns.

Avatar image for redskins26rocs
redskins26rocs

2674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 redskins26rocs
Member since 2009 • 2674 Posts
I read that some people think this graphical difference was not seen at E3, therefore, there isnt one. I saw hardly gameplay from the Xbone except for Forza 5 which looks like Forza 4 with better shadows and Killer Instinct that looked possible on 360, oh and I forgot Ryse, but it looks like crap, and not only that they were apparently ran on high end PCs and same goes with multiplats. The PS4 launch graphics are quite apparent unlike the Xbones, which showed off Infamous, Killzone, and Knack. If there are some game demos that show off how similar they are please show me.
Avatar image for silversix_
silversix_

26347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 silversix_  Online
Member since 2010 • 26347 Posts
Keep telling you that. The Order will be the first ps4 title that won't even be possible on xboned i bet.
Avatar image for ManatuBeard
ManatuBeard

1121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 ManatuBeard
Member since 2012 • 1121 Posts

People keep assuming that the weakest one will be the common denominator, it might be in the 6months-1st year, but for the rest of the run the console with the biggest install base will be the common denominator, and since multiplats are made on PC, its not that hard to scale down for the PS4 and then scale down some more for the Xbone.

As soon as Digital Foundry starts doing faceoffs of PS4 vs Xbone, it will all become very clear (maybe not with EA/Activision games... im sure MS will pay those to make the Ps4 version worse!)

Avatar image for Cubs360
Cubs360

3771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 Cubs360
Member since 2006 • 3771 Posts

whats up with esram area.  how come the ps4 doesnt have any of that?

Avatar image for blackace
blackace

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#46 blackace
Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts
Don't really care about the hardware. I care about the GAMES!! Don't really care which is more powerful. The original Xbox was more powerful then the PS2. Did it make any difference? Not really. Both the PS4 and Xbox 360 were more powerful then the Wii, yet it still sold more hardware and software then both. Sigh... Having more power is meaningless. It's been proven many times. Move on.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#47 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

whats up with esram area.  how come the ps4 doesnt have any of that?

Cubs360

Doesn't need it. The ESRAM is a low latency cache. The GDDR5 is all low latency thus the PS4 doesn't need a special cache.

Avatar image for ManatuBeard
ManatuBeard

1121

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 ManatuBeard
Member since 2012 • 1121 Posts

[QUOTE="Cubs360"]

whats up with esram area.  how come the ps4 doesnt have any of that?

Wasdie

Doesn't need it. The ESRAM is a low latency cache. The GDDR5 is all low latency thus the PS4 doesn't need a special cache.

 

hmmm NO

ESRAM is low latency and high bandwith, GDDR5 has very high bandwith but higher latency. But since its a console, a closed circuit, and the CPU has specific modifications to deal with the higher latency (higher than DDR3), the higher latency has no special impact for gaming/OS.

Avatar image for DerekLoffin
DerekLoffin

9095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 47

User Lists: 0

#49 DerekLoffin
Member since 2002 • 9095 Posts

[QUOTE="IshmaelSonata"]

[QUOTE="cheesie253"] Anyone who has dealt with upgrading PC hardware knows this. I also don't see a 40% or bigger advantage here. The two systems are much closer to eachother than some people will admit. It's the law of diminishing returns. Something anyone who buys the newest line of graphics cards will know about. At what point does product A perform better than B and at what cost. The two architectures are pretty much even par. cheesie253

It's very simple, you just have to look at benchmarks for the two different graphics cards. The 7850 consistently performs ~20 fps better @1080p for games like crysis 3, battlefield 3, etc.

At what cost you say? Well, the xbox one is $100 more.

I am not saying that isnt true. By what cost I was simply talking about the developers end. Just because one system has a slight advantage it doesnt mean that will translate into better software in the real world. Look at the current gen, the PS3 had much better hardware but never really took a huge advantage. When two GPU are similar like they are with the new systems it will be a small difference. What I do know is DX11 is used more so than Open GL. I am not going into compairing the two but it is something that will affect the way the two systems are utilized and also what comes out of the fact that one card may have more power than another. Ease and convenience of the programming language has a lot to do with the performance of a GPU. It actually is not as simple looking at benchmarks. All that proves is on a platform where no one person shares the exact hardware one card can have an advantage. I can show you some benchmarks where one system with a GTX 660 can outperform a system with a GTX 680. When two system are very close in spec to each other like these two are, small differences in a GPU will yield an advantage but to what extent. The law of diminishing returns.

I might agree with you except there is a 3rd system that uses this architecture in the mix, namely PC, and PC games always come with quality and performance settings. This means the code is already there. Most developers will keep the 3 using the same code base until near the end, then just hard code the settings on X1 and P4 that work best, but that will put the P4 ahead.

Avatar image for ShoTTyMcNaDeS
ShoTTyMcNaDeS

2784

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#50 ShoTTyMcNaDeS
Member since 2011 • 2784 Posts
These consoles will ultimately be judged on exclusive content. Multiplats will in general look quite similar with maybe a slight difference in performance on the PS4