This topic is locked from further discussion.
So Halo 3 looks like crap, based on those pictures we have seen or maybe those pictures were from early development? Hmm, fanboy logic is amazing.
The truth is Halo 3 will look MUCH better than screenshots we have seen by now, this game and many other in the future will look better when they reach final stage of development. And actually i think new pictures look more detailed.
The difference is that the early Halo 3 trailer was controllable. It wasn't CG.So Halo 3 looks like crap, based on those pictures we have seen or maybe those pictures were from early development? Hmm, fanboy logic is amazing.
The truth is Halo 3 will look MUCH better than screenshots we have seen by now, this game and many other in the future will look better when they reach will stage of development. And actually i think new pictures look more detailed.
Vojkan80001
So Halo 3 looks like crap, based on those pictures we have seen or maybe those pictures were from early development? Hmm, fanboy logic is amazing.
The truth is Halo 3 will look MUCH better than screenshots we have seen by now, this game and many other in the future will look better when they reach final stage of development. And actually i think new pictures look more detailed.
Vojkan80001
"But teh pre-alpha :cry:"
I agree with you, this game will look much better closer to release
[QUOTE="Vojkan80001"]The difference is that the early Halo 3 trailer was controllable. It wasn't CG.So Halo 3 looks like crap, based on those pictures we have seen or maybe those pictures were from early development? Hmm, fanboy logic is amazing.
The truth is Halo 3 will look MUCH better than screenshots we have seen by now, this game and many other in the future will look better when they reach will stage of development. And actually i think new pictures look more detailed.
jvonrader
Again fanboy logic? Naughty Dog game trailer was not CGI, link is few messages above
[QUOTE="Vojkan80001"]The difference is that the early Halo 3 trailer was controllable. It wasn't CG. Do think halo3 will look better than crysis????So Halo 3 looks like crap, based on those pictures we have seen or maybe those pictures were from early development? Hmm, fanboy logic is amazing.
The truth is Halo 3 will look MUCH better than screenshots we have seen by now, this game and many other in the future will look better when they reach will stage of development. And actually i think new pictures look more detailed.
jvonrader
[QUOTE="Phantom_J"]Those graphics were never on par with Crysis, and except for the face and gun, this new picture actually looks a little more detailed than the older one.skyform
[QUOTE="Vojkan80001"]So Halo 3 looks like crap, based on those pictures we have seen or maybe those pictures were from early development? Hmm, fanboy logic is amazing.
The truth is Halo 3 will look MUCH better than screenshots we have seen by now, this game and many other in the future will look better when they reach final stage of development. And actually i think new pictures look more detailed.
Mass_Effect
"But teh pre-alpha :cry:"
I agree with you, this game will look much better closer to release
Finally someone using his brain.
The game has not been downgraded.
Firstly, the Game Informer shots are work in progress shots. And they are not even to the right resolution.
Secondly, the 'new' jungle pictures were actually old shots being displayed at a game art exhibition. It was intended for art and demonstrative purposes only.
Lastly, the E3 footage was real-time. You could even see some jaggies, see the normal mapping on the rocks at work, and see the physics when the car hit the destructible boxes. But of course that is a trailer and will have been worked on to its maximum potential. Trailers are made much differently from that of games since everything is finalised on the spot. The game however is made in stages like pre-alpha, alpha, beta etc. as was shown with Halo 3's and Metal Gear Solid 4's apparent 'downgrade'.
Please, learn how game development works before ever using the word downgrade again.
Â
[QUOTE="jvonrader"][QUOTE="Vojkan80001"]The difference is that the early Halo 3 trailer was controllable. It wasn't CG. Do think halo3 will look better than crysis???? No.So Halo 3 looks like crap, based on those pictures we have seen or maybe those pictures were from early development? Hmm, fanboy logic is amazing.
The truth is Halo 3 will look MUCH better than screenshots we have seen by now, this game and many other in the future will look better when they reach will stage of development. And actually i think new pictures look more detailed.
Killfox
People who are saying the new screens look better or the same are huge fanboys or they are blind.It does look better.
This is a damn huge difference, look at the awesome environment in the 1st picture, the 2nd has nothing on it and so does the character, if you look at the new 3d picture you can see how plastic looks the new character model.
skyform
[QUOTE="Phantom_J"][QUOTE="skyform"][QUOTE="Phantom_J"]Those graphics were never on par with Crysis, and except for the face and gun, this new picture actually looks a little more detailed than the older one.skyform
[QUOTE="Killfox"][QUOTE="skyform"][QUOTE="Phantom_J"][QUOTE="skyform"][QUOTE="Phantom_J"]Those graphics were never on par with Crysis, and except for the face and gun, this new picture actually looks a little more detailed than the older one.skyform
thats a really crappy downgade :?alcarazo9
[QUOTE="alcarazo9"]thats a really crappy downgade :?beyondgamez
[QUOTE="alcarazo9"][QUOTE="beyondgamez"][QUOTE="alcarazo9"]thats a really crappy downgade :?beyondgamez
That's not a downgrade. Naughty Dog is a top tier studio, They've never made a bad looking game.
But I'm not sure why lemmings would want to bash on Naughty Dog. Andy Gavin and Jason Rubin (owners) have said that they like the 360 more than the PS3 and they'd make games on it once their contract finishes with Sony.WildTurkey00
[QUOTE="beyondgamez"][QUOTE="alcarazo9"][QUOTE="beyondgamez"][QUOTE="alcarazo9"]thats a really crappy downgade :?alcarazo9
[QUOTE="WildTurkey00"]That's not a downgrade. Naughty Dog is a top tier studio, They've never made a bad looking game.
But I'm not sure why lemmings would want to bash on Naughty Dog. Andy Gavin and Jason Rubin (owners) have said that they like the 360 more than the PS3 and they'd make games on it once their contract finishes with Sony.alcarazo9
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment