Halo is a game that not only influences but changes gaming. Halo is a major reason why FPS and online are big on consoles. What has KZ2 influenced or changed? BTW bad controls is not considered good type of change or influence.
Yeah, Halo is fun but nothing special and it's nothing compared to most PC shooters. It didn't do anything new, even in the console FPS department. GoldenEyewas a lot more revolutionary and innovative than Halo.
To call Halo a masterpiece in the art of video is like calling Titanic a brilliant film, its not.
FonkeyMunky7
Halo is a good game...Saying that it brought nothing new to the table is just showing jealousy of it's success. Why bother? KZ2 brought nothing new to the table, either...As a matter of fact, when has any recent console FPS been revolutionary? That's the point I wanted to bring up. There really hasn't been too much innovation in the FPS series in general for a while. Halo 3 was a very solid game with good co-op and solid online multiplayer. I haven't played Killzone 2, but I am pretty sure the same can be said for it too.Killzone 2 is at least fun unlike Halo 3.
[QUOTE="FonkeyMunky7"][QUOTE="MortalDecay"] Halo is a good game...Saying that it brought nothing new to the table is just showing jealousy of it's success. Why bother? KZ2 brought nothing new to the table, either...As a matter of fact, when has any recent console FPS been revolutionary?g805ge
That's the point I wanted to bring up. There really hasn't been too much innovation in the FPS series in general for a while. Halo 3 was a very solid game with good co-op and solid online multiplayer. I haven't played Killzone 2, but I am pretty sure the same can be said for it too.Killzone 2 is at least fun unlike Halo 3. So you get to decide what games people have fun playing?
People should get over this concept that to be great you need to do something new. Halo obviously executed well with what it did (new or not) and people had fun with it, when it boils down thats all that matters.
[QUOTE="rybe1025"]Halo is a game that not only influences but changes gaming. Halo is a major reason why FPS and online are big on consoles. What has KZ2 influenced or changed? BTW bad controls is not considered good type of change or influence. No, goldeneye is the reason FPSs are big on consoles. Halo is the McDonalds of FPSs. KZs class system makes it a more stratgic and deeper FPS than halo. Halo made FBSs big on consoles for noobs(people who started playing console FPSs after goldeneye, Torok, UT ect)
[QUOTE="rybe1025"]Halo is a game that not only influences but changes gaming. Halo is a major reason why FPS and online are big on consoles. What has KZ2 influenced or changed? BTW bad controls is not considered good type of change or influence.chicagodon
No, goldeneye is the reason FPSs are big on consoles. Halo is the McDonalds of FPSs. KZs class system makes it a more stratgic and deeper FPS than halo. Halo made FBSs big on consoles for noobs(people who started playing console FPSs after goldeneye, Torok, UT ect)LOLOLOLOLO!!!!! So true!!!
[QUOTE="chicagodon"][QUOTE="rybe1025"]Halo is a game that not only influences but changes gaming. Halo is a major reason why FPS and online are big on consoles. What has KZ2 influenced or changed? BTW bad controls is not considered good type of change or influence. No, goldeneye is the reason FPSs are big on consoles. Halo is the McDonalds of FPSs. KZs class system makes it a more stratgic and deeper FPS than halo. Halo made FBSs big on consoles for noobs(people who started playing console FPSs after goldeneye, Torok, UT ect) Halo IS shallow, but so is Killzone 2.
Log in to comment