The Purpose Of The Fake Conduit Review

  • 67 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for umcommon
umcommon

2503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#51 umcommon
Member since 2007 • 2503 Posts
[QUOTE="jonnyt61"]What's the "hidden message" then? This is the first I've seen of this fake review, but, I still believe Conduit is going to be a heavy disappointment, and sincerely believe Wii owners should focus on Little King's Story. It's out in the UK already, and it's a real good game, something the Wii needs. Not lousy looking FPS that only get hype because of a big mouth dev.

If I see another post like this I might break my keyboard. LKS looks like a good game but honestly it's not my type of game and I have zero interest in it. Besides how the heck can anyone compare a strategy game to a FPS game....WAY different genres. Also how is LKS so dang original? Besides including perverted cartoon characters, what is so special and ground breaking?
Avatar image for II-FBIsniper-II
II-FBIsniper-II

18067

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#52 II-FBIsniper-II
Member since 2005 • 18067 Posts
I don't really understand what you were trying to prove. You say that it was "obvious" that is was fake. Umm, not really. Their were a few mistakes and grammatical errors, but it wasn't so much that someone that hasn't followed the game would be able to catch. The biggest mistake on their was that it said the Conduit has "stunning graphics".
Avatar image for Keltoid
Keltoid

925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Keltoid
Member since 2009 • 925 Posts
I appreciate your efforts, TC... but honestly, taking a second glance at it all... you accomplished nothing and made the review so believable (yes it is believable if you arent checking for spelling errors) that you probably hurt The Conduit. As a matter of fact, I was logging off of my lap top earlier thinking "what a shame" after reading it, only to stumble upon this thread later. You better hope that the news of "it's a fake" spreads faster than the review score its self. Sure, the real review will eventually come out, at which point alot of people will have moved on thinking this review was real.
Avatar image for starmetroid
starmetroid

5000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#54 starmetroid
Member since 2007 • 5000 Posts
[QUOTE="W1NGMAN-"]

Dangit I didn't get to read it or see it :( I'm always late to the party!

killerfist
 Here it is. Well done TC, you sure fooled me. (untill the guy that pointed out the gramatical errors)

I never saw this before but I can tell that none of the current NP staff wrote this, and they would also wouldn't leave this review to the new guy. I can't believe anyone that reads NP could fall for this, plus NP has a lot of Sega fanboys so they wouldn't flop this.
Avatar image for Keltoid
Keltoid

925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Keltoid
Member since 2009 • 925 Posts
[QUOTE="II-FBIsniper-II"]I don't really understand what you were trying to prove. You say that it was "obvious" that is was fake. Umm, not really. Their were a few mistakes and grammatical errors, but it wasn't so much that someone that hasn't followed the game would be able to catch. The biggest mistake on their was that it said the Conduit has "stunning graphics".

For real... the clever title, the complaints about dumb AI that sounded legit... I havent bothered checking for bad spelling or what not... but I didnt catch much when reading it, if any. It seemed legit. Anyway, the more I think about, the more I realize the TC failed. Giving a game a 6.5 and then giving it a bad review score makes sense. Why would fanboys question it? Of course the hate is going to pour over any hyped game that "flops".
Avatar image for Vinolence
Vinolence

128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#56 Vinolence
Member since 2009 • 128 Posts
I hope you realize that a good amount of people aren't going to find out it was fake won't end up buying the game. And what makes you think writing FAKE REVIEWS is any more productive than... well, anything at all?! Where do you get off trying to teach us "lessons" when you have nothing better to do than literally just spread bull**** on the Internet? Why do you think anybody's going to learn anything from this? Seriously, I can't believe you wasted your time like this and you actually think your opinion holds any weight at all! It's pathetic, sad, and strangely amusing at the same time. You're just as immature as anybody who believed your stupid review.
Avatar image for stepat201
stepat201

1979

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 stepat201
Member since 2008 • 1979 Posts

[QUOTE="jonnyt61"]What's the "hidden message" then? This is the first I've seen of this fake review, but, I still believe Conduit is going to be a heavy disappointment, and sincerely believe Wii owners should focus on Little King's Story. It's out in the UK already, and it's a real good game, something the Wii needs. Not lousy looking FPS that only get hype because of a big mouth dev. umcommon
If I see another post like this I might break my keyboard. LKS looks like a good game but honestly it's not my type of game and I have zero interest in it. Besides how the heck can anyone compare a strategy game to a FPS game....WAY different genres. Also how is LKS so dang original? Besides including perverted cartoon characters, what is so special and ground breaking?

It's groundbreaking because it has a unique art style and is on the wii. :roll:

Avatar image for Hungry_Jello
Hungry_Jello

3024

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Hungry_Jello
Member since 2008 • 3024 Posts

[QUOTE="umcommon"][QUOTE="jonnyt61"]What's the "hidden message" then? This is the first I've seen of this fake review, but, I still believe Conduit is going to be a heavy disappointment, and sincerely believe Wii owners should focus on Little King's Story. It's out in the UK already, and it's a real good game, something the Wii needs. Not lousy looking FPS that only get hype because of a big mouth dev. stepat201

If I see another post like this I might break my keyboard. LKS looks like a good game but honestly it's not my type of game and I have zero interest in it. Besides how the heck can anyone compare a strategy game to a FPS game....WAY different genres. Also how is LKS so dang original? Besides including perverted cartoon characters, what is so special and ground breaking?

It's groundbreaking because it has a unique art style and is on the wii. :roll:

I can say the same thing about Lair.

Avatar image for stepat201
stepat201

1979

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 stepat201
Member since 2008 • 1979 Posts

[QUOTE="stepat201"]

[QUOTE="umcommon"] If I see another post like this I might break my keyboard. LKS looks like a good game but honestly it's not my type of game and I have zero interest in it. Besides how the heck can anyone compare a strategy game to a FPS game....WAY different genres. Also how is LKS so dang original? Besides including perverted cartoon characters, what is so special and ground breaking?Hungry_Jello

It's groundbreaking because it has a unique art style and is on the wii. :roll:

I can say the same thing about Lair.

They're making Lair for wii?

Avatar image for Hungry_Jello
Hungry_Jello

3024

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Hungry_Jello
Member since 2008 • 3024 Posts

[QUOTE="Hungry_Jello"]

[QUOTE="stepat201"]

It's groundbreaking because it has a unique art style and is on the wii. :roll:

stepat201

I can say the same thing about Lair.

They're making Lair for wii?

Maybe I wasnt clear. Lair: unique art style and is on the PS3. Does that make it groundbreaking? Hell to the NO. I dont have much incentive to think that LKS will be anything above mediocre as of now.

Avatar image for MasterC5
MasterC5

2932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 MasterC5
Member since 2006 • 2932 Posts

Never fooled me so I don't care. nice job wasting your time do, trying to teach fanboys a lesson is totally futile.

Avatar image for loco145
loco145

12226

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 loco145
Member since 2006 • 12226 Posts
Given the 'quality' of most of gaming journalism. I couldn't tell.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f4694ac412a8
deactivated-5f4694ac412a8

8599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

#63 deactivated-5f4694ac412a8
Member since 2005 • 8599 Posts
When I clicked that thread, you said, "No magazine scans are allowed, but it got a 6.5." So how the hell was I supposed to read the review? :| Anyway, I think your reasoning is stupid... I'm still not going to read a review. My God...
Avatar image for nZiFFLe
nZiFFLe

1481

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 nZiFFLe
Member since 2009 • 1481 Posts

[QUOTE="W1NGMAN-"]

Dangit I didn't get to read it or see it :( I'm always late to the party!

killerfist

 Here it is. Well done TC, you sure fooled me. (untill the guy that pointed out the gramatical errors)

Ha, that was pure genious TC. Good job.

Avatar image for Wanderer5
Wanderer5

25727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#65 Wanderer5
Member since 2006 • 25727 Posts

Now that I read your fake couduit review topic, TBH I think your "lesson" didn't turn out to be a good thing. It just would have made the conduit bashing a lot worse, which thankfully it didn't seems so.

Avatar image for rybe1025
rybe1025

6362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 rybe1025
Member since 2004 • 6362 Posts

[QUOTE="W1NGMAN-"]

Dangit I didn't get to read it or see it :( I'm always late to the party!

killerfist

 Here it is. Well done TC, you sure fooled me. (untill the guy that pointed out the gramatical errors)

So the TC made that? Bravo good sir. I would have been fooled. It looks pretty legit as far as just looking at it. I do not know much about the game for me to know some of the mistakes.You are right though people do put to much into a score

Avatar image for FILIPINOMAZTER
FILIPINOMAZTER

1627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 FILIPINOMAZTER
Member since 2008 • 1627 Posts

[QUOTE="killerfist"][QUOTE="W1NGMAN-"]

Dangit I didn't get to read it or see it :( I'm always late to the party!

rybe1025

Here it is. Well done TC, you sure fooled me. (untill the guy that pointed out the gramatical errors)

So the TC made that? Bravo good sir. I would have been fooled. It looks pretty legit as far as just looking at it. I do not know much about the game for me to know some of the mistakes.You are right though people do put to much into a score

glad that crap is fake