The PSP is a great system easily beating the DS in Hardware/Quality/Power. However the DS has the overall advantage as far as quality games go, using GameRankings and Metacritic as sources for that.
Which is more hardcore is questionable.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
The PSP is a great system easily beating the DS in Hardware/Quality/Power. However the DS has the overall advantage as far as quality games go, using GameRankings and Metacritic as sources for that.
Which is more hardcore is questionable.
So you think Assassins creed should have scored better cause it crappily mimicked a 360/PS3 game whereas the DS version smartly played to its strengths? Or that somehow PSP games should be given more leniency because it Almost pulls off PS2 quality games but not quite? Blame Sony for making crappy controls and marketing it as a portable PS2 which it obviously can NOT do properly. VideoGameGuyHaha! No. I feel that a game deserves a good rating/review if it plays like the superior console version, like Assassins Creed Bloodlines did, if it falls short in some areas, it's a handheld game and so that should go without saying. But for some reason games like that get low ratings and then a generic side scroller comes to ds with the only thing resembling assassins creed is the theme of it, and suddenly gets praised. I'd take slightly watered down version of original game than some side-scroller that plays like any other.
[QUOTE="kolkov01"]
[QUOTE="pokolvrolok"]
pokolvrolok
This is a GBA game, not a DS game
I know, but the second game is a ds game and third is a psp game. I was showing the huge advancement between 3 systems.My bad
although you should definatly change the PSP screenshot. it looks so jagged that it makes the DS game actualy look better
[QUOTE="pokolvrolok"] LOL!! People with modded psp's can run Ocarina Of Time. Even ds can't run that and that's from N64. Signor_BigglesUm... Just because the DS can't emulate an N64 doesn't mean that it can't run those games. I think Super Mario 64 DS (A port of an N64 game with added features) and the two Zelda DS games (Both of which are bigger, and more technologically complex than OoT) can attest to that. LOL You do realise it takes far less system power to run a top-down/slightly isometric viewed game like phantom hourglass, than the full sandbox game on n64 that had a fully rotatable camera view, solid animation, a better gaming perspective that lets you view the world from links eyes as opposed to a bird's eyes, interesting cutscenes and just more interesting gameplay?! Also, all of the depth & immersion is stripped out of the ds zelda games. Instead of actually moving forward and having that feeling of progression, on the ds games it's top down so it's just like scrolling up. I can scroll up and down on MS Word! In a game I would much rather jump into the game's world and feel like I'm that character.
Fine. But I believe PSP is a better all-round gaming system.I believe the DS is simply a better portable system. Key word, portable. Better battery life, screens are protected, not as obtusely shaped, and better games
Jamisonia
Ohhh sigh... My argument is not only power but what the power leads to! It's funny that you say you find the god of war series 1 dimensional. I find that to be the case with every single ds game. Where's the flair?! Where's the intensity?! Where's the hardcore-nes?! Where's the immersiveness?! I find side scrollers & top down games bland and uninspired in every sense of the word. The all-round package you get with the average psp game is greater than that of the average ds game.Sorry Tim Allen. "MORE POWER!" does not make a better system to me. The PSP has games I am not interested in. I find God of War series 1 dimensional, bland, and silly. Assassins creed....eh, theres versions on the DS and from what I've heard, neither portable version is good. If your only arguement to it's superiority is "more power", then you don't have much to stand on. The DS simply has more quality games than the PSP. All the power in the world doesn't help if there arn't alot of good games. Look at the Atari Jaguar. It had more power but few decent games.
I personally think the DS not only beats the PSP, but the PS3 as well.
Pixel-Pirate
[QUOTE="Jamisonia"]Fine. But I believe PSP is a better all-round gaming system.I believe the DS is simply a better portable system. Key word, portable. Better battery life, screens are protected, not as obtusely shaped, and better games
pokolvrolok
The psp is stuck in the no-mans land of not a very good portable and nowhere near as good as consoles.
You can buy a battery for psp that is a little more bulkier but doubles the battery life, meaning you can get around 10/12 hours gaming. Even if you didn't have such a thing, I still think a short but sweet gaming experience matters more than a long and bland one.battery life absolutely matters in a portable console. If I just were to plug it in all the time to play it, why would I just play a console?
Jamisonia
I know, but the second game is a ds game and third is a psp game. I was showing the huge advancement between 3 systems.[QUOTE="pokolvrolok"]
[QUOTE="kolkov01"]
This is a GBA game, not a DS game
kolkov01
My bad
although you should definatly change the PSP screenshot. it looks so jagged that it makes the DS game actualy look better
lol its ok. Oh as for the psp screen, nah it's ok. My point isn't about the graphics but gameplay. You can practically tell from the screenshot of the psp game that the game has solid animation and really sweet gameplay xDFine. But I believe PSP is a better all-round gaming system.[QUOTE="pokolvrolok"][QUOTE="Jamisonia"]
I believe the DS is simply a better portable system. Key word, portable. Better battery life, screens are protected, not as obtusely shaped, and better games
topgunmv
The psp is stuck in the no-mans land of not a very good portable and nowhere near as good as consoles.
Lmao u mean the psp is the handheld which didn't target itself at casual or non-gamers or get advertised everywhere and attract people with its touch screen and low price and appeal to kids with non-offensive or violent games and so it's selling badly. LOL[QUOTE="topgunmv"][QUOTE="pokolvrolok"] Fine. But I believe PSP is a better all-round gaming system.pokolvrolok
The psp is stuck in the no-mans land of not a very good portable and nowhere near as good as consoles.
Lmao u mean the psp is the handheld which didn't target itself at casual or non-gamers or get advertised everywhere and attract people with its touch screen and low price and appeal to kids with non-offensive or violent games and so it's selling badly. LOLprotip-the more lulz you use, the less people will take you seriously.
Lmao u mean the psp is the handheld which didn't target itself at casual or non-gamers or get advertised everywhere and attract people with its touch screen and low price and appeal to kids with non-offensive or violent games and so it's selling badly. LOL[QUOTE="pokolvrolok"][QUOTE="topgunmv"]
The psp is stuck in the no-mans land of not a very good portable and nowhere near as good as consoles.
topgunmv
protip-the more lulz you use, the less people will take you seriously.
Tip: The more you ignore the points and keep changing the subject, the more I know you can't back yourself up.[QUOTE="topgunmv"][QUOTE="pokolvrolok"] Fine. But I believe PSP is a better all-round gaming system.pokolvrolok
The psp is stuck in the no-mans land of not a very good portable and nowhere near as good as consoles.
Lmao u mean the psp is the handheld which didn't target itself at casual or non-gamers or get advertised everywhere and attract people with its touch screen and low price and appeal to kids with non-offensive or violent games and so it's selling badly. LOL[QUOTE="topgunmv"][QUOTE="pokolvrolok"] Lmao u mean the psp is the handheld which didn't target itself at casual or non-gamers or get advertised everywhere and attract people with its touch screen and low price and appeal to kids with non-offensive or violent games and so it's selling badly. LOLpokolvrolok
protip-the more lulz you use, the less people will take you seriously.
Tip: The more you ignore the points and keep changing the subject, the more I know you can't back yourself up.You're just recycling "deh kitty" rhetoric, why should I expend the energy?
Lmao u mean the psp is the handheld which didn't target itself at casual or non-gamers or get advertised everywhere and attract people with its touch screen and low price and appeal to kids with non-offensive or violent games and so it's selling badly. LOL[QUOTE="pokolvrolok"][QUOTE="topgunmv"]
The psp is stuck in the no-mans land of not a very good portable and nowhere near as good as consoles.
Yandere
CaptainObvious.jpg Should he prefer the PSP if he likes Zelda? :P[QUOTE="tagyhag"][QUOTE="raskullibur"] Maybe because you have a Zelda sig.raskullibur
He can still play Zelda games on PSP if he wanted to ;)
Yeah, illegally. And I doubt he can play his PSP in prison.
Actually funnily enough I own gamecube & ps2 and prefer gamecube. I used to own a ps1 & n64 but always preferred n64. But I prefer psp for the same reasons. Less games, yes but better games.I have a feeling the same people who say the PSP is better than the DS also say PS1 was better than N64 and PS2 was better than Gamecube. Graphics aren't everything. (then again, I don't have either handheld, so you can probably ignore my opinion. :P)
ferelas
Because you're not a gamer?[QUOTE="pokolvrolok"][QUOTE="Verge_6"]
There's a reason I haven't even taken the trouble of looking for my long-missing PSP.
topgunmv
Ironic, considering you're the one who made a thread to bash one of the handhelds.
Last I looked, there was a difference between preferring a handheld and bashing another.Well, everything people are writing is pretty much covered in my original post. xD
The only people who are actually bothering to reply are those who either didn't read it or didn't understand the point I was trying to get across.
It wasn't that the ds is bad but actually, that it's not superior.
There's a difference. I'm defending psp, not attacking ds.
[QUOTE="tagyhag"]More power does not equate to better games, it definitely helps, but not when it the devs don't fully take advantage of it to make said games. And LOL at you thinking hardcore gamers would want the PSP, you obviously have no idea what kind of games the DS has. :lol:pokolvrolok??? Don't take advantage of it?!
Resistance Retribution: Not only does it feature ragdoll physics but it has superb animation, good ai, has a load of enemies on screen at once without any slow-down, it features lots of unique weapons all with amazing abilities and powers, the explosions are awesome, the level design's great, the environment's well animated and there's always something going on on the screen.
Littlebigplanet: Despite a lack of multiplayer, it features the same impressive physics as the ps3 game and lets you create your own wicked, depthful levels on the go.
Assassins Creed Bloodlines: Sure, it lost a few things in translation but the core gameplay is pretty much intact! What an achievement that is.
God Of War: It was considered breathtaking and technically limit pushing on ps2, yet it made it to psp without a hitch except perhaps a slightly shorter length than the ps2 games.
Metal Gear SoliD Peace Walker: Upcoming Metal Gear Solid game which will feature co-op and after playing the demo, I have to say it plays better than most ps3/360 games! No joke. The environment's so alive. You can shoot and destroy quite a lot of things in the environment, stuff blows in the wind, things react to your gunshots, etc.
Medal Of Honor: Not exactly breathtaking graphics but still, 32 players per server online, that's amazing.
Motorstorm Arctic Edge: Featured everything you've come to expect from a motorstorm game and loses nothing except level of graphical detail. The game length is verryy long.
You see, psp's power is used.
What I see, are watered down versions of games.
The PSP should play its strengths,
It needs more games like Lumines/LocoRoco/Half-Minute Hero/Sid Meier's Pirates. Not clearly inferior version of games.
Take a look at Assassin's Creed for the DS/PSP for example, the translation from 3D to 2D/3D was done well on the DS, they knew the DS couldn't let you play an experience like AC for the consoles, so they decided to change it up, and it worked, not perfectly, but it worked.
They could have done the same for the PSP, but then they decided to at least try to give you a similar experience like the console version, and it clearly failed.
I sold my PSP for an Itouch. Why? Because as a multimedia player, there are better options. I know it's all subjective but out of all the games on the PSP only around 15 of them ever made me play my PSP for days on end. + belive it not but the software lineup for the PSP SUCKS ever since piracy became a a lot more open for the average joe.
DS is superior in everyway. If you want a multimedia device, there are FAR better options available and the DS lineup is actually FAR better than a PSP's. It have almost every genre the PSP has and more.
[QUOTE="ferelas"]Actually funnily enough I own gamecube & ps2 and prefer gamecube. I used to own a ps1 & n64 but always preferred n64. But I prefer psp for the same reasons. Less games, yes but better games.I have a feeling the same people who say the PSP is better than the DS also say PS1 was better than N64 and PS2 was better than Gamecube. Graphics aren't everything. (then again, I don't have either handheld, so you can probably ignore my opinion. :P)
pokolvrolok
Fair enough. At least you're consistent; that's more than can be said for most people.
??? Don't take advantage of it?![QUOTE="pokolvrolok"][QUOTE="tagyhag"]More power does not equate to better games, it definitely helps, but not when it the devs don't fully take advantage of it to make said games. And LOL at you thinking hardcore gamers would want the PSP, you obviously have no idea what kind of games the DS has. :lol:tagyhag
Resistance Retribution: Not only does it feature ragdoll physics but it has superb animation, good ai, has a load of enemies on screen at once without any slow-down, it features lots of unique weapons all with amazing abilities and powers, the explosions are awesome, the level design's great, the environment's well animated and there's always something going on on the screen.
Littlebigplanet: Despite a lack of multiplayer, it features the same impressive physics as the ps3 game and lets you create your own wicked, depthful levels on the go.
Assassins Creed Bloodlines: Sure, it lost a few things in translation but the core gameplay is pretty much intact! What an achievement that is.
God Of War: It was considered breathtaking and technically limit pushing on ps2, yet it made it to psp without a hitch except perhaps a slightly shorter length than the ps2 games.
Metal Gear SoliD Peace Walker: Upcoming Metal Gear Solid game which will feature co-op and after playing the demo, I have to say it plays better than most ps3/360 games! No joke. The environment's so alive. You can shoot and destroy quite a lot of things in the environment, stuff blows in the wind, things react to your gunshots, etc.
Medal Of Honor: Not exactly breathtaking graphics but still, 32 players per server online, that's amazing.
Motorstorm Arctic Edge: Featured everything you've come to expect from a motorstorm game and loses nothing except level of graphical detail. The game length is verryy long.
You see, psp's power is used.
What I see, are watered down versions of games.
The PSP should play its strengths,
It needs more games like Lumines/LocoRoco/Half-Minute Hero/Sid Meier's Pirates. Not clearly inferior version of games.
Take a look at Assassin's Creed for the DS/PSP for example, the translation from 3D to 2D/3D was done well on the DS, they knew the DS couldn't let you play an experience like AC for the consoles, so they decided to change it up, and it worked, not perfectly, but it worked.
They could have done the same for the PSP, but then they decided to at least try to give you a similar experience like the console version, and it clearly failed.
lol if ipod touch/iphone is superior to psp, it's superior also to ds. I'm actually buying an ipod touch soon to play a lot of its best games which are almost on-par with some great psp games but like the ds's library, it's got a lot of shovelware and there are only a handful of great titles.I sold my PSP for an Itouch. Why? Because as a multimedia player, there are better options. I know it's all subjective but out of all the games on the PSP only around 15 of them ever made me play my PSP for days on end. + belive it not but the software lineup for the PSP SUCKS ever since piracy became a a lot more open for the average joe.
DS is superior in everyway. If you want a multimedia device, there are FAR better options available and the DS lineup is actually FAR better than a PSP's. It have almost every genre the PSP has and more.
sanim02
Actually funnily enough I own gamecube & ps2 and prefer gamecube. I used to own a ps1 & n64 but always preferred n64. But I prefer psp for the same reasons. Less games, yes but better games.[QUOTE="pokolvrolok"][QUOTE="ferelas"]
I have a feeling the same people who say the PSP is better than the DS also say PS1 was better than N64 and PS2 was better than Gamecube. Graphics aren't everything. (then again, I don't have either handheld, so you can probably ignore my opinion. :P)
ferelas
Fair enough. At least you're consistent; that's more than can be said for most people.
Thanks :P[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="pokolvrolok"] ??? Don't take advantage of it?! Resistance Retribution: Not only does it feature ragdoll physics but it has superb animation, good ai, has a load of enemies on screen at once without any slow-down, it features lots of unique weapons all with amazing abilities and powers, the explosions are awesome, the level design's great, the environment's well animated and there's always something going on on the screen. Littlebigplanet: Despite a lack of multiplayer, it features the same impressive physics as the ps3 game and lets you create your own wicked, depthful levels on the go. Assassins Creed Bloodlines: Sure, it lost a few things in translation but the core gameplay is pretty much intact! What an achievement that is. God Of War: It was considered breathtaking and technically limit pushing on ps2, yet it made it to psp without a hitch except perhaps a slightly shorter length than the ps2 games. Metal Gear SoliD Peace Walker: Upcoming Metal Gear Solid game which will feature co-op and after playing the demo, I have to say it plays better than most ps3/360 games! No joke. The environment's so alive. You can shoot and destroy quite a lot of things in the environment, stuff blows in the wind, things react to your gunshots, etc. Medal Of Honor: Not exactly breathtaking graphics but still, 32 players per server online, that's amazing. Motorstorm Arctic Edge: Featured everything you've come to expect from a motorstorm game and loses nothing except level of graphical detail. The game length is verryy long. You see, psp's power is used.pokolvrolokWow, alot of watered-down console variants. I guess I, as a non-gamer, cannot fathom the appeal for such things. If you are a non-gamer you would not find games appealing at all.
That's a bit of a stretch.
[QUOTE="tagyhag"]
[QUOTE="pokolvrolok"] ??? Don't take advantage of it?!
Resistance Retribution: Not only does it feature ragdoll physics but it has superb animation, good ai, has a load of enemies on screen at once without any slow-down, it features lots of unique weapons all with amazing abilities and powers, the explosions are awesome, the level design's great, the environment's well animated and there's always something going on on the screen.
Littlebigplanet: Despite a lack of multiplayer, it features the same impressive physics as the ps3 game and lets you create your own wicked, depthful levels on the go.
Assassins Creed Bloodlines: Sure, it lost a few things in translation but the core gameplay is pretty much intact! What an achievement that is.
God Of War: It was considered breathtaking and technically limit pushing on ps2, yet it made it to psp without a hitch except perhaps a slightly shorter length than the ps2 games.
Metal Gear SoliD Peace Walker: Upcoming Metal Gear Solid game which will feature co-op and after playing the demo, I have to say it plays better than most ps3/360 games! No joke. The environment's so alive. You can shoot and destroy quite a lot of things in the environment, stuff blows in the wind, things react to your gunshots, etc.
Medal Of Honor: Not exactly breathtaking graphics but still, 32 players per server online, that's amazing.
Motorstorm Arctic Edge: Featured everything you've come to expect from a motorstorm game and loses nothing except level of graphical detail. The game length is verryy long.
You see, psp's power is used.pokolvrolok
What I see, are watered down versions of games.
The PSP should play its strengths,
It needs more games like Lumines/LocoRoco/Half-Minute Hero/Sid Meier's Pirates. Not clearly inferior version of games.
Take a look at Assassin's Creed for the DS/PSP for example, the translation from 3D to 2D/3D was done well on the DS, they knew the DS couldn't let you play an experience like AC for the consoles, so they decided to change it up, and it worked, not perfectly, but it worked.
They could have done the same for the PSP, but then they decided to at least try to give you a similar experience like the console version, and it clearly failed.
Hahaha! But your argument is that it's better to have a complete compromise than a few differences. I think that is a stupid idea because if you were lets say, a hardcore assassins creed fan. When you're on the go, why bring a system which has some weird sidescroller made to look like AC when it doesn't reflect the original gameplay in any way?! Instead, you would bring the psp version to continue the same gameplay.A hardcore fan of a game wouldn't play a terrible version of a game, only a blind fan would do that.
Hahaha! But your argument is that it's better to have a complete compromise than a few differences. I think that is a stupid idea because if you were lets say, a hardcore assassins creed fan. When you're on the go, why bring a system which has some weird sidescroller made to look like AC when it doesn't reflect the original gameplay in any way?! Instead, you would bring the psp version to continue the same gameplay.[QUOTE="pokolvrolok"]
[QUOTE="tagyhag"]
What I see, are watered down versions of games.
The PSP should play its strengths,
It needs more games like Lumines/LocoRoco/Half-Minute Hero/Sid Meier's Pirates. Not clearly inferior version of games.
Take a look at Assassin's Creed for the DS/PSP for example, the translation from 3D to 2D/3D was done well on the DS, they knew the DS couldn't let you play an experience like AC for the consoles, so they decided to change it up, and it worked, not perfectly, but it worked.
They could have done the same for the PSP, but then they decided to at least try to give you a similar experience like the console version, and it clearly failed.
tagyhag
A hardcore fan of a game wouldn't play a terrible version of a game, only a blind fan would do that.
Except that Bloodlines isn't a terrible version of anything. It's a fun, unique portion of the Assassin's Creed story that any hardcore fan should play.
the best solution was to compare the system to the superior Playstation 2. As a result, each time a psp game performed to the standards of a ps2 game (which should be absolutely worshipped considering it's running so smoothly in the palm of your hand), but lacked perhaps one or two features, it would get scrutinised and criticised much more that seems logical for a handheld system.pokolvrolokUm, when exactly was this review strategy confirmed?
Now, if the psp and ds were considered equal systems then surely you would see the exact same ratings for the games on both systems but is this the case...?Perhaps the DS verions were simply made better hn the PSP versions?No.
Here's one of the most extreme examples:
Asphalt 2 on ds got approximately: 6.5 average score
Asphalt 2 on psp got approximately: 3.0 average score
Also, user ratings for the ds games are almost always higher than that of psp. They seem to overrate all of their games, eg:
Harry Potter & The Half Blood Prince on ds, gamespot users gave it: 7.6
Harry Potter & The Half Blood Prince on psp, gamespot users gave it: 3.8
Spiderman Web Of Shadows for ds, gamespot users gave it: approximately: 8.0
Spiderman Web Of Shadows for psp, gamespot users gave it approximately: 5.0
Spongebob Squarepants: Yellow Avenger for ds, gamespot users gave it approximately: 7.5
Spongebob Squarepants: Yellow Avenger for psp, gamespot users gave it approximately: 6.5
The Golden compass on ds, users gave it: 6.2
The Golden compass on psp, users gave it: 3.1
Unlike ds owners, psp owners actually have standards.
Do you people understand? Ratings mean nothing in the context of PSP vs DS.pokolvrolok
[QUOTE="pokolvrolok"][QUOTE="Verge_6"]Because you're not a gamer? I've got more games than you, and have undoubtedly been doing it for a longer amount of time. :) lol I've been playing games since I could walk. I'm not a sony fanboy as I love Gamecube more than my ps2 and loved n64 more than ps1 and 360 more than ps3. And I've played over 300 psp games, have had an amazing experience with the system and know the library well and see that for the best games on ds, psp has equivalents which are at minimum, just as good.There's a reason I haven't even taken the trouble of looking for my long-missing PSP.
Verge_6
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment