The Xbox 360 Core Is The Biggest Mistake Microsoft Made

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for TrueReligion_
TrueReligion_

11037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 TrueReligion_
Member since 2006 • 11037 Posts

The Xbox 360 Core SKU was introduced at the launch of the Xbox 360. It was introduced at a relatively low price for a high definition next generation console at $299.99 USD. There was a catch, though: it didn't include a hard-drive and was void from essential features that enhance the Xbox experience.


So what's the mistake? Microsoft says the sweet spot in pricing is $199. This means that Microsoft isn't going to get rid of their Core SKU anytime soon. In fact, the Premium SKU has a better chance of being axed than the Core model. Why isn't Microsoft going to get rid of this SKU? Because they need to expand their demographic. The console is only appealing to hardcore gamers, and they need to expand like Nintendo is expanding with the Nintendo Wii and Nintendo DS.

Developers will continue to keep the Core model in mind, and without a hard drive, games are going to get downgraded. Microsoft even wants developers to, and I quote, "degrade" the game. Microsoft is asking developers to "degrade" textures in games in order to cater to the Core users and increase loading times. The only exception to this policy are MMOs. Now, you might counter this by saying that the mass market does not own a Core SKU--well that brings me back to my second point: Microsoft WILL bring down the Core's price to $199--and that is mass market pricing.

Thanks to the Xbox 360 being the best selling HD console, most games will have to be built around the Xbox 360. GTAIV will NOT have a HDD required sticker on it. You know why? Because GTAIV is a mass market game, the Core is a mass market system: if the two aren't compatible with eachother, then Microsoft has an even bigger problem on its hands.

To add to this, if some of you think that the majority of the mass market cares for things like the HDD: then you're wrong. Only 30% of 360 owners are aware of high definition capabilities in their console. I seriously doubt users care about HDDs if they aren't even aware of the major selling point of the Xbox 360.

The PS3, however, has a HDD in every single unit sold. This is a major incentive to developers and gamers alike since developers can use the PS3 as the lead SKU. Many developers have already done this with EA (Burnout Paradise and Army of Two) and Sega (Sega Rally) starting the new trend.

Source

Avatar image for Lemmywinks_360
Lemmywinks_360

1996

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Lemmywinks_360
Member since 2007 • 1996 Posts

I think microsoft shoulve done it this way.

Have a core and premium, but instead of the core being a piece of crap because it doesnt have anything with it. They should put a smaller hdd in the core models. Maybe 10 gb instead of 20gb or something like that.

Avatar image for darkjounin
darkjounin

714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 darkjounin
Member since 2005 • 714 Posts
The core appeals to some of the blind people that buys a wii. Yes I said some only okay. Which is one of the most genius tactics that m$ ever made.
Avatar image for InsaneBasura
InsaneBasura

12591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#5 InsaneBasura
Member since 2005 • 12591 Posts
Indeed. Die tard pack, die! I would say that the whole 3RLOD blunder is a contender for that title though.
Avatar image for lazzordude
lazzordude

6685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 lazzordude
Member since 2003 • 6685 Posts

the premium far outsells the core so i dont get how its the mass market sku

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#7 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Wow... I am speechless.
Avatar image for TrueReligion_
TrueReligion_

11037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 TrueReligion_
Member since 2006 • 11037 Posts

the premium far outsells the core so i dont get how its the mass market sku

lazzordude

You didn't read, did you? :|

Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#9 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts
i think they should've just stuck with 1 SKU..
Avatar image for Miles0T0Prower
Miles0T0Prower

1990

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Miles0T0Prower
Member since 2007 • 1990 Posts
they should keep the core. just make games harddrive needed games if they need to use a harddrive. so hardrive ownwers get the best games they can
Avatar image for Hermitkermit
Hermitkermit

1880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#12 Hermitkermit
Member since 2005 • 1880 Posts
Meh...really I liked the first Xbox where the Hard Drive is in the console, although I do wish I could detach it once in a while to move data....However Microsoft should really, think of getting rid of the core model, I mean even I did not want to buy that model...rather have a HDD than one with out....MUs are great but can only store so much....
Avatar image for lazzordude
lazzordude

6685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 lazzordude
Member since 2003 • 6685 Posts

The Xbox 360 Core SKU was introduced at the launch of the Xbox 360. It was introduced at a relatively low price for a high definition next generation console at $299.99 USD. There was a catch, though: it didn't include a hard-drive and was void from essential features that enhance the Xbox experience.


So what's the mistake? Microsoft says the sweet spot in pricing is $199. This means that Microsoft isn't going to get rid of their Core SKU anytime soon. In fact, the Premium SKU has a better chance of being axed than the Core model. Why isn't Microsoft going to get rid of this SKU? Because they need to expand their demographic. The console is only appealing to hardcore gamers, and they need to expand like Nintendo is expanding with the Nintendo Wii and Nintendo DS.

Developers will continue to keep the Core model in mind, and without a hard drive, games are going to get downgraded. Microsoft even wants developers to, and I quote, "degrade" the game. Microsoft is asking developers to "degrade" textures in games in order to cater to the Core users and increase loading times. The only exception to this policy are MMOs. Now, you might counter this by saying that the mass market does not own a Core SKU--well that brings me back to my second point: Microsoft WILL bring down the Core's price to $199--and that is mass market pricing.

Thanks to the Xbox 360 being the best selling HD console, most games will have to be built around the Xbox 360. GTAIV will NOT have a HDD required sticker on it. You know why? Because GTAIV is a mass market game, the Core is a mass market system: if the two aren't compatible with eachother, then Microsoft has an even bigger problem on its hands.

To add to this, if some of you think that the majority of the mass market cares for things like the HDD: then you're wrong. Only 30% of 360 owners are aware of high definition capabilities in their console. I seriously doubt users care about HDDs if they aren't even aware of the major selling point of the Xbox 360.

The PS3, however, has a HDD in every single unit sold. This is a major incentive to developers and gamers alike since developers can use the PS3 as the lead SKU. Many developers have already done this with EA (Burnout Paradise and Army of Two) and Sega (Sega Rally) starting the new trend.

Source

TrueReligion_
yes i read you post.and still most people do and will buy the premium because the average person doesnt drop a few hundred dollarswithout doing a bit of research.
Avatar image for TrueReligion_
TrueReligion_

11037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 TrueReligion_
Member since 2006 • 11037 Posts

Wow... I am speechless.foxhound_fox

You have a good reason to. We will, collectively, enjoy low polygon models/textures and be entertained by long loading times.

Thank you, Microsoft.

Avatar image for jrhawk42
jrhawk42

12764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#15 jrhawk42
Member since 2003 • 12764 Posts

I think microsoft shoulve done it this way.

Have a core and premium, but instead of the core being a piece of crap because it doesnt have anything with it. They should put a smaller hdd in the core models. Maybe 10 gb instead of 20gb or something like that.

Lemmywinks_360

true a cheap HDD wouldn't give anybody an excuse not to have one, but I think MS is paranoid about piracy so we'll not likely seen any cheap alternatives.

I really don't think any core users don't have a hard drive. I'm sure most of them are teens who's parents are buying their system. They make the kid settile for the lower priced one, and then the kid eventually nags his parents into getting a HDD the way snobby kids always do.

Avatar image for DementedDragon
DementedDragon

5095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 DementedDragon
Member since 2003 • 5095 Posts

they should keep the core. just make games harddrive needed games if they need to use a harddrive. so hardrive ownwers get the best games they canMiles0T0Prower

that would be a terrible offense.

Avatar image for TrueReligion_
TrueReligion_

11037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 TrueReligion_
Member since 2006 • 11037 Posts

yes i read you post.and still most people do and will buy the premium because the average person doesnt drop a few hundred dollarswithout doing a bit of research.lazzordude

So, you're telling me Grandma and Aunt Betty are going to pass up on getting little Jonny an Xbox 360 for $199 and opt for the more expensive version? Your reasoning is devoid of any common sense, whatsoever.

Avatar image for TrueReligion_
TrueReligion_

11037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 TrueReligion_
Member since 2006 • 11037 Posts

they should keep the core. just make games harddrive needed games if they need to use a harddrive. so hardrive ownwers get the best games they canMiles0T0Prower

Not going to happen when the Core is mass market.

Avatar image for XenogearsMaster
XenogearsMaster

3175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 XenogearsMaster
Member since 2007 • 3175 Posts

The core Lemmings are owned.

But everyone knew the tard pack was garbage, right?

Avatar image for lazzordude
lazzordude

6685

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 lazzordude
Member since 2003 • 6685 Posts

[QUOTE="lazzordude"]yes i read you post.and still most people do and will buy the premium because the average person doesnt drop a few hundred dollarswithout doing a bit of research.TrueReligion_

So, you're telling me Grandma and Aunt Betty are going to pass up on getting little Jonny an Xbox 360 for $199 and opt for the more expensive version? Your reasoning is devoid of any common sense, whatsoever.

you honestly think the majority of gamers need there grandmas to buy there systems for them?i knowit happens but it doesnt make the core the sku of choice.
Avatar image for littleman1992
littleman1992

1727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#21 littleman1992
Member since 2004 • 1727 Posts

Nahhhh, really?

Everybody knows this, Lemmings included.

Avatar image for groovdafied
groovdafied

5012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 groovdafied
Member since 2005 • 5012 Posts

I think microsoft shoulve done it this way.

Have a core and premium, but instead of the core being a piece of crap because it doesnt have anything with it. They should put a smaller hdd in the core models. Maybe 10 gb instead of 20gb or something like that.

Lemmywinks_360

Either that, or just include a memory card for saves. I would say 5G hard drive would be sufficient for the core.

Avatar image for jdang307
jdang307

1512

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 jdang307
Member since 2006 • 1512 Posts
They need to either drop the price of their external, or allow drop in HDDs a la Sony for their core systems.
Avatar image for beckhambender
beckhambender

793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 beckhambender
Member since 2007 • 793 Posts

The biggest mistake Microsoft made?

Probably designing a console that can't go a couple of weeks without croaking.

Avatar image for KhanhAgE
KhanhAgE

1345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 KhanhAgE
Member since 2004 • 1345 Posts

The biggest mistake Microsoft made?

Probably designing a console that can't go a couple of weeks without croaking.

beckhambender

Makes you wonder what the idiot QA were doing.

"Yep. It turned on. Good enough for me."

Avatar image for JAMES_L_BROOKS
JAMES_L_BROOKS

1463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 JAMES_L_BROOKS
Member since 2005 • 1463 Posts

The Xbox 360 Core SKU was introduced at the launch of the Xbox 360. It was introduced at a relatively low price for a high definition next generation console at $299.99 USD. There was a catch, though: it didn't include a hard-drive and was void from essential features that enhance the Xbox experience.


So what's the mistake? Microsoft says the sweet spot in pricing is $199. This means that Microsoft isn't going to get rid of their Core SKU anytime soon. In fact, the Premium SKU has a better chance of being axed than the Core model. Why isn't Microsoft going to get rid of this SKU? Because they need to expand their demographic. The console is only appealing to hardcore gamers, and they need to expand like Nintendo is expanding with the Nintendo Wii and Nintendo DS.

Developers will continue to keep the Core model in mind, and without a hard drive, games are going to get downgraded. Microsoft even wants developers to, and I quote, "degrade" the game. Microsoft is asking developers to "degrade" textures in games in order to cater to the Core users and increase loading times. The only exception to this policy are MMOs. Now, you might counter this by saying that the mass market does not own a Core SKU--well that brings me back to my second point: Microsoft WILL bring down the Core's price to $199--and that is mass market pricing.

Thanks to the Xbox 360 being the best selling HD console, most games will have to be built around the Xbox 360. GTAIV will NOT have a HDD required sticker on it. You know why? Because GTAIV is a mass market game, the Core is a mass market system: if the two aren't compatible with eachother, then Microsoft has an even bigger problem on its hands.

To add to this, if some of you think that the majority of the mass market cares for things like the HDD: then you're wrong. Only 30% of 360 owners are aware of high definition capabilities in their console. I seriously doubt users care about HDDs if they aren't even aware of the major selling point of the Xbox 360.

The PS3, however, has a HDD in every single unit sold. This is a major incentive to developers and gamers alike since developers can use the PS3 as the lead SKU. Many developers have already done this with EA (Burnout Paradise and Army of Two) and Sega (Sega Rally) starting the new trend.

Source

TrueReligion_

the old tech in a next gen unit was big mistake, PS3 was in development since PS2 was released... the 360 was put together with what ever top things MS had at the time, nothign new at all

Avatar image for 3picuri3
3picuri3

9618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 3picuri3
Member since 2006 • 9618 Posts
and the ps3 is the worst decision sony ever made.... or is it the psp? tough call.
Avatar image for BrooklynBomber
BrooklynBomber

1507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 BrooklynBomber
Member since 2007 • 1507 Posts
IMO the biggest mistake was selling a defective console that cost them billions to repair.
Avatar image for Pro_wrestler
Pro_wrestler

7880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#29 Pro_wrestler
Member since 2002 • 7880 Posts

What the hell is a tard-pack?

Anyways yes, I think they can redeem themselves by making the HDD cheaper and packaging all Xboxs with HDD's.
Or pull a Sony and drop the lowest SKU all together.

Avatar image for Digital_Cowboy
Digital_Cowboy

203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Digital_Cowboy
Member since 2007 • 203 Posts

"The Xbox 360 Core Is The Biggest Mistake ..."

your dead wrong. read my blog if you want my rant

Avatar image for beckhambender
beckhambender

793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 beckhambender
Member since 2007 • 793 Posts
[QUOTE="beckhambender"]

The biggest mistake Microsoft made?

Probably designing a console that can't go a couple of weeks without croaking.

KhanhAgE

Makes you wonder what the idiot QA were doing.

"Yep. It turned on. Good enough for me."

It's like they hired monkeys for that task!

Avatar image for Transfering7
Transfering7

183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Transfering7
Member since 2007 • 183 Posts

Ship out a 10-20GB HDD to every Core owner and Existing Cores on shelves and Plants.

They won't do that though....

Better luck next time MS.

Avatar image for Spartan8907
Spartan8907

3731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Spartan8907
Member since 2006 • 3731 Posts
You mean to tell us that putting faulty hardware into the 360 was not MS's biggest mistake? Personally, I'd take that over not having the core 360 SKU.
Avatar image for Marka1700
Marka1700

7500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Marka1700
Member since 2003 • 7500 Posts
Core should have at least had the 4GB that is used for caching.
Avatar image for manningbowl135
manningbowl135

7457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 manningbowl135
Member since 2006 • 7457 Posts

What the hell is a tard-pack?

Anyways yes, I think they can redeem themselves by making the HDD cheaper and packaging all Xboxs with HDD's.
Or pull a Sony and drop the lowest SKU all together.

Pro_wrestler

That's still not totally redeeming themselves. That means core owners are forced to buy something to enjoy some games. Making it cheaper is a step, but the mistake is still big.

Avatar image for snipe2004
snipe2004

1872

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 snipe2004
Member since 2007 • 1872 Posts
it truly is a tard pack and makes it a true xbox 1.5 model and in one case worse then the original xbox without a HDD.
Avatar image for TrueReligion_
TrueReligion_

11037

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 TrueReligion_
Member since 2006 • 11037 Posts

*sigh*

Some of you aren't understanding what I'm trying to convey.

The Core is going to be $199. It's going to happen. Microsoft is going to advertise their $199 console which is cheaper than the Wii. People are going to buy: it's going to be a mass market product.

Now that millions of people own a Core console, developers will have to "degrade" their games to cater for the Core crowd. They have no option: they have to make games HDD-less.

Avatar image for -Ninja_Dog-
-Ninja_Dog-

4197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 -Ninja_Dog-
Member since 2005 • 4197 Posts

*sigh*

Some of you aren't understanding what I'm trying to convey.

The Core is going to be $199. It's going to happen. Microsoft is going to advertise their $199 console which is cheaper than the Wii. People are going to buy: it's going to be a mass market product.

Now that millions of people own a Core console, developers will have to "degrade" their games to cater for the Core crowd. They have no option: they have to make games HDD-less.

TrueReligion_

Dev are aware they have to make games with no standard HDD in mind.

Its not a big deal.

Games like Saints Row , Gears, Halo 3, Oblivion , Mass Effect have already proven this.

HDD will only be needed for MMO games.

If you are someone who cares less about the extra benefits of HDD then you dont need to buy a pro or an elite version you can choose to get the cheaper version and fully enjoy the game you bought.

And last gen with Xbox only about 10 % devs used the standard HDD for games, so blame them for MS making the decision not to have a standard HDD.

Avatar image for Hot_Potato
Hot_Potato

3422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#39 Hot_Potato
Member since 2004 • 3422 Posts

I think microsoft shoulve done it this way.

Have a core and premium, but instead of the core being a piece of crap because it doesnt have anything with it. They should put a smaller hdd in the core models. Maybe 10 gb instead of 20gb or something like that.

Lemmywinks_360

That would be a total of 3GB, LOL! Seeing that the 20 GB model only has 13 after it's formatted and everything...

Avatar image for winner-ps3
winner-ps3

2364

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 winner-ps3
Member since 2007 • 2364 Posts

agreed! they real stupid thing is that all original xbox' shad a 20gig HDD

so why the hell did MS downgrade the 360? so stupid!

Avatar image for SiiSsy
SiiSsy

551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 SiiSsy
Member since 2007 • 551 Posts

I think the worst decision Microsoft ever made was getting into gaming period.

It has:

Cost them Billions with no return profit.

Made them look very unproffesional landing them in numerous magazines and TV shows for broken consoles.

Weakened their defenses against Apple by distracting their main focus right now which should be Zune.

Tangled up a great deal of their annual assets in technology that the company has very little expeience in.

Has them supporting a rapidly dying format (HD DVD)

Investing millions upon millions in a short but sweet 07 lineup with a visibly absent 08 lineup.

I like the Xbox and Xbox 360 but honestly it has been nothing but a burden to them as a company. Whether or not they will keep up the game is unknown to me....but all signs point to them quitting if they dont start making back money fast while resolving hardware issues just as quickly.

In any case good luck to them.

Avatar image for Riverwolf007
Riverwolf007

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 Riverwolf007
Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

Maybe it was a mistake to have the core, even MS fans don't like it very much. But people like me get a system with HD, good games, online, plenty of storage and any other bells and whistles we want to pay for and Joe Blow gets to play Halo 3, Madden and GTA 4with a memory card for around $300 bucks not counting the price of the games.

Live and learn, maybe the next Xbox will be better designed, after all look at how well the PS3 hardware turnedout on the third try.

Avatar image for svetzenlether
svetzenlether

3082

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 svetzenlether
Member since 2003 • 3082 Posts
[QUOTE="beckhambender"]

The biggest mistake Microsoft made?

Probably designing a console that can't go a couple of weeks without croaking.

KhanhAgE

Makes you wonder what the idiot QA were doing.

"Yep. It turned on. Good enough for me."

QFT