I love how Hermits love to post pics of Crysis that aren't even from their own rig.... It's almost always some MOD thats not even released yet, and even if it were their system would run it at 5fps. So sad.
I'm all for posting Crysis pics, but post them from your computer, make them look as best you can on your rig running at 30fps... then post them as much as you want. Make sure you have fraps running so we can see the fps. If Hermits would follow this rule, we'd see very few Crysis pics.
I don't get it, why on both Uncharted games everything looks like it's made out of plastic, especially the character models... nintendog66
It's not going for uber realism. All though, what suprises me is that Cows even hype the graphics. I mean, it has colours in it, and it's not an FPS. Cows ...
those uncharted picsare beautiful. thb, the pic where nathan is looking down the street seems to have way too much blur. it seems to be from an in game cinematic. reminds me of the in game cutscenes from geow2. it looks great but too much blur.
@ the guys with the crysis pics.
guys, that's not fair. crysis wins all graphics threads by default.
Why is that with sony fanboys posting off screenshots and off-shots of uncharted 2? why they can't be honest and admit it doesn't look that much better than the first uncharted infact it looks worse.
Why is that with sony fanboys posting off screenshots and off-shots of uncharted 2? why they can't be honest and admit it doesn't look that much better than the first uncharted infact it looks worse.VitunLehmat
This thread doesn't have off screen shots, the other Uncharted 2 thread does though.
those uncharted picsare beautiful. thb, the pic where nathan is looking down the street seems to have way too much blur. it seems to be from an in game cinematic. reminds me of the in game cutscenes from geow2. it looks great but too much blur.
@ the guys with the crysis pics.
guys, that's not fair. crysis wins all graphics threads by default.
cowgriller
Its not blurr,its an effect known as "Depth of Field" ...They use it to make the game look more realistic.
[QUOTE="VitunLehmat"]Why is that with sony fanboys posting off screenshots and off-shots of uncharted 2? why they can't be honest and admit it doesn't look that much better than the first uncharted infact it looks worse.AAllxxjjnn
This thread doesn't have off screen shots, the other Uncharted 2 thread does though. This one has bullshots.
Why is that with sony fanboys posting off screenshots and off-shots of uncharted 2? why they can't be honest and admit it doesn't look that much better than the first uncharted infact it looks worse.VitunLehmat
Why do people think their opinion if fact when they post their opinion as a question?
If the latest Uncharted 2 screen shots are not bullshots, then I'll be the first to say it looks likely to be a new console graphics king. Count me in as very impressed especially with the normal mapping and textures.
I have to also comment, there are tons of cows this last week on these boards and they're more aggressive than ever in bashing the 360. It's like someone stirred up a hornets nest.
mcgreddy: so if you're not falling over yourself in love with the PS3 you're automatically a lemming? :lol:
DAZZER7
Yes is agree,but you see its a seasonal thing.Some years back when the PS3 was bad and it wasnt getting any good exclusives,the lemms were all over the board.Claiming multiplat A and B look better on 360...etc...Exclusive A on 360 looks the best...etc.. But since recently when Sony has done a great job with releasing a well polished game one after another,the tables have turned...So its a seasonal thing. And about PC graphics,theres NO point in comparing PC with consoles,Gears Of War 1 on my Pc looks better than Gears of War 2 on 360.So no point in that....Its mostly about Ps3 vs 360.
[QUOTE="VitunLehmat"]Why is that with sony fanboys posting off screenshots and off-shots of uncharted 2? why they can't be honest and admit it doesn't look that much better than the first uncharted infact it looks worse.skektek
Why do people think their opinion if fact when they post their opinion as a question? Doesn't change the fact the screenshots in this thread are BULLSHOTS.
[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"][QUOTE="VitunLehmat"]Why is that with sony fanboys posting off screenshots and off-shots of uncharted 2? why they can't be honest and admit it doesn't look that much better than the first uncharted infact it looks worse.VitunLehmat
This thread doesn't have off screen shots, the other Uncharted 2 thread does though. This one has bullshots.No. But some of them are concept paintings.
Thanks for posting ingame shots of Crysis. Now we know for sure that U2 looks better. In motion U2 pwns Crysis even harder. Lol @ the people posting Crysis tech demo bullshots. I dare you to post ingame Crysis in motion Vs. Uncharted 2. I wouldn't recomend it though it might crush your soul when you realise you wasted 3G's on a gaming rig for 1 ho-hum whatever shooter.
[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"][QUOTE="VitunLehmat"]Why is that with sony fanboys posting off screenshots and off-shots of uncharted 2? why they can't be honest and admit it doesn't look that much better than the first uncharted infact it looks worse.VitunLehmat
This thread doesn't have off screen shots, the other Uncharted 2 thread does though. This one has bullshots. Hell no man ...Show me ONE which is bullshot ?
[QUOTE="skektek"][QUOTE="VitunLehmat"][QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"] This thread doesn't have off screen shots, the other Uncharted 2 thread does though. This one has bullshots.No. But some of them are concept paintings. They are bullshots,PS3 can't do 24xAA no matter how much you try to spin it they are still bullshots.
[QUOTE="mcgreddy"][QUOTE="VitunLehmat"][QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"] This thread doesn't have off screen shots, the other Uncharted 2 thread does though. This one has bullshots. Hell no man ...Show me ONE which is bullshot ? They are all bullshots,ps3 can't do 24xAA keep trying harder.
those uncharted picsare beautiful. thb, the pic where nathan is looking down the street seems to have way too much blur. it seems to be from an in game cinematic. reminds me of the in game cutscenes from geow2. it looks great but too much blur.
@ the guys with the crysis pics.
guys, that's not fair. crysis wins all graphics threads by default.
mcgreddy
Its not blurr,its an effect known as "Depth of Field" ...They use it to make the game look more realistic. looks more unrealistic
[QUOTE="VitunLehmat"]IF we use fanboy logic these screenshots aren't bullshots and look better than uncharted 2,what are cows going to say now? they arent bullshots
[QUOTE="VitunLehmat"]IF we use fanboy logic these screenshots aren't bullshots and look better than uncharted 2,what are cows going to say now? 600000000000455
they arent bullshots
You honestly made a new account just to bash gears 2 and crysis?
[QUOTE="600000000000455"][QUOTE="VitunLehmat"]IF we use fanboy logic these screenshots aren't bullshots and look better than uncharted 2,what are cows going to say now? PSdual_wielder
they arent bullshots
You honestly made a new account just to bash gears 2 and crysis?
Its probably VitunLe....... @VitunLehmat If you dont like U2s graphics and still think the 360 is "Graphics" king even after the release of Killzone 2.Than you probably have a different taste,because dude majority of the people think both U2 and KZ2 look good.Not only at GS but all over the net.
those uncharted picsare beautiful. thb, the pic where nathan is looking down the street seems to have way too much blur. it seems to be from an in game cinematic. reminds me of the in game cutscenes from geow2. it looks great but too much blur.
@ the guys with the crysis pics.
guys, that's not fair. crysis wins all graphics threads by default.
mcgreddy
Its not blurr,its an effect known as "Depth of Field" ...They use it to make the game look more realistic.
thanks for the correction but the depth only seems to be a few feet. just look at the tire in pic three. that tire can't be more than 6 feet away and yet it's blurred from the dof filter. epic did the same for geows2 and i found it annoying, though not as annoying as the "motion blur" they use. all it does is draw one or two frames in front and behind every object and not actually blur it. still, aside from the filter, the game looks top notch.
those uncharted picsare beautiful. thb, the pic where nathan is looking down the street seems to have way too much blur. it seems to be from an in game cinematic. reminds me of the in game cutscenes from geow2. it looks great but too much blur.
@ the guys with the crysis pics.
guys, that's not fair. crysis wins all graphics threads by default.
cowgriller
Its not blurr,its an effect known as "Depth of Field" ...They use it to make the game look more realistic.
thanks for the correction but the depth only seems to be a few feet. just look at the tire in pic three. that tire can't be more than 6 feet away and yet it's blurred from the dof filter. epic did the same for geows2 and i found it annoying, though not as annoying as the "motion blur" they use. all it does is draw one or two frames in front and behind every object and not actually blur it. still, aside from the filter, the game looks top notch.
Yeah the third one is from a mini in game cutscene.Can you notice the difference between the first and the third ? the first one is still more clear. Anyway though,these were the first few pics released,it has improved BY far.They did a great job on draw distance,shown in the recent E3 Sonys conference footage.A whole city was visible from the roof top of one building and the graphics were just amazing.You can check that out...
[QUOTE="mcgreddy"] Its not blurr,its an effect known as "Depth of Field" ...They use it to make the game look more realistic.mcgreddy
thanks for the correction but the depth only seems to be a few feet. just look at the tire in pic three. that tire can't be more than 6 feet away and yet it's blurred from the dof filter. epic did the same for geows2 and i found it annoying, though not as annoying as the "motion blur" they use. all it does is draw one or two frames in front and behind every object and not actually blur it. still, aside from the filter, the game looks top notch.
Yeah the third one is from a mini in game cutscene.Can you notice the difference between the first and the third ? the first one is still more clear. Anyway though,these were the first few pics released,it has improved BY far.They did a great job on draw distance,shown in the recent E3 Sonys conference footage.A whole city was visible from the roof top of one building and the graphics were just amazing.You can check that out...
yea i saw it on g4 during the sony conference. when nathan went to roof and showed the cam shot of the city and mountain range, my jaw dropped. that was amazing. looks like naughty dog knows exactly what their doing. i just wish that more companies would use a proprietary engine for the 360 and ps3 (especially 360) rather than relying on ue3. sure it looks good, but all games with it look the same, except for Mass Effect and ME2. those look heavenly. if you haven't seen ME2 yet, check it out.
[QUOTE="600000000000455"] they arent bullshots mcgreddy
You honestly made a new account just to bash gears 2 and crysis?
Its probably VitunLe....... @VitunLehmat If you dont like U2s graphics and still think the 360 is "Graphics" king even after the release of Killzone 2.Than you probably have a different taste,because dude majority of the people think both U2 and KZ2 look good.Not only at GS but all over the net. So now you are changing the subject because you can't prove me wrong? Most of these people are only sony fanboys and fake manticores.
Threads like this are pointless because we all know that someone will eventually post a crysis screenshot to bash the thread.
But isn't it amazing seeing graphics at this level rendered in "an outdated Hardware"(According to PC fanboys).
tontontam0
They already have posted Crysis pics on the first page.And my intention was never to compare it with Crysis.I personally have finished both Crysis and Warhead on very high DX10 and Warhead on enthusiast settings even with AA and AF.Still i dont see them in the same league,Crysis graphics dont have an argument.So no point in comparing PC games with consoles.PCs always have the advantage of upgrading. As on consoles,i believe that U2 is the best looking game.
You honestly made a new account just to bash gears 2 and crysis?
VitunLehmat
Its probably VitunLe....... @VitunLehmat If you dont like U2s graphics and still think the 360 is "Graphics" king even after the release of Killzone 2.Than you probably have a different taste,because dude majority of the people think both U2 and KZ2 look good.Not only at GS but all over the net. So now you are changing the subject because you can't prove me wrong? Most of these people are only sony fanboys and fake manticores.
I dont have to prove you wrong,because you are wrong.Killzone 2 is the undisputed console graphics king and so far Uncharted II is looking better than that.Its a fact not opinion anymore...
"Most of these people are only sony fanboys and fake manticores."
I hate it when lemms claim this ....
Just do a little reality check here on GS forums :
Xbox 360 = 1,667,525
PS3 = 1,643,645
Thats more than 20,000 more threads than the PS3.Xbox 360 has a far larger base over here than the PS3.Infact world wide Xbox 360 has a far larger base ..Facts say that its the console with more fanboys....
[QUOTE="AAllxxjjnn"][QUOTE="MortalDecay"] It does get VERY annoying when hermits feel the need to post a portfolio of Crysis pics every single time someone says a game looks good.ski11buzz
Know what's even more annoying? The console fan's constant bickering over which one of their games has the title of graphics king. The Crysis pics are just a dose of reality.
do you really think that people on a video game discussion board dont already know that crysis has the best graphics? anytime a graphics comparison comes up hermits come in showing re-used picutres of Crysis. thats really the most annoying thing of all.
Threads like this are pointless because we all know that someone will eventually post a crysis screenshot to bash the thread.
But isn't it amazing seeing graphics at this level rendered in "an outdated Hardware"(According to PC fanboys).
tontontam0
well the ps3 and 360 are both outdated. the wii is just a gamecube in a dvd drive with a new control. the difference with pc and console games is that console provide a closed environment. because of this, developers can fully utilize the hardware in console because they only have one specification (one type of gpu and one type of cpu with a set number of ram.)pc's are open environments. pc game devs don't have the luxury of fully utilizing one specific set of hardware because they have to make the game scalable enough to be played on low-end and middle-end pc's as well as high-end. why? to get a bigger number of potential customers. with the wider array of hardware ranging from a low end nvidia 8400gs or ati radeon hd 3400 all the way up to an nvidia gtx295 or amd radeon 4890, the devs aren't able to optimize a game to a particular set of hardware.
Threads like this are pointless because we all know that someone will eventually post a crysis screenshot to bash the thread.
But isn't it amazing seeing graphics at this level rendered in "an outdated Hardware"(According to PC fanboys).
mcgreddy
They already have posted Crysis pics on the first page.And my intention was never to compare it with Crysis.I personally have finished both Crysis and Warhead on very high DX10 and Warhead on enthusiast settings even with AA and AF.Still i dont see them in the same league,Crysis graphics dont have an argument.So no point in comparing PC games with consoles.PCs always have the advantage of upgrading. As on consoles,i believe that U2 is the best looking game.
I also finished it at high med @1680X1050 resolution settings. And I can say that the graphics is better than any console games.
But not all of us thinks that crysis looks better. It also depends on the art style.
Like this try comparing american animation and japanese animation.
But technically crysis defeats all games. so you're right there is no point comparing it to console games.
Log in to comment