Ubisoft says that Splinter Cell: Conviction couldn't be done on PS3

  • 169 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for steve17989
steve17989

1020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 steve17989
Member since 2006 • 1020 Posts
MS are paying ubisoft to say this stuff because they need some good games. Everyone know the PS3 is faster and more powerful than the 360.
Avatar image for LoG-Sacrament
LoG-Sacrament

20397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#52 LoG-Sacrament
Member since 2006 • 20397 Posts
translation: we make really bad ps3 ports so nobody buys them. instead of making good ones, we'll just insult the ps3 to hide our failure as developers.
Avatar image for billing
billing

642

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#53 billing
Member since 2004 • 642 Posts

We've always known that the PS3 was the inferior console,

this comes to no suprise.

Poor Cows, left with a system that's all show, and no go.

TCHBO 

 

 

 

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

This is Ubisoft.

:roll:

TerryBenedict

MADNESS! 

Avatar image for Realtop
Realtop

397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 Realtop
Member since 2006 • 397 Posts

I'm starting to believe that some developers are even more ignorant than fanboys.

Avatar image for reaperstoll
reaperstoll

918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 reaperstoll
Member since 2006 • 918 Posts

We've always known that the PS3 was the inferior console,

this comes to no suprise.

Poor Cows, left with a system that's all show, and no go.

TCHBO

 

 

 

billing

Your fanboyism is astounding.
Avatar image for Realtop
Realtop

397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Realtop
Member since 2006 • 397 Posts

We've always known that the PS3 was the inferior console,

this comes to no suprise.

Poor Cows, left with a system that's all show, and no go.

TCHBO

 

 

 

billing

 

Oh noes, A nine year old have spoken 

Avatar image for thirstychainsaw
thirstychainsaw

3761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 thirstychainsaw
Member since 2007 • 3761 Posts

I'm starting to believe that some developers are even more ignorant than fanboys.

Realtop

It's obvious you know more about developing games then Ubisoft :roll:

 

Avatar image for Endfinal
Endfinal

875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Endfinal
Member since 2007 • 875 Posts

We've always known that the PS3 was the inferior console,

this comes to no suprise.

Poor Cows, left with a system that's all show, and no go.

TCHBO

 

 

 

billing

Go back to being terrible at Halo and let some intelligent lemmings do the talking, ok? 

Avatar image for Mystery_Writer
Mystery_Writer

8351

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 Mystery_Writer
Member since 2004 • 8351 Posts

I'm no longer buying "teh devs are lazy" execuse for the PS3.

The PS3 seems to be the lowest common denominator compared to X360 this gen.

Avatar image for dracula_16
dracula_16

16572

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#61 dracula_16
Member since 2005 • 16572 Posts
Another lame multi-plat from Ubiport. When will this end?
Avatar image for reaperstoll
reaperstoll

918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 reaperstoll
Member since 2006 • 918 Posts

Another lame multi-plat from Ubiport. When will this end?dracula_16

This one is exclusive for 360, so there is a chance it will be a decent game. Maybe they realized that if you suck at porting its better to just not bother. 

Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
"but teh laziness" :cry: PS3 just isn't up to par to the 360 face it.
Avatar image for Educated_Gamer
Educated_Gamer

1095

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Educated_Gamer
Member since 2007 • 1095 Posts

Thank god, a change in splinter cell that just doesnt make it easier!

The only choice system i want in my Splinter Cells would be to go to the main power thingy for the building and you can turn it off or leave it on. While leaving it on you would have to sneak around in pretty much light, if you break it and turn it off then theyd expect you to be their but there wouldnt be more shadows. What do you do? Neither, you grab a bird from the tree and shove it in there to break the machine like it hit it and broke it 

Avatar image for Adrian_Cloud
Adrian_Cloud

7169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 Adrian_Cloud
Member since 2006 • 7169 Posts

Not only does MEtal GEar solid 4 look better, its gameplay is also better. Not only that, this game sounds like Splinter Cell: Assasins Creed. UBI are the most un-original publishers/developng companys i've ever seen.
this game could be done on PS3 in a sinch. None of the reasons you posted make it not possible on PS3.

Avatar image for RaniK_
RaniK_

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 RaniK_
Member since 2004 • 10542 Posts

Old.  I already knew the X360 was more powerful than the inferiorstation2.4.  

Facts such as these will only make the cows continue to weep.  :glad: 

Avatar image for ManILoveSony
ManILoveSony

303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#67 ManILoveSony
Member since 2007 • 303 Posts
microsoft payed them to say that probaly lol microsoft always paying people
Avatar image for RaniK_
RaniK_

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 RaniK_
Member since 2004 • 10542 Posts

Not only does MEtal GEar solid 4 look better, its gameplay is also better. Not only that, this game sounds like Splinter Cell: Assasins Creed. UBI are the most un-original publishers/developng companys i've ever seen.
this game could be done on PS3 in a sinch. None of the reasons you posted make it not possible on PS3.

Adrian_Cloud

 

Moar cow tearz plz.  :glad: 

Avatar image for reaperstoll
reaperstoll

918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 reaperstoll
Member since 2006 • 918 Posts

Old. I already knew the X360 was more powerful than the inferiorstation2.4.

Facts such as these will only make the cows continue to weep. :glad:

RaniK_

That was witty, you lems get more and more creative every day. 

Avatar image for RaniK_
RaniK_

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 RaniK_
Member since 2004 • 10542 Posts
[QUOTE="RaniK_"]

Old. I already knew the X360 was more powerful than the inferiorstation2.4.

Facts such as these will only make the cows continue to weep. :glad:

reaperstoll

That was witty, you lems get more and more creative every day. 

 

Do I win teh prize?  ;D 

Avatar image for wooopz
wooopz

476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 wooopz
Member since 2005 • 476 Posts

rofl i love it how u guys critisize ubi for making bad ports and then whine about them not porting this

and to everyone who keeps saying they're lazy grow up, if theyre lazy how come each ps3 port is delayed to have more time to work on and still comes up short. Thats not lazy, most ports u can see the problem is lighting and textures, which is clearly showing hardware inneficeincy in the ps3

Avatar image for reaperstoll
reaperstoll

918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 reaperstoll
Member since 2006 • 918 Posts
[QUOTE="reaperstoll"][QUOTE="RaniK_"]

Old. I already knew the X360 was more powerful than the inferiorstation2.4.

Facts such as these will only make the cows continue to weep. :glad:

RaniK_

That was witty, you lems get more and more creative every day.

 

Do I win teh prize? ;D

Yup, you get SC: C. Have fun with it.

Avatar image for RaniK_
RaniK_

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 RaniK_
Member since 2004 • 10542 Posts
[QUOTE="RaniK_"][QUOTE="reaperstoll"][QUOTE="RaniK_"]

Old. I already knew the X360 was more powerful than the inferiorstation2.4.

Facts such as these will only make the cows continue to weep. :glad:

reaperstoll

That was witty, you lems get more and more creative every day.

 

Do I win teh prize? ;D

Yup, you get SC: C. Have fun with it.

 

Is it going to be the collector's edition?  ;D 

Avatar image for Verge_6
Verge_6

20282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Verge_6
Member since 2007 • 20282 Posts
I'm 99% sure it could. What's with all the dev smack-talk nowadays?
Avatar image for BrooklynBomber
BrooklynBomber

1507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 BrooklynBomber
Member since 2007 • 1507 Posts
Ubisoft is lazy or just lacks skills so no wonder their game can't be done on the ps3 lol. When I see FN3,oblivion,sigma ect it just shows you how much ubisoft sucks at ports.
Avatar image for RaniK_
RaniK_

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 RaniK_
Member since 2004 • 10542 Posts

rofl i love it how u guys critisize ubi for making bad ports and then whine about them not porting this

and to everyone who keeps saying they're lazy grow up, if theyre lazy how come each ps3 port is delayed to have more time to work on and still comes up short. Thats not lazy, most ports u can see the problem is lighting and textures, which is clearly showing hardware inneficeincy in the ps3

wooopz

 

Indeed, it's quite pathetic.  Then again, cows are pathetic so it isn't anything out of the ordinary.  Those babycalfz still believe

 the loafstation3 is more powerful.  Ha.  ;D 

Avatar image for RaniK_
RaniK_

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 RaniK_
Member since 2004 • 10542 Posts

Ubisoft is lazy or just lacks skills so no wonder their game can't be done on the ps3 lol. When I see FN3,oblivion,sigma ect it just shows you how much ubisoft sucks at ports.BrooklynBomber

 

And the tear flow from babycalfz ensues.  Moar plz. 

Avatar image for Sgt_Hale
Sgt_Hale

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#78 Sgt_Hale
Member since 2007 • 2257 Posts

[QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"]I really don't care. 360 could keep all Tom Clancy games exclusive and I wouldn't care. But it's Ubisoft, I'm sure they'll find a way to get it to the PS3, as much as it will likely suck.dapmediainc

 

LazyDevs, I don't think so. UBIsoft made some fantastic game for both Xbox and PC, they where not lazy with those systems.

Fear, great on PC and XBOX. Its just that the PS3 is a very hard system to master AND, the PS3 is real bad at lighting affects and shadows.Take a look at that tech demo for the ducks, no shadow what so eva.

You're incorrect on that. NGS has the best shadow effects of any other next gen machine right now & there have already been several comments about how nice some of the lighting effects are on the PS3. It's just up to the devs. And Ubisoft hasn't been able to do a good job on the PS3 yet, period. Dissapointing considering that I'm looking forward to Assassin's Creed.

But regardless, without a link, I tend to believe this is bs from the poster anyway.

Avatar image for Zenkuso
Zenkuso

4090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Zenkuso
Member since 2006 • 4090 Posts

When you build a game from the ground up on one system its not going to be doable on the other unless you build the game again from the ground up on that system.

Hope that helps alot of you's get your head around this, lair, msg4 and FF13 being ported, because thats essentially the only reason they can't be ported.

 

Avatar image for Sgt_Hale
Sgt_Hale

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#80 Sgt_Hale
Member since 2007 • 2257 Posts

rofl i love it how u guys critisize ubi for making bad ports and then whine about them not porting this

and to everyone who keeps saying they're lazy grow up, if theyre lazy how come each ps3 port is delayed to have more time to work on and still comes up short. Thats not lazy, most ports u can see the problem is lighting and textures, which is clearly showing hardware inneficeincy in the ps3

wooopz

Ubi is either lazy or unskilled. When other devs are able to make ports on par, or better, than the original, it only stands to reason that the reasponsibility lies in the hands of the developers. There has already been at least 2 ports that were better on the PS3 and more that were identical on both platforms... the 360 is hardly superior, it's just up to the devs to take advantage of the hardware.

Avatar image for Gen007
Gen007

11006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#81 Gen007
Member since 2006 • 11006 Posts
you know everyday we hear devs saying that so and so is not possible on x system who do we trust
Avatar image for ApocalypseXIVV
ApocalypseXIVV

1988

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#82 ApocalypseXIVV
Member since 2004 • 1988 Posts
[QUOTE="dapmediainc"]

[QUOTE="Not-A-Stalker"]I really don't care. 360 could keep all Tom Clancy games exclusive and I wouldn't care. But it's Ubisoft, I'm sure they'll find a way to get it to the PS3, as much as it will likely suck.Not-A-Stalker

 

LazyDevs, I don't think so. UBIsoft made some fantastic game for both Xbox and PC, they where not lazy with those systems.

Fear, great on PC and XBOX. Its just that the PS3 is a very hard system to master AND, the PS3 is real bad at lighting affects and shadows.Take a look at that tech demo for the ducks, no shadow what so eva.

 

Uh, no. They are bad devs. They may be good for the 360 or PC, but once they start making all these shoddy ports, their crediblility goes down, down, down. Ports are game, too. These guys obviously don't understand that.

PS3 is bad at lighting and shadows? Tell me, what games have you made or are working on for the PS3 right now?

Assasins Creed??? the game u all bragged about until it went multiplat 

Avatar image for Sgt_Hale
Sgt_Hale

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#83 Sgt_Hale
Member since 2007 • 2257 Posts

Ubisoft is lazy or just lacks skills so no wonder their game can't be done on the ps3 lol. When I see FN3,oblivion,sigma ect it just shows you how much ubisoft sucks at ports.BrooklynBomber

Exactly. And the list goes on... NBA Homecourt, Virtua Tennis, Armored Core 4 (the 360 lighting is horrible on that game), etc...

Avatar image for TheWiikestLink
TheWiikestLink

1730

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 TheWiikestLink
Member since 2006 • 1730 Posts

[QUOTE="grovestreet12"]Magazine article:

- No more sneaking around in the shadows. Apparently you're going to be more like James Bond and infiltrate buildings in plain daylight. You won't have to use force or sneak around as long as you don't act suspiciously.

- According to the article, every single object that is rendered on screen has physical properties and most of them can be used by Sam. For example, Sam can pick up furniture and use it as a weapon, or throw printers at enemies or papers in the face of enemies to gain the upperhand in fights.

- Melee fights are much more than "press this button to hit" this time around. There's different context sensitive attack buttons and as mentioned before lots of environmental interaction.

- Some pretty negative comments about the ps3 made by the devs. They state the fact that they are exclusive to the 360 allows them to do much more than if they were multiplatform (duh) but they also state they doubt they would be able to achieve what they're doing with the game on the 360 on the ps3 even if it was ps3 exclusive.

The lead programmer told the magazine he doubts they would have been able to pull of the lightning effects they have right now on the ps3. That's the only thing they say straight out, but they do state they believe they're much better off on the 360.

Discuss.Huxley_00

 

for a developer company that has worked on the 360 and PS3 and works on PS3 games all the time..

I'll take his word for it.. 

using that logic,every thing factor 5 has said about the ps3 being 100x times more powerfull is true too since factior 5 was a XBOX 360 xclusive,then JUMPED SHIP to be Playstation exclusive after ps3 was shown.
Avatar image for Sgt_Hale
Sgt_Hale

2257

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#85 Sgt_Hale
Member since 2007 • 2257 Posts

you know everyday we hear devs saying that so and so is not possible on x system who do we trustGen007

It's the new fad. And yet Rockstar points out that it is the 360 holding back progress on GTAIV. GS tried to put a spin on it but the his actual response was that the 360 is hindering progress on the game due to the lack of standardized hdd's and the fact that dvd's are 5x smaller than blu rays.

Avatar image for Sooshy
Sooshy

1723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#86 Sooshy
Member since 2007 • 1723 Posts
All the new gameplay makes me nervous. I hope they pull it off.
Avatar image for RaniK_
RaniK_

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 RaniK_
Member since 2004 • 10542 Posts

[QUOTE="BrooklynBomber"]Ubisoft is lazy or just lacks skills so no wonder their game can't be done on the ps3 lol. When I see FN3,oblivion,sigma ect it just shows you how much ubisoft sucks at ports.Sgt_Hale

Exactly. And the list goes on... NBA Homecourt, Virtua Tennis, Armored Core 4 (the 360 lighting is horrible on that game), etc...

 

HAHAHAHAHA, cows are so delusional.  Wow, all games you listed are better on X360.  Especially AC4, a game that was built on inferiorstation3 hardware and ported to X360.  

 

More spin plz, angry calf. 

 

bu bu teh ubi iz teh lazy!!!111 *tearz 

Avatar image for RaniK_
RaniK_

10542

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 RaniK_
Member since 2004 • 10542 Posts

[QUOTE="Gen007"]you know everyday we hear devs saying that so and so is not possible on x system who do we trustSgt_Hale

It's the new fad. And yet Rockstar points out that it is the 360 holding back progress on GTAIV. GS tried to put a spin on it but the his actual response was that the 360 is hindering progress on the game due to the lack of standardized hdd's and the fact that dvd's are 5x smaller than blu rays.

 

Hahahaha, more spin plz.  Hopefully you're aware the footage they revealed was running on the superior X360.  :glad: 

Avatar image for kittykatz5k
kittykatz5k

32249

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 34

User Lists: 0

#89 kittykatz5k
Member since 2004 • 32249 Posts
It's not that they couldn't, it's the ubisoft isn't. Any ubigame that isn't on xbox mainly sucks as they only try with 1 freakin version.
Avatar image for Sooshy
Sooshy

1723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#90 Sooshy
Member since 2007 • 1723 Posts
using that logic,every thing factor 5 has said about the ps3 being 100x times more powerfull is true too since factior 5 was a XBOX 360 xclusive,then JUMPED SHIP to be Playstation exclusive after ps3 was shown.TheWiikestLink
Factor 5 never even made any games for the Xbox 360, or Xbox for that matter.
Avatar image for sainraja
sainraja

1956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 sainraja
Member since 2006 • 1956 Posts

Anyone who says Ubisoft hasn't been lazy needs to explain how other developers have managed to do it just fine with the PS3.

 

[QUOTE="TheWiikestLink"]using that logic,every thing factor 5 has said about the ps3 being 100x times more powerfull is true too since factior 5 was a XBOX 360 xclusive,then JUMPED SHIP to be Playstation exclusive after ps3 was shown.Sooshy
Factor 5 never even made any games for the Xbox 360, or Xbox for that matter.

 That doesn't mean they haven't worked with the hardware.

Avatar image for AcidTWister
AcidTWister

22981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 AcidTWister
Member since 2002 • 22981 Posts

Everybody hear that? Its time for COW LOGIC.

"Teh 360 is limitin Gta 4 becuz of da core. Ps3 for da win"

"ubisoft is unrelible of curse splinter cell would be betta on the ps3 there just paid by micosoft to say that"

Cows you make me smile every time :lol:

DeathWishv1

Cow logic? Rockstar gave reasons why GTA was limited. Ubisoft just says "It can't be done" with no reasoning behind it.  Lack of memory, lack of eperience with the hardware? What is it?

Avatar image for XL83
XL83

994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#93 XL83
Member since 2007 • 994 Posts

I dont care what Ubisoft says about the PS3 after the **** they put on it. It just shows they dont care about the console.asdasd

Ubisoft is a joke these days. They are pretty much the epitome of a weak ass developer. If they want to alienate a huge chunk of their old fanbase, they're doing a fantastic job of it.  

Avatar image for XL83
XL83

994

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#94 XL83
Member since 2007 • 994 Posts
[QUOTE="DeathWishv1"]

Everybody hear that? Its time for COW LOGIC.

"Teh 360 is limitin Gta 4 becuz of da core. Ps3 for da win"

"ubisoft is unrelible of curse splinter cell would be betta on the ps3 there just paid by micosoft to say that"

Cows you make me smile every time :lol:

AcidTWister

Cow logic? Rockstar gave reasons why GTA was limited. Ubisoft just says "It can't be done" with no reasoning behind it. Lack of memory, lack of eperience with the hardware? What is it?

CAUTION: Reasoning with fools can make your head explode. Proceed at your own risk. 

Avatar image for albi321
albi321

1552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 albi321
Member since 2007 • 1552 Posts
Why should devs take their time to make good ports for other consoles if they aren't going to sell well. (oblivion ps3 anyone?)
Avatar image for asdasd
asdasd

4464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 asdasd
Member since 2005 • 4464 Posts

Why should devs take their time to make good ports for other consoles if they aren't going to sell well. (oblivion ps3 anyone?)albi321

You mean the port of a game that a !@#$ ton of people played a year befre the ps3 release? :? What did you expect from its sales? #1? 

Avatar image for RurouniSaiyajin
RurouniSaiyajin

4951

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 RurouniSaiyajin
Member since 2007 • 4951 Posts
I'm sorry but Ubisoft has lost all rights to say what any system is capable of other than the 360 until it actually produces something great for one of the other two current gen systems.
Avatar image for djestar
djestar

480

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#98 djestar
Member since 2005 • 480 Posts
PS3 clearly is inferior to 360 when it comes to textures and lighting.
Avatar image for gamer4life85
gamer4life85

1203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 gamer4life85
Member since 2003 • 1203 Posts

Taketwo gave reasons why both PS3 and xbox have disadvantages in GTA5.

Its not lazy devs its sony hardware(CELL,Video Card) what are all the devs lazy LOL, I don't think so.

Tecmo had no Pro with NGS cause really its a xbox port and yes it looks good but really its only in high res with some new details nothing special.

Avatar image for HyperMetaDragon
HyperMetaDragon

5345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#100 HyperMetaDragon
Member since 2006 • 5345 Posts

That's cause 360's GPU and CPU are a bit more powerful than PS3's, yet A LOT easier to program.