Truth to be told, PS3 hardware performance always struggled to keep up with X360

  • 193 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#151 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62080 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="themajormayor"] Oh yeah. Didn't read his post. I was thinking about the competition. Journey. A DL cartoon PS3 game still made the nomination. I mean it looks nice but I don't think I ever seen anyone mention it when talking about it in graphics debate. Uncharted 3, Killzone 3 etc. all came out previous years.themajormayor

I'm not sure of their requirements for the category. It could have been an exception due to the great art.

Isn't spike suppose to be lolspike anyway?

Yep. Their VGA's this year were markedly better, though.

Avatar image for greensand24
greensand24

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#152 greensand24
Member since 2011 • 457 Posts

[QUOTE="o0squishy0o"]Its amazing that these consoles have been out for 5 or 6 years and yet still from day 1 we have the same arguments. Its hard to judge who can produce the best graphics unless there was a single developer who made the same game taliored to both systems to prove which can produce the best visuals. I honestly believe the 360 can nudge out the PS3, however when you are infront of your direct competition, there is zero need to throw money at your developers to produce the "next big thing", microsoft brough back halo 4 just to keep things ticking over until the next gen. Sony needs decent exclusives because it falls behind in the third party scene and most importantly in COD. Crysis 2 is apperently graphics king this gen which is a multiplat. After that people say gears of war 3 is the 360s best looking exclusive, but that is running on a multiplat engine which means again its not a taliored made game. Think about the monetary investment that sony made into gt5 and killzone 2, it dwarfs what xbox developers recieve.ToScA-

Good points!

Yep Crysis 2 (360) is technically/visually better than every single ps3 exclusive. There were pics posted the other day that showed Crysis 2 making The last of us look like a cheap cartoon. And it's because of this why I'm 99% confident that Crysis 3 consoles will kill the last of us if crysis 2 a near two-year old game is already doing that.
Avatar image for super600
super600

33166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#153 super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33166 Posts

Both consoles are pretty much equal in graphics and it's sad how cows are denying that.

Avatar image for super600
super600

33166

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#154 super600  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 33166 Posts

[QUOTE="ToScA-"]

[QUOTE="o0squishy0o"]Its amazing that these consoles have been out for 5 or 6 years and yet still from day 1 we have the same arguments. Its hard to judge who can produce the best graphics unless there was a single developer who made the same game taliored to both systems to prove which can produce the best visuals. I honestly believe the 360 can nudge out the PS3, however when you are infront of your direct competition, there is zero need to throw money at your developers to produce the "next big thing", microsoft brough back halo 4 just to keep things ticking over until the next gen. Sony needs decent exclusives because it falls behind in the third party scene and most importantly in COD. Crysis 2 is apperently graphics king this gen which is a multiplat. After that people say gears of war 3 is the 360s best looking exclusive, but that is running on a multiplat engine which means again its not a taliored made game. Think about the monetary investment that sony made into gt5 and killzone 2, it dwarfs what xbox developers recieve.greensand24

Good points!

Yep Crysis 2 (360) is technically/visually better than every single ps3 exclusive. There were pics posted the other day that showed Crysis 2 making The last of us look like a cheap cartoon. And it's because of this why I'm 99% confident that Crysis 3 consoles will kill the last of us if crysis 2 a near two-year old game is already doing that.

I don't call a game with severe framerate issues graphic king.Literally all ps3 graphically intensive ps3 exclusives beat crysis 2 in that department.

Avatar image for greensand24
greensand24

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#155 greensand24
Member since 2011 • 457 Posts

[QUOTE="greensand24"][QUOTE="ToScA-"]

Good points!

super600

Yep Crysis 2 (360) is technically/visually better than every single ps3 exclusive. There were pics posted the other day that showed Crysis 2 making The last of us look like a cheap cartoon. And it's because of this why I'm 99% confident that Crysis 3 consoles will kill the last of us if crysis 2 a near two-year old game is already doing that.

I don't call a game with severe framerate issues graphic king.Literally all ps3 graphically intensive ps3 exclusives beat crysis 2 in that department.

I beat the game several times. Didnt notice any drops. Did you actually play the game or are you just listening to naysayers who are trying to find something negative about the game. Seriously the critique about performance is exaggerated. DF also confirms this so not sure what people are talking about. You don't finish a game several times if it's unplayable. And who cares if others run more steady. The fact is no console game is combing all of the technical feats that C2 does on console on that scale. Period.
Avatar image for AznbkdX
AznbkdX

4284

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#156 AznbkdX
Member since 2012 • 4284 Posts

MS definitely won by going with hardware that was similar to the PC. Sony took a big gamble going for obscure hardware that was hard to develop for, and it bit them in the ass this generation. I doubt they will try that same move on the next gen machine.

coasterguy65

Honestly not many of their decisions have been the best as of late.

Wouldn't surprise me if Sony didn't learn from their mistakes fully. They still haven't learned from the mistake of "pricing things much higher than they need to be" imo. Hence why they are losing out on the TV and camera front.

Avatar image for AznbkdX
AznbkdX

4284

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#157 AznbkdX
Member since 2012 • 4284 Posts

Both consoles are pretty much equal in graphics and it's sad how cows are denying that.

super600

They got their ups and downs. The PS3 when done correctly was done very right. The Xbox was more consistent over the gen.

It really matters on your taste of games. Multiplats tended to do better on the 360, but the PS3 exclusives tended to beat out many of 360's finest at the same time at least graphics wise.

Avatar image for deactivated-585ea4b128526
deactivated-585ea4b128526

612

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#158 deactivated-585ea4b128526
Member since 2007 • 612 Posts
Ps3 did what my 360 was incapable of doing. Not overheating, causing the gpu to warp while playing gtaiv 8 hours straight. I don't care who has the better graphics, if it takes nearly 4 years to fix an issue that nearly 100% of the systems encounter.
Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#159 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

[QUOTE="super600"]

Both consoles are pretty much equal in graphics and it's sad how cows are denying that.

AznbkdX

They got their ups and downs. The PS3 when done correctly was done very right. The Xbox was more consistent over the gen.

It really matters on your taste of games. Multiplats tended to do better on the 360, but the PS3 exclusives tended to beat out many of 360's finest at the same time at least graphics wise.

But that can be said about both consoles. Halo 4, the first 360 exclusive with a budget similar to Killzone 2, 3, GT5, etc, ended up looking as good as the best PS3 exclusives. The fact 360 is easy to develop for, doesn't mean third party devs are taking advantage of it's hardware.

Avatar image for greensand24
greensand24

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#160 greensand24
Member since 2011 • 457 Posts

[QUOTE="AznbkdX"]

[QUOTE="super600"]

Both consoles are pretty much equal in graphics and it's sad how cows are denying that.

PAL360

They got their ups and downs. The PS3 when done correctly was done very right. The Xbox was more consistent over the gen.

It really matters on your taste of games. Multiplats tended to do better on the 360, but the PS3 exclusives tended to beat out many of 360's finest at the same time at least graphics wise.

The fact 360 is easy to develop for, doesn't mean third party devs are taking advantage of it's hardware.

This is too true and easily misunderstood.
Avatar image for AznbkdX
AznbkdX

4284

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#161 AznbkdX
Member since 2012 • 4284 Posts

[QUOTE="AznbkdX"]

[QUOTE="super600"]

Both consoles are pretty much equal in graphics and it's sad how cows are denying that.

PAL360

They got their ups and downs. The PS3 when done correctly was done very right. The Xbox was more consistent over the gen.

It really matters on your taste of games. Multiplats tended to do better on the 360, but the PS3 exclusives tended to beat out many of 360's finest at the same time at least graphics wise.

But that can be said about both consoles. Halo 4, the first 360 exclusive with a budget similar to Killzone 2, 3, GT5, etc, ended up looking as good as the best PS3 exclusives. The fact 360 is easy to develop for, doesn't mean third party devs are taking advantage of it's hardware.

It can, and I didn't say that it wasn't said for both. I said the sentence after on my reinforcement of that claim for Sonys product in general.

You may claim that Xbox also did things very right, but I tried to address that Sony did things "a little more right" on certain aspects when they could.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#162 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62080 Posts

... that nearly 100% of the systems encounter. joehult

What?

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#163 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="AznbkdX"]

[QUOTE="super600"]

Both consoles are pretty much equal in graphics and it's sad how cows are denying that.

PAL360

They got their ups and downs. The PS3 when done correctly was done very right. The Xbox was more consistent over the gen.

It really matters on your taste of games. Multiplats tended to do better on the 360, but the PS3 exclusives tended to beat out many of 360's finest at the same time at least graphics wise.

But that can be said about both consoles. Halo 4, the first 360 exclusive with a budget similar to Killzone 2, 3, GT5, etc, ended up looking as good as the best PS3 exclusives.

Ah no

Avatar image for greensand24
greensand24

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#164 greensand24
Member since 2011 • 457 Posts
[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="AznbkdX"]

They got their ups and downs. The PS3 when done correctly was done very right. The Xbox was more consistent over the gen.

It really matters on your taste of games. Multiplats tended to do better on the 360, but the PS3 exclusives tended to beat out many of 360's finest at the same time at least graphics wise.

themajormayor

But that can be said about both consoles. Halo 4, the first 360 exclusive with a budget similar to Killzone 2, 3, GT5, etc, ended up looking as good as the best PS3 exclusives.

Ah no

Halo 4 looks better than kz3 ;)
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#165 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts
[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

But that can be said about both consoles. Halo 4, the first 360 exclusive with a budget similar to Killzone 2, 3, GT5, etc, ended up looking as good as the best PS3 exclusives. greensand24

Ah no

Halo 4 looks better than kz3 ;)

No
Avatar image for greensand24
greensand24

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#166 greensand24
Member since 2011 • 457 Posts
[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="greensand24"][QUOTE="themajormayor"] Ah no

Halo 4 looks better than kz3 ;)

No

Kz3 is fun though. A lot of people don't give the campaign enough credit. The early snow level actually looks great by the way. Kz3 is actually up there visually I just don't think it's the best.
Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#167 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10978 Posts

[QUOTE="HalcyonScarlet"]

Xbox 360 is better designed, but it's likely the PS3 is more powerful, it's just not good for the business. No one has the time to make it work.

MS has a unified hardware, with a good OS and development tools. It's designed to make life easier for the developer. All gen it's had consistent performance.

PAL360

I don't think PS3 is any more capable than 360. Maybe looking at numbers on paper, but clearly not in practice for games.

At their best, buth consoles have been proving to be pretty much on par (Uncharted 3, Halo 4, Forza Horizon, KZ3, Gears 3, GoW3, etc), but 360 has a better average, it's more consistant.

Not with superb looking exclusives. The ps3 easily takes the cake on consistant superb looking exclusives.

Avatar image for KarateeeChop
KarateeeChop

4666

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#168 KarateeeChop
Member since 2010 • 4666 Posts

looking at this thread it seems cows just need a good cry. or a 360. :(

Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#169 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10978 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

But that can be said about both consoles. Halo 4, the first 360 exclusive with a budget similar to Killzone 2, 3, GT5, etc, ended up looking as good as the best PS3 exclusives. greensand24

Ah no

Halo 4 looks better than kz3 ;)

and UC3, GOW3 looks better than Halo 4.

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#170 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

looking at this thread it seems cows just need a good cry. or a 360. :(

KarateeeChop
Those are mutually inclusive.
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#171 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="greensand24"][QUOTE="themajormayor"] Ah no

ermacness

Halo 4 looks better than kz3 ;)

and UC3, GOW3 looks better than Halo 4.

And KZ3 looks better than all of them.
Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#172 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10978 Posts

looking at this thread it seems cows just need a good cry. or a 360. :(

KarateeeChop

I have a 360, and can safely say that the 360 really don't have anything for ps3 users to rush out to buy a 360.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#173 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="HalcyonScarlet"]

Xbox 360 is better designed, but it's likely the PS3 is more powerful, it's just not good for the business. No one has the time to make it work.

MS has a unified hardware, with a good OS and development tools. It's designed to make life easier for the developer. All gen it's had consistent performance.

ermacness

I don't think PS3 is any more capable than 360. Maybe looking at numbers on paper, but clearly not in practice for games.

At their best, buth consoles have been proving to be pretty much on par (Uncharted 3, Halo 4, Forza Horizon, KZ3, Gears 3, GoW3, etc), but 360 has a better average, it's more consistant.

Not with superb looking exclusives. The ps3 easily takes the cake on good looking exclusives.

Not anymore. I'm not saying that Halo 4, Gears 3 and Forza Horizon destroy the competition, like cows use to do when it comes to their exclusives, but they look easily up to the best on PS3. The good thing is that the best looking 360 exclusives don't need to sacrify scale to reach the same graphical level. That's probably due to less ram limitations :P

Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#174 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10978 Posts

[QUOTE="ermacness"]

[QUOTE="greensand24"] Halo 4 looks better than kz3 ;)themajormayor

and UC3, GOW3 looks better than Halo 4.

And KZ3 looks better than all of them.

We're going to have to agree to disagree here. KZ3 didn't "wow"me like UC3 and GOW3 did. KZ2 had a much more wowing factor to me than KZ3.

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#175 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="ermacness"]

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

I don't think PS3 is any more capable than 360. Maybe looking at numbers on paper, but clearly not in practice for games.

At their best, buth consoles have been proving to be pretty much on par (Uncharted 3, Halo 4, Forza Horizon, KZ3, Gears 3, GoW3, etc), but 360 has a better average, it's more consistant.

PAL360

Not with superb looking exclusives. The ps3 easily takes the cake on good looking exclusives.

Not anymore. I'm not saying that Halo 4, Gears 3 and Forza Horizon destroy the competition, like cows use to do when it comes to their exclusives, but they look easily up to the best on PS3. The good thing is that the best looking 360 exclusives don't need to sacrify scale to reach the same graphical level. That's probably due to less ram limitations :P

No. The best PS3 exclusives has AA, doesn't screen tear and has detailed textures.
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#176 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="ermacness"]and UC3, GOW3 looks better than Halo 4.

ermacness

And KZ3 looks better than all of them.

We're going to have to agree to disagree here. KZ3 didn't "wow"me like UC3 and GOW3 did. KZ2 had a much more wowing factor to me than KZ3.

But U3 had horrible AA
Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#177 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10978 Posts

[QUOTE="ermacness"]

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

I don't think PS3 is any more capable than 360. Maybe looking at numbers on paper, but clearly not in practice for games.

At their best, buth consoles have been proving to be pretty much on par (Uncharted 3, Halo 4, Forza Horizon, KZ3, Gears 3, GoW3, etc), but 360 has a better average, it's more consistant.

PAL360

Not with superb looking exclusives. The ps3 easily takes the cake on good looking exclusives.

Not anymore. I'm not saying that Halo 4, Gears 3 and Forza Horizon destroy the competition, like cows use to do when it comes to their exclusives, but they look easily up to the best on PS3. The good thing is that the best looking 360 exclusives don't need to sacrify scale to reach the same graphical level. That's probably due to less ram limitations :P

I'm sorry, but GOW3 have plenty of intances in it's gameplay, that rivals most games cut scenes. Halo 4 did raise the bar, but to me, nothing on the 360 beats or is dead even with GOW3. Not many (if any) ps3 exclusives are up there with GOW3 in visuals to me.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#178 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="ermacness"]Not with superb looking exclusives. The ps3 easily takes the cake on good looking exclusives.

themajormayor

Not anymore. I'm not saying that Halo 4, Gears 3 and Forza Horizon destroy the competition, like cows use to do when it comes to their exclusives, but they look easily up to the best on PS3. The good thing is that the best looking 360 exclusives don't need to sacrify scale to reach the same graphical level. That's probably due to less ram limitations :P

No. The best PS3 exclusives has AA, doesn't screen tear and has detailed textures.

Do you mean, like Halo 4 and Forza Horizon?

Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#179 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10978 Posts

[QUOTE="ermacness"]

[QUOTE="themajormayor"] And KZ3 looks better than all of them.themajormayor

We're going to have to agree to disagree here. KZ3 didn't "wow"me like UC3 and GOW3 did. KZ2 had a much more wowing factor to me than KZ3.

But U3 had horrible AA

and some of KZ3's texture work was downright disgusting, like the water in KZ3 was very laughable at the very best, in which you saw ALOT of .

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#180 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

Not anymore. I'm not saying that Halo 4, Gears 3 and Forza Horizon destroy the competition, like cows use to do when it comes to their exclusives, but they look easily up to the best on PS3. The good thing is that the best looking 360 exclusives don't need to sacrify scale to reach the same graphical level. That's probably due to less ram limitations :P

PAL360

No. The best PS3 exclusives has AA, doesn't screen tear and has detailed textures.

Do you mean, like Halo 4 and Forza Horizon?

No Gears 3. And you put them equal to Halo 4 and Forza Horizon. Halo 4 looks flat with butt ugly foliage and screen tear. It has AA though.
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#181 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="ermacness"]We're going to have to agree to disagree here. KZ3 didn't "wow"me like UC3 and GOW3 did. KZ2 had a much more wowing factor to me than KZ3.

ermacness

But U3 had horrible AA

and some of KZ3's texture work was downright disgusting, like the water in KZ3 was very laughable at the very best, in which you saw ALOT of .

The water was awesome. Great physics and many different kinds of water
Avatar image for greensand24
greensand24

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#182 greensand24
Member since 2011 • 457 Posts

[QUOTE="greensand24"][QUOTE="themajormayor"] Ah no

ermacness

Halo 4 looks better than kz3 ;)

and UC3, GOW3 looks better than Halo 4.

I actually think Halo 4 looks better than all of them. The only reason I only mentioned kz3 is because I know major loves the visuals in kz3 so I was just messin with him.
Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#183 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="themajormayor"] No. The best PS3 exclusives has AA, doesn't screen tear and has detailed textures.themajormayor

Do you mean, like Halo 4 and Forza Horizon?

No Gears 3. And you put them equal to Halo 4 and Forza Horizon. Halo 4 looks flat with butt ugly foliage and screen tear. It has AA though.

Hmm...i didn't need more proof that you never played those games, but thanks anyway! Gears 3 does lack AA, though, but despite that, it does look incredible.

Avatar image for greensand24
greensand24

457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#184 greensand24
Member since 2011 • 457 Posts
[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="themajormayor"] No. The best PS3 exclusives has AA, doesn't screen tear and has detailed textures.themajormayor

Do you mean, like Halo 4 and Forza Horizon?

No Gears 3. And you put them equal to Halo 4 and Forza Horizon. Halo 4 looks flat with butt ugly foliage and screen tear. It has AA though.

:) Lol there is no butt ugly foliage or screen tear in Halo 4.
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#185 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

Do you mean, like Halo 4 and Forza Horizon?

PAL360

No Gears 3. And you put them equal to Halo 4 and Forza Horizon. Halo 4 looks flat with butt ugly foliage and screen tear. It has AA though.

Hmm...i didn't need more proof that you never played those games, but thanks anyway! Gears 3 does lack AA, though, but despite that, it does look incredible.

Apperantly you haven't since according to Eurogamer there is screen tearing in Halo 4 and Gears 3.
Avatar image for ermacness
ermacness

10978

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#186 ermacness
Member since 2005 • 10978 Posts

[QUOTE="ermacness"]

[QUOTE="greensand24"] Halo 4 looks better than kz3 ;)greensand24

and UC3, GOW3 looks better than Halo 4.

I actually think Halo 4 looks better than all of them. The only reason I only mentioned kz3 is because I know major loves the visuals in kz3 so I was just messin with him.

Halo 4 looks great, but to me, it ain't no GOW3 in strictly visual graphics.

Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#187 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="themajormayor"] No Gears 3. And you put them equal to Halo 4 and Forza Horizon. Halo 4 looks flat with butt ugly foliage and screen tear. It has AA though. themajormayor

Hmm...i didn't need more proof that you never played those games, but thanks anyway! Gears 3 does lack AA, though, but despite that, it does look incredible.

Apperantly you haven't since according to Eurogamer there is screen tearing in Halo 4 and Gears 3.

Well, according to eurogamer (your source), "Gears 3 is one of the most advanced games this generation", and Halo 4 "looks as good as what Naughty Dog and Sony Santa Monica have been doing on PS3".

I didn't notice any screen tearing on Halo 4, by the way.

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#188 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

Hmm...i didn't need more proof that you never played those games, but thanks anyway! Gears 3 does lack AA, though, but despite that, it does look incredible.

PAL360

Apperantly you haven't since according to Eurogamer there is screen tearing in Halo 4 and Gears 3.

Well, according to eurogamer (your source), "Gears 3 is one of the most advanced games this generation", and Halo 4 "looks as good as what Naughty Dog and Sony Santa Monica have been doing on PS3".

I didn't notice any screen tearing on Halo 4, by the way.

That's subjective. But if you don't believe there is screen tearing you are questioning the credibility of their technical analysis. And they didn't mention guerilla games.
Avatar image for PAL360
PAL360

30574

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 31

User Lists: 0

#189 PAL360
Member since 2007 • 30574 Posts

[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="themajormayor"] Apperantly you haven't since according to Eurogamer there is screen tearing in Halo 4 and Gears 3. themajormayor

Well, according to eurogamer (your source), "Gears 3 is one of the most advanced games this generation", and Halo 4 "looks as good as what Naughty Dog and Sony Santa Monica have been doing on PS3".

I didn't notice any screen tearing on Halo 4, by the way.

That's subjective. But if you don't believe there is screen tearing you are questioning the credibility of their technical analysis. And they didn't mention guerilla games.

"In an era where the likes of Naughty Dog and Sony Santa Monica have defined the graphical state-of-the-art with Uncharted and God of War, Xbox 360 finally has its own shot at the title."

Apparently, it's because they don't think Killzone 3 looks as good as Uncharted 3, GoW3...and Halo 4. I would actualy agree with them!

Oh, and i'm not saying that i don't believe there is screen tearing. I'm saying i dodn't notice it.

Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#190 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

Well, according to eurogamer (your source), "Gears 3 is one of the most advanced games this generation", and Halo 4 "looks as good as what Naughty Dog and Sony Santa Monica have been doing on PS3".

I didn't notice any screen tearing on Halo 4, by the way.

PAL360

That's subjective. But if you don't believe there is screen tearing you are questioning the credibility of their technical analysis. And they didn't mention guerilla games.

"In an era where the likes of Naughty Dog and Sony Santa Monica have defined the graphical state-of-the-art with Uncharted and God of War, Xbox 360 finally has its own shot at the title."

Apparently, it's because they don't think Killzone 3 looks as good as Uncharted 3, GoW3...and Halo 4. I would actualy agree with them!

Oh, and i'm not saying that i don't believe there is screen tearing. I'm saying i dodn't notice it.

Allright then. But I guess that really proves how irrelevant their opinion is. I wouldn't either. It's there though and it's enough to count. Gears 3 thougs is screen tear galore.
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#191 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

[QUOTE="themajormayor"][QUOTE="PAL360"]

Well, according to eurogamer (your source), "Gears 3 is one of the most advanced games this generation", and Halo 4 "looks as good as what Naughty Dog and Sony Santa Monica have been doing on PS3".

I didn't notice any screen tearing on Halo 4, by the way.

PAL360

That's subjective. But if you don't believe there is screen tearing you are questioning the credibility of their technical analysis. And they didn't mention guerilla games.

"In an era where the likes of Naughty Dog and Sony Santa Monica have defined the graphical state-of-the-art with Uncharted and God of War, Xbox 360 finally has its own shot at the title."

Apparently, it's because they don't think Killzone 3 looks as good as Uncharted 3, GoW3...and Halo 4. I would actualy agree with them!

Oh, and i'm not saying that i don't believe there is screen tearing. I'm saying i dodn't notice it.

Dude, ignore him, he's talking about this analysis 'Other characteristics of the technology include a v-sync implementation which all but eliminates screen-tear - save for the odd frame running over budget just a touch, resulting in a tear-line at the very top of the screen, usually unseen in an HDTV's overscan area.' http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-halo-4 "Ususally unseen in an HDTV's Overscan Area"- Probably why you didn't see it "all but eliminates" it''s not really there to any degree So to summarise , theres next to no screen tearing and even when it Does you probab;y won't see it. Major Myaor twisting words again,lol
Avatar image for themajormayor
themajormayor

25729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#192 themajormayor
Member since 2011 • 25729 Posts
[QUOTE="PAL360"]

[QUOTE="themajormayor"] That's subjective. But if you don't believe there is screen tearing you are questioning the credibility of their technical analysis. And they didn't mention guerilla games.delta3074

"In an era where the likes of Naughty Dog and Sony Santa Monica have defined the graphical state-of-the-art with Uncharted and God of War, Xbox 360 finally has its own shot at the title."

Apparently, it's because they don't think Killzone 3 looks as good as Uncharted 3, GoW3...and Halo 4. I would actualy agree with them!

Oh, and i'm not saying that i don't believe there is screen tearing. I'm saying i dodn't notice it.

Dude, ignore him, he's talking about this analysis 'Other characteristics of the technology include a v-sync implementation which all but eliminates screen-tear - save for the odd frame running over budget just a touch, resulting in a tear-line at the very top of the screen, usually unseen in an HDTV's overscan area.' http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-vs-halo-4 "Ususally unseen in an HDTV's Overscan Area"- Probably why you didn't see it "all but eliminates" it''s not really there to any degree So to summarise , theres next to no screen tearing and even when it Does you probab;y won't see it. Major Myaor twisting words again,lol

This is what I said: "I wouldn't either [notice the screen tearing]. It's there though and it's enough to count" So there's no word twisting.
Avatar image for Caseytappy
Caseytappy

2199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#193 Caseytappy
Member since 2005 • 2199 Posts

Ps3 did what my 360 was incapable of doing. Not overheating, causing the gpu to warp while playing gtaiv 8 hours straight. I don't care who has the better graphics, if it takes nearly 4 years to fix an issue that nearly 100% of the systems encounter. joehult

Yeh , launch 360's started dieing like launch PS3's, MS offered a warranty though .

Sony just offered it's respect !