Tomb Raider 360 vs PC

  • 104 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="lostrib"]

[QUOTE="I_can_haz"]

:| Meh, other than the better hair and textures on PC version there isn't that much difference. Console players can still enjoy the game.

I_can_haz

Then why make new consoles. We should all just stick with the current ones

We need new consoles so that we can finally get next generation assets and bigger worlds in games. It's pretty clear that the current dated consoles are holding PC back because every game made now has to take them into consideration. With new consoles that won't be the case and we'll finally start to see real jumps in graphics and hopefully gameplay.

Why do we need jumps in graphics.  Like you said graphics don't make the games play any differently, you should still be able to enjoy the game, no need for next gen graphics

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#52 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

PC version looks notably better. It also supports a higher resolution and higher fps. 

Not as drastic a change as other games, but certainly noteworthy. Crysis 3 and FC3, I believe, are far better examples.

lundy86_4

Oh god, the crysis 3 console pics hurt my eyes

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62057

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#53 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62057 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

PC version looks notably better. It also supports a higher resolution and higher fps. 

Not as drastic a change as other games, but certainly noteworthy. Crysis 3 and FC3, I believe, are far better examples.

lostrib

Oh god, the crysis 3 console pics hurt my eyes

Yeah, it definitely isn't close. I'll be playing the 360 version when I get it, unfortunately :(

Avatar image for I_can_haz
I_can_haz

6511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 I_can_haz
Member since 2013 • 6511 Posts

[QUOTE="I_can_haz"][QUOTE="lostrib"]

Then why make new consoles. We should all just stick with the current ones

lostrib

We need new consoles so that we can finally get next generation assets and bigger worlds in games. It's pretty clear that the current dated consoles are holding PC back because every game made now has to take them into consideration. With new consoles that won't be the case and we'll finally start to see real jumps in graphics and hopefully gameplay.

Why do we need jumps in graphics.  Like you said graphics don't make the games play any differently, you should still be able to enjoy the game, no need for next gen graphics

You're right graphics don't matter and to be honest I'd be ok with next gen if graphics didn't change much. But don't you want bigger worlds and smarter AI and NPCs? :) I think it'd be nice if we got more detailed worlds as that would help with immersion.
Avatar image for iamrob7
iamrob7

2138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 52

User Lists: 0

#55 iamrob7
Member since 2007 • 2138 Posts

Half size 720p screenshots for a comparison when the major disparity is the fact that it runs in 1080p and above on the PC.

 

My face is so deep into my palm right now I may never see daylight again.  How can you be on these forums so long and still be this clueless?

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts

Half size 720p screenshots for a comparison when the major disparity is the fact that it runs in 1080p and above on the PC.

 

My face is so deep into my palm right now I may never see daylight again.  How can you be on these forums so long and still be this clueless?

iamrob7
What do u mean half size 720p screen shots?
Avatar image for KiZZo1
KiZZo1

3989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 KiZZo1
Member since 2007 • 3989 Posts

Eh, I doubt they put a lot of work to make the PC version look better ...

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

Eh, I doubt they put a lot of work to make the PC version look better ...

KiZZo1

I don't think they did. It's not on the level of something like a Sleeping Dogs port or Hitman Absolution. It's pretty bare bones and TressFX is the only really big difference

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

Eh, I doubt they put a lot of work to make the PC version look better ...

KiZZo1

They included TressFx hair so i guess that would count as a lot of work

Avatar image for KillzoneSnake
KillzoneSnake

2761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#60 KillzoneSnake
Member since 2012 • 2761 Posts

:| Meh, other than the better hair and textures on PC version there isn't that much difference. Console players can still enjoy the game.

I_can_haz

Yep. And 360 will soon be 8 years old. This is why the gap between console and PC was less than the PS2 days. Next gen... game over.

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

[QUOTE="KiZZo1"]

Eh, I doubt they put a lot of work to make the PC version look better ...

lostrib

They included TressFx hair so i guess that would count as a lot of work

I wouldn't say so, because the tech seems slapped together and poorly optimised. Then again that's coming from an Nvidia user talking about AMD tech

Avatar image for ReadingRainbow4
ReadingRainbow4

18733

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#62 ReadingRainbow4
Member since 2012 • 18733 Posts

atleast compare the ps3 version, you aren't even trying man.

-2/10.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

[QUOTE="I_can_haz"]

:| Meh, other than the better hair and textures on PC version there isn't that much difference. Console players can still enjoy the game.

KillzoneSnake

Yep. And 360 will soon be 8 years old. This is why the gap between console and PC was less than the PS2 days. Next gen... game over.

Besides from all that important performance stuff like frame rates and resolutions 

Avatar image for Tessellation
Tessellation

9297

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Tessellation
Member since 2009 • 9297 Posts
[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]Wtf? The PC version looks better :?

this
Avatar image for Bebi_vegeta
Bebi_vegeta

13558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Bebi_vegeta
Member since 2003 • 13558 Posts

Is tomb raider graphic king or something... what's this topic about ?

Avatar image for glez13
glez13

10314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 glez13
Member since 2006 • 10314 Posts

It's the same assets. The console version only lacks some ligthing, shadows and lower res textures.

Honestly the only good thing graphically from this game is TressFX.

Avatar image for IcyRhythms
IcyRhythms

83

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 IcyRhythms
Member since 2010 • 83 Posts

As long as console games continue to run at 30FPS and things like screen tearing remaing very apparent, I'll stick with the PC version of multiplatform titles. Console gamers continue to let themselves be ripped off by paying more for less. Inferior games that often can't even hold 30FPS. 

Avatar image for redskins26rocs
redskins26rocs

2674

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 redskins26rocs
Member since 2009 • 2674 Posts

The PC version looks better who would have thought, but why use fxaa instead of ssaa. I think fxaa dont look near as good as ssaa.x2 or x4 

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60836

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60836 Posts
PC version is miles better. Still going to play the console version after I finish the PC version.
Avatar image for tionmedon
tionmedon

468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 tionmedon
Member since 2006 • 468 Posts
[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]Am I the only one that thinks this just looks silly? [spoiler]  [/spoiler]

yep........
Avatar image for tionmedon
tionmedon

468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 tionmedon
Member since 2006 • 468 Posts
[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]Am I the only one that thinks this just looks silly? [spoiler]  [/spoiler]

yep........
Even the PC is not yet ready for realistic hair. The shadows of dat hair looks so bad. LustForSoul
yes it is...........
Avatar image for tionmedon
tionmedon

468

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 tionmedon
Member since 2006 • 468 Posts

These compasion shots are sh!t an always will be. They are too small... take a 1080p screen shot and leave it at its normal size. Then get the console screen shot and stretch it to the 1080p one. Its worse and the fact consoles play on a big HDTV look even more like sh!t.

If i played the consoel version on my 27inch monitor it would look 5x worser than that.

 

PCgameruk
yes it would.............
Avatar image for ladyblue
LadyBlue

4943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 LadyBlue
Member since 2012 • 4943 Posts

Not sure about everyone else, but the hair is a make or break deal for me.

Avatar image for faizan_faizan
faizan_faizan

7869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 faizan_faizan
Member since 2009 • 7869 Posts
Was this really needed?
Avatar image for ladyblue
LadyBlue

4943

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 LadyBlue
Member since 2012 • 4943 Posts

Was this really needed?faizan_faizan
Don't you take hair seriously?

Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26717 Posts

[QUOTE="freedomfreak"]Am I the only one that thinks this just looks silly? [spoiler]  [/spoiler] tionmedon
yep........
Even the PC is not yet ready for realistic hair. The shadows of dat hair looks so bad. LustForSoul
yes it is...........

You don't really notice the shadows in motion.

Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29845

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29845 Posts
[QUOTE="Rocker6"]

Thank you for your comparison... the 360 version already looks painful to the eye, and it'd be even worse if you actually posted nice 1080p shots...

GioVela2010
I can't, I have an Apple 1440p monitor :P

You sure are proud of your stuff, aren't you. Could you please post some pics of your car?
Avatar image for DragonfireXZ95
DragonfireXZ95

26717

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 DragonfireXZ95
Member since 2005 • 26717 Posts
[QUOTE="GioVela2010"][QUOTE="Rocker6"]

Thank you for your comparison... the 360 version already looks painful to the eye, and it'd be even worse if you actually posted nice 1080p shots...

clone01
I can't, I have an Apple 1440p monitor :P

You sure are proud of your stuff, aren't you. Could you please post some pics of your car?

He's not overcompensating for anything. ;)
Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#80 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

[QUOTE="Zaibach"]

 

Soon, 8GB GDDR5, soon

Ackad

That is one creepy ass sig.

How so?

Avatar image for GioVela2010
GioVela2010

5566

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 GioVela2010
Member since 2008 • 5566 Posts
[QUOTE="DragonfireXZ95"][QUOTE="clone01"][QUOTE="GioVela2010"] I can't, I have an Apple 1440p monitor :P

You sure are proud of your stuff, aren't you. Could you please post some pics of your car?

He's not overcompensating for anything. ;)

100% truth
Avatar image for clone01
clone01

29845

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 clone01
Member since 2003 • 29845 Posts
[QUOTE="GioVela2010"] 100% truth

Oh, he's back! Show us pics of your things!
Avatar image for crusadernm
crusadernm

1609

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 crusadernm
Member since 2009 • 1609 Posts

I actually had to go back and forth to see any noticeable difference.  The jump to next gen isn't going to be as dramatic as people think.

Avatar image for ChubbyGuy40
ChubbyGuy40

26442

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 ChubbyGuy40
Member since 2007 • 26442 Posts

I actually had to go back and forth to see any noticeable difference. crusadernm

Really? The difference is quite noticable even in the scaled down shots.

The jump to next gen isn't going to be as dramatic as people think.

crusadernm

Because things are still being built for last gen hardware. Putting that software on new hardware doesn't make it magically prettier.

Avatar image for Ben-Buja
Ben-Buja

2809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#86 Ben-Buja
Member since 2011 • 2809 Posts

I noticed the PC version is using FXAA which heavily blurs the picture obscuring finer details.

You should of compared it with SSAA instead or atleast sweetfx.

I took these on the release day and in fullscreen mode so I think it was missing some effects that would of shown in the screenshots but they still look better than the ones you posted.

.

tr9l.jpg

RyviusARC

^This is a better representation of what it looks like on PC.

These comparisons are really bad most of the time.

Some screens from my playthrough:

tombraider2013-03-051xhk7f.png

tombraider2013-03-0811wjkv.png

tombraider2013-03-0618zsj8.png

 

Avatar image for Eddie-Vedder
Eddie-Vedder

7810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Eddie-Vedder
Member since 2003 • 7810 Posts

Those PC screens look terrible, I played the game not even maxed and it looked way better then that. Smells like trolling. 

Avatar image for nihonking
nihonking

187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 nihonking
Member since 2013 • 187 Posts

I actually had to go back and forth to see any noticeable difference.  The jump to next gen isn't going to be as dramatic as people think.

crusadernm

 

He does not have it a res that you can tell the diff. Tomb raider on pc is a very nice looking game.

Avatar image for VanDammFan
VanDammFan

4783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#89 VanDammFan
Member since 2009 • 4783 Posts

YAWWWWWN.....what??..hu?...im sorry..I was just yawning..whats all the fuss now?

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#90 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

Those PC screens look terrible, I played the game not even maxed and it looked way better then that. Smells like trolling. 

Eddie-Vedder
Just look at the other pics, people actually truthfully posting what the PC version is like.
Avatar image for Zaibach
Zaibach

13466

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#91 Zaibach
Member since 2007 • 13466 Posts

[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="Ackad"] That is one creepy ass sig.Ackad

How so?

She looks...blemished. Nose too pointy, weird smile, eyes are protruding similar to a Boston Terrier. Looks like a mannequin. 3/10 for sure

.........HHHHHHHHHHHNNNNGGGGGGGGGG!

Avatar image for faizan_faizan
faizan_faizan

7869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 faizan_faizan
Member since 2009 • 7869 Posts

[QUOTE="RyviusARC"]

I noticed the PC version is using FXAA which heavily blurs the picture obscuring finer details.

You should of compared it with SSAA instead or atleast sweetfx.

I took these on the release day and in fullscreen mode so I think it was missing some effects that would of shown in the screenshots but they still look better than the ones you posted.

.

 

Ben-Buja

^This is a better representation of what it looks like on PC.

These comparisons are really bad most of the time.

Some screens from my playthrough:

You post the best pics.

Avatar image for Gxgear
Gxgear

10425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 Gxgear
Member since 2003 • 10425 Posts

Wow, it is not a pretty game when stopped in motion.

Avatar image for sukraj
sukraj

27859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#94 sukraj
Member since 2008 • 27859 Posts

360 looks real sweet

Avatar image for kipsta77
kipsta77

1119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 kipsta77
Member since 2012 • 1119 Posts

Why even compare the two platforms in any game? PC will always come out on top with better textures, further draw distance, more frames, hell, some people are gaming at 1440p and 1600p because 1080p is too mainstream.

Better off comparing ps3 to 360.

Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts

This game is dumb i feel dumb watching the walkthrough videos and seeing her say dumbass **** to herself.

Avatar image for nextgenjoke
nextgenjoke

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 nextgenjoke
Member since 2013 • 1676 Posts

Along with the cutscenes makes me not even want to give it a try.

Avatar image for clyde46
clyde46

49061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#98 clyde46
Member since 2005 • 49061 Posts

Why even compare the two platforms in any game? PC will always come out on top with better textures, further draw distance, more frames, hell, some people are gaming at 1440p and 1600p because 1080p is too mainstream.

Better off comparing ps3 to 360.

kipsta77
The TC has an Apple 1440P display.