This topic is locked from further discussion.
"I want to chain the moon....."
Seriously? WTF is up with JRPG storylines? Why do they have to be so goddamn ridiculous?
heretrix
JRPGs are good for the imagination, like milk is good for the bones.
[QUOTE="blitzkid1"][QUOTE="heretrix"]"I want to chain the moon....."
Seriously? WTF is up with JRPG storylines? Why do they have to be so goddamn ridiculous?
heretrix
i wanna take over the universe , Mass Effect.
Actually play Mass Effect and get back to me, OK?And you don't think IU is the same way?
[QUOTE="heretrix"][QUOTE="blitzkid1"][QUOTE="heretrix"]"I want to chain the moon....."
Seriously? WTF is up with JRPG storylines? Why do they have to be so goddamn ridiculous?
zachshalakindap
i wanna take over the universe , Mass Effect.
Actually play Mass Effect and get back to me, OK?And you don't think IU is the same way?
I was referring to: "i wanna take over the universe , Mass Effect."There is nothing in Mass Effect about taking over the universe. Anyone that actually played the game would know that.
And while I am all for good imaginative stories, physically chaining the moon is a bit silly, even for JRPGs.
That being said, I still want to play it, I'm just speaking my mind. I also think the name is pretty dumb too. But I think the game looks promising.
[QUOTE="zachshalakindap"][QUOTE="heretrix"][QUOTE="blitzkid1"][QUOTE="heretrix"]"I want to chain the moon....."
Seriously? WTF is up with JRPG storylines? Why do they have to be so goddamn ridiculous?
heretrix
i wanna take over the universe , Mass Effect.
Actually play Mass Effect and get back to me, OK?And you don't think IU is the same way?
I was referring to: "i wanna take over the universe , Mass Effect."There is nothing in Mass Effect about taking over the universe. Anyone that actually played the game would know that.
And while I am all for good imaginative stories, physically chaining the moon is a bit silly, even for JRPGs.
That being said, I still want to play it, I'm just speaking my mind. I also think the name is pretty dumb too. But I think the game looks promising.
Ive played the game , check my gamertag.
The majority of screens for PGR,Mass Effect,and PDZ sucked,but they are some of the best looking games this gen.killab2oo5
PGR? I disagree. The in car view was more or less disgusting.
Like I said, people only care about Tri-Ace this time around because they're working with 360.
Anyone thinking AAA for either this game or Star Ocean 4, KEEP DREAMING.
Tri-Ace never had such a 'following' last gen :| well, besides Japan I guess.
leadernator
Cause everyone was praising the highly overrated Square Enix. :( It's too bad, because Final Fantasy has fallen of its throne. I've always liked Tri-Ace and Atlus.
[QUOTE="leadernator"]Like I said, people only care about Tri-Ace this time around because they're working with 360.
Anyone thinking AAA for either this game or Star Ocean 4, KEEP DREAMING.
Tri-Ace never had such a 'following' last gen :| well, besides Japan I guess.
BioShockOwnz
Cause everyone was praising the highly overrated Square Enix. :( It's too bad, because Final Fantasy has fallen of its throne. I've always liked Tri-Ace and Atlus.
To each his own.
[QUOTE="leadernator"]Like I said, people only care about Tri-Ace this time around because they're working with 360.
Anyone thinking AAA for either this game or Star Ocean 4, KEEP DREAMING.
Tri-Ace never had such a 'following' last gen :| well, besides Japan I guess.
BioShockOwnz
Cause everyone was praising the highly overrated Square Enix. :( It's too bad, because Final Fantasy has fallen of its throne. I've always liked Tri-Ace and Atlus.
Agreed completely. They fell off a long time ago, but I for one only noticed the change when they made FFX-2.:?
[QUOTE="Krigon"]It looks like a ps2 title.
Though Star Ocean 4 doesn't :P and that is made by Tri-Ace right?
blitzkid1
I like the way Star Ocean 4 looks though maybe because its published by Square and Square likes Quality titles and doesnt rush things.
I dont see nothing wrong with this game. Its a different art style compared to the realistic look of SO4. I dont see why people think every game should look realistic. I think the art style looks good in this game.
[QUOTE="leadernator"]Like I said, people only care about Tri-Ace this time around because they're working with 360.
Anyone thinking AAA for either this game or Star Ocean 4, KEEP DREAMING.
Tri-Ace never had such a 'following' last gen :| well, besides Japan I guess.
BioShockOwnz
Cause everyone was praising the highly overrated Square Enix. :( It's too bad, because Final Fantasy has fallen of its throne. I've always liked Tri-Ace and Atlus.
highly overrated? more like those Tri-Ace games SUCKED last gen. SPOILER ALERT. In SO3's story, you find out you're in a video game. LAMEST A$S $*IT EVER.
Valkrie Profile Silmera? Hey tri-ace, way to go! you just ruined your cult classic series!
no offense against you, but Tri-Ace really has no excuse for sucking last gen. What makes anyone think they'll do well this time around?
As for SE, well... although they did release a ton of crap during the PS2 era, their flagship titles were really flagship titles. Kingdom Hearts became a welcome new franchise, FFX was incredible, and FFXII, while extremely different from other main FF titles, is still an excellent game.
And how can we forget Dragon Quest XIII?
*EDIT: Atlus does not make games :|
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="leadernator"]Like I said, people only care about Tri-Ace this time around because they're working with 360.
Anyone thinking AAA for either this game or Star Ocean 4, KEEP DREAMING.
Tri-Ace never had such a 'following' last gen :| well, besides Japan I guess.
Delsage
Cause everyone was praising the highly overrated Square Enix. :( It's too bad, because Final Fantasy has fallen of its throne. I've always liked Tri-Ace and Atlus.
Agreed completely. They fell off a long time ago, but I for one only noticed the change when they made FFX-2.:?
FFXII still managed to generally be a AAA game.
Maybe you guys can refresh our memory... what made Tri Ace so awesome last gen? seriously :|
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="leadernator"]Like I said, people only care about Tri-Ace this time around because they're working with 360.
Anyone thinking AAA for either this game or Star Ocean 4, KEEP DREAMING.
Tri-Ace never had such a 'following' last gen :| well, besides Japan I guess.
leadernator
Cause everyone was praising the highly overrated Square Enix. :( It's too bad, because Final Fantasy has fallen of its throne. I've always liked Tri-Ace and Atlus.
highly overrated? more like those Tri-Ace games SUCKED last gen. SPOILER ALERT. In SO3's story, you find out you're in a video game. LAMEST A$S $*IT EVER.
Valkrie Profile Silmera? Hey tri-ace, way to go! you just ruined your cult classic series!
no offense against you, but Tri-Ace really has no excuse for sucking last gen. What makes anyone think they'll do well this time around?
As for SE, well... although they did release a ton of crap during the PS2 era, their flagship titles were really flagship titles. Kingdom Hearts became a welcome new franchise, FFX was incredible, and FFXII, while extremely different from other main FF titles, is still an excellent game.
And how can we forget Dragon Quest XIII?
*EDIT: Atlus does not make games :|
Nice comeback. I guess he means the Shin megami tensei developers. Which where Atlus Japan are the ones named as developers.
Anyways my top JRPG developers last gen are LEVEL 5!
[QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="leadernator"]Like I said, people only care about Tri-Ace this time around because they're working with 360.
Anyone thinking AAA for either this game or Star Ocean 4, KEEP DREAMING.
Tri-Ace never had such a 'following' last gen :| well, besides Japan I guess.
leadernator
Cause everyone was praising the highly overrated Square Enix. :( It's too bad, because Final Fantasy has fallen of its throne. I've always liked Tri-Ace and Atlus.
highly overrated? more like those Tri-Ace games SUCKED last gen. SPOILER ALERT. In SO3's story, you find out you're in a video game. LAMEST A$S $*IT EVER.
Valkrie Profile Silmera? Hey tri-ace, way to go! you just ruined your cult classic series!
no offense against you, but Tri-Ace really has no excuse for sucking last gen. What makes anyone think they'll do well this time around?
As for SE, well... although they did release a ton of crap during the PS2 era, their flagship titles were really flagship titles. Kingdom Hearts became a welcome new franchise, FFX was incredible, and FFXII, while extremely different from other main FF titles, is still an excellent game.
And how can we forget Dragon Quest XIII?
*EDIT: Atlus does not make games :|
So3 was lame i bought and sold back.
[QUOTE="leadernator"][QUOTE="BioShockOwnz"][QUOTE="leadernator"]Like I said, people only care about Tri-Ace this time around because they're working with 360.
Anyone thinking AAA for either this game or Star Ocean 4, KEEP DREAMING.
Tri-Ace never had such a 'following' last gen :| well, besides Japan I guess.
ff7isnumbaone
Cause everyone was praising the highly overrated Square Enix. :( It's too bad, because Final Fantasy has fallen of its throne. I've always liked Tri-Ace and Atlus.
highly overrated? more like those Tri-Ace games SUCKED last gen. SPOILER ALERT. In SO3's story, you find out you're in a video game. LAMEST A$S $*IT EVER.
Valkrie Profile Silmera? Hey tri-ace, way to go! you just ruined your cult classic series!
no offense against you, but Tri-Ace really has no excuse for sucking last gen. What makes anyone think they'll do well this time around?
As for SE, well... although they did release a ton of crap during the PS2 era, their flagship titles were really flagship titles. Kingdom Hearts became a welcome new franchise, FFX was incredible, and FFXII, while extremely different from other main FF titles, is still an excellent game.
And how can we forget Dragon Quest XIII?
*EDIT: Atlus does not make games :|
So3 was lame i bought and sold back.
no it was not
no it was not CyberfairyStar Ocean 3's story was an affront to the series. It was really that bad. [spoiler] Oh noes I is Tron in your compooterz killin ur programz lawl
[QUOTE="supermechakirby"]the game looks good
and I would rather take gameplay over eye popping graphics
blitzkid1
they dont have to be eye popping grahphics but Lost Odyssey looked good and it had good gameplay.
You're on crack if you're trying to suggest Infinite Undiscovery looks worse than LO.
FF12 has better graphics than this game, however, Infinite Discovery is a B rate RPG as well as Star Ocean. You want something big, its all bout Final Fantasy XIII or FF Versus XIIIhashimgillani1B-Rated? Star Ocean is easily up there in terms of quality with Final Fantasy. Heck, Second Story is probably one of the best JRPGs ever released, and I'd easily rate it up there, if not better than FF8 and 9.
You are saying that becuase you are a PS3 fanboy. I read your profile, all PS3. Final Fantasy Versus is not a RPG. It's some kind of hybrid game. And Star Ocean looks amazing, if it was on PS3 instead of 360 you would be agreeing. 360 has alot of great RPG's that PS3 doesnt. Square chose 360 as there system of choice.
FF12 has better graphics than this game, however, Infinite Discovery is a B rate RPG as well as Star Ocean. You want something big, its all bout Final Fantasy XIII or FF Versus XIIIhashimgillani1
Probably because its a different game?
[QUOTE="AtrumRegina"]
Why doesn't it look like this ?
digitalman42
No, it isn't. That was an early image released.Probably some form of Target render, or concept... I unno, but it definitely isn't the same quality as what they have now.
Look at the character on the right, casting a spell. He/she is present in a couple of videos on Gametrailers.
[QUOTE="digitalman42"]Probably because its a different game?
[QUOTE="AtrumRegina"]
Why doesn't it look like this ?
jonnyt61
No, it isn't. That was an early image released.Probably some form of Target render, or concept... I unno, but it definitely isn't the same quality as what they have now.
Look at the character on the right, casting a spell. He/she is present in a couple of videos on Gametrailers.
wait.... really???? devs do that
[QUOTE="jonnyt61"][QUOTE="digitalman42"]Probably because its a different game?
[QUOTE="AtrumRegina"]
Why doesn't it look like this ?
sireclaborn
No, it isn't. That was an early image released.Probably some form of Target render, or concept... I unno, but it definitely isn't the same quality as what they have now.
Look at the character on the right, casting a spell. He/she is present in a couple of videos on Gametrailers.
wait.... really???? devs do that
Your point is? I never said they didn't. But the fact is, it doesn't match it. I didn't badmouth the game, I'm actually looking forward to it... Or was, at least. A 4 minute gameplay demo kind of spoiled it for me, with it looking rather generic, kind of like a Final Fantasy/dark Cloud cross.
Of course, it's an early part of the game, so I'm waiting for a full release to decide whether it'd be worth getting a 360 after all.
[QUOTE="sireclaborn"][QUOTE="jonnyt61"][QUOTE="digitalman42"]Probably because its a different game?
[QUOTE="AtrumRegina"]
Why doesn't it look like this ?
jonnyt61
No, it isn't. That was an early image released.Probably some form of Target render, or concept... I unno, but it definitely isn't the same quality as what they have now.
Look at the character on the right, casting a spell. He/she is present in a couple of videos on Gametrailers.
wait.... really???? devs do that
Your point is? I never said they didn't. But the fact is, it doesn't match it. I didn't badmouth the game, I'm actually looking forward to it... Or was, at least. A 4 minute gameplay demo kind of spoiled it for me, with it looking rather generic, kind of like a Final Fantasy/dark Cloud cross.
Of course, it's an early part of the game, so I'm waiting for a full release to decide whether it'd be worth getting a 360 after all.
whoa.. im not flaming you i just wanted to know
All games are meant to be viewed in motion. We aren't playing a slide show so how something looks in stills doesn't matter compared to how it looks in actually play. Even if you are standing still in a game the game's environments are still going to be moving. Taking a single frame out of something that is suppose to run 60fps or 30fps, etc and then claiming how bad something looks doesn't make any kind of sense to me.
Personally I can't wait for this game and all footage and video previews look great, especailly the town/city areas and combat.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment