TOTAL ASSETS Microsoft VS Sony.

  • 81 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for 600pc
600pc

32

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 600pc
Member since 2009 • 32 Posts
SONY: Total assets ▲ US$ 200 Billion (2009) 2 trillion y Total equity ▲ US$ 50 Billion (2009) Employees 180,500 (as of March 2008) MICROSOFT:Total assets ▲ US$ 72.793 billion (2008) Total equity ▲ US$ 36.286 billion (2008) Employees 89,809 in 105 countries (2008) (wikipedia MS,Sony) im tired of the fake market capital comparison.
Avatar image for Tjeremiah1988
Tjeremiah1988

16665

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Tjeremiah1988
Member since 2003 • 16665 Posts
and why does this matter?
Avatar image for -Traveller-
-Traveller-

2477

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 -Traveller-
Member since 2009 • 2477 Posts

This isn't Company Wars, it's System Wars.

This point is obvious, and irrelevant.

Avatar image for 600pc
600pc

32

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 600pc
Member since 2009 • 32 Posts
and why does this matter?Tjeremiah1988
cause i see people saying microsoft is worth more! look at the market capital. this is the point. whos worth more.
Avatar image for 600pc
600pc

32

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 600pc
Member since 2009 • 32 Posts

This isn't Company Wars, it's System Wars.

This point is obvious, and irrelevant.

-Traveller-
. ms makes xbox. sony ps3. system wars. we also talk about games, a game isnt a system
Avatar image for Rza_rectah
Rza_rectah

3959

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Rza_rectah
Member since 2005 • 3959 Posts

point being??

Avatar image for Sword-Demon
Sword-Demon

7007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 Sword-Demon
Member since 2008 • 7007 Posts

hmm...

this has nothing to do with the PS3 or 360.

Avatar image for 600pc
600pc

32

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 600pc
Member since 2009 • 32 Posts

hmm...

this has nothing to do with the PS3 or 360.

Sword-Demon
yes delete this please! it shows how big sony really is.
Avatar image for Sword-Demon
Sword-Demon

7007

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 Sword-Demon
Member since 2008 • 7007 Posts
[QUOTE="600pc"][QUOTE="Sword-Demon"]

hmm...

this has nothing to do with the PS3 or 360.

yes delete this please! it shows how big sony really is.

and what does that have to do with gaming at all? if you want to compare the companies, compare the gaming divisions
Avatar image for Shattered007
Shattered007

3139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 Shattered007
Member since 2007 • 3139 Posts
[QUOTE="600pc"][QUOTE="Sword-Demon"]

hmm...

this has nothing to do with the PS3 or 360.

yes delete this please! it shows how big sony really is.

There was a thread like this before and I don't know how it all works but it ended up that Microsoft was way above Sony. If I were you, I'd quit while I were ahead.
Avatar image for darkguy_101
darkguy_101

744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 darkguy_101
Member since 2008 • 744 Posts

Sony has alot of divisions, MS has two or three.

Totally

Fair

Avatar image for oldbrettc
oldbrettc

35

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 oldbrettc
Member since 2008 • 35 Posts

I can make one notable differentiation. Sony sells a plethora of hardware devices form tv's to game consoles to stereosect.......Microsoft sells, primarily, software. The profitability for software, I think, should be far higher than that of "hardware"; ie Sony's first party games which they make the highest profit on. So, while Sony may be worth more they are selling a lot more items. Microsoft is selling intellectual property, for the most part, excluding zune and xbox and a few other gadgets. This is a very big difference. Sony must do R&D, like microsoft,then assemble an item, then store an item, then ship an item to a retailer and pay people to do all of the aforementioned. Microsoft primalrily does R&D and sells information on a form of media (excluding Xbox and Zune and a few others). I would be willing to bet, overall as a company, Microsoft will show much higher profits while grossing less sales than Sony. Onceone has information in a scaleable format, how much does it cost to keep manufacturing said information on an inexpensive piece of media?

Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#15 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

determing the value of a corporation via its assets is probably the last way anyone would go by to find out its value, unless of course the company is being liquidated then that would make sense.

CURRENT MARKET CAP stats show MS at 180billion, and sony at 28billion.

PLEASE STOP POSTING

Avatar image for teufelherz
teufelherz

1315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#16 teufelherz
Member since 2004 • 1315 Posts

determing the value of a corporation via its assets is probably the last way anyone would go by to find out its value, unless of course the company is being liquidated then that would make sense.

CURRENT MARKET CAP stats show MS at 180billion, and sony at 28billion.

PLEASE STOP POSTING

Fizzman

Agreed, and ownage aproved I guess.

Avatar image for Burning_Sun
Burning_Sun

633

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Burning_Sun
Member since 2007 • 633 Posts

[QUOTE="600pc"]SONY: Total assets ▲ US$ 200 Billion (2009) 2 trillion y Total equity ▲ US$ 50 Billion (2009) Employees 180,500 (as of March 2008) MICROSOFT:Total assets ▲ US$ 72.793 billion (2008) Total equity ▲ US$ 36.286 billion (2008) Employees 89,809 in 105 countries (2008) (wikipedia MS,Sony) im tired of the fake market capital comparison.farrell2k

Sony (SNE) Market Cap. $26B

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=sne&=

Microsoft (MSFT) Market Cap. $179B

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=msft&=

That looks about 7x more than sony.

Nortel Market Cap once upon a time was at 300 BIILION now it worth less then 300 million. That value can fade away over night. Tangible assets don't. The intellectual property Sony owns in music and movies alone is worth more then MS.

Avatar image for rybe1025
rybe1025

6362

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 rybe1025
Member since 2004 • 6362 Posts
Somewhere out there a school teacher needs to be fired.
Avatar image for Shafftehr
Shafftehr

2889

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Shafftehr
Member since 2008 • 2889 Posts
If MS were to disappear today, the computer industry would be plunged into chaos - it's the cornerstone of the PC world, and the PC world as we know it would cease to exist without it. If Sony were to disappear today, there would be dozens of other hardware makers and movie studios there to take their place. MS has less in tangible assets, but has so much market capital, and makes so much more money, because it's simply a *way* more important and influential company.
Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#20 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

[QUOTE="farrell2k"]

[QUOTE="600pc"]SONY: Total assets ▲ US$ 200 Billion (2009) 2 trillion y Total equity ▲ US$ 50 Billion (2009) Employees 180,500 (as of March 2008) MICROSOFT:Total assets ▲ US$ 72.793 billion (2008) Total equity ▲ US$ 36.286 billion (2008) Employees 89,809 in 105 countries (2008) (wikipedia MS,Sony) im tired of the fake market capital comparison.Burning_Sun

Sony (SNE) Market Cap. $26B

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=sne&=

Microsoft (MSFT) Market Cap. $179B

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=msft&=

That looks about 7x more than sony.

Nortel Market Cap once upon a time was at 300 BIILION now it worth less then 300 million. That value can fade away over night. Tangible assets don't. The intellectual property Sony owns in music and movies alone is worth more then MS.

Ummm tangible assets definitely can turn to nothing. Movie A does horrible, and therefore if Sony tries to sell the rights to that asset noone buys it. You cant use Assets as a good indicator for value of a company because until the company sells that asset its worthless. Market cap is determined by how a company is performing which is an excellent way to determine value. Yes it can disappear overnight if lets say a company's latest product or Asset bombs.... Its why MS is worth so much because MS has been meeting or beating its expectations for 23+ years with this being its 1st quarter where revenues didnt increase.

Avatar image for TOAO_Cyrus1
TOAO_Cyrus1

2895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 TOAO_Cyrus1
Member since 2004 • 2895 Posts

SONY: Total assets ▲ US$ 200 Billion (2009) 2 trillion y Total equity ▲ US$ 50 Billion (2009) Employees 180,500 (as of March 2008) MICROSOFT:Total assets ▲ US$ 72.793 billion (2008) Total equity ▲ US$ 36.286 billion (2008) Employees 89,809 in 105 countries (2008) (wikipedia MS,Sony) im tired of the fake market capital comparison.600pc
Well yeah because Sony is a hardware company so they have more tangible assets. Im pretty sure GM has them both beat by a country mile but if any of them get sold MS will command the highest price by far. A company that makes billions in profits a year is much more valuable to investers then a company that has allot of TV's and factories but loses money. Market cap is what investers think a company is worth and MS is way higher then Sony.

Avatar image for nervmeister
nervmeister

15377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 nervmeister
Member since 2005 • 15377 Posts

hmm...

this has nothing to do with the PS3 or 360.

Sword-Demon

LOL. Funny pic. :P

Avatar image for Fizzman
Fizzman

9895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#24 Fizzman
Member since 2003 • 9895 Posts

Its safe to say that we wont be seeing the OP again in this thread. Im sure he will make another one soon enough though that makes less sense then this thread.

Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
who cares? both are huge companies and aren't going anywhere. sony has had problems selling ps3 and ms has had problems selling windows vista. point being?
Avatar image for Syn_Valence
Syn_Valence

2174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Syn_Valence
Member since 2004 • 2174 Posts

sony is a larger company then micorsot.................end of story!!!!

Avatar image for Brownesque
Brownesque

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Brownesque
Member since 2005 • 5660 Posts

[QUOTE="Burning_Sun"]

[QUOTE="farrell2k"]

Sony (SNE) Market Cap. $26B

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=sne&=

Microsoft (MSFT) Market Cap. $179B

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=msft&=

That looks about 7x more than sony.

farrell2k

Nortel Market Cap once upon a time was at 300 BIILION now it worth less then 300 million. That value can fade away over night. Tangible assets don't. The intellectual property Sony owns in music and movies alone is worth more then MS.

Assets are also subject to depreciation. You make no sense. Sony's market cap is only $26B. As such, their total approximate net worth is only $26B. You make no sense.

He makes no sense? When he says that tangible assets don't fade away in value over night, how is that a nonsensical statement? His Nortel example is true. The reason for that is because stock price isn't necessarily representative of a company's actual value....it's representative of the confidence of investors. Why anyone would extrapolate that to have larger meaning as a rule of thumb and then turn around and trivialize a comparison of actual, hard assets is utterly beyond me. If you have no assets....what is your function as a company? To hide behind IP law? Give me a break, you destroy economics. The fact of the matter is if there was no IP law Microsoft would be busted open and splayed out like a gutted fish. So, here's another question for you: could you make me a Playstation 3? Go ahead and make me a Playstation 3. Nope, you can't? Okay, here's another question, do you know how to download a file? Wow, extraordinary, then you have the sufficient mastery to take intellectual property. Intellectual property is almost entirely dependent on IP law. How any of this makes this big, bad, impenetrable and super-important company is utterly beyond me. You do realize that a superior operating system is literally being distributed for free with completely open-source code, right? Microsoft is a joke, I'm sorry. I sit here and I DREAM of the day that people will actually beg for a free product with greater reliability, flexibility, and security. I WISH that was what people were interested in. Instead, they're interested in big promises, big numbers with imaginary meanings attached to them, and enormous advertising campaigns that make NO SENSE WHATSOEVER (I'm a PC, I'M A PC, I'M A PC!!!!).
Avatar image for Brownesque
Brownesque

5660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 Brownesque
Member since 2005 • 5660 Posts

[QUOTE="Burning_Sun"]

[QUOTE="farrell2k"]

Sony (SNE) Market Cap. $26B

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=sne&=

Microsoft (MSFT) Market Cap. $179B

http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=msft&=

That looks about 7x more than sony.

farrell2k

Nortel Market Cap once upon a time was at 300 BIILION now it worth less then 300 million. That value can fade away over night. Tangible assets don't. The intellectual property Sony owns in music and movies alone is worth more then MS.

Assets are also subject to depreciation. You make no sense. Sony's market cap is only $26B. As such, their total approximate net worth is only $26B. You make no sense.

Oh, and I'd like you to take a long, hard look at the value of a dollar (a specie-less currency) and the price of the former specie that backed that dollar (gold). You might gain a greater appreciation of these concepts. Can you guess which medium held its value better? A dollar or gold? Gold or dollar? As it turns out, it's gold. Incredible stuff, eh? Could you go print me some gold, please?
Avatar image for -Ichigo1987-
-Ichigo1987-

205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 -Ichigo1987-
Member since 2008 • 205 Posts

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

determing the value of a corporation via its assets is probably the last way anyone would go by to find out its value, unless of course the company is being liquidated then that would make sense.

CURRENT MARKET CAP stats show MS at 180billion, and sony at 28billion.

PLEASE STOP POSTING

teufelherz

Agreed, and ownage aproved I guess.

By your logic Nintendo is worth more than Sony. Something should register in your brain by now telling you that market cap is not what u go by to determine a company's worth. 600pc has ownage over everyone in this thread refering to market cap
Avatar image for mattacular
mattacular

363

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 mattacular
Member since 2007 • 363 Posts
Why is this even being debated Microsoft is a behemoth of a company, bigger than Sony, bigger than Nintendo and that is a fact.
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
[QUOTE="teufelherz"]

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

determing the value of a corporation via its assets is probably the last way anyone would go by to find out its value, unless of course the company is being liquidated then that would make sense.

CURRENT MARKET CAP stats show MS at 180billion, and sony at 28billion.

PLEASE STOP POSTING

-Ichigo1987-

Agreed, and ownage aproved I guess.

By your logic Nintendo is worth more than Sony. Something should register in your brain by now telling you that market cap is not what u go by to determine a company's worth. 600pc has ownage over everyone in this thread refering to market cap

nintendo is worth more than sony, nintendo dates back 1889 when they where a card making company, when the yakuza play cards they use a fresh pack for each hand,guess who was selling them those packs of cards? also everytime someone puts a D pad on there controller, nintendo get royalties for it as they own the patent.
Avatar image for iskabroo
iskabroo

95

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 iskabroo
Member since 2007 • 95 Posts

wikipedia... ? really?? :? isn't that like quoting vgcharts or something?

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#33 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts

Lets put aside the fact that microsoft is listed number 25 on forbes ( a credible source) on the list of the 2000 biggest world companies and sony 86 or something like that why does it even matter? Isnt it enough already that you fight over the sales of consoles and games? Now you have to fight which is the bigger company? what does that have to do with gaming? sometimes i wonder if microsoft and sony are using brainwashed tactics from the thinks i read in system wars?

Avatar image for Kashiwaba
Kashiwaba

8059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Kashiwaba
Member since 2005 • 8059 Posts

If MS were to disappear today, the computer industry would be plunged into chaos - it's the cornerstone of the PC world, and the PC world as we know it would cease to exist without it. If Sony were to disappear today, there would be dozens of other hardware makers and movie studios there to take their place. MS has less in tangible assets, but has so much market capital, and makes so much more money, because it's simply a *way* more important and influential company.Shafftehr

Windows is the worst OS on earth but MS keeping it the market leader with their money there is dozens of better OSs and cheaper but they are unnoticed because they are not getting the support from other companies.

Avatar image for user_nat
user_nat

3130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 user_nat
Member since 2006 • 3130 Posts
More importantly one of the companies posted profit in last year.
Avatar image for Samox
Samox

890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Samox
Member since 2004 • 890 Posts

More importantly one of the companies posted profit in last year.user_nat


this

Avatar image for lhughey
lhughey

4890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 lhughey
Member since 2006 • 4890 Posts
Are we really comparing companies assets based on number of employees? This might be the most ridiculous thread in SW I've read this quarter (and thats saying something). From now on, only talk about subject matters you have a clue about. Market cap is all that matters. Assets mean nothing because a company that purchases another company (by making an offer usually around its market cap) will own the companies assets anyway. Also, electronic hardware depreciates VERY fast and is also subject to market fluctuations in commodity prices (metal, etc). This is why software companies control their destiny much more than hardware companies.
Avatar image for lhughey
lhughey

4890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 lhughey
Member since 2006 • 4890 Posts
[QUOTE="teufelherz"]

[QUOTE="Fizzman"]

determing the value of a corporation via its assets is probably the last way anyone would go by to find out its value, unless of course the company is being liquidated then that would make sense.

CURRENT MARKET CAP stats show MS at 180billion, and sony at 28billion.

PLEASE STOP POSTING

-Ichigo1987-

Agreed, and ownage aproved I guess.

By your logic Nintendo is worth more than Sony. Something should register in your brain by now telling you that market cap is not what u go by to determine a company's worth. 600pc has ownage over everyone in this thread refering to market cap

as someone else said, Nintendo IS worth more than sony. Something should register in your brain telling you that market cap IS what you go by to determine a company's worth. Please use the google.
Avatar image for Ilikemyname420
Ilikemyname420

5147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 Ilikemyname420
Member since 2007 • 5147 Posts
SONY: Total assets ▲ US$ 200 Billion (2009) 2 trillion y Total equity ▲ US$ 50 Billion (2009) Employees 180,500 (as of March 2008) MICROSOFT:Total assets ▲ US$ 72.793 billion (2008) Total equity ▲ US$ 36.286 billion (2008) Employees 89,809 in 105 countries (2008) (wikipedia MS,Sony) im tired of the fake market capital comparison.600pc
fake market capital comparison!? The two numbers you cherry-picked for Sony from wikipedia aren't even sourced....litterally someone just edited that in there.
Avatar image for Squeets
Squeets

8185

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#40 Squeets
Member since 2006 • 8185 Posts

SONY: Total assets ▲ US$ 200 Billion (2009) 2 trillion y Total equity ▲ US$ 50 Billion (2009) Employees 180,500 (as of March 2008) MICROSOFT:Total assets ▲ US$ 72.793 billion (2008) Total equity ▲ US$ 36.286 billion (2008) Employees 89,809 in 105 countries (2008) (wikipedia MS,Sony) im tired of the fake market capital comparison.600pc

And I think Wikipedia is wrong because I am looking at Microsoft on Nasdaq and the Sony Corporation on the New York Stock Exchange and:

Microsoft:

Market Cap/Value: $179,950,000,000

Sony:

Market Cap/Value: $26,570,000,000

If I were you I wouldn't use wikipedia as a place to get stock quotes lol...

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#41 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts
This is not how you compare two companies in terms of net worth. Microsoft is worth more than Sony. Hate to break that one to you. Check a real finance site with real measures of worth, not Wikipedia.
Avatar image for navyguy21
navyguy21

17952

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#42 navyguy21
Member since 2003 • 17952 Posts

ALL publicly traded companies are measured in Market Capitalization, which is share price multiplied by the number of shares. Microsoft has almost 10x the shares that Sony does (hard assets) and sony has more liquid assets (electronic devices). This is why we see sony's revenues so high, because they deal in liquid assets that are always changing hands and being sold. Stocks, and investments arent, they are long term investments, so money doesnt change hands nearly as often. As of today, the MARKET CAP of each company is as follows.......

MICROSOFT 179.95 Billion

SONY 26.57 Billion

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#43 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

If MS were to disappear today, the computer industry would be plunged into chaos - it's the cornerstone of the PC world, and the PC world as we know it would cease to exist without it. If Sony were to disappear today, there would be dozens of other hardware makers and movie studios there to take their place. MS has less in tangible assets, but has so much market capital, and makes so much more money, because it's simply a *way* more important and influential company.Shafftehr

Not really. OSX will just take over. The reason windows is successful is because it's simple, user friendly and has some idiot blocks built in. OSX is very close to windows so they will just get the entire market.

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#44 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts

[QUOTE="Shafftehr"]If MS were to disappear today, the computer industry would be plunged into chaos - it's the cornerstone of the PC world, and the PC world as we know it would cease to exist without it. If Sony were to disappear today, there would be dozens of other hardware makers and movie studios there to take their place. MS has less in tangible assets, but has so much market capital, and makes so much more money, because it's simply a *way* more important and influential company.Espada12

Not really. OSX will just take over. The reason windows is successful is because it's simple, user friendly and has some idiot blocks built in. OSX is very close to windows so they will just get the entire market.

Perhaps, but not likely to happen if MS just fell out. If MS died, the computer market as we know it would disappear. Not to say comuting would disappear, but it would certainly be chaotic. Especially in a business world impact.
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#45 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="Shafftehr"]If MS were to disappear today, the computer industry would be plunged into chaos - it's the cornerstone of the PC world, and the PC world as we know it would cease to exist without it. If Sony were to disappear today, there would be dozens of other hardware makers and movie studios there to take their place. MS has less in tangible assets, but has so much market capital, and makes so much more money, because it's simply a *way* more important and influential company.SpruceCaboose

Not really. OSX will just take over. The reason windows is successful is because it's simple, user friendly and has some idiot blocks built in. OSX is very close to windows so they will just get the entire market.

Perhaps, but not likely to happen if MS just fell out. If MS died, the computer market as we know it would disappear. Not to say comuting would disappear, but it would certainly be chaotic. Especially in a business world impact.

Yea there would be problems for a couple months until everything gets settled down and OSX can replace windows.

Avatar image for SpruceCaboose
SpruceCaboose

24589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#46 SpruceCaboose
Member since 2005 • 24589 Posts

Yea there would be problems for a couple months until everything gets settled down and OSX can replace windows.

Espada12
A few months would be generous. It would take years for OS X to completely overtake Windows. They would be able to get a majority marketshare within a few months due to necessity in security patching and what not in the world of business, but there are tons of people outside the business world who would keep using Windows.
Avatar image for Synthetic_NinJI
Synthetic_NinJI

2809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Synthetic_NinJI
Member since 2006 • 2809 Posts
StockWars :|
Avatar image for gensigns
gensigns

1495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 gensigns
Member since 2007 • 1495 Posts

How can people argue and try and rationalize differently? MS is way bigger than Sony - there is no denying or changing this.

Any really, wiki as a source? You might as well said "some guy in my math class told me", it would hold as much rationality. :roll:

Avatar image for Shattered007
Shattered007

3139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#49 Shattered007
Member since 2007 • 3139 Posts
[QUOTE="Shattered007"][QUOTE="600pc"] yes delete this please! it shows how big sony really is.600pc
There was a thread like this before and I don't know how it all works but it ended up that Microsoft was way above Sony. If I were you, I'd quit while I were ahead.

jesus.

Nah, I'm Shattered001 but I heard that guy was pretty great... :)
Avatar image for Makari
Makari

15250

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Makari
Member since 2003 • 15250 Posts
[QUOTE="SpruceCaboose"][QUOTE="Espada12"]

Yea there would be problems for a couple months until everything gets settled down and OSX can replace windows.

A few months would be generous. It would take years for OS X to completely overtake Windows. They would be able to get a majority marketshare within a few months due to necessity in security patching and what not in the world of business, but there are tons of people outside the business world who would keep using Windows.

You can tell who's never used OSX Server! :D Yeah, a third of the business world would collapse completely if everything MS just.. disappeared.