Time0 runs at 360 hardware in 720p, can't run on PS3 yet !!!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for tricyclon123
tricyclon123

436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 tricyclon123
Member since 2007 • 436 Posts

Another game that will take full advantage of 360, and struggle to run on PS3

How many are there by now ?

Avatar image for Marka1700
Marka1700

7500

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Marka1700
Member since 2003 • 7500 Posts
Your goin to need a link to back that up, this is system wars.
Avatar image for Vyse_The_Daring
Vyse_The_Daring

5318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Vyse_The_Daring
Member since 2003 • 5318 Posts
What's Time0 and where's the link?
Avatar image for RAZZY_B
RAZZY_B

1709

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 RAZZY_B
Member since 2005 • 1709 Posts
no link = no show.
Avatar image for -L-U-I-S-
-L-U-I-S-

3665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#5 -L-U-I-S-
Member since 2006 • 3665 Posts

Another game that will take full advantage of 360, and struggle to run on PS3

How many are there by now ?

tricyclon123
Wow...a game that takes advantage of 360s hardware struggles to run on another console. Its logic but cuz its SW I dont expect any so listen. If a game is made taking full advantage a console's hardware, how the hell would run on another hardware thats completely different from the other and its also harder to develop?
Avatar image for Boba_Fett_3710
Boba_Fett_3710

8783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 Boba_Fett_3710
Member since 2005 • 8783 Posts
My guess is the PS3 hardware is too hard to develop for. This would explain the difference between most multiplat games.
Avatar image for tricyclon123
tricyclon123

436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 tricyclon123
Member since 2007 • 436 Posts

What's Time0 and where's the link? Vyse_The_Daring

The story

http://www.xbox2-newz.de/v2/?show=aktuelles&do=detail&id=7664

The game vids

http://www.zootfly.com/

Avatar image for Conker-Fan
Conker-Fan

1239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Conker-Fan
Member since 2007 • 1239 Posts
[QUOTE="tricyclon123"]

Another game that will take full advantage of 360, and struggle to run on PS3

How many are there by now ?

-L-U-I-S-
Wow...a game that takes advantage of 360s hardware struggles to run on another console. Its logic but cuz its SW I dont expect any so listen. If a game is made taking full advantage a console's hardware, how the hell would run on another hardware thats completely different from the other and its also harder to develop?


thats not a good thing to admit. That means small companies wont dev as much for the ps3
Avatar image for tricyclon123
tricyclon123

436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 tricyclon123
Member since 2007 • 436 Posts

PICS

http://forum.teamxbox.com/showthread.php?t=509437

Avatar image for beyondgamez
beyondgamez

1335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 beyondgamez
Member since 2006 • 1335 Posts
My guess is the PS3 hardware is too hard to develop for. This would explain the difference between most multiplat games.Boba_Fett_3710


you are right the ps3 hardware is hard to develope for everyone should know this by now..ps3 can easily handle it ..but i guess it will take time till the devlopers get used to programmin the ps3.just look at motor storm it can easily do 720p
Avatar image for munu9
munu9

11109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#11 munu9
Member since 2004 • 11109 Posts

[QUOTE="Vyse_The_Daring"]What's Time0 and where's the link? tricyclon123

The story

http://www.xbox2-newz.de/v2/?show=aktuelles&do=detail&id=7664

The game vids

http://www.zootfly.com/

you give us an xbox site which is in german? :|

Avatar image for tricyclon123
tricyclon123

436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 tricyclon123
Member since 2007 • 436 Posts
Turok, Oblivion and now Tine0 confirmed better on 360 by far, i wonder what is next
Avatar image for Ryusuken
Ryusuken

467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 Ryusuken
Member since 2003 • 467 Posts

I think its interesting, really. You see, when fanboys go into rants about the version of Oblivion on PS3 being slightily better than the X360 version, MS fans got the argument that its because of 1 year more for development. BUT when any game that is coming for PS3 dont par with the X360 (multiplat or not) they go ranting that PS3 is a weaker console....so, when the devs show something good its because they had more time, but if the devs dont put time into it (development), its because PS3 is weak.....System Wars logic FTW......(/sarcasm)  

Note: PS3 has a harder architecture to develop for, its a FACT, as its a FACT that if developers do explore it, it can do great things.

Avatar image for trasherhead
trasherhead

3058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#14 trasherhead
Member since 2005 • 3058 Posts
it looks good, but not THAT good.
Avatar image for danneswegman
danneswegman

12937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 danneswegman
Member since 2005 • 12937 Posts
Turok, Oblivion and now Tine0 confirmed better on 360 by far, i wonder what is nexttricyclon123
hmmn, i don't know about that... we'll have to wait and see..
Avatar image for tricyclon123
tricyclon123

436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 tricyclon123
Member since 2007 • 436 Posts

I think its interesting, really. You see, when fanboys go into rants about the version of Oblivion on PS3 being slightily better than the X360 version, MS fans got the argument that its because of 1 year more for development. BUT when any game that is coming for PS3 dont par with the X360 (multiplat or not) they go ranting that PS3 is a weaker console....so, when the devs show something good its because they had more time, but if the devs dont put time into it (development), its because PS3 is weak.....System Wars logic FTW......(/sarcasm)  

Note: PS3 has a harder architecture to develop for, its a FACT, as its a FACT that if developers do explore it, it can do great things.

Ryusuken

Actually PS3 version is not any bit better, but far worst as it shows, no AA, no HDR, no DL content, no Shivering Isles for some time at least, worst colors (washed out), and 360 gets any texture enchancements too

So there is nothing really better on PS3 Oblivion, only worst as all games in both platforms

Avatar image for ps3-nikita
ps3-nikita

2945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 ps3-nikita
Member since 2005 • 2945 Posts
Arent these the guys behind the ghostbusters game promo
Avatar image for trasherhead
trasherhead

3058

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 trasherhead
Member since 2005 • 3058 Posts
[QUOTE="Ryusuken"]

I think its interesting, really. You see, when fanboys go into rants about the version of Oblivion on PS3 being slightily better than the X360 version, MS fans got the argument that its because of 1 year more for development. BUT when any game that is coming for PS3 dont par with the X360 (multiplat or not) they go ranting that PS3 is a weaker console....so, when the devs show something good its because they had more time, but if the devs dont put time into it (development), its because PS3 is weak.....System Wars logic FTW......(/sarcasm)

Note: PS3 has a harder architecture to develop for, its a FACT, as its a FACT that if developers do explore it, it can do great things.

tricyclon123

Actually PS3 version is not any bit better, but far worst as it shows, no AA, no HDR, no DL content, no Shivering Isles for some time at least, worst colors (washed out), and 360 gets any texture enchancements too

So there is nothing really better on PS3 Oblivion, only worst as all games in both platforms

Are you high on something? THere will be DL content, shivering isles will be on the disc too. As for AA and HDR, that I don't know about.
Avatar image for Ryusuken
Ryusuken

467

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 Ryusuken
Member since 2003 • 467 Posts
[QUOTE="Ryusuken"]

I think its interesting, really. You see, when fanboys go into rants about the version of Oblivion on PS3 being slightily better than the X360 version, MS fans got the argument that its because of 1 year more for development. BUT when any game that is coming for PS3 dont par with the X360 (multiplat or not) they go ranting that PS3 is a weaker console....so, when the devs show something good its because they had more time, but if the devs dont put time into it (development), its because PS3 is weak.....System Wars logic FTW......(/sarcasm)  

Note: PS3 has a harder architecture to develop for, its a FACT, as its a FACT that if developers do explore it, it can do great things.

tricyclon123

Actually PS3 version is not any bit better, but far worst as it shows, no AA, no HDR, no DL content, no Shivering Isles for some time at least, worst colors (washed out), and 360 gets any texture enchancements too

So there is nothing really better on PS3 Oblivion, only worst as all games in both platforms

Well, both IGN and GS think its slightly better, even if its only load time, distance and all that ****. So, I will take the profisionals opinions, at least until I put my hands on it (I have it for PC, so I pretty much will play it on one of my friends house or in the stores I usuallty buy games, they let me play it for awhile sometimes). The DL content will come, the devs already said it, just that they didnt had the time to look into it, they want to release the game, to explore the European market.

In the last IGN interview, teh devs even say that both are virtually the same. The slightily better comes from the things I already pointed. And the main point of my previous post is the always hypocritical arguments that rolls here in SW, Oblivion just of the oh so many examples.

PS- for confirmation on my info, go into the PS3 part of this site and IGN, its all there.

Avatar image for killab2oo5
killab2oo5

13621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 killab2oo5
Member since 2005 • 13621 Posts
The story is here and they never said Time0 cant run on PS3,just that they need to spend more time optimizing it.
Avatar image for rahzel54
rahzel54

1732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#21 rahzel54
Member since 2004 • 1732 Posts
this doesn't mean squat. they finished the 360 version, now they're optimizing it for the ps3. simple as that. it doesn't say it can't handle it. this thread fails.
Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
different stages of development. if you went back to summer/fall of last year, crysis just plain would not run on any nvidia card. the game's engine just wasn't optimized for it yet.
Avatar image for tricyclon123
tricyclon123

436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 tricyclon123
Member since 2007 • 436 Posts
[QUOTE="tricyclon123"][QUOTE="Ryusuken"]

I think its interesting, really. You see, when fanboys go into rants about the version of Oblivion on PS3 being slightily better than the X360 version, MS fans got the argument that its because of 1 year more for development. BUT when any game that is coming for PS3 dont par with the X360 (multiplat or not) they go ranting that PS3 is a weaker console....so, when the devs show something good its because they had more time, but if the devs dont put time into it (development), its because PS3 is weak.....System Wars logic FTW......(/sarcasm)  

Note: PS3 has a harder architecture to develop for, its a FACT, as its a FACT that if developers do explore it, it can do great things.

Ryusuken

Actually PS3 version is not any bit better, but far worst as it shows, no AA, no HDR, no DL content, no Shivering Isles for some time at least, worst colors (washed out), and 360 gets any texture enchancements too

So there is nothing really better on PS3 Oblivion, only worst as all games in both platforms

Well, both IGN and GS think its slightly better, even if its only load time, distance and all that ****. So, I will take the profisionals opinions, at least until I put my hands on it (I have it for PC, so I pretty much will play it on one of my friends house or in the stores I usuallty buy games, they let me play it for awhile sometimes). The DL content will come, the devs already said it, just that they didnt had the time to look into it, they want to release the game, to explore the European market.

In the last IGN interview, teh devs even say that both are virtually the same. The slightily better comes from the things I already pointed. And the main point of my previous post is the always hypocritical arguments that rolls here in SW, Oblivion just of the oh so many examples.

PS- for confirmation on my info, go into the PS3 part of this site and IGN, its all there.

Unless those pics in IGN and gamespot are fakes, from the PICS of PS3 version it shows that there is no AA, and the HDR is crap, no glows from the sun, washed out colors