This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="FLOPPAGE_50"][QUOTE="uninspiredcup"]it boggles my mind how someone could say half-life does not deserve to be number one.. than what the hell does? if you say anything released in the past decade, you're an idiot (seeing as how dumb down games have become). Half-Life in 1998 was one of the greatest games released at that time. and the modding community further put FPS at the top of the online pyramid. Counter Strike, Day of Defeat, Natural Selection, Action Half-Life, The Specialists, ect. Half-Life is garbage. The game that should have been number one is DOOM. Even if you're somehow under the delusion that the Half-Life series doesn't suck dick Half-Life has aged terribly, while DOOM is still as playable today as it was in 1993.Console built shooters should not be on any top 100 list.
Halflife at the top, we could see a mile away. Even a website as bad as IGN should be able to see this clear as day. At this point, only hipsters attempt to throw mud (badly) at Halflife.
DarkLink77
I agree that Doom is still a very enjoyable, adrenaline pumping experience (on Nightmare), but such criticism towards HL is hurting my soul.
HL1 has excellent AI (exception being the weird way the enemies turn to face you wen you're close to them), great gunplay, great level design (with the exception of the platforming sections) and is a overall tightly paced, varied and extremely fun game. How can you seriously tell me that it has 'aged terribly' wen its AI is still better than some modern FPS games (like the shit AI in Crysis 2).
Halo: CE (on Legendary, Splitscreen co-op mode and the f*cking fantastic 4 player splitscreen), Half Life and Doom are my personal eternally fun trinity of first person shooters. You may have a point with HL 2 (it's baffling how its AI & gunplay is vastly inferior than in HL1), but not with Half Life.
70 seems a bit high for KZ :P Seriously, I do not get how people like Sony's shooter series. I've played Killzone 1 and 2, Resistance 1 and 2, MAG, Warhawk, Socom 4 and they were all mediocre at best. I don't understand the love... locopatho
The fact that they're exclusive so they have something to brag about.
[QUOTE="locopatho"]70 seems a bit high for KZ :P Seriously, I do not get how people like Sony's shooter series. I've played Killzone 1 and 2, Resistance 1 and 2, MAG, Warhawk, Socom 4 and they were all mediocre at best. I don't understand the love... Lucianu
The fact that they're exclusive so they have something to brag about.
I know but they get good to great reviews and sales as well tho. So it's not just SW bragging. It's straaange!ARE U SERIOUS? your saying Halo:CE is worse than COD:4?? You fail#5 - Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare
#4 - Halo: Combat Evolved
IgGy621985
ARE U SERIOUS? your saying Halo:CE is worse than COD:4?? You failwalkingdream
First, it's "you're".
Second, I'm saying both of those two shooters don't deserve to be on those high places.
Why this list sucks
- Killzone 3 has a better single player campaign than any Halo this gen.
- Far Cry 2 is on the list
- Same for Halo ODST
- A lot of these games really aren't shooters (Metroid, Deus Ex)
- F.E.A.R. is a top ten shooter by any standard
- Both L4D games should be higher
- Neither Darkness game made the list
[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]
Oh the Half Life games are at the top. What a surprise.
kingoflife9
never played them.... what am i missing?
half life 2 was different when it released. Valve showed an e3 demo with a city full of booby traps and all that stuff, and when the game came out, the town was nothing like the demo. You also missed a smg with a scope that couldn't be used. You also missed a bunch of crappy vehicle gameplay. The only good thing about half life 2 was the gravity gun.[QUOTE="turtlethetaffer"]
Oh the Half Life games are at the top. What a surprise.
kingoflife9
never played them.... what am i missing?
Half Life 1 has the best campaign of any FPS series ever.
Half Life 2 is a tad boring at times, but it's worth playing through for the story.
Half Life has some brilliant story-telling.
[QUOTE="walkingdream"]
ARE U SERIOUS? your saying Halo:CE is worse than COD:4?? You failIgGy621985
First, it's "you're".
Second, I'm saying both of those two shooters don't deserve to be on those high places.
Halo:CE for 2001 was simply amazing....easily in the top 10.Half-Life is garbage. The game that should have been number one is DOOM. Even if you're somehow under the delusion that the Half-Life series doesn't suck dick Half-Life has aged terribly, while DOOM is still as playable today as it was in 1993.[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="FLOPPAGE_50"] it boggles my mind how someone could say half-life does not deserve to be number one.. than what the hell does? if you say anything released in the past decade, you're an idiot (seeing as how dumb down games have become). Half-Life in 1998 was one of the greatest games released at that time. and the modding community further put FPS at the top of the online pyramid. Counter Strike, Day of Defeat, Natural Selection, Action Half-Life, The Specialists, ect.Lucianu
I agree that Doom is still a very enjoyable, adrenaline pumping experience (on Nightmare), but such criticism towards HL is hurting my soul.
HL1 has excellent AI (exception being the weird way the enemies turn to face you wen you're close to them), great gunplay, great level design (with the exception of the platforming sections) and is a overall tightly paced, varied and extremely fun game. How can you seriously tell me that it has 'aged terribly' wen its AI is still better than some modern FPS games (like the shit AI in Crysis 2).
Halo: CE (on Legendary, Splitscreen co-op mode and the f*cking fantastic 4 player splitscreen), Half Life and Doom are my personal eternally fun trinity of first person shooters. You may have a point with HL 2 (it's baffling how its AI & gunplay is vastly inferior than in HL1), but not with Half Life.
Having tried to play the original Half-Life recently... it was painful.[QUOTE="Lucianu"][QUOTE="DarkLink77"] Half-Life is garbage. The game that should have been number one is DOOM. Even if you're somehow under the delusion that the Half-Life series doesn't suck dick Half-Life has aged terribly, while DOOM is still as playable today as it was in 1993.DarkLink77
I agree that Doom is still a very enjoyable, adrenaline pumping experience (on Nightmare), but such criticism towards HL is hurting my soul.
HL1 has excellent AI (exception being the weird way the enemies turn to face you wen you're close to them), great gunplay, great level design (with the exception of the platforming sections) and is a overall tightly paced, varied and extremely fun game. How can you seriously tell me that it has 'aged terribly' wen its AI is still better than some modern FPS games (like the shit AI in Crysis 2).
Halo: CE (on Legendary, Splitscreen co-op mode and the f*cking fantastic 4 player splitscreen), Half Life and Doom are my personal eternally fun trinity of first person shooters. You may have a point with HL 2 (it's baffling how its AI & gunplay is vastly inferior than in HL1), but not with Half Life.
Having tried to play the original Half-Life recently... it was painful.Painful how? What does it not do over other shooters?
70 seems a bit high for KZ :P Seriously, I do not get how people like Sony's shooter series. I've played Killzone 1 and 2, Resistance 1 and 2, MAG, Warhawk, Socom 4 and they were all mediocre at best. I don't understand the love... locopatho
Seriously... they all feel b-rate.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment