There is still a chance for MW3 to beat BF3 in reviews.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for RRTTWAAA
RRTTWAAA

419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#251 RRTTWAAA
Member since 2011 • 419 Posts

[QUOTE="RRTTWAAA"]

Why not compare to previous entries from the MODERN WARFARE series?

McStrongfast

More balanced ARs

More balanced SMGs

More balanced Perks, no OMA, Commando

No overpowered noobtube, no cheap cross the map kills

No overpowered killstreaks, CG.

Yup.

One of the best games of 2010, no doubts.RRTTWAAA

That's why. Blops is considered an improvement over MW2, a better game, yet the critical reception was more tepid. From 94 down to 87. Which goes to prove my point that critics are getting weary of the CoD formula.

BC2 on the other hand increased its MC score from BC1.

Like I said I am not expecting MW3 to fully counteract this feeling of stagnation. The wee information that's out there points towards it being exactly what it is, a sequel to MW2. Even the teaser trailers evoke the MW brand. Think Activision is a bit wary of losing the fanbase they've built up and are playing it safe to keep those sales up. No doubt that'll succeed.

I am however expecting DICE and EA to make good on their promise of focusing on quality in order to hurt the competition and delivering a proper Battlefield sequel.

I'm predicting MW3 will do about as well as Blops and BF3 to do better than BC2.
MW3: 81-87
BF3: 88-92

No way will MW3 do anything below 90. Its IW once again and MW3 is shaping up really well.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#252 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

It's only a matter of time before people stop caring about CoD.

UnrealLegend
That's going to be a long time then.
Avatar image for deactivated-5c79c3cfce222
deactivated-5c79c3cfce222

4715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#253 deactivated-5c79c3cfce222
Member since 2009 • 4715 Posts

No way will MW3 do anything below 90. Its IW once again and MW3 is shaping up really well.

RRTTWAAA

I just told you why there is a very significant chance of that happening. But if you want to disregard all that based on your counterargument that it can't happen because you say so, then good luck with that.

Also, IW is not IW, a large chunk of the senior staff left mid-development.

Avatar image for RRTTWAAA
RRTTWAAA

419

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#254 RRTTWAAA
Member since 2011 • 419 Posts

[QUOTE="RRTTWAAA"]No way will MW3 do anything below 90. Its IW once again and MW3 is shaping up really well.

McStrongfast

I just told you why there is a very significant chance of that happening. But if you want to disregard all that based on your counterargument that it can't happen because you say so, then good luck with that.

Also, IW is not IW, a large chunk of the senior staff left mid-development.

Only like 20 % left. Its still IW. :)

Avatar image for DroidPhysX
DroidPhysX

17098

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#255 DroidPhysX
Member since 2010 • 17098 Posts

[QUOTE="McStrongfast"]

[QUOTE="RRTTWAAA"]No way will MW3 do anything below 90. Its IW once again and MW3 is shaping up really well.

RRTTWAAA

I just told you why there is a very significant chance of that happening. But if you want to disregard all that based on your counterargument that it can't happen because you say so, then good luck with that.

Also, IW is not IW, a large chunk of the senior staff left mid-development.

Only like 20 % left. Its still IW. :)

Im still going to post this.

http://www.examiner.com/video-game-news-in-national/infinity-ward-outlines-future-patches-and-playlist-updates-for-call-of-duty-modern-warfare-2

IW has a history of failing hard in terms of patching their game.