Two reasons why PS3 and Wii will be defeated by 360 (56k)

  • 63 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for aznfool07
aznfool07

3552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 aznfool07
Member since 2005 • 3552 Posts
Haha. You're using ports nad multiplats. to show how bad a certain system is and ones with the worse graphics. You are sad and fail miserably.
Avatar image for tonythestudent
tonythestudent

2592

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 tonythestudent
Member since 2004 • 2592 Posts

I looked for what in my mind were the absolute best each system had to offer and I presented them in a fair fashion. Lets not pout.JiveT

Yeah, course you did, i believe you thousands wouldn't 

Avatar image for Dualshockin
Dualshockin

7826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 Dualshockin
Member since 2006 • 7826 Posts
[QUOTE="Dualshockin"]Exibit C,the true nature of 360 games LOL http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/bombermanactzero/index.htmlTylendal
Actually that looks pretty cool. Too bad its crap.

Yup,it currently holds the record I believe.
Avatar image for Rougehunter
Rougehunter

5873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#54 Rougehunter
Member since 2004 • 5873 Posts

LMAO!!! Still can't believe there are lemmings that think the 360 is either going to win this consol war or is a better value then the PS3.

Read my sig for reasons the 180 is not going to win and why ms should stop making consols.

Heres a video on how great and reliable the 180/360 is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56-gQq62Hyc&mode=related&search=

Solution to fixing a broken xbox:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLOPW1Qe1HU

insomnia37
xbow 180?never heard about. Although the xbox 360 is much better how is it not next gen? Was the N64 last gen when it came out because it used cartridges. Next gen means the console that came out after it's predecessor. Xbox 360 came after xbox so it's next gen, Wii came after GC so it's next gen, and PS3 came after PS2 because its next gen.Do you have any good reasons for sony winning because all of the signs that are showing the PS3 has a chance of loosing, 600$(3DO was 700), came out a year(N64) later, using a brand new format(3DO used CD and the market wasn't ready for them). And also whats to point of showing the 360's faulty hardware? The PS2 broke down the most and won.
Avatar image for 2largeadults
2largeadults

1608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 2largeadults
Member since 2007 • 1608 Posts
[QUOTE="insomnia37"]

LMAO!!! Still can't believe there are lemmings that think the 360 is either going to win this consol war or is a better value then the PS3.

Read my sig for reasons the 180 is not going to win and why ms should stop making consols.

Heres a video on how great and reliable the 180/360 is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56-gQq62Hyc&mode=related&search=

Solution to fixing a broken xbox:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLOPW1Qe1HU

Rougehunter

xbow 180?never heard about. Although the xbox 360 is much better how is it not next gen? Was the N64 last gen when it came out because it used cartridges. Next gen means the console that came out after it's predecessor. Xbox 360 came after xbox so it's next gen, Wii came after GC so it's next gen, and PS3 came after PS2 because its next gen.Do you have any good reasons for sony winning because all of the signs that are showing the PS3 has a chance of loosing, 600$(3DO was 700), came out a year(N64) later, using a brand new format(3DO used CD and the market wasn't ready for them). And also whats to point of showing the 360's faulty hardware? The PS2 broke down the most and won.

$600? Plenty of people seem to be paying.

A year later? So what? That's not insurmountable.

Brand new format? So what? It's beating down HD-DVD and offers developers a chance to play with more space.

Faulty hardware? Just because the PS2 won with faulty hardware doesn't mean MS should follow that formula to a T. Great games + reliable hardware = winning. 

Avatar image for -KinGz-
-KinGz-

5232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#56 -KinGz-
Member since 2006 • 5232 Posts

Exhibit A-PS3-RSX at its best plus teh cell

Exhibit B- The full power of the Wii, not sure if its Hollywood or Broadway

I don't see how the 360 can lose when this is its competition.

JiveT

 

Wth...? 

Avatar image for Tylendal
Tylendal

14681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#57 Tylendal
Member since 2006 • 14681 Posts

[QUOTE="Tylendal"][QUOTE="Dualshockin"]Exibit C,the true nature of 360 games LOL http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/bombermanactzero/index.htmlDualshockin
Actually that looks pretty cool. Too bad its crap.

Yup,it currently holds the record I believe.

What record?  And this better be something serious, not some fanboyish comment.

 

P.S.  That is what the original concept art for "Bomberman" looked like.

Avatar image for lespaul1919
lespaul1919

7074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 lespaul1919
Member since 2003 • 7074 Posts

[QUOTE="Tylendal"]We all know that PS2 ports are the best that Wii can do graphically :roll:osbassgordo

The can generate 10 more MHz of graphics power than the original xbox! its a fact. Look it up. We are talkin bout' Ninja Gaiden Black type graphics man!

which is still really bad. 

Avatar image for Tylendal
Tylendal

14681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#59 Tylendal
Member since 2006 • 14681 Posts
[QUOTE="osbassgordo"]

[QUOTE="Tylendal"]We all know that PS2 ports are the best that Wii can do graphically :roll:lespaul1919

The can generate 10 more MHz of graphics power than the original xbox! its a fact. Look it up. We are talkin bout' Ninja Gaiden Black type graphics man!

which is still really bad. 

Hypocrite.  The games in your sig have horrid graphics.  Halo 1 is painful, and Halo 2 is easily overshadowed.  Even a GC release game (MP) looked better than it.

Avatar image for coltonnaslund
coltonnaslund

3793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#60 coltonnaslund
Member since 2005 • 3793 Posts
Haha....you obviously don't know much about videogames if you think both of those games are the best they can look on Wii and PS3
Avatar image for Rougehunter
Rougehunter

5873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 Rougehunter
Member since 2004 • 5873 Posts
[QUOTE="Rougehunter"][QUOTE="insomnia37"]

LMAO!!! Still can't believe there are lemmings that think the 360 is either going to win this consol war or is a better value then the PS3.

Read my sig for reasons the 180 is not going to win and why ms should stop making consols.

Heres a video on how great and reliable the 180/360 is:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56-gQq62Hyc&mode=related&search=

Solution to fixing a broken xbox:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLOPW1Qe1HU

2largeadults

xbow 180?never heard about. Although the xbox 360 is much better how is it not next gen? Was the N64 last gen when it came out because it used cartridges. Next gen means the console that came out after it's predecessor. Xbox 360 came after xbox so it's next gen, Wii came after GC so it's next gen, and PS3 came after PS2 because its next gen.Do you have any good reasons for sony winning because all of the signs that are showing the PS3 has a chance of loosing, 600$(3DO was 700), came out a year(N64) later, using a brand new format(3DO used CD and the market wasn't ready for them). And also whats to point of showing the 360's faulty hardware? The PS2 broke down the most and won.

$600? Plenty of people seem to be paying.

A year later? So what? That's not insurmountable.

Brand new format? So what? It's beating down HD-DVD and offers developers a chance to play with more space.

Faulty hardware? Just because the PS2 won with faulty hardware doesn't mean MS should follow that formula to a T. Great games + reliable hardware = winning.

I can understand that but my point is that just because of a company's mistake the console wont lose. But at the moment, Mass effect, Oblivion, PGR3 prove blu-ray is not needed, Its only good for the CGI cutscenes in JRPGs
Avatar image for 2largeadults
2largeadults

1608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 2largeadults
Member since 2007 • 1608 Posts
[QUOTE="2largeadults"][QUOTE="Rougehunter"]Do you have any good reasons for sony winning because all of the signs that are showing the PS3 has a chance of loosing, 600$(3DO was 700), came out a year(N64) later, using a brand new format(3DO used CD and the market wasn't ready for them). And also whats to point of showing the 360's faulty hardware? The PS2 broke down the most and won.Rougehunter

$600? Plenty of people seem to be paying.

A year later? So what? That's not insurmountable.

Brand new format? So what? It's beating down HD-DVD and offers developers a chance to play with more space.

Faulty hardware? Just because the PS2 won with faulty hardware doesn't mean MS should follow that formula to a T. Great games + reliable hardware = winning.

I can understand that but my point is that just because of a company's mistake the console wont lose. But at the moment, Mass effect, Oblivion, PGR3 prove blu-ray is not needed, Its only good for the CGI cutscenes in JRPGs

At the moment, I agree it isn't needed.

But in the very near future, it may offer some enhancements to gaming that cannot be offered on regular DVD.

And that's why I think so many Sony fans are glad to have the option. 

Avatar image for Rougehunter
Rougehunter

5873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 Rougehunter
Member since 2004 • 5873 Posts
[QUOTE="Rougehunter"][QUOTE="2largeadults"][QUOTE="Rougehunter"]Do you have any good reasons for sony winning because all of the signs that are showing the PS3 has a chance of loosing, 600$(3DO was 700), came out a year(N64) later, using a brand new format(3DO used CD and the market wasn't ready for them). And also whats to point of showing the 360's faulty hardware? The PS2 broke down the most and won.2largeadults

$600? Plenty of people seem to be paying.

A year later? So what? That's not insurmountable.

Brand new format? So what? It's beating down HD-DVD and offers developers a chance to play with more space.

Faulty hardware? Just because the PS2 won with faulty hardware doesn't mean MS should follow that formula to a T. Great games + reliable hardware = winning.

I can understand that but my point is that just because of a company's mistake the console wont lose. But at the moment, Mass effect, Oblivion, PGR3 prove blu-ray is not needed, Its only good for the CGI cutscenes in JRPGs

At the moment, I agree it isn't needed.

But in the very near future, it may offer some enhancements to gaming that cannot be offered on regular DVD.

And that's why I think so many Sony fans are glad to have the option.

Never thought of that. Maybe the next generation when the console's hardware is powerful enough to handle those features.
Avatar image for snyper1982
snyper1982

3407

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 snyper1982
Member since 2004 • 3407 Posts
[QUOTE="Rougehunter"][QUOTE="2largeadults"][QUOTE="Rougehunter"]Do you have any good reasons for sony winning because all of the signs that are showing the PS3 has a chance of loosing, 600$(3DO was 700), came out a year(N64) later, using a brand new format(3DO used CD and the market wasn't ready for them). And also whats to point of showing the 360's faulty hardware? The PS2 broke down the most and won.2largeadults

$600? Plenty of people seem to be paying.

A year later? So what? That's not insurmountable.

Brand new format? So what? It's beating down HD-DVD and offers developers a chance to play with more space.

Faulty hardware? Just because the PS2 won with faulty hardware doesn't mean MS should follow that formula to a T. Great games + reliable hardware = winning.

I can understand that but my point is that just because of a company's mistake the console wont lose. But at the moment, Mass effect, Oblivion, PGR3 prove blu-ray is not needed, Its only good for the CGI cutscenes in JRPGs

At the moment, I agree it isn't needed.

But in the very near future, it may offer some enhancements to gaming that cannot be offered on regular DVD.

And that's why I think so many Sony fans are glad to have the option.

 

Sony fans are glad because it is made by Sony. Nothing more, nothing less. They are pathetic. Sony could sell them a brick in a box, and promise it is the future of entertainment, and they would buy. 

Avatar image for _AsasN_
_AsasN_

3646

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 _AsasN_
Member since 2003 • 3646 Posts

Exhibit A-PS3-RSX at its best plus teh cell

Exhibit B- The full power of the Wii, not sure if its Hollywood or Broadway

I don't see how the 360 can lose when this is its competition.

JiveT


Wow! Worst thread today without a doubt.