Ubisoft is the most overrated company ever

Ubi are fantastic, all their main releases are all AA/AAA games

They just suck with ports

Ubisoft Montreal is one of the best developers in the world.

Beyond Good and Evil, Assassins Creed, Splinter Cell Chaos Theory, Far Cry and Prince of Persia.

Seriously do they even know how to make a fun game? Tom Clancy games are realistic to the point where they are no fun to play. Brothers in Arms sucks. Assassin's Creed had potential but they screwed that up. And Far Cry 2 looks meh. Great graphics but the campaign vids look really dull.

Why does this company always get so much praise? They go for realism over fun which is NOT what makes good games. If I wanted a overly realistic shooter I'd go join the real army.

xboxplayer1990

Brothers in Arms sucks, FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF go back and play COD.

lmfao.

" Tom Clancy games are realistic to the point where they are no fun to play."

Im guessing you never played the REAL Tom Clancy games published by ubi.

Like the original PC Rainbow Six series and Ghost Recon?

BiA is made by Gearbox, AC was shallow yes, and Far Cry 2 is great.

They have no realistic games.

Quite frankly if you want realism go look at Bohemia Interactives games - that are modified and sold to the military.

Ubisoft Montreal is one of the best developers in the world.

Far Cry

whocares4peace

Unless you mean FC 2 or FC I

I would say some Ubisoft games are overrated before I say the company is. Games like Rain Bow Six Vegas 2, and No More Heroes are incredibly overrated. I know No More Heroes is a Wii title but its ugly, Zelda Twilight Princess looked good and that is on the Wii. Also every-time you had to recharge the sword in the game (No More Heroes), it looked like your character was m*********, and when you were finished recharging a white sword would light up. For Reference: http://www.megatonik.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/nomoreheroes1.jpgM3rkMast3r

...A) NMH was only published by Ubi in America. It was developed by Grasshopper

B) It's supposed to look like he's jacking off, that's the joke

C) It's fun :P

[QUOTE="whocares4peace"]

Ubisoft Montreal is one of the best developers in the world.

Far Cry

skrat_01

Unless you mean FC 2 or FC I

lmfao.

" Tom Clancy games are realistic to the point where they are no fun to play."

Im guessing you never played the REAL Tom Clancy games published by ubi.

Like the original PC Rainbow Six series and Ghost Recon?

BiA is made by Gearbox, AC was shallow yes, and Far Cry 2 is great.

They have no realistic games.

Quite frankly if you want realism go look at Bohemia Interactives games - that are modified and sold to the military.

skrat_01

AC was a truly unique game that you either hated or loved, but a game thats going to have a killer follow up now that they have all their mechanics in place.

Far Cry 2 on the other hand is a quality game, not just some quick linear shooter cashed-in for the name

[QUOTE="skrat_01"]

lmfao.

" Tom Clancy games are realistic to the point where they are no fun to play."

Im guessing you never played the REAL Tom Clancy games published by ubi.

Like the original PC Rainbow Six series and Ghost Recon?

BiA is made by Gearbox, AC was shallow yes, and Far Cry 2 is great.

They have no realistic games.

Quite frankly if you want realism go look at Bohemia Interactives games - that are modified and sold to the military.

FirstDiscovery

AC was a truly unique game that you either hated or loved, but a game thats going to have a killer follow up now that they have all their mechanics in place.

Far Cry 2 on the other hand is a quality game, not just some quick linear shooter cashed-in for the name

Raven Shield hit the spot perfectly. It was better for newcomers than all previous R6 games, had a fantastic interface, and far more streamlined controls, great mission and level design, and all the complexity and depth of its predacessors - as well as nice visuals, that have aged well.

R6 Vegas totally destroys everything that was memorable of the original series, in favour of become somthing along the lines of a linear corridoor shooter that gives the illusion of 'tactical' gameplay, and choice.

Its not a bad game... and its great for a casual shooter audience, however it does not hold a candle, and is quite frankly not a Rainbow Six game - or sucessor - to the original series. Its a weird barstard child and mash of designs into a odd package.

The tactical depth, the complexities, the realism, the micromanagement, the thrill and exitement of the gameplay. All gone.

R6 needed a change of direction on consoles and it did with R6 3 on the Xbox - was designed for the Xbox in mind. On the PC however the real R6 did not need to go in such a direction at all.

Its not a bad game, to me its simply a bit of a disgrace (I do own vegas on pc though).

I could ramble about R6 all night, as Ive become pretty attached to the original series - pretty much grew up on it.