This topic is locked from further discussion.
We've always known that the PS3 was the inferior console,
this comes to no suprise.
Poor Cows, left with a system that's all show, and no go.
TCHBO
Â
Â
Â
billing
I'm starting to believe that some developers are even more ignorant than fanboys.
Realtop
It's obvious you know more about developing games then Ubisoft :roll:
Â
I'm no longer buying "teh devs are lazy" execuse for the PS3.
The PS3 seems to be the lowest common denominator compared to X360 this gen.
Another lame multi-plat from Ubiport. When will this end?dracula_16
This one is exclusive for 360, so there is a chance it will be a decent game. Maybe they realized that if you suck at porting its better to just not bother.Â
Thank god, a change in splinter cell that just doesnt make it easier!
The only choice system i want in my Splinter Cells would be to go to the main power thingy for the building and you can turn it off or leave it on. While leaving it on you would have to sneak around in pretty much light, if you break it and turn it off then theyd expect you to be their but there wouldnt be more shadows. What do you do? Neither, you grab a bird from the tree and shove it in there to break the machine like it hit it and broke itÂ
Not only does MEtal GEar solid 4 look better, its gameplay is also better. Not only that, this game sounds like Splinter Cell: Assasins Creed. UBI are the most un-original publishers/developng companys i've ever seen.
this game could be done on PS3 in a sinch. None of the reasons you posted make it not possible on PS3.
Not only does MEtal GEar solid 4 look better, its gameplay is also better. Not only that, this game sounds like Splinter Cell: Assasins Creed. UBI are the most un-original publishers/developng companys i've ever seen.
this game could be done on PS3 in a sinch. None of the reasons you posted make it not possible on PS3.Adrian_Cloud
Â
Moar cow tearz plz.  :glad:Â
Old. I already knew the X360 was more powerful than the inferiorstation2.4.
Facts such as these will only make the cows continue to weep. :glad:
RaniK_
That was witty, you lems get more and more creative every day.Â
[QUOTE="RaniK_"]Old. I already knew the X360 was more powerful than the inferiorstation2.4.
Facts such as these will only make the cows continue to weep. :glad:
reaperstoll
That was witty, you lems get more and more creative every day.Â
Â
Do I win teh prize?  ;DÂ
rofl i love it how u guys critisize ubi for making bad ports and then whine about them not porting this
and to everyone who keeps saying they're lazy grow up, if theyre lazy how come each ps3 port is delayed to have more time to work on and still comes up short. Thats not lazy, most ports u can see the problem is lighting and textures, which is clearly showing hardware inneficeincy in the ps3
[QUOTE="reaperstoll"][QUOTE="RaniK_"]Old. I already knew the X360 was more powerful than the inferiorstation2.4.
Facts such as these will only make the cows continue to weep. :glad:
RaniK_
That was witty, you lems get more and more creative every day.
Â
Do I win teh prize? ;D
Yup, you get SC: C. Have fun with it.
[QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="reaperstoll"][QUOTE="RaniK_"]Old. I already knew the X360 was more powerful than the inferiorstation2.4.
Facts such as these will only make the cows continue to weep. :glad:
reaperstoll
That was witty, you lems get more and more creative every day.
Â
Do I win teh prize? ;D
Yup, you get SC: C. Have fun with it.
Â
Is it going to be the collector's edition?  ;DÂ
rofl i love it how u guys critisize ubi for making bad ports and then whine about them not porting this
and to everyone who keeps saying they're lazy grow up, if theyre lazy how come each ps3 port is delayed to have more time to work on and still comes up short. Thats not lazy, most ports u can see the problem is lighting and textures, which is clearly showing hardware inneficeincy in the ps3
wooopz
Â
Indeed, it's quite pathetic.  Then again, cows are pathetic so it isn't anything out of the ordinary.  Those babycalfz still believe
 the loafstation3 is more powerful.  Ha.  ;DÂ
[QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"]I really don't care. 360 could keep all Tom Clancy games exclusive and I wouldn't care. But it's Ubisoft, I'm sure they'll find a way to get it to the PS3, as much as it will likely suck.dapmediainc
Â
LazyDevs, I don't think so. UBIsoft made some fantastic game for both Xbox and PC, they where not lazy with those systems.
Fear, great on PC and XBOX. Its just that the PS3 is a very hard system to master AND, the PS3 is real bad at lighting affects and shadows.Take a look at that tech demo for the ducks, no shadow what so eva.
You're incorrect on that. NGS has the best shadow effects of any other next gen machine right now & there have already been several comments about how nice some of the lighting effects are on the PS3. It's just up to the devs. And Ubisoft hasn't been able to do a good job on the PS3 yet, period. Dissapointing considering that I'm looking forward to Assassin's Creed.
But regardless, without a link, I tend to believe this is bs from the poster anyway.
When you build a game from the ground up on one system its not going to be doable on the other unless you build the game again from the ground up on that system.
Hope that helps alot of you's get your head around this, lair, msg4 and FF13 being ported, because thats essentially the only reason they can't be ported.
Â
rofl i love it how u guys critisize ubi for making bad ports and then whine about them not porting this
and to everyone who keeps saying they're lazy grow up, if theyre lazy how come each ps3 port is delayed to have more time to work on and still comes up short. Thats not lazy, most ports u can see the problem is lighting and textures, which is clearly showing hardware inneficeincy in the ps3
wooopz
Ubi is either lazy or unskilled. When other devs are able to make ports on par, or better, than the original, it only stands to reason that the reasponsibility lies in the hands of the developers. There has already been at least 2 ports that were better on the PS3 and more that were identical on both platforms... the 360 is hardly superior, it's just up to the devs to take advantage of the hardware.
[QUOTE="dapmediainc"][QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"]I really don't care. 360 could keep all Tom Clancy games exclusive and I wouldn't care. But it's Ubisoft, I'm sure they'll find a way to get it to the PS3, as much as it will likely suck.Not-A-Stalker
Â
LazyDevs, I don't think so. UBIsoft made some fantastic game for both Xbox and PC, they where not lazy with those systems.
Fear, great on PC and XBOX. Its just that the PS3 is a very hard system to master AND, the PS3 is real bad at lighting affects and shadows.Take a look at that tech demo for the ducks, no shadow what so eva.
Â
Uh, no. They are bad devs. They may be good for the 360 or PC, but once they start making all these shoddy ports, their crediblility goes down, down, down. Ports are game, too. These guys obviously don't understand that.
PS3 is bad at lighting and shadows? Tell me, what games have you made or are working on for the PS3 right now?
Assasins Creed??? the game u all bragged about until it went multiplatÂ
Ubisoft is lazy or just lacks skills so no wonder their game can't be done on the ps3 lol. When I see FN3,oblivion,sigma ect it just shows you how much ubisoft sucks at ports.BrooklynBomber
Exactly. And the list goes on... NBA Homecourt, Virtua Tennis, Armored Core 4 (the 360 lighting is horrible on that game), etc...
[QUOTE="grovestreet12"]Magazine article:
- No more sneaking around in the shadows. Apparently you're going to be more like James Bond and infiltrate buildings in plain daylight. You won't have to use force or sneak around as long as you don't act suspiciously.
- According to the article, every single object that is rendered on screen has physical properties and most of them can be used by Sam. For example, Sam can pick up furniture and use it as a weapon, or throw printers at enemies or papers in the face of enemies to gain the upperhand in fights.
- Melee fights are much more than "press this button to hit" this time around. There's different context sensitive attack buttons and as mentioned before lots of environmental interaction.
- Some pretty negative comments about the ps3 made by the devs. They state the fact that they are exclusive to the 360 allows them to do much more than if they were multiplatform (duh) but they also state they doubt they would be able to achieve what they're doing with the game on the 360 on the ps3 even if it was ps3 exclusive.
The lead programmer told the magazine he doubts they would have been able to pull of the lightning effects they have right now on the ps3. That's the only thing they say straight out, but they do state they believe they're much better off on the 360.
Discuss.Huxley_00
Â
for a developer company that has worked on the 360 and PS3 and works on PS3 games all the time..
I'll take his word for it..Â
using that logic,every thing factor 5 has said about the ps3 being 100x times more powerfull is true too since factior 5 was a XBOX 360 xclusive,then JUMPED SHIP to be Playstation exclusive after ps3 was shown.you know everyday we hear devs saying that so and so is not possible on x system who do we trustGen007
It's the new fad. And yet Rockstar points out that it is the 360 holding back progress on GTAIV. GS tried to put a spin on it but the his actual response was that the 360 is hindering progress on the game due to the lack of standardized hdd's and the fact that dvd's are 5x smaller than blu rays.
[QUOTE="BrooklynBomber"]Ubisoft is lazy or just lacks skills so no wonder their game can't be done on the ps3 lol. When I see FN3,oblivion,sigma ect it just shows you how much ubisoft sucks at ports.Sgt_Hale
Exactly. And the list goes on... NBA Homecourt, Virtua Tennis, Armored Core 4 (the 360 lighting is horrible on that game), etc...
Â
HAHAHAHAHA, cows are so delusional.  Wow, all games you listed are better on X360.  Especially AC4, a game that was built on inferiorstation3 hardware and ported to X360. Â
Â
More spin plz, angry calf.Â
Â
bu bu teh ubi iz teh lazy!!!111 *tearzÂ
[QUOTE="Gen007"]you know everyday we hear devs saying that so and so is not possible on x system who do we trustSgt_Hale
It's the new fad. And yet Rockstar points out that it is the 360 holding back progress on GTAIV. GS tried to put a spin on it but the his actual response was that the 360 is hindering progress on the game due to the lack of standardized hdd's and the fact that dvd's are 5x smaller than blu rays.
Â
Hahahaha, more spin plz.  Hopefully you're aware the footage they revealed was running on the superior X360.  :glad:Â
using that logic,every thing factor 5 has said about the ps3 being 100x times more powerfull is true too since factior 5 was a XBOX 360 xclusive,then JUMPED SHIP to be Playstation exclusive after ps3 was shown.TheWiikestLinkFactor 5 never even made any games for the Xbox 360, or Xbox for that matter.
Anyone who says Ubisoft hasn't been lazy needs to explain how other developers have managed to do it just fine with the PS3.
Â
[QUOTE="TheWiikestLink"]using that logic,every thing factor 5 has said about the ps3 being 100x times more powerfull is true too since factior 5 was a XBOX 360 xclusive,then JUMPED SHIP to be Playstation exclusive after ps3 was shown.SooshyFactor 5 never even made any games for the Xbox 360, or Xbox for that matter.
 That doesn't mean they haven't worked with the hardware.
Everybody hear that? Its time for COW LOGIC.
"Teh 360 is limitin Gta 4 becuz of da core. Ps3 for da win"
"ubisoft is unrelible of curse splinter cell would be betta on the ps3 there just paid by micosoft to say that"
Cows you make me smile every time :lol:
DeathWishv1
Cow logic? Rockstar gave reasons why GTA was limited. Ubisoft just says "It can't be done" with no reasoning behind it. Lack of memory, lack of eperience with the hardware? What is it?
I dont care what Ubisoft says about the PS3 after the **** they put on it. It just shows they dont care about the console.asdasd
Ubisoft is a joke these days. They are pretty much the epitome of a weak ass developer. If they want to alienate a huge chunk of their old fanbase, they're doing a fantastic job of it. Â
[QUOTE="DeathWishv1"]Everybody hear that? Its time for COW LOGIC.
"Teh 360 is limitin Gta 4 becuz of da core. Ps3 for da win"
"ubisoft is unrelible of curse splinter cell would be betta on the ps3 there just paid by micosoft to say that"
Cows you make me smile every time :lol:
AcidTWister
Cow logic? Rockstar gave reasons why GTA was limited. Ubisoft just says "It can't be done" with no reasoning behind it. Lack of memory, lack of eperience with the hardware? What is it?
CAUTION: Reasoning with fools can make your head explode. Proceed at your own risk.Â
Why should devs take their time to make good ports for other consoles if they aren't going to sell well. (oblivion ps3 anyone?)albi321
You mean the port of a game that a !@#$ ton of people played a year befre the ps3 release? :? What did you expect from its sales? #1?Â
Taketwo gave reasons why both PS3 and xbox have disadvantages in GTA5.
Its not lazy devs its sony hardware(CELL,Video Card) what are all the devs lazy LOL, I don't think so.
Tecmo had no Pro with NGS cause really its a xbox port and yes it looks good but really its only in high res with some new details nothing special.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment