So hot. Post more hot pics of this game. Deserves to get some credit for its graphics
This topic is locked from further discussion.
At least the game is easy to play over and over again and at least it's FUN.Yeaaah... Great job focusing on the graphics and yet again producing a game lacking in length.
septicvirus
[QUOTE="septicvirus"]At least the game is easy to play over and over again and at least it's FUN.Yeaaah... Great job focusing on the graphics and yet again producing a game lacking in length.
-dark-shadow-
i'm over 70hrs into mass effect and still having fun finding new missions armor and weapons.
[QUOTE="-dark-shadow-"][QUOTE="septicvirus"]At least the game is easy to play over and over again and at least it's FUN.Yeaaah... Great job focusing on the graphics and yet again producing a game lacking in length.
marklarmer
i'm over 70hrs into mass effect and still having fun finding new missions armor and weapons.
70!!! wow no offense but your slow at it then, i guess u like to sit around enjoy the scenery huh? lol seriously tho i did everything in 30 hours on verteran as a vangaurd i was prolly lvl 53 by the end too.
i guess it didnt take long to find those in a 7 hour game.marklarmer
It took me 9 hours and thats the right length otherwise it would get too repetitive
It's a great looking game. There have already been numerous threads declaring it "the graphics king of consoles", I'd say that's enough recognition. What more do you want us to do? Gently spoon it by the fire with Barry White playing in the background?aerman176Eh, it isn't recognized outside of the ps3 community. People are ignoring almost everything, and then stating 'gears of war looks better'. It is sad, that this game is getting zero recognition outside of the people who played it.
Why does it matter? "OMG TEH GRAPHICS ARE SO GREAT NOW PLAY THIS GAME!" Graphics mean jack when they pass a certain thresh-hold.
Sorta reminds me when Halo 3 was revealed to be 640p. Do you know what the population on XBOX Live went to when this was discovered? It went from one million to one million. Nobody cares. If it looks decent enough to not be distracted in a bad way, then graphics really don't mean a thing.
[QUOTE="aerman176"]It's a great looking game. There have already been numerous threads declaring it "the graphics king of consoles", I'd say that's enough recognition. What more do you want us to do? Gently spoon it by the fire with Barry White playing in the background?numba1234Eh, it isn't recognized outside of the ps3 community. People are ignoring almost everything, and then stating 'gears of war looks better'. It is sad, that this game is getting zero recognition outside of the people who played it.
Hmm, I guess I spoke to quickly then. I don't own a ps3, but I readily admit that Uncharted is better looking than any game I've played
Graphics do matter. Why do people hype games up in the fps genre. It isn't like there are different enemies, different vehicles, or different ai. It is usually because one fps looks better graphically then another. Why did cod4 get all this hype? What was so great about it besides its graphics?Why does it matter? "OMG TEH GRAPHICS ARE SO GREAT NOW PLAY THIS GAME!" Graphics mean jack when they pass a certain thresh-hold.
Sorta reminds me when Halo 3 was revealed to be 640p. Do you know what the population on XBOX Live went to when this was discovered? It went from one million to one million. Nobody cares. If it looks decent enough to not be distracted in a bad way, then graphics really don't mean a thing.
Element00216
Wow..the game looks great. I've been looking for a deal on Uncharted.
[QUOTE="septicvirus"]
[QUOTE="Heil68"]Its a absolutely gorgeous game.majadamus
I think Timeshift looks better.
That's funny.
You've obviously never played Timeshift.
The main problem with Uncharted is that too many people are focusing on just the graphics. It was a great game and maybe if cows spent less time bragging about the graphics on message boards and actually went out and bought it, it would have done much better. heretrixIt deserves to be bragged about. Just like how gears of war deserved tobe bragged about when it came out. It is so far ahead graphically then the other games, it should be recognized.
[QUOTE="heretrix"]The main problem with Uncharted is that too many people are focusing on just the graphics. It was a great game and maybe if cows spent less time bragging about the graphics on message boards and actually went out and bought it, it would have done much better. numba1234It deserves to be bragged about. Just like how gears of war deserved tobe bragged about when it came out. It is so far ahead graphically then the other games, it should be recognized.
Gears of War was "so far ahead" but Uncharted isnt, its slightly ahead. and miles behind the all-platform graphics king.
[QUOTE="septicvirus"]Yeaaah... Great job focusing on the graphics and yet again producing a game lacking in length.
R-Dot-Yung
took my 9 hours, and i played it twice, the unlockables are cool
its a "great" game for a reason
I concur, many many unlockables.. It took me about 9 hours as well.
It deserves to be bragged about. Just like how gears of war deserved tobe bragged about when it came out. It is so far ahead graphically then the other games, it should be recognized.[QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="heretrix"]The main problem with Uncharted is that too many people are focusing on just the graphics. It was a great game and maybe if cows spent less time bragging about the graphics on message boards and actually went out and bought it, it would have done much better. Meu2k7
Gears of War was "so far ahead" but Uncharted isnt, its slightly ahead. and miles behind the all-platform graphics king.
What is the all-platform graphics king?
[QUOTE="Meu2k7"]It deserves to be bragged about. Just like how gears of war deserved tobe bragged about when it came out. It is so far ahead graphically then the other games, it should be recognized.[QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="heretrix"]The main problem with Uncharted is that too many people are focusing on just the graphics. It was a great game and maybe if cows spent less time bragging about the graphics on message boards and actually went out and bought it, it would have done much better. inertk
Gears of War was "so far ahead" but Uncharted isnt, its slightly ahead. and miles behind the all-platform graphics king.
What is the all-platform graphics king?
crysis. I think. but wasn't that special graphics indoor. The graphics indoor were empty, and stale.[QUOTE="inertk"][QUOTE="Meu2k7"]It deserves to be bragged about. Just like how gears of war deserved tobe bragged about when it came out. It is so far ahead graphically then the other games, it should be recognized.[QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="heretrix"]The main problem with Uncharted is that too many people are focusing on just the graphics. It was a great game and maybe if cows spent less time bragging about the graphics on message boards and actually went out and bought it, it would have done much better. numba1234
Gears of War was "so far ahead" but Uncharted isnt, its slightly ahead. and miles behind the all-platform graphics king.
What is the all-platform graphics king?
crysis. I think. but wasn't that special graphics indoor. The graphics indoor were empty, and stale.When he said all-platform I thought he meant a game on both consoles + PC.
[QUOTE="Element00216"]Graphics do matter. Why do people hype games up in the fps genre. It isn't like there are different enemies, different vehicles, or different ai. It is usually because one fps looks better graphically then another. Why did cod4 get all this hype? What was so great about it besides its graphics?Why does it matter? "OMG TEH GRAPHICS ARE SO GREAT NOW PLAY THIS GAME!" Graphics mean jack when they pass a certain thresh-hold.
Sorta reminds me when Halo 3 was revealed to be 640p. Do you know what the population on XBOX Live went to when this was discovered? It went from one million to one million. Nobody cares. If it looks decent enough to not be distracted in a bad way, then graphics really don't mean a thing.
numba1234
No they don't. Unless there is something distracting about the graphics that take away from gameplay, all it manages to do is draw a user in. Gameplay does the same, and in the end, is the defining experience.
It happened when I got the 360 at launch. At first I was amazed by the graphics. It was a whole new world. Then after a few days, I stopped noticing them. The great graphics didn't change the fact that it was a last-gen game with a new face. Unless of course that you're willing to argue that the XBOX was superior to the PS2 and all of its games simply because it could render a better looking picture.
[QUOTE="numba1234"][QUOTE="Element00216"]Graphics do matter. Why do people hype games up in the fps genre. It isn't like there are different enemies, different vehicles, or different ai. It is usually because one fps looks better graphically then another. Why did cod4 get all this hype? What was so great about it besides its graphics?Why does it matter? "OMG TEH GRAPHICS ARE SO GREAT NOW PLAY THIS GAME!" Graphics mean jack when they pass a certain thresh-hold.
Sorta reminds me when Halo 3 was revealed to be 640p. Do you know what the population on XBOX Live went to when this was discovered? It went from one million to one million. Nobody cares. If it looks decent enough to not be distracted in a bad way, then graphics really don't mean a thing.
Element00216
No they don't. Unless there is something distracting about the graphics that take away from gameplay, all it manages to do is draw a user in. Gameplay does the same, and in the end, is the defining experience.
It happened when I got the 360 at launch. At first I was amazed by the graphics. It was a whole new world. Then after a few days, I stopped noticing them. The great graphics didn't change the fact that it was a last-gen game with a new face. Unless of course that you're willing to argue that the XBOX was superior to the PS2 and all of its games simply because it could render a better looking picture.
The difference between xbox, and ps2 was miniscule because it was unable to render visuals to reality. The fact is, the games that sell the highest aren't because of the gameplay, but because of the graphic capacity. Why the heck did cod3 sell more then cod2? COD3 wasn't the better game, but because the graphics were closer to reality more people bought it. People can't know what the gameplay is like from a trailer. The first hype comes from 1.the developer 2. The concept of the game 3. the graphics. Look at many games. For instance psn/xbla games usually are a blast to play, but why do they get lower scores, because they aren't graphically up bar with the 60 $ games. Look at some games. For example, prototype, and infamous aren't hyped besides its ambigious is because of the graphics. There concept and gameplay should be amazing, but graphics are very important for hype.yes, this game looks incredible. i'm at 92 % of the game now and i'm 8 and a half hours in.. avarage length these days.
The game does nothing new, but it does everything in a great and breathtaking way.
Not playing it is truelly missing out on a great game. Gameplay wise and graphics wise
The indoor stuff is beautiful, but the foliage is mehtacular.BioShockOwnzIf this guy says it looks good then the game really looks good.
mediocre games don't average higher then 85%. Anything higher then 85% is a amazing game. Worth playing. 90% is must buy (which this game is).
well the PS3 may be an overexpensive failure that's rapidly losing supportbut at least it has one or 2 mediocre games that look really nicethe_h_bomb
well the PS3 may be an overexpensive failure that's rapidly losing supportbut at least it has one or 2 mediocre games that look really nicethe_h_bomb
wow what planet do u live on. were are on earth buddy.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment