The Wii is the only console with a next gen controller.

  • 90 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Metrovania
Metrovania

2540

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 Metrovania
Member since 2003 • 2540 Posts
too bad wii has last gen graphics...joeychew
better than last gen, but not as good as other current gen consoles.
Avatar image for coldhelp
coldhelp

123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 coldhelp
Member since 2007 • 123 Posts
[QUOTE="cterry04"][QUOTE="Ayaaan"]PS3 uses a 10 year old controller, and the 360's controller hasn't changed much either.Metrovania
Yet its the only console that isn't next gen in any other way.

It has VC, which is better than live arcade or anything SONY can throw at us. It has the channels system, which is great and has really helped sell it to casuals. It has greater functionality than other controllers and has better graphical capabilities than last gen consoles. I really don't see any problem.

Graphical capabilities may be better than last gen, but it is not nearly good enough for next gen when compared with the other next gen consoles (the more powerful consoles typically define what next gen is).
Avatar image for daveg1
daveg1

20405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#53 daveg1
Member since 2005 • 20405 Posts

yes based on something that has been around way longer than the 360 and ps3 and wii!

BAD THREAD AND POOR ARGUMENT!

Avatar image for Metrovania
Metrovania

2540

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 Metrovania
Member since 2003 • 2540 Posts
[QUOTE="Metrovania"][QUOTE="cterry04"][QUOTE="Ayaaan"]PS3 uses a 10 year old controller, and the 360's controller hasn't changed much either.coldhelp
Yet its the only console that isn't next gen in any other way.

It has VC, which is better than live arcade or anything SONY can throw at us. It has the channels system, which is great and has really helped sell it to casuals. It has greater functionality than other controllers and has better graphical capabilities than last gen consoles. I really don't see any problem.

Graphical capabilities may be better than last gen, but it is not nearly good enough for next gen when compared with the other next gen consoles (the more powerful consoles typically define what next gen is).

Look at SMG and tell me the Wii can't do really nice graphics! That game may not look AS amazing as R&C for example, but it can be compared to it without looking horribly outdated! SPM has stunning looks - sure it would be possible on the GC, but it still looks better than 90% of games out there at the moment. Plus, if you don't have HD the difference between Wii and other current gen consoles is pretty negligible especially when we looks at MP3 and SMG.
Avatar image for Tylendal
Tylendal

14681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#55 Tylendal
Member since 2006 • 14681 Posts

[QUOTE="Zhengi"][QUOTE="xLegend24"]I've used the Wii controller, and personally didn't like it very much. The 360 is the most comfortable controller ever imo. The wiimote does get old after a while, becuase sometimes I just want to sit down and play by just pushing buttons.xLegend24

Who says you can't sit down while using the Wii controller?

You still have to swing your arms around. If I'm tired, swinging around is the last thing I want to do. Also, I go carzy when I play Wii sports, and therefore don't play it sitting down.

A) You don't have to swing your arms around to play. A few flicks is all you need. B) Going crazy is a choice, not a necessity.
Avatar image for Tylendal
Tylendal

14681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#56 Tylendal
Member since 2006 • 14681 Posts
[QUOTE="Metrovania"][QUOTE="cterry04"][QUOTE="Ayaaan"]PS3 uses a 10 year old controller, and the 360's controller hasn't changed much either.coldhelp
Yet its the only console that isn't next gen in any other way.

It has VC, which is better than live arcade or anything SONY can throw at us. It has the channels system, which is great and has really helped sell it to casuals. It has greater functionality than other controllers and has better graphical capabilities than last gen consoles. I really don't see any problem.

Graphical capabilities may be better than last gen, but it is not nearly good enough for next gen when compared with the other next gen consoles (the more powerful consoles typically define what next gen is).

The why have the more powerful consoles always sold poorly :lol:
Avatar image for coldhelp
coldhelp

123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 coldhelp
Member since 2007 • 123 Posts
[QUOTE="coldhelp"][QUOTE="Metrovania"][QUOTE="cterry04"][QUOTE="Ayaaan"]PS3 uses a 10 year old controller, and the 360's controller hasn't changed much either.Tylendal
Yet its the only console that isn't next gen in any other way.

It has VC, which is better than live arcade or anything SONY can throw at us. It has the channels system, which is great and has really helped sell it to casuals. It has greater functionality than other controllers and has better graphical capabilities than last gen consoles. I really don't see any problem.

Graphical capabilities may be better than last gen, but it is not nearly good enough for next gen when compared with the other next gen consoles (the more powerful consoles typically define what next gen is).

The why have the more powerful consoles always sold poorly :lol:

I don't believe the more powerful consoles have sold poorly, unless you are talking in relative terms. This is perhaps because the more powerful consoles have steeper prices (especially PS3). And casuals, seeing all consoles as substitute goods, will naturally go for the optimum (reasonable power with a reasonable price). Wii has demonstrated just that in the new generation.
Avatar image for lilpoop215
lilpoop215

393

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 lilpoop215
Member since 2006 • 393 Posts
2 bad wii hardware is 6 years old blackpretttyboy
omg owned! I don't like nex gen controlers then...
Avatar image for Zaistev_basic
Zaistev_basic

2975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Zaistev_basic
Member since 2002 • 2975 Posts

I don't believe the more powerful consoles have sold poorly, unless you are talking in relative terms. This is perhaps because the more powerful consoles have steeper prices (especially PS3). And casuals, seeing all consoles as substitute goods, will naturally go for the optimum (reasonable power with a reasonable price). Wii has demonstrated just that in the new generation.

-------------------------------------------------------

Well not that all sold poorly but all never comes close to 1st: 3DO, Neo Geo, Saturn, XBox

Avatar image for _AsasN_
_AsasN_

3646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 _AsasN_
Member since 2003 • 3646 Posts
PS3 uses a 10 year old controller, and the 360's controller hasn't changed much either.Ayaaan
Try to be smart about this. That 10 year old controller you speak of is still around because it kicks ass. The 360 is very similar to it and is also great. The Wii controller is alright at best, but is basically the only "nextgen" feature of the Wii. It's good for stuff like Wii Sports, but for playing regular 3rd or 1st shooters, adventure games etc. it's not so hot.
Avatar image for wooooode
wooooode

16666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 wooooode
Member since 2002 • 16666 Posts
Give it up, they all advanced in there own way but you cant just throw next gen around. I prefer the Wii and Nintendo but who cares.
Avatar image for Zaistev_basic
Zaistev_basic

2975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Zaistev_basic
Member since 2002 • 2975 Posts
I think it's just a different opinion between a hardcore gamer (graphics) and casuals gamers (motion sensing). I never thought would see the day when one console divides these two kinds of gamers I mean look at the Wii sales and the type of the userbase.
Avatar image for coonana
coonana

5909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#63 coonana
Member since 2003 • 5909 Posts
True dat. Wii is the only controller that was advanced. PS3 and 360 have little to no room to advance gameplay. PS3 has the same basic controller as PS1 and 360 has the same basic controller as Xbox all last gen material. Which is worst than bad graphics and thats a fact.
Avatar image for coonana
coonana

5909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#64 coonana
Member since 2003 • 5909 Posts

I think it's just a different opinion between a hardcore gamer (graphics) and casuals gamers (motion sensing). I never thought would see the day when one console divides these two kinds of gamers I mean look at the Wii sales and the type of the userbase.Zaistev_basic

The Wii has alot of hardcore gamers. Just because it has non gamers and casuals does not mean it is a non gamer console. the most successful games are hardcore gamer material.

Also you are very misinformed. Motion sensing is for the hardcores and graphics are for the casuals. Non gamers dont really ccare for either they just want it simple which happens to be possible with motion sensing but motion sensing also allows for a higher level of playing.

Avatar image for mexicangordo
mexicangordo

8687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 mexicangordo
Member since 2005 • 8687 Posts
I think it's just a different opinion between a hardcore gamer (graphics) and casuals gamers (motion sensing). I never thought would see the day when one console divides these two kinds of gamers I mean look at the Wii sales and the type of the userbase.Zaistev_basic
  Well im a Wii owner and its an ok system as of now, but the same can be said about the ps2 though. The user base is mostly casuals anyway
Avatar image for PSP107
PSP107

18983

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 PSP107
Member since 2007 • 18983 Posts
Eye Toy was out before Wii.
Avatar image for Ipik_Fenris
Ipik_Fenris

3627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Ipik_Fenris
Member since 2005 • 3627 Posts
Topic.... ZOMG !! really ???? i wouldn't never imagined that the Wii is the only console with the next gen controller.... ZOMG RUN AWAY !!!...../ sarcasm....
Avatar image for Ipik_Fenris
Ipik_Fenris

3627

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Ipik_Fenris
Member since 2005 • 3627 Posts
Topic.... ZOMG !! really ???? i wouldn't never imagined that the Wii is the only console with the next gen controller.... ZOMG RUN AWAY !!!...../ sarcasm....
Avatar image for supermanfarr
supermanfarr

888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 supermanfarr
Member since 2006 • 888 Posts
[QUOTE="ps3-nikita"]Sorry the Wii isnt a next gen controller, pretty much like the console isnt next gen. Stop with all this we have better gameplay, when there is more prove that you dont. The controls on Wii games are broken. You will find more then 50% faliure rate with the purpose of teh controller, which is the main reason your dropping $250 on the console and $60 oer extra broken controller. Comeback when the games are actually showing the benfits of the controller. Comeback when you actually innovative in a game. Comeback when you can actually create a new game mechanic. Comeback when you can actually do something ingame charcaterwise because of the Wii controller, you cant do anywhere else. 360 is already is already doing this things. BTW mini games dont count. I am talk full on games and tech demos ala Wii Sports dont count either. There isnt any innovation in that either.Pulse123
hey man do u want to know whats broken ur grammer, stop hating on the wii, just because ur an ignorant fanboy doesn't mean u have to have zero credibility.....wait what am i saying yes it does. You dont deserve an opinion until u try it.

Dude I have a wii and all that he has said is true. I do get tired of swinging the controller, I would rather push a button {zelda tp} . For hardcore gaming I dont see it lasting.
Avatar image for _Ishida_
_Ishida_

185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 _Ishida_
Member since 2007 • 185 Posts
To bad the Wii controller flops a controller. And the sensor sucks.
Avatar image for Tylendal
Tylendal

14681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#71 Tylendal
Member since 2006 • 14681 Posts
[QUOTE="Tylendal"][QUOTE="coldhelp"][QUOTE="Metrovania"][QUOTE="cterry04"][QUOTE="Ayaaan"]PS3 uses a 10 year old controller, and the 360's controller hasn't changed much either.coldhelp
Yet its the only console that isn't next gen in any other way.

It has VC, which is better than live arcade or anything SONY can throw at us. It has the channels system, which is great and has really helped sell it to casuals. It has greater functionality than other controllers and has better graphical capabilities than last gen consoles. I really don't see any problem.

Graphical capabilities may be better than last gen, but it is not nearly good enough for next gen when compared with the other next gen consoles (the more powerful consoles typically define what next gen is).

The why have the more powerful consoles always sold poorly :lol:

I don't believe the more powerful consoles have sold poorly, unless you are talking in relative terms. This is perhaps because the more powerful consoles have steeper prices (especially PS3). And casuals, seeing all consoles as substitute goods, will naturally go for the optimum (reasonable power with a reasonable price). Wii has demonstrated just that in the new generation.

Umm, Gamecube was the cheapest, and made the PS2 look pathetic.
Avatar image for Vyse_The_Daring
Vyse_The_Daring

5318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Vyse_The_Daring
Member since 2003 • 5318 Posts
True dat. Wii is the only controller that was advanced. PS3 and 360 have little to no room to advance gameplay. PS3 has the same basic controller as PS1 and 360 has the same basic controller as Xbox all last gen material. Which is worst than bad graphics and thats a fact.coonana
I would argue that the PS3 and 360 can both advance gameplay to new and exciting levels with their increased power. Every current gen console owner will be doing things they couldn't do on a last gen system. You don't need a wiimote to have great gameplay.
Avatar image for azrealhk
azrealhk

1731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#73 azrealhk
Member since 2006 • 1731 Posts
It is only a matter of time before Sony releases the Pii-Rod :lol:
Avatar image for coonana
coonana

5909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#74 coonana
Member since 2003 • 5909 Posts
[QUOTE="coonana"]True dat. Wii is the only controller that was advanced. PS3 and 360 have little to no room to advance gameplay. PS3 has the same basic controller as PS1 and 360 has the same basic controller as Xbox all last gen material. Which is worst than bad graphics and thats a fact.Vyse_The_Daring
I would argue that the PS3 and 360 can both advance gameplay to new and exciting levels with their increased power. Every current gen console owner will be doing things they couldn't do on a last gen system. You don't need a wiimote to have great gameplay.

true they can advance gameplay to a certain degree and that is only through hardware power. But that is limited and we see that with the games. They have to play the same games. Just look at the N64/PS1 to PS2/Xbox/GC jump due to the second analog alot of genres were reinvented (TPS and FPS mainly). How about this gen???? The jump from the PS2/Xbox to the PS3/360 has no difference other than visuals I dont see any genres being reinvented???? Why is that can you tell me??? I can tell you, its because the controllers were ont advanced they were lazy and too scared so they just did a PC-like upgrade. The jump from GC to Wii in control is a quantum leap and we are just starting to see its advantages (MP3). So you dont need a Wiimote to have good gameplay but that is only true to a very short degree.
Avatar image for MaTT2011
MaTT2011

3949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 MaTT2011
Member since 2005 • 3949 Posts
i own a Wii and i personally think the Wii remote is a gimmick... Rather than pushing a button, you move the controller in a certain way. I hate itkrp008
Why does that make it a "gimmick" , to me that makes DOING things (activity, which is the primary reason we enjoy games) much more involved and complicated than simple on/off input that is a result of buttons being used as a primary means of interaction in games. In a game you might need to just push a button to jump (whatever action you want to use just replace the jump with that)....how does that require user involvment? Its the most basic method to interact with a game and to be honest, for me, its had its time and now we should upgrade to something deeper, more involving and more satisfying. Its easier to push a button than make the actual movement; easier does not equal more fun. Games are fun because they require interaction and the wiimote provides new levels and depths of interaction. and if your trying to say that interaction with games should get no more complicated then on/off signals coming from simply pushing a button then you are saying that you want your games as simple, in terms of player to game interaction, as possible. And thats just not nearly as fun as actually DOING the action/motion. Wii bowling would be the most incredibly boring game on the planet if all you had to do was simply push a button. Yet because it requires a far more interactive and deep method of activity its one of the most entertaining games in.....generations!
Avatar image for skixwolf
skixwolf

4013

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 skixwolf
Member since 2004 • 4013 Posts
And yet, the Wii is the only console without a next gen console... just a next gen controller, sad isn't it?
Avatar image for deactivated-57af49c27f4e8
deactivated-57af49c27f4e8

14149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#77 deactivated-57af49c27f4e8
Member since 2005 • 14149 Posts
so that makes the pc have the oldest controller of all?
Avatar image for deactivated-57af49c27f4e8
deactivated-57af49c27f4e8

14149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#78 deactivated-57af49c27f4e8
Member since 2005 • 14149 Posts
[QUOTE="azrealhk"]It is only a matter of time before Sony releases the Pii-Rod :lol:

:lol:
Avatar image for El_Fanboy
El_Fanboy

5789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 El_Fanboy
Member since 2002 • 5789 Posts
PS3 uses a 10 year old controller, and the 360's controller hasn't changed much either.Ayaaan
ps3's controller is next gen, but the 360's is next gen. ability to turn on and off console with controller is next gen, plus the 360 controller is well, better
Avatar image for coonana
coonana

5909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#80 coonana
Member since 2003 • 5909 Posts
[QUOTE="Ayaaan"]PS3 uses a 10 year old controller, and the 360's controller hasn't changed much either.El_Fanboy
ps3's controller is next gen, but the 360's is next gen. ability to turn on and off console with controller is next gen, plus the 360 controller is well, better

PS3 controller has tilt sensor that does not work and is never used. Turning a console off with a controller is not next gen. Give me a break.
Avatar image for tonemd_basic
tonemd_basic

1944

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 tonemd_basic
Member since 2003 • 1944 Posts
[QUOTE="paullywog"][QUOTE="azrealhk"]It is only a matter of time before Sony releases the Pii-Rod :lol:

:lol:

Np need. They have already copied that gimmick.
Avatar image for Metrovania
Metrovania

2540

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#82 Metrovania
Member since 2003 • 2540 Posts
[QUOTE="krp008"]i own a Wii and i personally think the Wii remote is a gimmick... Rather than pushing a button, you move the controller in a certain way. I hate itMaTT2011
Why does that make it a "gimmick" , to me that makes DOING things (activity, which is the primary reason we enjoy games) much more involved and complicated than simple on/off input that is a result of buttons being used as a primary means of interaction in games. In a game you might need to just push a button to jump (whatever action you want to use just replace the jump with that)....how does that require user involvment? Its the most basic method to interact with a game and to be honest, for me, its had its time and now we should upgrade to something deeper, more involving and more satisfying. Its easier to push a button than make the actual movement; easier does not equal more fun. Games are fun because they require interaction and the wiimote provides new levels and depths of interaction. and if your trying to say that interaction with games should get no more complicated then on/off signals coming from simply pushing a button then you are saying that you want your games as simple, in terms of player to game interaction, as possible. And thats just not nearly as fun as actually DOING the action/motion. Wii bowling would be the most incredibly boring game on the planet if all you had to do was simply push a button. Yet because it requires a far more interactive and deep method of activity its one of the most entertaining games in.....generations!

You're forgetting the fact that certain games are getting things done to them thanks to the controller that would simply be impossible on the other current gen consoles. The Wii-mote is great, not because it maps button presses to motions, but because it allows greater control over the game. There are only so many combinations of buttons that can be intuitively used to add control over the character and the game world; whereas with the Wii-mote you can map very complex moves that simply couldn't be done on a regular controller to a simple gesture. Look at MP3 and it's grapple beam - I'd imagine it would be rather unintuitive to implement the beam as a weapon with a regular controller since every button on the GC controller was used in the first 2 MP games; on the Wii however, a simple flick of the nunchuk and a whole new play mechanic is born!! The Wii-mote also allows a whole new level of interactivity and multi-tasking to the game world. Look at SMG, for example: there you can do every move you ever could in a Mario game (plus a few new moves courtesy of the nunchuk) while simultaneously interacting with the environment with the Wii-mote pointer function. This would simply be impossible to d with a regular control. Even 3rd parties are beginning to use the Wii-mote to add things to ports than weren't in the original game. For example MoH:V on the Wii has every single move that can be done on the PS2 version, plus the addition of 180 degree spin thanks to the nunchuk. True, this game probably won't be particularly good, but this is an example of motion sensing not simply being used to replace a button command; but to add greater control over the character. Almost every game that has come out this gen could be done on the Wii. It's true that Oblivion would need graphics more on par with Elder Scrolls III, but the gameplay could basically make the move untouched. GeoW could be done with roughly Chronicles of Riddick-level graphics (given a dedicated developer) and no real gameplay downgrade. However, MP3 and SMG simply could not intuitively be done on the 360/PS3. In both cases the gameplay would need to be altered significantly in order to bring them to the other current-gen consoles. At least that's the way I see it.
Avatar image for poopinloop32
poopinloop32

4949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#83 poopinloop32
Member since 2006 • 4949 Posts
If I wanted motion sencing I would have gotten a Wii...but im not
Avatar image for Tylendal
Tylendal

14681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#84 Tylendal
Member since 2006 • 14681 Posts
If I wanted motion sencing I would have gotten a Wii...but im notpoopinloop32
Okay... your point :|
Avatar image for coonana
coonana

5909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#85 coonana
Member since 2003 • 5909 Posts

[QUOTE="poopinloop32"]If I wanted motion sencing I would have gotten a Wii...but im notTylendal
Okay... your point :|

exactly motion sensing is the next jump. Joystick, D-pad, Analog, Dual Analog, and now Motion Sensing. And just like when analogs just came out the advantage to them was not as noticable but later on when more games came it was the only way to go. the same thing is going to happen with motion sensing there is now way to say this is flase just look at all the other control upgrades same exact trend.

Avatar image for Gamer46
Gamer46

11304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 315

User Lists: 0

#86 Gamer46
Member since 2003 • 11304 Posts
i own a Wii and i personally think the Wii remote is a gimmick... Rather than pushing a button, you move the controller in a certain way. I hate itkrp008


I agree with you, all I heard is how the Wii remote will be better than the standard controller. Well, it's different for sure, but I've yet to see how it is better. Especially for FPS, I've yet to play one FPS that I felt was done better with the remote than it could've been with a Sixaxis or 360 controller.

The remote is great for gimmicky crap games like Nintendogs, and Cooking Mama, stuff Nintendo wants to become the norm. But for real games, the Sixaxis and 360 controller are better.
Avatar image for BackFlip101
BackFlip101

676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 BackFlip101
Member since 2005 • 676 Posts

The Wii is the only console with a next gen controller.Ayaaan

Too bad the Wii isn't a next gen console.

Avatar image for Gamer46
Gamer46

11304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 315

User Lists: 0

#88 Gamer46
Member since 2003 • 11304 Posts

[QUOTE="Ayaaan"]The Wii is the only console with a next gen controller.BackFlip101

Too bad the Wii isn't a next gen console.



TSHBO /thread
Avatar image for coonana
coonana

5909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#89 coonana
Member since 2003 • 5909 Posts

[QUOTE="krp008"]i own a Wii and i personally think the Wii remote is a gimmick... Rather than pushing a button, you move the controller in a certain way. I hate itGamer46


I agree with you, all I heard is how the Wii remote will be better than the standard controller. Well, it's different for sure, but I've yet to see how it is better. Especially for FPS, I've yet to play one FPS that I felt was done better with the remote than it could've been with a Sixaxis or 360 controller.

The remote is great for gimmicky crap games like Nintendogs, and Cooking Mama, stuff Nintendo wants to become the norm. But for real games, the Sixaxis and 360 controller are better.

you must be too young to understand the trend of new advancements. Do you think the analog instantly was better than the D-pad, no it did things clunky and messed up. Once devs got used to it and one dev found the perfect way to control it there was a successful control more advacned then its predecessor. 

Motion sensing allows for games that could never be done on 360 the ones you call gimmicky crap because im sure you only go for guns and swords, it allows for games that would otherwise suck (Wii Sports) to be fun, and it will one day like the analog revolutionize FPS along with other things. Have you been paying attention to the FPS on Wii. Obviously not because each time they get better and better. Do you think a completely new and revolutionary control is gonna work perfectly in an instant. If you do your more of a fool than I thought you were. They have to keep developing games for it and find the perfect combination. Right now FPS are okay one they get the turning barrier down they will be SOOO mcuh better than your piece of crap 2 generation old 360 and PS3 crap controllers. Right now the Wimote has already surpassed your outdated controllers in so many ways its only a matter of time until the harder genres like FPS and TPS are better with the Wiimote. Too bad for you because your a fanboy and you wont listen to me.

Avatar image for coonana
coonana

5909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#90 coonana
Member since 2003 • 5909 Posts
[QUOTE="BackFlip101"]

[QUOTE="Ayaaan"]The Wii is the only console with a next gen controller.Gamer46

Too bad the Wii isn't a next gen console.



TSHBO /thread

actually if you have been reading the post you would realise otherwise. Man you really dont know what your talking about with anything.