I dunno what's the big fuss about COD4. Looks nice I guess, but it doesn't look as good as Bioshock, Mass Effect, or Halo 3 for the 360. I'm surprised people are comparing a multiplat to Killzone 2.
Anyway, I think Killzone looks nicer than COD4 atm judging by the trailers, but we'll have to wait to release to get the final decision on this.
the-very-best
They are happy because it gives all the nice things. Like Motion blur, Depth of feild, crisp texture, shaded waters, nice particle effects, good physics etc etc etc etc but it all runs at 60fps not 30 like a sertain other serise we all know.
Personally I think the both look amazing...but KZ looks more impressive with it's lighting and animations and cool art style. But CoD4 has some higher-rest textures. Still, KZ is in pre-alpha so we'll have to wait and see about that. (remember Lair at pre-alpha? Now look at it :))
Do I need to vote on a PS3 game vs a PS3 game? Whichever is better depends upon people's own tastes and opinions. Anyway, there is nothing to loose for me cause I will just buy them both.
This is a dumb comparison. COD4 is coming out this year while KZ2 won't be out til MAYBE march of next year. Obviously one is much further along in development than the other. IMO KZ2 will end up looking better than COD4 because it will come out after. As of right now, I think KZ2 is more impressive than COD4 giving it is pre pre alpha and still looks that good. next year these two won't even be compared. KZ2 will be compared to whatever is coming out in close proximity to it. The only comparison that can be made with COD4, is Halo 3 in which COD4 looks much better from what I have seen. Even a Haze comparison would do, which, again COD4 wins. UT3 owns it though, but I'll admit I am biased on this point ;)
I've got both the Killzone 2 and COD4 trailers running on my PS3 and 360 respectively (in 720p) and I think Killzone 2 looks better. It has better lighting, better animations, much better physics, destructible environments, and better graphical effects (lightning, particle effect, better use of motion blur etc.) COD4 does deserve mad props for running at 60FPS though and is still a great looking game. I think sites like Gamespot and Gametrailers gave COD4 best E3 graphics because it's a lot closer to completion, and they saw a lot more of the game. All they got to see of Killzone 2 was a short trailer so I think they were wary of giving it too much praise. Once games are both out we'll know for sure but I predict Killzone 2 will smoke COD4 in the graphics department once it's released.
this topic should have been which has better gfx. Cod4 on 360 or ps3 based on the fanboy comments. :shock:Comparing 2 games that are completely different and another is a ps3 exclusive doesn't really make sense. If KZ2 was on 360 also then it would be a viable debate. However, when it's just the games itself (without the sony v.s. microsoft bs) I'd say CoD4 is better.
Call of Duty 4 looked finished. KillZone 2 looked like a game that needed to be released in 08 because some things looked unfinsihed.
However Animations and something about the lighting was just amazing in KillZone compared to anything I've seen (even Call of Duty 4). When they get everything hammered down for Killzone it should turn out better overall than COD4 just because it was so close.
Log in to comment