False. PC is on the top.trix5817Only if your rich...
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="primetime2121"][QUOTE="baddog121390"][QUOTE="Gamer556"]*Looks at FEAR on my PC*Nope.I'm tired of people saying the PC has the best graphics, because right now it doesn't. Sure, the technology is there, but the games are not. The Xbox 360 still has it beat by a pretty large margin, and even the PS3 in some cases.
Vandalvideo
[QUOTE="trix5817"]False. PC is on the top.xXHackettXxOnly if your rich...
Lies! Good pcs dont require tons of money. I built mine 2 or 3 years ago for about $1250 and its still fine, i can play most new games on med graphics, even medieval 2 total war which has tons and tons of characters on the same screen and they are highly detailed. I plan on upgrading it slightly to play supreme commander, but thats because the card i had gotten was a year old at the time and half priced -.-.
[QUOTE="Killfox"]The next game people will start bragging about will probably be mass effect.dgsagJust a little more till Crysis, come on Hermits, we can hang on till then! :D
[QUOTE="primetime2121"][QUOTE="baddog121390"][QUOTE="Gamer556"]*Looks at FEAR on my PC*I'm tired of people saying the PC has the best graphics, because right now it doesn't. Sure, the technology is there, but the games are not. The Xbox 360 still has it beat by a pretty large margin, and even the PS3 in some cases.
Vandalvideo
Nope.
The dynamic shadow system was nice, but that can't make up for... every other aspect of the game. Aside from the cool bullet-time effects, FEAR didn't look that much better than Doom 3, if at all.
FEAR was a great looking game in 2005, and still looks pretty good today, but it has definately been surpassed by many games since then, including numerous ones on its own home platform (PC).
[QUOTE="dgsag"][QUOTE="Killfox"]The next game people will start bragging about will probably be mass effect.jwcyclone15Just a little more till Crysis, come on Hermits, we can hang on till then! :D
PC > PS3/360 > Wii.CJL13
I agree with this. Crysis clearly shows that PC will always be ahead in graphics...as it should be. You pay for constant upgrades with a PC to get quality graphics like Crysis.
As for the 360 and PS3...well, 360's GPU outperforms PS3's GPU while PS3's CPU outperforms Xbox 360's CPU. They're about equal in reality. Techheads can disbute it all they want IMO, in the end, they're about equal. With the Wii, well, it's fairly behind the 360 and PS3 in terms of graphics. It's going to be dead last in graphics, no doubt.
[QUOTE="jwcyclone15"][QUOTE="dgsag"][QUOTE="Killfox"]The next game people will start bragging about will probably be mass effect.KillfoxJust a little more till Crysis, come on Hermits, we can hang on till then! :D
PC >>> 360 >> PS3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Wii
BTW another game confirmed to run best on 360, Time0, now it makes like 15 games beter on 360, even Oblivion has AA+HDR and proper glows and colors on 360, so it could be 360 >>>> PS3, but i will give it the benefit of the doubt for now
^
edit: actually I was mistaken, currently PS3 has better graphics than the PC. So I guess it should be X360 > PS3 > PC > WiiMystery_Writer
Its PC = X360 > PS3 >>>>>>>> Wii. Oblivion with mods looks as good as GeoWand soon PC games will come out that will obliterate any 360 games.
All of you are actually awfully wrong, GTHD > Gears > PC > WiigingerdividDo you have a site from where you get your punch-lines from?
Again the hermits fail. Your PC graphics are only as good as your machine. To say that PC is better than console in graphics is unfair. It's really not that complicated to understand.
Also, the wii is a joke. :)
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment