This is why I bought a Wii.....

What are you guys talking about...they are all AWESOME! take off your fanboy goggles.... if these titles don't convince people to pick up a Wii... then nothing will.... I feel bad for any gamer that misses these gaming treats.Veterngamer

Ill buy those if they are $5 each, otherwise...no, just no.

[QUOTE="Videodogg"]My 6 year old and 8 year old nephews would never play that crap. They play Halo 3, Gears of War and Resistance, lol.bf2nutta

not exactly the games I would allow my 6 year old to play... + Resistance has a 15 certificate on it...

lol those kids are too young to play shooters. trust me my little cousins suck at shooter because their young and theres alot of effort at that age. Plus most kids under 10 have a hard time with the controllers for shooters and their slow and useless in shooters.

except for the fishing game, all those other games are meant for kids. whats so wrong about videogames for kids?

Fact: Sony and Microsoft do have some sort of system to at least check all the games being put on their system. EGM did an article about this awhile ago. The truth is Nintendo has no such system, nor do they really care that Wii owners are being subjigated to this crap. They get money from every dev who wants to put a game on the Wii so they care more about their pockets than their customers. Now of course this isn't FOOL PROOF because bad games make it onto the other consoles of course...but you've gotta admit the LEVEL of bad is clearly different. You don't see CATZ and DOGZ on the PS3.

Bread_or_Decide

correct, you dont see Catz or Dogz for the ps3, but you do see them for the ps2. how can that be if sony has this 'quality check system' that you speak of?

If Ninjabread man didn't make people by the Wii, nothing will! Seriously, why does the Wii just get crapped on by devs? Look at Super Mario Galaxy or Twilight Princess? Those two games are amazing, and then we get stuff like "Carnival Games" and "Ninjabread Man," like what did the Wii do to deserve this?

[QUOTE="bf2nutta"]

[QUOTE="Videodogg"]My 6 year old and 8 year old nephews would never play that crap. They play Halo 3, Gears of War and Resistance, lol.ff7isnumbaone

not exactly the games I would allow my 6 year old to play... + Resistance has a 15 certificate on it...

lol those kids are too young to play shooters. trust me my little cousins suck at shooter because their young and theres alot of effort at that age. Plus most kids under 10 have a hard time with the controllers for shooters and their slow and useless in shooters.

[QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="Ontain"][QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]

Fact: Sony and Microsoft do have some sort of system to at least check all the games being put on their system. EGM did an article about this awhile ago. The truth is Nintendo has no such system, nor do they really care that Wii owners are being subjigated to this crap. They get money from every dev who wants to put a game on the Wii so they care more about their pockets than their customers. Now of course this isn't FOOL PROOF because bad games make it onto the other consoles of course...but you've gotta admit the LEVEL of bad is clearly different. You don't see CATZ and DOGZ on the PS3.

Bread_or_Decide

hi dev costs help more than any system they have in place. after all where was this system when the ps2 was the top seller? it was full of shovelware as well.

Yes, it was BUT the Percentage's of Crap vs. Good game were FAR Different.

Being that you don't play the crap, does it matter if it's 90% crap and only 10% good.

The problem is that it wasn't expected to be number one so it's got to few great or interesting games. Which now that the Wii is the new bread, is changing.

the amount of crap vs the amount of good doesn't matter at all.

Ummm..it does matter. Especially if you OWN THE CONSOLE.

Sheep can't play sales... but they can play Statistics?

I own a PS3 and Wii, and I could care less what crap games or how many crap games or relatively how many games are crap to how many are good on the Wii, I only care about the actuall honest to goodness number of good games, as in 5 or 10, or 2 billion, not 48.3% or that there are 10 good games for every 90 crap games... I can't play statistics.

Fact: Sony and Microsoft do have some sort of system to at least check all the games being put on their system. EGM did an article about this awhile ago. The truth is Nintendo has no such system, nor do they really care that Wii owners are being subjigated to this crap. They get money from every dev who wants to put a game on the Wii so they care more about their pockets than their customers. Now of course this isn't FOOL PROOF because bad games make it onto the other consoles of course...but you've gotta admit the LEVEL of bad is clearly different. You don't see CATZ and DOGZ on the PS3.

Bread_or_Decide

You obviously never owned a Playstation 2.

[QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="SolidTy"][QUOTE="Ontain"][QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]

Fact: Sony and Microsoft do have some sort of system to at least check all the games being put on their system. EGM did an article about this awhile ago. The truth is Nintendo has no such system, nor do they really care that Wii owners are being subjigated to this crap. They get money from every dev who wants to put a game on the Wii so they care more about their pockets than their customers. Now of course this isn't FOOL PROOF because bad games make it onto the other consoles of course...but you've gotta admit the LEVEL of bad is clearly different. You don't see CATZ and DOGZ on the PS3.

Bread_or_Decide

hi dev costs help more than any system they have in place. after all where was this system when the ps2 was the top seller? it was full of shovelware as well.

Yes, it was BUT the Percentage's of Crap vs. Good game were FAR Different.

Being that you don't play the crap, does it matter if it's 90% crap and only 10% good.

The problem is that it wasn't expected to be number one so it's got to few great or interesting games. Which now that the Wii is the new bread, is changing.

the amount of crap vs the amount of good doesn't matter at all.

Ummm..it does matter. Especially if you OWN THE CONSOLE.

Fact: Sony and Microsoft do have some sort of system to at least check all the games being put on their system. EGM did an article about this awhile ago. The truth is Nintendo has no such system, nor do they really care that Wii owners are being subjigated to this crap. They get money from every dev who wants to put a game on the Wii so they care more about their pockets than their customers. Now of course this isn't FOOL PROOF because bad games make it onto the other consoles of course...but you've gotta admit the LEVEL of bad is clearly different. You don't see CATZ and DOGZ on the PS3.

Bread_or_Decide

So why is Rapala's Fishing Frenzy also coming out on Xbox 360 and PS3? :|

**** you people! Freddy the Fish and Pajama Sam were awesome childrens adventure games. Didin't anyone love Putt Putt?

Yes i'm totally serious.

Man,

Me and Pajama Sam were best friends in Second Grade.

I might just pick that game up, realize what I'm doing is ludacris and burn it.

At least they have my support(money)

This is like saying Barbie's Magic Adventure sums up PS2 gaming...

or that Nancy Drew represents all of PC gaming...

or that Grabbed by the Ghoulies was the pinnacle of xbox gaming...

or that Lair is top of the class for PS3 games...

Senor_Kami

actually the TC has a valid point. thats wat wii gamers have to look forward to every month

Wow, those games are from the 1990's! I loved playing those games on the PC back in the day. Freddi the Fish is thirteen years old. They are all point and click adventure games.

But there's one problem...

WHERE THE HELL IS PUTT-PUTT!?

[QUOTE="Senor_Kami"]

This is like saying Barbie's Magic Adventure sums up PS2 gaming...

or that Nancy Drew represents all of PC gaming...

or that Grabbed by the Ghoulies was the pinnacle of xbox gaming...

or that Lair is top of the class for PS3 games...

Androvinus

actually the TC has a valid point. thats wat wii gamers have to look forward to every month

TBH i really fell sorry for these hardcore sheep these past few months..nothing even hype worthy is coming form that machine but a bunch of janpanese games and one game with overused gore..

[QUOTE="Androvinus"][QUOTE="Senor_Kami"]

This is like saying Barbie's Magic Adventure sums up PS2 gaming...

or that Nancy Drew represents all of PC gaming...

or that Grabbed by the Ghoulies was the pinnacle of xbox gaming...

or that Lair is top of the class for PS3 games...

Pinkyimp

actually the TC has a valid point. thats wat wii gamers have to look forward to every month

TBH i really fell sorry for these hardcore sheep these past few months..nothing even hype worthy is coming form that machine but a bunch of janpanese games and one game with overused gore..

I think you're forgetting that we get de Blob, Wario Land: Shake It, Samba de Amigo, and many more games just this September alone.

What the hell is wrong with Japanese games? They are certainly better than Western games.

[QUOTE="Pinkyimp"][QUOTE="Androvinus"][QUOTE="Senor_Kami"]

This is like saying Barbie's Magic Adventure sums up PS2 gaming...

or that Nancy Drew represents all of PC gaming...

or that Grabbed by the Ghoulies was the pinnacle of xbox gaming...

or that Lair is top of the class for PS3 games...

DeathScape666

actually the TC has a valid point. thats wat wii gamers have to look forward to every month

TBH i really fell sorry for these hardcore sheep these past few months..nothing even hype worthy is coming form that machine but a bunch of janpanese games and one game with overused gore..

I think you're forgetting that we get de Blob, Wario Land: Shake It, Samba de Amigo, and many more games just this September alone.

What the hell is wrong with Japanese games? They are certainly better than Western games.

Well thats an opinion..i hate JRPS and almost every japanese game in general..except for those little qurky titlles like The last guy..i like that game.

and yeah..almost none of those games looks like i will be keeping company with my WII again..i mean come on..Samba de Amigo..lol.

Either that, or sheeps are smart enough not to hype anything. Look at what happend when they start hyping games like Haze, Too Human, and Lair. Hyping a game is pointless, IMO, you can't tell a game is going to be good if you never played it.hiphops_savior

yeah..but when PS3 owners played the haze demo they said it sucked..when 360 owners played the Too Human demo there where alot of hater at the game..and lair..well yeah..

That's a shame, i'm being forced to buy these games and not the quality games I bought a Wii for.

Sucks.

Damn you Nintendo for forcing me to buy these games I don't want.

:roll:

Wow, those games are from the 1990's! I loved playing those games on the PC back in the day. Freddi the Fish is thirteen years old. They are all point and click adventure games.

But there's one problem...

WHERE THE HELL IS PUTT-PUTT!?

DeathScape666

I don't mind those kiddy games, or casual, trust me , i am happy if it provide people jobs and entertainment to the consumer. Yes they are great for 6 year olds(which I think they should spend time away from pc/console/tv) but what bothers me is that we are ONLY seeing these types of games.

Less real games are out for the wii, and more of these kiddy games, and because they sell, then even more of these games and even less hardcore games. We need a hardcore game that will set record on wii so others will pay attention.

its not hard, because so many people are crying because of this and they will buy any serious game on the wii

[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]

Fact: Sony and Microsoft do have some sort of system to at least check all the games being put on their system. EGM did an article about this awhile ago. The truth is Nintendo has no such system, nor do they really care that Wii owners are being subjigated to this crap. They get money from every dev who wants to put a game on the Wii so they care more about their pockets than their customers. Now of course this isn't FOOL PROOF because bad games make it onto the other consoles of course...but you've gotta admit the LEVEL of bad is clearly different. You don't see CATZ and DOGZ on the PS3.

ogvampire

correct, you dont see Catz or Dogz for the ps3, but you do see them for the ps2. how can that be if sony has this 'quality check system' that you speak of?

Does NO ONE read my entire paragraph? Its not fool proof. But it does exist. EGM said so themselves. The point is..SOMETHING does exist. Where at Nintendo they don't even PRETEND to care. They can at least pretend to care. Again, NOT FOOL PROOF, but at least it's there to filter some of the absolute garbage so only the average garbage gets through. As for the PS2...ten years later...they get DOGZ...oh no. I honestly think at this point and time they don't care...neither does anyone else. Wii is brand new.

[QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]

Fact: Sony and Microsoft do have some sort of system to at least check all the games being put on their system. EGM did an article about this awhile ago. The truth is Nintendo has no such system, nor do they really care that Wii owners are being subjigated to this crap. They get money from every dev who wants to put a game on the Wii so they care more about their pockets than their customers. Now of course this isn't FOOL PROOF because bad games make it onto the other consoles of course...but you've gotta admit the LEVEL of bad is clearly different. You don't see CATZ and DOGZ on the PS3.

Bread_or_Decide

correct, you dont see Catz or Dogz for the ps3, but you do see them for the ps2. how can that be if sony has this 'quality check system' that you speak of?

Does NO ONE read my entire paragraph? Its not fool proof. But it does exist. EGM said so themselves. The point is..SOMETHING does exist. Where at Nintendo they don't even PRETEND to care. They can at least pretend to care. Again, NOT FOOL PROOF, but at least it's there to filter some of the absolute garbage so only the average garbage gets through. As for the PS2...ten years later...they get DOGZ...oh no. I honestly think at this point and time they don't care...neither does anyone else. Wii is brand new.

what you are not getting is that these types of games started on ps2... since its too expensive to make games like this for 360/ps3, they instead make it for the Wii. also, notice how games like Horsez and Dogz came out for the ps2 before the launch of the Wii.

so it was ok for the ps2 to have them, but not the Wii? interesting logic...

I bought my Wii for:

^^^^^^

Those are the best games for the wii...and I can't count them using my ten fingers with some spare fingers left unused

If you guys think that the amount of bad games doesn't matter, only the amount of good ones, then I hope one day when you come home to find roaches eating the rotten fruit and spoiled meat in the fridge, then proceed to poop in the purified water, you enjoy that one high-quality Cheeto in the cobwebbed pantry.

Yep. You're livin' the dream. :roll:

[QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"][QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]

Fact: Sony and Microsoft do have some sort of system to at least check all the games being put on their system. EGM did an article about this awhile ago. The truth is Nintendo has no such system, nor do they really care that Wii owners are being subjigated to this crap. They get money from every dev who wants to put a game on the Wii so they care more about their pockets than their customers. Now of course this isn't FOOL PROOF because bad games make it onto the other consoles of course...but you've gotta admit the LEVEL of bad is clearly different. You don't see CATZ and DOGZ on the PS3.

ogvampire

correct, you dont see Catz or Dogz for the ps3, but you do see them for the ps2. how can that be if sony has this 'quality check system' that you speak of?

Does NO ONE read my entire paragraph? Its not fool proof. But it does exist. EGM said so themselves. The point is..SOMETHING does exist. Where at Nintendo they don't even PRETEND to care. They can at least pretend to care. Again, NOT FOOL PROOF, but at least it's there to filter some of the absolute garbage so only the average garbage gets through. As for the PS2...ten years later...they get DOGZ...oh no. I honestly think at this point and time they don't care...neither does anyone else. Wii is brand new.

what you are not getting is that these types of games started on ps2... since its too expensive to make games like this for 360/ps3, they instead make it for the Wii. also, notice how games like Horsez and Dogz came out for the ps2 before the launch of the Wii.

so it was ok for the ps2 to have them, but not the Wii? interesting logic...

^^^^^^

Those are the best games for the wii...and I can't count them using my ten fingers with some spare fingers left unused

demon-returns

um... those arent all the best games for the Wii, those are just the ones that he bought for the wii. you didnt notice that?

[QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"][QUOTE="ogvampire"][QUOTE="Bread_or_Decide"]

Fact: Sony and Microsoft do have some sort of system to at least check all the games being put on their system. EGM did an article about this awhile ago. The truth is Nintendo has no such system, nor do they really care that Wii owners are being subjigated to this crap. They get money from every dev who wants to put a game on the Wii so they care more about their pockets than their customers. Now of course this isn't FOOL PROOF because bad games make it onto the other consoles of course...but you've gotta admit the LEVEL of bad is clearly different. You don't see CATZ and DOGZ on the PS3.

DireToad

correct, you dont see Catz or Dogz for the ps3, but you do see them for the ps2. how can that be if sony has this 'quality check system' that you speak of?

Does NO ONE read my entire paragraph? Its not fool proof. But it does exist. EGM said so themselves. The point is..SOMETHING does exist. Where at Nintendo they don't even PRETEND to care. They can at least pretend to care. Again, NOT FOOL PROOF, but at least it's there to filter some of the absolute garbage so only the average garbage gets through. As for the PS2...ten years later...they get DOGZ...oh no. I honestly think at this point and time they don't care...neither does anyone else. Wii is brand new.

what you are not getting is that these types of games started on ps2... since its too expensive to make games like this for 360/ps3, they instead make it for the Wii. also, notice how games like Horsez and Dogz came out for the ps2 before the launch of the Wii.

so it was ok for the ps2 to have them, but not the Wii? interesting logic...

no need to call me a sheep, i have all the consoles. i play my wii more than my ps3.

its not like i am enjoying my games less because the console has some 'bad' games on it that i will never play.

its really not that hard to understand.

no need to call me a sheep, i have all the consoles. i play my wii more than my ps3.

its not like i am enjoying my games less because the console has some 'bad' games on it that i will never play.

its really not that hard to understand.ogvampire

[QUOTE="ogvampire"]no need to call me a sheep, i have all the consoles. i play my wii more than my ps3.

its not like i am enjoying my games less because the console has some 'bad' games on it that i will never play.

its really not that hard to understand.DireToad

The PS2 was 90% crap, you don't know it because you didn't play the crap. Are we going to rewrite history to call the PS2's libray terrible because it was 90% shovelware?... (BTW It was)

[QUOTE="ogvampire"]no need to call me a sheep, i have all the consoles. i play my wii more than my ps3.

its not like i am enjoying my games less because the console has some 'bad' games on it that i will never play.

its really not that hard to understand.DireToad

He makes a good point.....

[QUOTE="ogvampire"]no need to call me a sheep, i have all the consoles. i play my wii more than my ps3.

its not like i am enjoying my games less because the console has some 'bad' games on it that i will never play.

its really not that hard to understand.DireToad

isnt the title of this thread: This is why I bought a Wii...? :|

It wasn't ok for those games to exists on the PS2, but at least the PS2 almost had more AAAs and AAs than the other two consoles combined.

Now for the Wii, it's still not ok. But the Wii has such a limited library of quality titles (compared to the PS2 at least) that it does matter.


It's really not that hard to understand, sheep.DireToad

Double Standards for the Win!

No it's actually not an issue at all ever.

If the Wii were ahead in AAA's or something I would understand why non-sheep would resort to this anti-aaa accounting method in which bad games make the good games not good, but it's not like that so, why are Cows and Lems trying to spin this non-issue into an issue?

It's not like they are losing to the wii...

There is nothing wrong with having any of those games on a console. They are games for young kids.

I see no reason a console shouldn't have a wide selection of games. It's no a bad thing to be able to go from playing No More Heroes to letting your 3-5 year old nephew play some of those games. Kind of like Movies, there is Pokemon for the kids, and Sin City for the adults, or whatever.

[QUOTE="DireToad"][QUOTE="ogvampire"]no need to call me a sheep, i have all the consoles. i play my wii more than my ps3.

its not like i am enjoying my games less because the console has some 'bad' games on it that i will never play.

its really not that hard to understand.GundamGuy0

The PS2 was 90% crap, you don't know it because you didn't play the crap. Are we going to rewrite history to call the PS2's libray terrible because it was 90% shovelware?... (BTW It was)

The shovelware on the PS2 didn't matter because it had such an overwhelming amount of AAA's and AA's. Wii has PS2-level shovelware and the LEAST amount of AAA's and AA's this generation.

[QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="DireToad"][QUOTE="ogvampire"]no need to call me a sheep, i have all the consoles. i play my wii more than my ps3.

its not like i am enjoying my games less because the console has some 'bad' games on it that i will never play.

its really not that hard to understand.RuprechtMonkey

The PS2 was 90% crap, you don't know it because you didn't play the crap. Are we going to rewrite history to call the PS2's libray terrible because it was 90% shovelware?... (BTW It was)

The shovelware on the PS2 didn't matter because it had such an overwhelming amount of AAA's and AA's. Wii has PS2-level shovelware and the LEAST amount of AAA's and AA's this generation.

[QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="DireToad"][QUOTE="ogvampire"]no need to call me a sheep, i have all the consoles. i play my wii more than my ps3.

its not like i am enjoying my games less because the console has some 'bad' games on it that i will never play.

its really not that hard to understand.RuprechtMonkey

The PS2 was 90% crap, you don't know it because you didn't play the crap. Are we going to rewrite history to call the PS2's libray terrible because it was 90% shovelware?... (BTW It was)

The shovelware on the PS2 didn't matter because it had such an overwhelming amount of AAA's and AA's. Wii has PS2-level shovelware and the LEAST amount of AAA's and AA's this generation.

Yay for double standards.

Again why restort to this stupid argument when you could just argue the libray is bad because it has the least AAA's and AA's? Your going that extra step to degrade the Wii father, but for what reason. From a meta argument standpoint it only makes cows and lems look desprate to have to go above and behond what is a solid argument on it's own. IE they are compensating for something else.

[QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="DireToad"][QUOTE="ogvampire"]no need to call me a sheep, i have all the consoles. i play my wii more than my ps3.

its not like i am enjoying my games less because the console has some 'bad' games on it that i will never play.

its really not that hard to understand.RuprechtMonkey

The PS2 was 90% crap, you don't know it because you didn't play the crap. Are we going to rewrite history to call the PS2's libray terrible because it was 90% shovelware?... (BTW It was)

The shovelware on the PS2 didn't matter because it had such an overwhelming amount of AAA's and AA's. Wii has PS2-level shovelware and the LEAST amount of AAA's and AA's this generation.

actually, Wii has 1 more AAA than ps3

[QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"][QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="DireToad"][QUOTE="ogvampire"]no need to call me a sheep, i have all the consoles. i play my wii more than my ps3.

its not like i am enjoying my games less because the console has some 'bad' games on it that i will never play.

its really not that hard to understand.ogvampire

The PS2 was 90% crap, you don't know it because you didn't play the crap. Are we going to rewrite history to call the PS2's libray terrible because it was 90% shovelware?... (BTW It was)

The shovelware on the PS2 didn't matter because it had such an overwhelming amount of AAA's and AA's. Wii has PS2-level shovelware and the LEAST amount of AAA's and AA's this generation.

actually, Wii has 1 more AAA than ps3

[QUOTE="RuprechtMonkey"][QUOTE="GundamGuy0"][QUOTE="DireToad"][QUOTE="ogvampire"]no need to call me a sheep, i have all the consoles. i play my wii more than my ps3.

its not like i am enjoying my games less because the console has some 'bad' games on it that i will never play.

its really not that hard to understand.DireToad

The PS2 was 90% crap, you don't know it because you didn't play the crap. Are we going to rewrite history to call the PS2's libray terrible because it was 90% shovelware?... (BTW It was)

The shovelware on the PS2 didn't matter because it had such an overwhelming amount of AAA's and AA's. Wii has PS2-level shovelware and the LEAST amount of AAA's and AA's this generation.

the PS2 plays PS2 games and PS1 games and the Wii plays Wii games, and GC games. Diffrece found.

It's not that it's that you can't say one library is the best ever, and the other is absolute trash for a reason that the best ever also suffers from... It's called hypocrisy and it makes your arugment look stupid.

Why not just go with it has the least AAA's and AA's. You don't have to go the extra step to win.