Oh hai guys, its just Real Life 2 flexing its muscles
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="chaplainDMK"]
Oh hai guys, its just Real Life 2 flexing its muscles
jimmarko21876
/Thread LOL :)
Best of all, practicaly evreyone can play it! All you need is a 5 GHz Single Core Brain and some Mk 2 eyeballs. Runs silky smooth at 30 FPS without any hiccups! Amazing.
[QUOTE="marcos27pr"]
[QUOTE="TintedEyes"]
Gonna gove Kz2 the nod on this sorry.
TintedEyes
Wait is this a joke ARE YOU BLINDBlur Vs sharp
Look How much Sharper its Halo OMG you must be joking are you looking at the same thing am looking at
BY THE WAY THIS ITS ALPHA
Sharper doesn't equal better graphics though KZ2 still looks better, and you brought Reach up not me, dont fall back on alpha now.Sharp doesn't equal better graphics? then what do's?
Better Texture ?
Polygons ?
I dont know it seems reach beats KZ2 in all of thos
Personally, I prefer sharp and jaggies-free graphics. I don't know why the preoccupation with blurry graphics. That said, blurries seem harder to notice in HDTV than pc monitors.
Sharper doesn't equal better graphics though KZ2 still looks better, and you brought Reach up not me, dont fall back on alpha now.[QUOTE="TintedEyes"]
[QUOTE="marcos27pr"]
Wait is this a joke ARE YOU BLINDBlur Vs sharp
Look How much Sharper its Halo OMG you must be joking are you looking at the same thing am looking at
BY THE WAY THIS ITS ALPHA
marcos27pr
Sharp doesn't equal better graphics? then what do's?
Better Texture ?
Polygons ?
I dont know it seems reach beats KZ2 in all of thos
I notice you never have gameplay pics, why not post gameplay pics?[QUOTE="marcos27pr"]
[QUOTE="TintedEyes"] Sharper doesn't equal better graphics though KZ2 still looks better, and you brought Reach up not me, dont fall back on alpha now.
FIipMode
Sharp doesn't equal better graphics? then what do's?
Better Texture ?
Polygons ?
I dont know it seems reach beats KZ2 in all of thos
I notice you never have gameplay pics, why not post gameplay pics?Because ther arent that Many Pics
This is gameplay Halo Reach Go's 3rd person Cam when driving and Assasination ther arent that many on First person
...read his post :P[QUOTE="NVIDIATI"]
[QUOTE="jettpack"]
Are you joking? that Crysis pic is set on low. and is super low res. you got the worst crysis pic you could find.
jettpack
lol, wups. mybad.
you cant compare bad shots from an open world game to a corridor linear game. uc2 just makes u look at what they wanted u to see.[QUOTE="Human-after-all"]Those pics reveal just how far it is away from Crysis-level.stenderoniand NBA Street Homecourt-level.
:lol: It's great to have you back. I could use a few good laughs.
marcos27pr, :lol:, listen, KZ2's graphical fidelity is much, much higher than HR graphical fidelity in every single graphical aspect so far. Honestly stop embarrising yourself on the forums...your acting like a rabid fanboy...Also, those pics you show of HR, while comparing them to KZ2 is so sad its not even funny. Do you know what kind of pics you are touting? You are touting pics that are in pre-alpha and alpha, representing place holder textures, then you try to tout "lookz at those texturez!!!11!!1!1", or you use pics from the vid doc representing Bungies Target Render and honestly...its pretty pathetic. Do you wish to allow me to use the E3 2005 KZ2 trailer to represent KZ2? Because that would certainly look much better than HR
There's a photo mode in Uncharted 2...this does not represent the real game and you know it....I can go into the game and get an actual pic to stop your fanboy but we both no that's you're wrong.A few more Multiplayer
kid" src="http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/6741/uncharted2amongthieves4.jpg" width=720 height=1280>
Impress3
[QUOTE="Jake145222"]the first two pics look terrible. The third one is niceTheAxeMurdererAgree about the middle one, but I think the first one is the most impressive of the bunch. yeah look at the snow on his pants and the detail
[QUOTE="TheAxeMurderer"][QUOTE="Jake145222"]the first two pics look terrible. The third one is nicenitromuffinAgree about the middle one, but I think the first one is the most impressive of the bunch. yeah look at the snow on his pants and the detail
You could get snow on your pants by rolling around in it in Lost Planet, it's not a big deal. :roll:
you'll never experience anything graphically or gameplay wise on the 360...ever!!!
well....maybe that soccerball kicking game for the natal...lol
Except Gears of War which does still lok great, Alan wake, exclusively for the 360 coming soon, ... Oh and SP3 will never be graphics king as long as this is 'system wars' and Crysis exists. Sorry but FAIL on the attempt to rub in graphix king where none exists.dude i don't know if you know this but, seeing a game in screenshot isn't the same as seeing it in person, i just saw it now and my mouth was wide open.
uncharted 2 is pretty as hell
Graphically, U2 COULD (and I said COULD) match up crysis in every aspect, color, shadows texture (less physic). But the damne fu**in problem with U2 and U1, it's that the artworkers (just invent this term now) have chosen a lot of OVER-SATURATED colors, Crysis's strength was in the its perfect colorimetey. Maybe U3 could get it correct.TheDarkPersianSo much wrong with this post.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment