This proves to me that haters haven't touched K2.

What is with the whole "blurred, washed our poor textures" BS i see coming from haters?

Denial is strong, K2 has no blurring with its textures, but majority of high quality clear textures with minor low rez ones here and there (console games, they all have them (FIXED HARDWARE)).

Has me believe that they're going by poor screens.

Then i see Haters use RE5 as an example of insane textures, which if you pay attention has textures that resemble a last gen game (RE4 to be exact). Reason being all the effort and graphical power went to the character models as with all RE games.(it is why RE5 hold up some of the best character models)

People need to stop confusing this with MOTION blurr. People do know what MOTION blurr is right? Yeesh!

They attack KZ2's textures because compared to the lighting, animation, etc., it's the weakest link. I beat the game and there were more poor textures than I expected to see.

They attack KZ2's textures because compared to the lighting, animation, etc., it's the weakest link. I beat the game and there were more poor textures than I expected to see.

KzerXtreme

The Way SW works, if a game gets a good score, you attack the Sales or Graphics.

It's a fullproof strategy against almost any game, except the big sellers like Halo, Mario, etc.

For a Console game, KZ2 is a marvel to look at, and even the Xbox company may have acknowledged this with their latest PR...all that matters is the haters voice will be silenced by the critics time and time again.

I'm sure this is old to some people,but I just saw those youtube videos with clips of the movie downfall,where they had hitler going off about killzone 2

people should stop hating kz2's graphics. it is an awesome looking game but I say cows also need to stop saying its the best looking console game coz its not. uncharted looks better, and imo maybe gears 2 looks a bit better too

Killzone 2 haters just have nothing to talk about but sales and low res textures, which has NOTHING to do with gameplay. lolMaximumD

To be fair, sales and textures can be factually compared to other shooters. On the other hand, gameplay is up to personal opinions, so it can't really be compared in the first place.

Killzone 2 haters just have nothing to talk about but sales and low res textures, which has NOTHING to do with gameplay. lolMaximumD

kz2 gameplay isnt worth talking about coz it is nothing special

I've played Killzone 2. It has button lag. Therefore it sucks.

And button lag has EVERYTHING to do with gameplay.

Everyone has the right to a opinion, you are in no position to deny others that. If declaring anyone who doesn't agree with you haters in denial makes you feel better then fine you do that, just don't expect to be taken seriously.

Everyone has the right to a opinion, you are in no position to deny others that. If declaring anyone who doesn't agree with you haters in denial makes you feel better then fine you do that, just don't expect to be taken seriously.

AnnoyedDragon

Killzone 2 haters just have nothing to talk about but sales and low res textures, which has NOTHING to do with gameplay. lolMaximumD

I agree, it's mostly great textures with a few weak looking ones when you take cover. RE5 really doesn't have better textures. From an objective technical standpoint, KZ2 blows RE5 away, its just that some prefer the look of RE5.Floppy_Jim

What is with the whole "blurred, washed our poor textures" BS i see coming from haters?

Denial is strong, K2 has no blurring with its textures, but majority of high quality clear textures with minor low rez ones here and there (console games, they all have them (FIXED HARDWARE)).

Has me believe that they're going by poor screens.

Then i see Haters use RE5 as an example of insane textures, which if you pay attention has textures that resemble a last gen game (RE4 to be exact). Reason being all the effort and graphical power went to the character models as with all RE games.(it is why RE5 hold up some of the best character models)

People need to stop confusing this with MOTION blurr. People do know what MOTION blurr is right? Yeesh!

Slambo86

What is with the whole "blurred, washed our poor textures" BS i see coming from haters?

Denial is strong, K2 has no blurring with its textures, but majority of high quality clear textures with minor low rez ones here and there (console games, they all have them (FIXED HARDWARE)).

Has me believe that they're going by poor screens.

Then i see Haters use RE5 as an example of insane textures, which if you pay attention has textures that resemble a last gen game (RE4 to be exact). Reason being all the effort and graphical power went to the character models as with all RE games.(it is why RE5 hold up some of the best character models)

People need to stop confusing this with MOTION blurr. People do know what MOTION blurr is right? Yeesh!

Slambo86

The "blurred, washed out poor textures" is an observation people have made. You can do 2 things with that. Dismiss it as any fanboy would as simply hating on the game or acknowledge that quite a few people see this as a weak point in the other wise great graphics of the game and move on lol

When you actually break down Killzones 2s graphics, its does have relatively low environment textures when compared to many other games out there. There is also a distinct lack of normal mapping. However, its clear that Guerilla opted to focus more on post processing effects, lighting, depth of field and motion blur. Feel free to disagree but these are just my personal observations.

Also, its a added effect and is not easy to just have and just proves even more superior power.killzowned24

Also, its a added effect and is not easy to just have and just proves even more superior power.killzowned24

You do realise that the PS3 is just a games console and not a political movement lol? :P

The Way SW works, if a game gets a good score, you attack the Sales or Graphics.

It's a fullproof strategy against almost any game, except the big sellers like Halo, Mario, etc.

KZ2 is a marvel to look at, and even M$ acknowledged this with their latest PR...all that matters is the haters voice will be silenced by the critics time and time again.

SolidTy

The Way SW works, if a game gets a good score, you attack the Sales or Graphics.

It's a fullproof strategy against almost any game, except the big sellers like Halo, Mario, etc.

KZ2 is a marvel to look at, and even M$ acknowledged this with their latest PR...all that matters is the haters voice will be silenced by the critics time and time again.

SolidTy

LOL Killzone2=trying to be halo combat evolved killer specially so since it uses the monkier (war perfected lol)

Why is it that people that have no argument fall upon they state well the people that don't like this game haven't played it?
The simple fact is you all ready admitted your self the burring textures and bad textures are there, you forget the mention the stale bad gameplay, the slow mechanics and the team fortress rip off online.

What is with the whole "blurred, washed our poor textures" BS i see coming from haters?

Denial is strong, K2 has no blurring with its textures, but majority of high quality clear textures with minor low rez ones here and there (console games, they all have them (FIXED HARDWARE)).

Has me believe that they're going by poor screens.

Then i see Haters use RE5 as an example of insane textures, which if you pay attention has textures that resemble a last gen game (RE4 to be exact). Reason being all the effort and graphical power went to the character models as with all RE games.(it is why RE5 hold up some of the best character models)

People need to stop confusing this with MOTION blurr. People do know what MOTION blurr is right? Yeesh!

Slambo86

Now, i thinki read that RE5 has RE4 textures ?

The Way SW works, if a game gets a good score, you attack the Sales or Graphics.

It's a fullproof strategy against almost any game, except the big sellers like Halo, Mario, etc.

KZ2 is a marvel to look at, and even M$ acknowledged this with their latest PR...all that matters is the haters voice will be silenced by the critics time and time again.

SolidTy

What is with the whole "blurred, washed our poor textures" BS i see coming from haters?

Denial is strong, K2 has no blurring with its textures, but majority of high quality clear textures with minor low rez ones here and there (console games, they all have them (FIXED HARDWARE)).

Has me believe that they're going by poor screens.

Then i see Haters use RE5 as an example of insane textures, which if you pay attention has textures that resemble a last gen game (RE4 to be exact). Reason being all the effort and graphical power went to the character models as with all RE games.(it is why RE5 hold up some of the best character models)

People need to stop confusing this with MOTION blurr. People do know what MOTION blurr is right? Yeesh!

Slambo86

just finish RE5 just recently and currently playing killzone, i do beleive KZ2 has much better graphics than RE5, im not even impressed with its graphics, although the gameplay is awesome. for me uncharted looks more impressive than RE5..

KZ2 is a marvel to look at, and even M$ acknowledged this with their latest PR...SolidTy

The "haters" :|

Last time I checked everybody was entitled to an opinion, as long as it is based on some kind of objective PoV.

I played Killzone 2, great game.

I also think Killzone 2 is flop in the terms of sales.

That doesn't make me or anybody a "hater", just an opinion that differs from yours.

Man I really hate the fanboys of this generation. Who cares about textures???? I hardly heard anybody complain about bad textures previous gens. If the game is good I can deal with "poor graphics and textures". KZ 2 is a good game. Sure it is basically just another FPS but what FPS these days is'nt??? Im so sick of ppl hating on this game. Give it a rest.

Man I really hate the fanboys of this generation. Who cares about textures????

coltsfan4ever

[QUOTE="coltsfan4ever"]

Man I really hate the fanboys of this generation. Who cares about textures????

loco145

All console games have mediocre textures because of memory limitation so it's stupid to single out killzone 2 just for bashing sake, the game looks fantastic in motion and is arguably the best looking console game to date, and this is not jus from a biased perspective, i'm a pc gamer

KZ2 has incredible lighting, particle effects and post processing, it isn't the end be all of graphics but it's a good achievement for GG as a console game, textures don't have to be super detailed or bump mapped to look good, That is unless you're going for a full cgi look and that's for high end games like crysis, project offset etc. PS3 is not a super computer so KZ2 can't look better than Crysis even though it came out 2 years later, but when you compare to other console games, KZ2 is a leader and pushes the visual envelope in almost every way possible

Another underrated thing is the animations, KZ2 has unrivaled animations, some even better than Crysis, but it is an unfair comparison since Crysis is open world and refused ragdoll physics because of the strict anti violence lawas in Germany, also it has superior animations for wild life and more interactivity, but KZ2's hit response system is a benchmark for all games, It makes you feel like every bullet counts

As you can see from both shots, the top shot has more detail because of more motion blur in the second shot, the textures aren't that bad, it just so happens dat the game has a cover system that exploits the weakness of the textures when viewed up close, And trust me, you are not going to find a console game that will have good textures up close, heck, the only few pc games that have that kind of monstrous detail are games like crysis, stalker clear sky etc. and that's because of superior RAM advantage

Now i just took random crysis shots to show you how motion blur can make it look blurry even though it is detailed when standing still, the bottom two shots look blurry but that doesn't mean the textures suck

[QUOTE="KzerXtreme"]

They attack KZ2's textures because compared to the lighting, animation, etc., it's the weakest link. I beat the game and there were more poor textures than I expected to see.

Slambo86

I've played Killzone 2. It has button lag. Therefore it sucks.

And button lag has EVERYTHING to do with gameplay.

TheElfChild

um maybe if your playing online and have a bad connection, other then that its always been fine

[QUOTE="TheElfChild"]

I've played Killzone 2. It has button lag. Therefore it sucks.

And button lag has EVERYTHING to do with gameplay.

hyperboy152000

um maybe if your playing online and have a bad connection, other then that its always been fine

I hate that in online, many times I shot someone a fair ammount of times and for some reason he doesn't die, then he procedes to kill me only to randomly die moments later...

Everyone has the right to a opinion, you are in no position to deny others that. If declaring anyone who doesn't agree with you haters in denial makes you feel better then fine you do that, just don't expect to be taken seriously.

AnnoyedDragon

I love Kilzone2 the mp is so amazing, and the graphics are great but I do think the textures are pretty poor (Gear1 and 2 have much better textures)

The Way SW works, if a game gets a good score, you attack the Sales or Graphics.

It's a fullproof strategy against almost any game, except the big sellers like Halo, Mario, etc.

KZ2 is a marvel to look at, and even M$ acknowledged this with their latest PR...all that matters is the haters voice will be silenced by the critics time and time again.

SolidTy