This topic is locked from further discussion.
I looked for what in my mind were the absolute best each system had to offer and I presented them in a fair fashion. Lets not pout.JiveT
Yeah, course you did, i believe you thousands wouldn'tÂ
[QUOTE="Dualshockin"]Exibit C,the true nature of 360 games LOL http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/bombermanactzero/index.htmlTylendalActually that looks pretty cool. Too bad its crap. Yup,it currently holds the record I believe.
xbow 180?never heard about. Although the xbox 360 is much better how is it not next gen? Was the N64 last gen when it came out because it used cartridges. Next gen means the console that came out after it's predecessor. Xbox 360 came after xbox so it's next gen, Wii came after GC so it's next gen, and PS3 came after PS2 because its next gen.Do you have any good reasons for sony winning because all of the signs that are showing the PS3 has a chance of loosing, 600$(3DO was 700), came out a year(N64) later, using a brand new format(3DO used CD and the market wasn't ready for them). And also whats to point of showing the 360's faulty hardware? The PS2 broke down the most and won.LMAO!!! Still can't believe there are lemmings that think the 360 is either going to win this consol war or is a better value then the PS3.
Read my sig for reasons the 180 is not going to win and why ms should stop making consols.
Heres a video on how great and reliable the 180/360 is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56-gQq62Hyc&mode=related&search=
Solution to fixing a broken xbox:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLOPW1Qe1HU
insomnia37
[QUOTE="insomnia37"]xbow 180?never heard about. Although the xbox 360 is much better how is it not next gen? Was the N64 last gen when it came out because it used cartridges. Next gen means the console that came out after it's predecessor. Xbox 360 came after xbox so it's next gen, Wii came after GC so it's next gen, and PS3 came after PS2 because its next gen.Do you have any good reasons for sony winning because all of the signs that are showing the PS3 has a chance of loosing, 600$(3DO was 700), came out a year(N64) later, using a brand new format(3DO used CD and the market wasn't ready for them). And also whats to point of showing the 360's faulty hardware? The PS2 broke down the most and won.LMAO!!! Still can't believe there are lemmings that think the 360 is either going to win this consol war or is a better value then the PS3.
Read my sig for reasons the 180 is not going to win and why ms should stop making consols.
Heres a video on how great and reliable the 180/360 is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56-gQq62Hyc&mode=related&search=
Solution to fixing a broken xbox:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLOPW1Qe1HU
Rougehunter
$600? Plenty of people seem to be paying.
A year later? So what? That's not insurmountable.
Brand new format? So what? It's beating down HD-DVD and offers developers a chance to play with more space.
Faulty hardware? Just because the PS2 won with faulty hardware doesn't mean MS should follow that formula to a T. Great games + reliable hardware = winning.Â
[QUOTE="Tylendal"][QUOTE="Dualshockin"]Exibit C,the true nature of 360 games LOL http://www.gamespot.com/xbox360/action/bombermanactzero/index.htmlDualshockinActually that looks pretty cool. Too bad its crap. Yup,it currently holds the record I believe.
What record? And this better be something serious, not some fanboyish comment.
Â
P.S. That is what the original concept art for "Bomberman" looked like.
[QUOTE="Tylendal"]We all know that PS2 ports are the best that Wii can do graphically :roll:osbassgordo
The can generate 10 more MHz of graphics power than the original xbox! its a fact. Look it up. We are talkin bout' Ninja Gaiden Black type graphics man!
which is still really bad.Â
[QUOTE="osbassgordo"][QUOTE="Tylendal"]We all know that PS2 ports are the best that Wii can do graphically :roll:lespaul1919
The can generate 10 more MHz of graphics power than the original xbox! its a fact. Look it up. We are talkin bout' Ninja Gaiden Black type graphics man!
which is still really bad.Â
Hypocrite. The games in your sig have horrid graphics. Halo 1 is painful, and Halo 2 is easily overshadowed. Even a GC release game (MP) looked better than it.
[QUOTE="Rougehunter"][QUOTE="insomnia37"]xbow 180?never heard about. Although the xbox 360 is much better how is it not next gen? Was the N64 last gen when it came out because it used cartridges. Next gen means the console that came out after it's predecessor. Xbox 360 came after xbox so it's next gen, Wii came after GC so it's next gen, and PS3 came after PS2 because its next gen.Do you have any good reasons for sony winning because all of the signs that are showing the PS3 has a chance of loosing, 600$(3DO was 700), came out a year(N64) later, using a brand new format(3DO used CD and the market wasn't ready for them). And also whats to point of showing the 360's faulty hardware? The PS2 broke down the most and won.LMAO!!! Still can't believe there are lemmings that think the 360 is either going to win this consol war or is a better value then the PS3.
Read my sig for reasons the 180 is not going to win and why ms should stop making consols.
Heres a video on how great and reliable the 180/360 is:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=56-gQq62Hyc&mode=related&search=
Solution to fixing a broken xbox:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLOPW1Qe1HU
2largeadults
$600? Plenty of people seem to be paying.
A year later? So what? That's not insurmountable.
Brand new format? So what? It's beating down HD-DVD and offers developers a chance to play with more space.
Faulty hardware? Just because the PS2 won with faulty hardware doesn't mean MS should follow that formula to a T. Great games + reliable hardware = winning.
I can understand that but my point is that just because of a company's mistake the console wont lose. But at the moment, Mass effect, Oblivion, PGR3 prove blu-ray is not needed, Its only good for the CGI cutscenes in JRPGs[QUOTE="2largeadults"][QUOTE="Rougehunter"]Do you have any good reasons for sony winning because all of the signs that are showing the PS3 has a chance of loosing, 600$(3DO was 700), came out a year(N64) later, using a brand new format(3DO used CD and the market wasn't ready for them). And also whats to point of showing the 360's faulty hardware? The PS2 broke down the most and won.Rougehunter
$600? Plenty of people seem to be paying.
A year later? So what? That's not insurmountable.
Brand new format? So what? It's beating down HD-DVD and offers developers a chance to play with more space.
Faulty hardware? Just because the PS2 won with faulty hardware doesn't mean MS should follow that formula to a T. Great games + reliable hardware = winning.
I can understand that but my point is that just because of a company's mistake the console wont lose. But at the moment, Mass effect, Oblivion, PGR3 prove blu-ray is not needed, Its only good for the CGI cutscenes in JRPGsAt the moment, I agree it isn't needed.
But in the very near future, it may offer some enhancements to gaming that cannot be offered on regular DVD.
And that's why I think so many Sony fans are glad to have the option.Â
[QUOTE="Rougehunter"][QUOTE="2largeadults"][QUOTE="Rougehunter"]Do you have any good reasons for sony winning because all of the signs that are showing the PS3 has a chance of loosing, 600$(3DO was 700), came out a year(N64) later, using a brand new format(3DO used CD and the market wasn't ready for them). And also whats to point of showing the 360's faulty hardware? The PS2 broke down the most and won.2largeadults
$600? Plenty of people seem to be paying.
A year later? So what? That's not insurmountable.
Brand new format? So what? It's beating down HD-DVD and offers developers a chance to play with more space.
Faulty hardware? Just because the PS2 won with faulty hardware doesn't mean MS should follow that formula to a T. Great games + reliable hardware = winning.
I can understand that but my point is that just because of a company's mistake the console wont lose. But at the moment, Mass effect, Oblivion, PGR3 prove blu-ray is not needed, Its only good for the CGI cutscenes in JRPGsAt the moment, I agree it isn't needed.
But in the very near future, it may offer some enhancements to gaming that cannot be offered on regular DVD.
And that's why I think so many Sony fans are glad to have the option.
Never thought of that. Maybe the next generation when the console's hardware is powerful enough to handle those features.[QUOTE="Rougehunter"][QUOTE="2largeadults"][QUOTE="Rougehunter"]Do you have any good reasons for sony winning because all of the signs that are showing the PS3 has a chance of loosing, 600$(3DO was 700), came out a year(N64) later, using a brand new format(3DO used CD and the market wasn't ready for them). And also whats to point of showing the 360's faulty hardware? The PS2 broke down the most and won.2largeadults
$600? Plenty of people seem to be paying.
A year later? So what? That's not insurmountable.
Brand new format? So what? It's beating down HD-DVD and offers developers a chance to play with more space.
Faulty hardware? Just because the PS2 won with faulty hardware doesn't mean MS should follow that formula to a T. Great games + reliable hardware = winning.
I can understand that but my point is that just because of a company's mistake the console wont lose. But at the moment, Mass effect, Oblivion, PGR3 prove blu-ray is not needed, Its only good for the CGI cutscenes in JRPGsAt the moment, I agree it isn't needed.
But in the very near future, it may offer some enhancements to gaming that cannot be offered on regular DVD.
And that's why I think so many Sony fans are glad to have the option.
Â
Sony fans are glad because it is made by Sony. Nothing more, nothing less. They are pathetic. Sony could sell them a brick in a box, and promise it is the future of entertainment, and they would buy.Â
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment