There is still a chance for MW3 to beat BF3 in reviews.

Don't judge devs's future games based on the past. That is being ignorant. You haven't seen SQUAT about the game, how do you know that B3 will beat it in reviews? Because Bf3's graphics?

For all we know MW3 could be entirely different than past cods. Until you see gameplay vids, you have no right to prematurely declare BF3 the winner.

It'd be nice for it to be different from past CoDs, but that won't happen. If reviewers are smart, maybe they'll realize that CoD is not AAA games.

It shouldn't be too hard to make yet another annual COD game that reviewers and gamers EXPECT this year, despite IW's destruction. IW is now a shell of it's former self, but COD8 : MW3 has a lot of devs working on it.

Who knows what's going to happen...but I can say that I most likely will not be buying COD8 this year. I stopped at COD6, and even then, I wanted to stop at COD5.

It shouldn't be too hard to make yet another annual COD game that reviewers and gamers EXPECT this year, despite IW's destruction. IW is now a shell of it's former self, but COD8 : MW3 has a lot of devs working on it.

Who knows what's going to happen...but I can say that I most likely will not be buying COD8 this year. I stopped at COD6, and even then, I wanted to stop at COD5.

SolidTy

Yo Ty remember how people were touting how Treyarch would finally make their first AAA COD game... Or any game... and it misses 90+ on meta?:P ... Man those threads were some good times.:P

Fun game nevertheless, the online was addictive as usual.:P

[QUOTE="Remmib"][QUOTE="xxhoosierdaddyx"] I ya, I forgot you played it to form an opinion /failxxhoosierdaddyx

No offense toeither of you, but this whole argument is kind of ridiculous.

Don't judge devs's future games based on the past. That is being ignorant. You haven't seen SQUAT about the game, how do you know that B3 will beat it in reviews? Because Bf3's graphics?

For all we know MW3 could be entirely different than past cods. Until you see gameplay vids, you have no right to prematurely declare BF3 the winner.

xxhoosierdaddyx

Don't judge devs's future games based on the past. That is being ignorant. You haven't seen SQUAT about the game, how do you know that B3 will beat it in reviews? Because Bf3's graphics?

For all we know MW3 could be entirely different than past cods. Until you see gameplay vids, you have no right to prematurely declare BF3 the winner.

xxhoosierdaddyx

only thing that can save MW3 MP from itself is the removal of perks and killstreaks and a new system instead......i dont think they are that ballsy to mess with a formula that gave them success for all these years tho

It might. Sadly none of us have cristal balls now do we?

:P

Still I do know one thing. I'll enjoy MW3 more. :]

Still I do know one thing. I'll enjoy MW3 more. :]

timmy00

That's like saying you would enjoy McDonald's more than a burger from Fuddrucker's...in which case there is something wrong with your tastebuds.

yeah...i've only seen one game so i'm not gonna pass judgement yet

although right now Battlefield 3 has my attention big time

[QUOTE="timmy00"]

Still I do know one thing. I'll enjoy MW3 more. :]

Remmib

That's like saying you would enjoy McDonald's more than a burger from Fuddrucker's...in which case there is something wrong with your tastebuds.

Seems you like to bash MW2 a lot. I got a brilliant idea. How about you just ignore the people who like it and stop hating on their taste. mmmkay?

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

It shouldn't be too hard to make yet another annual COD game that reviewers and gamers EXPECT this year, despite IW's destruction. IW is now a shell of it's former self, but COD8 : MW3 has a lot of devs working on it.

Who knows what's going to happen...but I can say that I most likely will not be buying COD8 this year. I stopped at COD6, and even then, I wanted to stop at COD5.

sanim02

Yo Ty remember how people were touting how Treyarch would finally make their first AAA COD game... Or any game... and it misses 90+ on meta?:P ... Man those threads were some good times.:P

Fun game nevertheless, the online was addictive as usual.:P

Oh, I remember that laughable event very well, just like so many other hilarious events. VH1's old "Where are they Now" comes to mind with that group of users! :lol:

Yeah, COD was a good time, if I didn't own COD1-COD6 and play those online games to death, I would probably still be playing COD today, but alas, I grew tired as I realized it's the same formula game in and game out. I think we all will get there at some point, but in the meantime, ACTIVISION is laughing all the way to the bank. :P

[QUOTE="Remmib"]

[QUOTE="timmy00"]

Still I do know one thing. I'll enjoy MW3 more. :]

timmy00

That's like saying you would enjoy McDonald's more than a burger from Fuddrucker's...in which case there is something wrong with your tastebuds.

Seems you like to bash MW2 a lot. I got a brilliant idea. How about you just ignore the people who like it and stop hating on their taste. mmmkay?

Again, that is like saying people who enjoy McDonald's more than Fuddruckers have "different taste." That is not the case.

The people who enjoy McD's more have worse taste in comparison.

This is not debatable...

Don't judge devs's future games based on the past. That is being ignorant. You haven't seen SQUAT about the game, how do you know that B3 will beat it in reviews? Because Bf3's graphics?

For all we know MW3 could be entirely different than past cods. Until you see gameplay vids, you have no right to prematurely declare BF3 the winner.

xxhoosierdaddyx

I agree their is a tiny chance, but you do have to remember their are multiple dev teams working on the game.

[QUOTE="sanim02"]

[QUOTE="SolidTy"]

It shouldn't be too hard to make yet another annual COD game that reviewers and gamers EXPECT this year, despite IW's destruction. IW is now a shell of it's former self, but COD8 : MW3 has a lot of devs working on it.

Who knows what's going to happen...but I can say that I most likely will not be buying COD8 this year. I stopped at COD6, and even then, I wanted to stop at COD5.

SolidTy

Yo Ty remember how people were touting how Treyarch would finally make their first AAA COD game... Or any game... and it misses 90+ on meta?:P ... Man those threads were some good times.:P

Fun game nevertheless, the online was addictive as usual.:P

Oh, I remember that laughable event very well, just like so many other hilarious events. VH1's old "Where are the Now" comes to mind with that group of users! :lol:

Yeah, COD was a good time, if I didn't own COD1-COD6 and play those online games to death, I would probably still be playing COD today, but alas, I grew tired as I realized it's the same formula game in and game out. I think we all will get there at some point, but in the meantime, ACTIVISION is laughing all the way to the bank. :P

:lol:

All that flak for nothing, it's like being arrested but they caught the wrong dude.:P It DID hit AAA on GS but that wasn't the point so even that doesn't mean jack.:P Sometimes I chuckle at how things go your way sometimes.:P

As for COD, I always played COD on 360 (MW1 and MW2) until I got BLOPS on PS3, which I really liked (multiplayer cuz of my college buds:P), but man I got burnt after just one release.:? I'm looking forward to BF3, but hey I'll play MW3 when my friends obviously buy it as soon as it's out.:P

[QUOTE="xxhoosierdaddyx"]

Don't judge devs's future games based on the past. That is being ignorant. You haven't seen SQUAT about the game, how do you know that B3 will beat it in reviews? Because Bf3's graphics?

For all we know MW3 could be entirely different than past cods. Until you see gameplay vids, you have no right to prematurely declare BF3 the winner.

lightleggy

And the wager matches.Those were the only two main changes and that's kinda sad.

It might. Sadly none of us have cristal balls now do we?

:P

Still I do know one thing. I'll enjoy MW3 more. :]

timmy00

MW3 will be garbage and will not even compare in the least to BF3. /truestorybroRemmib

Everybody is happy.

Doubt it BF2 (if I'm not mistaken) is the only BF to out score a CoD game and I'm betting BF3 will top BF2.

[QUOTE="lightleggy"][QUOTE="xxhoosierdaddyx"]

Don't judge devs's future games based on the past. That is being ignorant. You haven't seen SQUAT about the game, how do you know that B3 will beat it in reviews? Because Bf3's graphics?

For all we know MW3 could be entirely different than past cods. Until you see gameplay vids, you have no right to prematurely declare BF3 the winner.

super600

And the wager matches.Those were the only two main changes and that's kinda sad.

Yeah seriously, all we've seen so far is small clips from bf3, which only show two major things from a reviewer's standpoint: great graphics and and the same linear type of single player in CoD.

So is it the graphics that will make this game "the best fps ever"?

[QUOTE="Remmib"]

[QUOTE="timmy00"]No not really. I just have different taste. :]

Seems you like to bash MW2 a lot. I got a brilliant idea. How about you just ignore the people who like it and stop hating on their taste. mmmkay?

timmy00

Again, that is like saying people who enjoy McDonald's more than Fuddruckers have "different taste." That is not the case.

The people who enjoy McD's more have worse taste in comparison.

This is not debatable...

I'm sorry for having a different opinion and taste. If you truly think you have surperior taste, then get off your horse.

Quality is for the holder to judge.

[QUOTE="timmy00"]

[QUOTE="Remmib"]

Again, that is like saying people who enjoy McDonald's more than Fuddruckers have "different taste." That is not the case.

The people who enjoy McD's more have worse taste in comparison.

This is not debatable...

lightleggy

I'm sorry for having a different opinion and taste. If you truly think you have surperior taste, then get off your horse.

Quality is for the holder to judge.

I find it arrogant that people thinks their taste in games to be better just because someone play a game they find to be trash.

There is no technical side to this. Games quality is subjective.

[QUOTE="lightleggy"][QUOTE="timmy00"]How the **** is that not debatable? :|

I'm sorry for having a different opinion and taste. If you truly think you have surperior taste, then get off your horse.

Quality is for the holder to judge.

timmy00

I find it arrogant that people thinks their taste in games to be better just because someone play a game they find to be trash.

There is no technical side to this. Games quality is subjective.

like my mate above me said, its like saying that you think an acura is better than a porsche... you may think that acura is the greatest car ever made, but acura is an extremely mediocre car in front of a porsche or a ferrari...its the same here...cod is a mediocre game, that can not be debated, because CoD IS a mediocre game.

anyone can give you facts on why cod is a mediocre game

[QUOTE="timmy00"]

[QUOTE="Remmib"]

Again, that is like saying people who enjoy McDonald's more than Fuddruckers have "different taste." That is not the case.

The people who enjoy McD's more have worse taste in comparison.

This is not debatable...

Remmib

I'm sorry for having a different opinion and taste. If you truly think you have surperior taste, then get off your horse.

Quality is for the holder to judge.

Apparently I do have superior taste.

Quality is not for the holder to judge. That is like saying someone can have an opinion on whether an Acura or Porsche is higher quality. That is not the case. Anyone with more than half of a brain knows that Porsche is higher quality.

I accept your defeat.

Get off your high-horse. Accept my defeat? :|

[QUOTE="Remmib"]

[QUOTE="timmy00"]How the **** is that not debatable? :|

I'm sorry for having a different opinion and taste. If you truly think you have surperior taste, then get off your horse.

Quality is for the holder to judge.

pl4yer_f0und

Apparently I do have superior taste.

Quality is not for the holder to judge. That is like saying someone can have an opinion on whether an Acura or Porsche is higher quality. That is not the case. Anyone with more than half of a brain knows that Porsche is higher quality.

I accept your defeat.

LoL:lol: Your full of yourself. I dont know what world your living in, but in the real world there are these things called opinions. Btw your analagies suck... quality is in the eye of the beholder. An acura is whole differant type of car than a porsche, way differant price range. Your comparing apple to oranges.

[QUOTE="timmy00"]

[QUOTE="lightleggy"] he has a point, and you are not understanding that point...its for example as if you would say that tetris has better graphics than crysis...it might be your opinion, but your opinion will be based on an utterly fake fact. COD is a mediocre game, which has failed to evolve for like 10 years, just like pokemon games which have repeated the same formula over and over...you may like COD more than BF, but if we look it from a technical side, COD is a piece of garbage compared to BFlightleggy

I find it arrogant that people thinks their taste in games to be better just because someone play a game they find to be trash.

There is no technical side to this. Games quality is subjective.

like my mate above me said, its like saying that you think an acura is better than a porsche... you may think that acura is the greatest car ever made, but acura is an extremely mediocre car in front of a porsche or a ferrari...its the same here...cod is a mediocre game, that can not be debated, because CoD IS a mediocre game.

anyone can give you facts on why cod is a mediocre game

Cars can be surperior to each other. Stuff like Miles per gallon, saftey, etc isn't really subjective. Games quality is. One could find Mw2 gameplay to be surperior. Same with music. Graphics not so much. BF3 will be better in that category because it isn't really subjective.

[QUOTE="timmy00"]

[QUOTE="lightleggy"] he has a point, and you are not understanding that point...its for example as if you would say that tetris has better graphics than crysis...it might be your opinion, but your opinion will be based on an utterly fake fact. COD is a mediocre game, which has failed to evolve for like 10 years, just like pokemon games which have repeated the same formula over and over...you may like COD more than BF, but if we look it from a technical side, COD is a piece of garbage compared to BFlightleggy

I find it arrogant that people thinks their taste in games to be better just because someone play a game they find to be trash.

There is no technical side to this. Games quality is subjective.

like my mate above me said, its like saying that you think an acura is better than a porsche... you may think that acura is the greatest car ever made, but acura is an extremely mediocre car in front of a porsche or a ferrari...its the same here...cod is a mediocre game, that can not be debated, because CoD IS a mediocre game.

anyone can give you facts on why cod is a mediocre game

So you're saying that, BF plays like a Porche and COD plays like an Acura?:? I guess that is true in a sense but he mentioned how he would have more "fun" with MW3.

I'd understand if you mean it from a technical stand-point (aka physics, AI, detail) but you can't really put up an objective factor as to how a game can be fun for X person and how that persons taste is trash because they consider it fun while Y person doesn`t.:?

Man I never knew there was a right and wrong way to have fun.:P

[QUOTE="pl4yer_f0und"]

[QUOTE="Remmib"]

Apparently I do have superior taste.

Quality is not for the holder to judge. That is like saying someone can have an opinion on whether an Acura or Porsche is higher quality. That is not the case. Anyone with more than half of a brain knows that Porsche is higher quality.

I accept your defeat.

PalmPixi

LoL:lol: Your full of yourself. I dont know what world your living in, but in the real world there are these things called opinions. Btw your analagies suck... quality is in the eye of the beholder. An acura is whole differant type of car than a porsche, way differant price range. Your comparing apple to oranges.

[QUOTE="Remmib"]

[QUOTE="timmy00"]How the **** is that not debatable? :|

I'm sorry for having a different opinion and taste. If you truly think you have surperior taste, then get off your horse.

Quality is for the holder to judge.

timmy00

Apparently I do have superior taste.

Quality is not for the holder to judge. That is like saying someone can have an opinion on whether an Acura or Porsche is higher quality. That is not the case. Anyone with more than half of a brain knows that Porsche is higher quality.

I accept your defeat.

Get off your high-horse. Accept my defeat? :|

[QUOTE="Remmib"]

[QUOTE="timmy00"]How the **** is that not debatable? :|

I'm sorry for having a different opinion and taste. If you truly think you have surperior taste, then get off your horse.

Quality is for the holder to judge.

pl4yer_f0und

Apparently I do have superior taste.

Quality is not for the holder to judge. That is like saying someone can have an opinion on whether an Acura or Porsche is higher quality. That is not the case. Anyone with more than half of a brain knows that Porsche is higher quality.

I accept your defeat.

LoL:lol: Your full of yourself. I dont know what world your living in, but in the real world there are these things called opinions. Btw your analagies suck... quality is in the eye of the beholder. An acura is whole differant type of car than a porsche, way differant price range. Your comparing apple to oranges.

[QUOTE="lightleggy"]

[QUOTE="timmy00"]That's not a point at all. Graphics is not really subjective. That "medicore" game could be great to someone.

I find it arrogant that people thinks their taste in games to be better just because someone play a game they find to be trash.

There is no technical side to this. Games quality is subjective.

sanim02

like my mate above me said, its like saying that you think an acura is better than a porsche... you may think that acura is the greatest car ever made, but acura is an extremely mediocre car in front of a porsche or a ferrari...its the same here...cod is a mediocre game, that can not be debated, because CoD IS a mediocre game.

anyone can give you facts on why cod is a mediocre game

So you're saying that, BF plays like a Porche and COD plays like an Acura?:? I guess that is true in a sense but he mentioned how he would have more "fun" with MW3.

I'd understand if you mean it from a technical stand-point (aka physics, AI, detail) but you can't really put up an objective factor as to how a game can be fun for X person and how that persons taste is trash because they consider it fun while Y person doesn`t.:?

Man I never knew there was a right and wrong way to have fun.:P

I never said that, I said that COD is a mediocre game, and thus if he likes COD but he doesnt like battlefield then he is into mediocre games

[QUOTE="timmy00"]

[QUOTE="Remmib"]

Apparently I do have superior taste.

Quality is not for the holder to judge. That is like saying someone can have an opinion on whether an Acura or Porsche is higher quality. That is not the case. Anyone with more than half of a brain knows that Porsche is higher quality.

I accept your defeat.

lightleggy

Get off your high-horse. Accept my defeat? :|

[QUOTE="timmy00"]

[QUOTE="lightleggy"] he has a point, and you are not understanding that point...its for example as if you would say that tetris has better graphics than crysis...it might be your opinion, but your opinion will be based on an utterly fake fact. COD is a mediocre game, which has failed to evolve for like 10 years, just like pokemon games which have repeated the same formula over and over...you may like COD more than BF, but if we look it from a technical side, COD is a piece of garbage compared to BFlightleggy

I find it arrogant that people thinks their taste in games to be better just because someone play a game they find to be trash.

There is no technical side to this. Games quality is subjective.

like my mate above me said, its like saying that you think an acura is better than a porsche... you may think that acura is the greatest car ever made, but acura is an extremely mediocre car in front of a porsche or a ferrari...its the same here...cod is a mediocre game, that can not be debated, because CoD IS a mediocre game.

anyone can give you facts on why cod is a mediocre game

Everything else you can tell me about BF3 and what makes it better about a COD game we know nothing about is ALL subjective.

Hence the previous comments were just blind MW3 hate. Oh, BF3 will have great graphics, does it make a polished turd if I said so because I didn't like BF2 and don't think BF3 sounds amazing? No, it's subjective.

And to Remmib, it's okay I accept your defeat. :)