These new Infinite Undiscovery shots make me think Tri-ace doesnt evn care.

  • 89 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for naruto7777
naruto7777

8059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 naruto7777
Member since 2007 • 8059 Posts
looks good
Avatar image for -DrRobotnik-
-DrRobotnik-

5463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 -DrRobotnik-
Member since 2008 • 5463 Posts

"I want to chain the moon....."

Seriously? WTF is up with JRPG storylines? Why do they have to be so goddamn ridiculous?

heretrix

JRPGs are good for the imagination, like milk is good for the bones.

Avatar image for zachshalakindap
zachshalakindap

106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 zachshalakindap
Member since 2008 • 106 Posts
[QUOTE="blitzkid1"][QUOTE="heretrix"]

"I want to chain the moon....."

Seriously? WTF is up with JRPG storylines? Why do they have to be so goddamn ridiculous?

heretrix

i wanna take over the universe , Mass Effect.

Actually play Mass Effect and get back to me, OK?

And you don't think IU is the same way?

Avatar image for Fumpa
Fumpa

3307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Fumpa
Member since 2003 • 3307 Posts
it's better than nothing.
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#55 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts
[QUOTE="heretrix"][QUOTE="blitzkid1"][QUOTE="heretrix"]

"I want to chain the moon....."

Seriously? WTF is up with JRPG storylines? Why do they have to be so goddamn ridiculous?

zachshalakindap

i wanna take over the universe , Mass Effect.

Actually play Mass Effect and get back to me, OK?

And you don't think IU is the same way?

I was referring to: "i wanna take over the universe , Mass Effect."

There is nothing in Mass Effect about taking over the universe. Anyone that actually played the game would know that.

And while I am all for good imaginative stories, physically chaining the moon is a bit silly, even for JRPGs.

That being said, I still want to play it, I'm just speaking my mind. I also think the name is pretty dumb too. But I think the game looks promising.

Avatar image for blitzkid1
blitzkid1

3952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 blitzkid1
Member since 2008 • 3952 Posts
[QUOTE="zachshalakindap"][QUOTE="heretrix"][QUOTE="blitzkid1"][QUOTE="heretrix"]

"I want to chain the moon....."

Seriously? WTF is up with JRPG storylines? Why do they have to be so goddamn ridiculous?

heretrix

i wanna take over the universe , Mass Effect.

Actually play Mass Effect and get back to me, OK?

And you don't think IU is the same way?

I was referring to: "i wanna take over the universe , Mass Effect."

There is nothing in Mass Effect about taking over the universe. Anyone that actually played the game would know that.

And while I am all for good imaginative stories, physically chaining the moon is a bit silly, even for JRPGs.

That being said, I still want to play it, I'm just speaking my mind. I also think the name is pretty dumb too. But I think the game looks promising.

Ive played the game , check my gamertag.

Avatar image for leejohnson7
leejohnson7

2909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 leejohnson7
Member since 2007 • 2909 Posts

The majority of screens for PGR,Mass Effect,and PDZ sucked,but they are some of the best looking games this gen.killab2oo5

PGR? I disagree. The in car view was more or less disgusting.

Avatar image for Delsage
Delsage

3355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 Delsage
Member since 2004 • 3355 Posts
Ok, I thought this game was looking good ... Until now, that looks like Crap!
Avatar image for Krigon
Krigon

5591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Krigon
Member since 2005 • 5591 Posts

Ok, I thought this game was looking good ... Until now, that looks like Crap!Delsage

Watch the E3 trailer. It looks better in motion.

Avatar image for BioShockOwnz
BioShockOwnz

52901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#60 BioShockOwnz
Member since 2006 • 52901 Posts

Like I said, people only care about Tri-Ace this time around because they're working with 360.

Anyone thinking AAA for either this game or Star Ocean 4, KEEP DREAMING.

Tri-Ace never had such a 'following' last gen :| well, besides Japan I guess.

leadernator

Cause everyone was praising the highly overrated Square Enix. :( It's too bad, because Final Fantasy has fallen of its throne. I've always liked Tri-Ace and Atlus.

Avatar image for blitzkid1
blitzkid1

3952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 blitzkid1
Member since 2008 • 3952 Posts
[QUOTE="leadernator"]

Like I said, people only care about Tri-Ace this time around because they're working with 360.

Anyone thinking AAA for either this game or Star Ocean 4, KEEP DREAMING.

Tri-Ace never had such a 'following' last gen :| well, besides Japan I guess.

BioShockOwnz

Cause everyone was praising the highly overrated Square Enix. :( It's too bad, because Final Fantasy has fallen of its throne. I've always liked Tri-Ace and Atlus.

To each his own.

Avatar image for Delsage
Delsage

3355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Delsage
Member since 2004 • 3355 Posts
[QUOTE="leadernator"]

Like I said, people only care about Tri-Ace this time around because they're working with 360.

Anyone thinking AAA for either this game or Star Ocean 4, KEEP DREAMING.

Tri-Ace never had such a 'following' last gen :| well, besides Japan I guess.

BioShockOwnz

Cause everyone was praising the highly overrated Square Enix. :( It's too bad, because Final Fantasy has fallen of its throne. I've always liked Tri-Ace and Atlus.

Agreed completely. They fell off a long time ago, but I for one only noticed the change when they made FFX-2.:?

Avatar image for PlagueMyGames
PlagueMyGames

408

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 PlagueMyGames
Member since 2008 • 408 Posts
i can't really Judge a Game From just Some Screenshots,Imo the IU Gameplay I Saw a While Back Was Grade A.
Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#64 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
I fail to see the problem.
Avatar image for sireclaborn
sireclaborn

1305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 sireclaborn
Member since 2008 • 1305 Posts
im sorry put this does look like a ps2 game. the gameplay looks ok but really it looks like the type of game thats really not worth it. i mean i keep seeing lems hype this everyday i seen some screen shots of it yesterday and was i kind of wanted to play it but after these screen shots and the video on page 2 i don't see whats with the hype.
Avatar image for clintos59
clintos59

1320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 clintos59
Member since 2008 • 1320 Posts
[QUOTE="Krigon"]

It looks like a ps2 title.

Though Star Ocean 4 doesn't :P and that is made by Tri-Ace right?

blitzkid1

I like the way Star Ocean 4 looks though maybe because its published by Square and Square likes Quality titles and doesnt rush things.

I dont see nothing wrong with this game. Its a different art style compared to the realistic look of SO4. I dont see why people think every game should look realistic. I think the art style looks good in this game.

Avatar image for VanHelsingBoA64
VanHelsingBoA64

5455

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 VanHelsingBoA64
Member since 2007 • 5455 Posts

it's better than nothing.Fumpa

What?????

Avatar image for kokomos
kokomos

329

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 kokomos
Member since 2007 • 329 Posts
meh. there's other jprgs. and fallout 3. nothing can survive fallout 3!!
Avatar image for CronoSquall
CronoSquall

915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 CronoSquall
Member since 2008 • 915 Posts
Ah, handpicking a few unflattering screens and saying "This game iz ugly lulz". Can't beat the classics.
Avatar image for leadernator
leadernator

9064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 leadernator
Member since 2003 • 9064 Posts
[QUOTE="leadernator"]

Like I said, people only care about Tri-Ace this time around because they're working with 360.

Anyone thinking AAA for either this game or Star Ocean 4, KEEP DREAMING.

Tri-Ace never had such a 'following' last gen :| well, besides Japan I guess.

BioShockOwnz

Cause everyone was praising the highly overrated Square Enix. :( It's too bad, because Final Fantasy has fallen of its throne. I've always liked Tri-Ace and Atlus.

highly overrated? more like those Tri-Ace games SUCKED last gen. SPOILER ALERT. In SO3's story, you find out you're in a video game. LAMEST A$S $*IT EVER.

Valkrie Profile Silmera? Hey tri-ace, way to go! you just ruined your cult classic series!

no offense against you, but Tri-Ace really has no excuse for sucking last gen. What makes anyone think they'll do well this time around?

As for SE, well... although they did release a ton of crap during the PS2 era, their flagship titles were really flagship titles. Kingdom Hearts became a welcome new franchise, FFX was incredible, and FFXII, while extremely different from other main FF titles, is still an excellent game.

And how can we forget Dragon Quest XIII?

*EDIT: Atlus does not make games :|

Avatar image for leadernator
leadernator

9064

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 leadernator
Member since 2003 • 9064 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="leadernator"]

Like I said, people only care about Tri-Ace this time around because they're working with 360.

Anyone thinking AAA for either this game or Star Ocean 4, KEEP DREAMING.

Tri-Ace never had such a 'following' last gen :| well, besides Japan I guess.

Delsage

Cause everyone was praising the highly overrated Square Enix. :( It's too bad, because Final Fantasy has fallen of its throne. I've always liked Tri-Ace and Atlus.

Agreed completely. They fell off a long time ago, but I for one only noticed the change when they made FFX-2.:?

FFXII still managed to generally be a AAA game.

Maybe you guys can refresh our memory... what made Tri Ace so awesome last gen? seriously :|

Avatar image for Krigon
Krigon

5591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Krigon
Member since 2005 • 5591 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="leadernator"]

Like I said, people only care about Tri-Ace this time around because they're working with 360.

Anyone thinking AAA for either this game or Star Ocean 4, KEEP DREAMING.

Tri-Ace never had such a 'following' last gen :| well, besides Japan I guess.

leadernator

Cause everyone was praising the highly overrated Square Enix. :( It's too bad, because Final Fantasy has fallen of its throne. I've always liked Tri-Ace and Atlus.

highly overrated? more like those Tri-Ace games SUCKED last gen. SPOILER ALERT. In SO3's story, you find out you're in a video game. LAMEST A$S $*IT EVER.

Valkrie Profile Silmera? Hey tri-ace, way to go! you just ruined your cult classic series!

no offense against you, but Tri-Ace really has no excuse for sucking last gen. What makes anyone think they'll do well this time around?

As for SE, well... although they did release a ton of crap during the PS2 era, their flagship titles were really flagship titles. Kingdom Hearts became a welcome new franchise, FFX was incredible, and FFXII, while extremely different from other main FF titles, is still an excellent game.

And how can we forget Dragon Quest XIII?

*EDIT: Atlus does not make games :|

Nice comeback. I guess he means the Shin megami tensei developers. Which where Atlus Japan are the ones named as developers.

Anyways my top JRPG developers last gen are LEVEL 5!

Avatar image for ff7isnumbaone
ff7isnumbaone

5352

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#73 ff7isnumbaone
Member since 2005 • 5352 Posts
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="leadernator"]

Like I said, people only care about Tri-Ace this time around because they're working with 360.

Anyone thinking AAA for either this game or Star Ocean 4, KEEP DREAMING.

Tri-Ace never had such a 'following' last gen :| well, besides Japan I guess.

leadernator

Cause everyone was praising the highly overrated Square Enix. :( It's too bad, because Final Fantasy has fallen of its throne. I've always liked Tri-Ace and Atlus.

highly overrated? more like those Tri-Ace games SUCKED last gen. SPOILER ALERT. In SO3's story, you find out you're in a video game. LAMEST A$S $*IT EVER.

Valkrie Profile Silmera? Hey tri-ace, way to go! you just ruined your cult classic series!

no offense against you, but Tri-Ace really has no excuse for sucking last gen. What makes anyone think they'll do well this time around?

As for SE, well... although they did release a ton of crap during the PS2 era, their flagship titles were really flagship titles. Kingdom Hearts became a welcome new franchise, FFX was incredible, and FFXII, while extremely different from other main FF titles, is still an excellent game.

And how can we forget Dragon Quest XIII?

*EDIT: Atlus does not make games :|

So3 was lame i bought and sold back.

Avatar image for Cyberfairy
Cyberfairy

5180

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Cyberfairy
Member since 2003 • 5180 Posts
[QUOTE="leadernator"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="leadernator"]

Like I said, people only care about Tri-Ace this time around because they're working with 360.

Anyone thinking AAA for either this game or Star Ocean 4, KEEP DREAMING.

Tri-Ace never had such a 'following' last gen :| well, besides Japan I guess.

ff7isnumbaone

Cause everyone was praising the highly overrated Square Enix. :( It's too bad, because Final Fantasy has fallen of its throne. I've always liked Tri-Ace and Atlus.

highly overrated? more like those Tri-Ace games SUCKED last gen. SPOILER ALERT. In SO3's story, you find out you're in a video game. LAMEST A$S $*IT EVER.

Valkrie Profile Silmera? Hey tri-ace, way to go! you just ruined your cult classic series!

no offense against you, but Tri-Ace really has no excuse for sucking last gen. What makes anyone think they'll do well this time around?

As for SE, well... although they did release a ton of crap during the PS2 era, their flagship titles were really flagship titles. Kingdom Hearts became a welcome new franchise, FFX was incredible, and FFXII, while extremely different from other main FF titles, is still an excellent game.

And how can we forget Dragon Quest XIII?

*EDIT: Atlus does not make games :|

So3 was lame i bought and sold back.

no it was not

Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#75 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
no it was not Cyberfairy
Star Ocean 3's story was an affront to the series. It was really that bad. [spoiler] Oh noes I is Tron in your compooterz killin ur programz lawl  [/spoiler] Not very Star Oceany. Second Story owns that story.
Avatar image for Senor_Kami
Senor_Kami

8529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#76 Senor_Kami
Member since 2008 • 8529 Posts
[QUOTE="supermechakirby"]

the game looks good

and I would rather take gameplay over eye popping graphics

blitzkid1

they dont have to be eye popping grahphics but Lost Odyssey looked good and it had good gameplay.

You're on crack if you're trying to suggest Infinite Undiscovery looks worse than LO.

Avatar image for MetroidPrimePwn
MetroidPrimePwn

12399

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#77 MetroidPrimePwn
Member since 2007 • 12399 Posts
Good enough for me. Not every game is going to have Crysis graphics. Besides, at least the gameplay looks fun.
Avatar image for hashimgillani1
hashimgillani1

1495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 45

User Lists: 0

#78 hashimgillani1
Member since 2004 • 1495 Posts
FF12 has better graphics than this game, however, Infinite Discovery is a B rate RPG as well as Star Ocean. You want something big, its all bout Final Fantasy XIII or FF Versus XIII
Avatar image for Vandalvideo
Vandalvideo

39655

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#79 Vandalvideo
Member since 2003 • 39655 Posts
FF12 has better graphics than this game, however, Infinite Discovery is a B rate RPG as well as Star Ocean. You want something big, its all bout Final Fantasy XIII or FF Versus XIIIhashimgillani1
B-Rated? Star Ocean is easily up there in terms of quality with Final Fantasy. Heck, Second Story is probably one of the best JRPGs ever released, and I'd easily rate it up there, if not better than FF8 and 9.
Avatar image for digitalman42
digitalman42

888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 digitalman42
Member since 2007 • 888 Posts

You are saying that becuase you are a PS3 fanboy. I read your profile, all PS3. Final Fantasy Versus is not a RPG. It's some kind of hybrid game. And Star Ocean looks amazing, if it was on PS3 instead of 360 you would be agreeing. 360 has alot of great RPG's that PS3 doesnt. Square chose 360 as there system of choice.

FF12 has better graphics than this game, however, Infinite Discovery is a B rate RPG as well as Star Ocean. You want something big, its all bout Final Fantasy XIII or FF Versus XIIIhashimgillani1

Avatar image for AtrumRegina
AtrumRegina

1584

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 AtrumRegina
Member since 2008 • 1584 Posts

Why doesn't it look like this ?

Avatar image for digitalman42
digitalman42

888

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 digitalman42
Member since 2007 • 888 Posts

Probably because its a different game?

Why doesn't it look like this ?

AtrumRegina
Avatar image for jonnyt61
jonnyt61

2147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 jonnyt61
Member since 2003 • 2147 Posts

Probably because its a different game?

[QUOTE="AtrumRegina"]

Why doesn't it look like this ?

digitalman42

No, it isn't. That was an early image released.Probably some form of Target render, or concept... I unno, but it definitely isn't the same quality as what they have now.

Look at the character on the right, casting a spell. He/she is present in a couple of videos on Gametrailers.

Avatar image for sireclaborn
sireclaborn

1305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 sireclaborn
Member since 2008 • 1305 Posts
[QUOTE="digitalman42"]

Probably because its a different game?

[QUOTE="AtrumRegina"]

Why doesn't it look like this ?

jonnyt61

No, it isn't. That was an early image released.Probably some form of Target render, or concept... I unno, but it definitely isn't the same quality as what they have now.

Look at the character on the right, casting a spell. He/she is present in a couple of videos on Gametrailers.

wait.... really???? devs do that

Avatar image for TheBestUserEver
TheBestUserEver

69

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 TheBestUserEver
Member since 2008 • 69 Posts
I havent been impressed with this game, especially after seeing the gameplay videos and now this too, not looking good for infinite undiscovery. I think it will follow suit with other JRPG's on the 360. Im exepting a 6-8.
Avatar image for Dahaka-UK
Dahaka-UK

6915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 Dahaka-UK
Member since 2005 • 6915 Posts
I actually don't mind those graphics. It's only the typical girly teen looking characters that put me off. I'll get this game though.
Avatar image for jonnyt61
jonnyt61

2147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 jonnyt61
Member since 2003 • 2147 Posts
[QUOTE="jonnyt61"][QUOTE="digitalman42"]

Probably because its a different game?

[QUOTE="AtrumRegina"]

Why doesn't it look like this ?

sireclaborn

No, it isn't. That was an early image released.Probably some form of Target render, or concept... I unno, but it definitely isn't the same quality as what they have now.

Look at the character on the right, casting a spell. He/she is present in a couple of videos on Gametrailers.

wait.... really???? devs do that

Your point is? I never said they didn't. But the fact is, it doesn't match it. I didn't badmouth the game, I'm actually looking forward to it... Or was, at least. A 4 minute gameplay demo kind of spoiled it for me, with it looking rather generic, kind of like a Final Fantasy/dark Cloud cross.

Of course, it's an early part of the game, so I'm waiting for a full release to decide whether it'd be worth getting a 360 after all.

Avatar image for sireclaborn
sireclaborn

1305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 sireclaborn
Member since 2008 • 1305 Posts
[QUOTE="sireclaborn"][QUOTE="jonnyt61"][QUOTE="digitalman42"]

Probably because its a different game?

[QUOTE="AtrumRegina"]

Why doesn't it look like this ?

jonnyt61

No, it isn't. That was an early image released.Probably some form of Target render, or concept... I unno, but it definitely isn't the same quality as what they have now.

Look at the character on the right, casting a spell. He/she is present in a couple of videos on Gametrailers.

wait.... really???? devs do that

Your point is? I never said they didn't. But the fact is, it doesn't match it. I didn't badmouth the game, I'm actually looking forward to it... Or was, at least. A 4 minute gameplay demo kind of spoiled it for me, with it looking rather generic, kind of like a Final Fantasy/dark Cloud cross.

Of course, it's an early part of the game, so I'm waiting for a full release to decide whether it'd be worth getting a 360 after all.

whoa.. im not flaming you i just wanted to know

Avatar image for NeoStar9
NeoStar9

1761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 NeoStar9
Member since 2003 • 1761 Posts

All games are meant to be viewed in motion. We aren't playing a slide show so how something looks in stills doesn't matter compared to how it looks in actually play. Even if you are standing still in a game the game's environments are still going to be moving. Taking a single frame out of something that is suppose to run 60fps or 30fps, etc and then claiming how bad something looks doesn't make any kind of sense to me.

Personally I can't wait for this game and all footage and video previews look great, especailly the town/city areas and combat.