Valve's New Game: DOTA 2!!

  • 141 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Zero5000X
Zero5000X

8314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Zero5000X
Member since 2004 • 8314 Posts
So, is DOTA 2 the official name or is that still an acronym for Defense of the Ancients?
Avatar image for deactivated-6243ee9902175
deactivated-6243ee9902175

5847

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 deactivated-6243ee9902175
Member since 2007 • 5847 Posts

I can't wait to get my hands on this, if there is 1 game I buy next year it will be this. Just looking at the art sends chills down my spine, can't wait to see what they do to Sand King, Earth Shaker, Tiny and Clock Work.

Avatar image for mexicangordo
mexicangordo

8687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 mexicangordo
Member since 2005 • 8687 Posts

[QUOTE="mexicangordo"]

Why? Again, Dota was not that popular before Icefrog started developing it. He made it successful, i don't know why people have a problem with that.

Maroxad

He may have popularized the game. But he didnt create it. DotA didnt create the concept either, it was Aeon of Strife, a map for the original Starcraft. Hence if you visit WC3 map sites, they will frequently refer the genre as Aeon of Strife (AoS). Still he didnt make the game, and because of that, he doesn't deserve rights to the IP, even if it was he who made the DotA the game it is today. In my opinion the IP should belong to the one that created it not the one that popularized it.

The game (DotA 2) will probably be the best in the AoS genre, but it is also the most questionable.

Obviously Ice didnt create it, however what does that have to do with anything? I honestly don't know where you guys are coming from. The IP was passed to him, and Valve officially took it. Dotais a editorial map, and is technically not a real game, its still WC3 there for there are no rights to the IP. Except if Blizzard/Activision step in (which can happen)

The original creator of Dota had his chance, and left. Now that Icefrog made things big he should claim the rewards? He had his chance with LoL (which flopped) and screwed up, it just further proves that Icefrog had what it took to elevate dota to a more access able and successful level.

Avatar image for mexicangordo
mexicangordo

8687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 mexicangordo
Member since 2005 • 8687 Posts

[QUOTE="AdrianWerner"]

[QUOTE="mexicangordo"]

Icefrog was not alone in creating Dota-allstars,

zaibutzu

The problem is he had no hand in actually creating DOTA, he just took over after few years. So creators in good faith left it for him and he cashed in on it and ran away. He even had a nerve to call it DOTA.

And knowingly purchasing stolen goods is what Valve did.

ICEFROG has been hard at work for the past few years developing dota for the community, releasing updates, fixing bugs, updating the game to keep the community interested. He also posts in forums to ask us what the gamers want to change in Dota and always updates the latest news. So what do you even mean when you say he ran away? And when he does not charge for the mods, what do you mean he cashed in on it. If you mean he sold it to Valve, please think again; Valve approached IceFrog. Seriously i doubt the people flaming Icefrog are even true Dota players. Anyone who plays it appreciates how much IceFrog has done for the game.

Thats exactly what im saying. I dont get how Icefrog put an incredible amount of effort in an abandoned project and people flame him for "stealing"

Avatar image for Karnage108
Karnage108

2595

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#55 Karnage108
Member since 2010 • 2595 Posts
Wait, "Valve"? I'm so confused.
Avatar image for Giancar
Giancar

19160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 Giancar
Member since 2006 • 19160 Posts
Please, can someone create a dota hater sig...:( I'm gonna change my Freeman sig :(:(:(
Avatar image for N30F3N1X
N30F3N1X

8923

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 N30F3N1X
Member since 2009 • 8923 Posts

*Everything from DotA is coming over


Its community too, I fear.

*AI bots take over disconnected players

LOLWUT - bots? Bots are worthless in a teamwork based game :?
*Not being a dick will improve your standing in the community


According to who?

*Interactive guides and coaching system to help newer players

Like SC2, I suppose. Too bad they're all worthless anyway.

siddhu33

Avatar image for hexashadow13
hexashadow13

5157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 hexashadow13
Member since 2010 • 5157 Posts
I really hope that LoL destroys this. This is the first time I've wanted Valve to fail.
Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

25309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Maroxad
Member since 2007 • 25309 Posts

Obviously Ice didnt create it, however what does that have to do with anything? I honestly don't know where you guys are coming from. The IP was passed to him, and Valve officially took it. Dotais a editorial map, and is technically not a real game, its still WC3 there for there are no rights to the IP. Except if Blizzard/Activision step in (which can happen)

The original creator of Dota had his chance, and left. Now that Icefrog made things big he should claim the rewards? He had his chance with LoL (which flopped) and screwed up, it just further proves that Icefrog had what it took to elevate dota to a more access able and successful level.

mexicangordo

Don't think I am viewing this in Black and white. The original creator should have taken steps to avoid this, Icefrog has his justifications for doing this, it may not be very nice, but he certainly has his justifications for doing this. Also, I don't think he ever gave him the IP, just permission to continue updating the map and in my honest opinion at this rate he deserves the map a lot more than the original creator does. However with that said, he does should not have the right making the sequel, sure he can make a spiritual sequel but not an actual sequel using the IP. Making the sequel should be reserved to him.

I mentioned this in my edit, but as it is right now the ones that really have the right to the IP is none other than Blizzard/Activision. I believe their EULA stated that any maps and such that were created using Blizzard's map editor belongs to them. Concepts don't, however the IP pretty much does. Don't get me wrong, I am mostly happy that the game is made the only thing I don't like about it is the fact that it is using the DotA IP.

To summarize: Make the game, just change the IP being used.

P.S: I don't know if LoL flopped, quality wise it was not that good but it certainly is popular. Icefrog not only proved himself to be the superior developer when he made the map popular, but also when LoL showed up to be not nearly as good as the game. Unfortunately, all my friends moved over from DotA to LoL meaning that if I want to play with them I will have to play that :cry: (I can rant about the game all day complaining about bad design choices in LoL)

Avatar image for mexicangordo
mexicangordo

8687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 mexicangordo
Member since 2005 • 8687 Posts

[QUOTE="mexicangordo"]

Obviously Ice didnt create it, however what does that have to do with anything? I honestly don't know where you guys are coming from. The IP was passed to him, and Valve officially took it. Dotais a editorial map, and is technically not a real game, its still WC3 there for there are no rights to the IP. Except if Blizzard/Activision step in (which can happen)

The original creator of Dota had his chance, and left. Now that Icefrog made things big he should claim the rewards? He had his chance with LoL (which flopped) and screwed up, it just further proves that Icefrog had what it took to elevate dota to a more access able and successful level.

Maroxad

Don't think I am viewing this in Black and white. The original creator should have taken steps to avoid this, Icefrog has his justifications for doing this, it may not be very nice, but he certainly has his justifications for doing this. Also, I don't think he ever gave him the IP, just permission to continue updating the map and in my honest opinion at this rate he deserves the map a lot more than the original creator does. However with that said, he does should not have the right making the sequel, sure he can make a spiritual sequel but not an actual sequel using the IP. Making the sequel should be reserved to him.

I mentioned this in my edit, but as it is right now the ones that really have the right to the IP is none other than Blizzard/Activision. Their EULA stated that any maps and such that were created using Blizzard's map editor belongs to them. Concepts don't, however the IP pretty much does. Don't get me wrong, I am mostly happy that the game is made the only thing I don't like about it is the fact that it is using the DotA IP.

To summarize: Make the game, just change the IP being used.

P.S: I don't know if LoL flopped, quality wise it was not that good but it certainly is popular. Icefrog not only proved himself to be the superior developer when he made the map popular, but also when LoL showed up to be not nearly as good as the game. Unfortunately, all my friends moved over from DotA to LoL meaning that if I want to play with them I will have to play that :cry: (I can rant about the game all day complaining about bad design choices in LoL)

I totally agree with that. I think using Dota as the offical name is going to lead into a huge legal issue. Unless if its really called Dota 2 and not Defence of the Ancients then I can see them having rights to that since Dota is only an abbreviation. But I'm really hoping Blizzard or Activision dont step in to stop this.

And LoL is not that popular. I think your thinking of Heores of Neworth which is very popular since it is some what like the recent dota except with better graphics and faster gameplay. I still only play dota because it is by far the most balanced out of the 3, but HoN is gaining a lot of popularity. To bad they continue copying the Icefrogs ideas and refuse to fix major problems with the map.

Avatar image for Vadislav
Vadislav

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 Vadislav
Member since 2009 • 199 Posts
Yes yes yes I love you Valve. I will leave HoN just to play DOTA 2.0
Avatar image for hexashadow13
hexashadow13

5157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 hexashadow13
Member since 2010 • 5157 Posts

[QUOTE="Maroxad"]

[QUOTE="mexicangordo"]

Obviously Ice didnt create it, however what does that have to do with anything? I honestly don't know where you guys are coming from. The IP was passed to him, and Valve officially took it. Dotais a editorial map, and is technically not a real game, its still WC3 there for there are no rights to the IP. Except if Blizzard/Activision step in (which can happen)

The original creator of Dota had his chance, and left. Now that Icefrog made things big he should claim the rewards? He had his chance with LoL (which flopped) and screwed up, it just further proves that Icefrog had what it took to elevate dota to a more access able and successful level.

mexicangordo

Don't think I am viewing this in Black and white. The original creator should have taken steps to avoid this, Icefrog has his justifications for doing this, it may not be very nice, but he certainly has his justifications for doing this. Also, I don't think he ever gave him the IP, just permission to continue updating the map and in my honest opinion at this rate he deserves the map a lot more than the original creator does. However with that said, he does should not have the right making the sequel, sure he can make a spiritual sequel but not an actual sequel using the IP. Making the sequel should be reserved to him.

I mentioned this in my edit, but as it is right now the ones that really have the right to the IP is none other than Blizzard/Activision. Their EULA stated that any maps and such that were created using Blizzard's map editor belongs to them. Concepts don't, however the IP pretty much does. Don't get me wrong, I am mostly happy that the game is made the only thing I don't like about it is the fact that it is using the DotA IP.

To summarize: Make the game, just change the IP being used.

P.S: I don't know if LoL flopped, quality wise it was not that good but it certainly is popular. Icefrog not only proved himself to be the superior developer when he made the map popular, but also when LoL showed up to be not nearly as good as the game. Unfortunately, all my friends moved over from DotA to LoL meaning that if I want to play with them I will have to play that :cry: (I can rant about the game all day complaining about bad design choices in LoL)

I totally agree with that. I think using Dota as the offical name is going to lead into a huge legal issue. Unless if its really called Dota 2 and not Defence of the Ancients then I can see them having rights to that since Dota is only an abbreviation. But I'm really hoping Blizzard or Activision step in to stop this.

And LoL is not that popular. I think your thinking of Heores of Neworth which is very popular since it is some what like the recent dota except with better graphics and faster gameplay. I still only play dota because it is by far the most balanced out of the 3, but HoN is gaining a lot of popularity. To bad they continue copying the Icefrogs ideas and refuse to fix major problems with the map.

LoL has a larger base then HoN. That sort of comes with being free.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
I kind of figured it would be this. I've never been disappointed with a valve game so far so I guess I'll look forward to it.
Avatar image for soiheardyoulike
soiheardyoulike

724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#64 soiheardyoulike
Member since 2008 • 724 Posts

crap community ahoy!

Avatar image for mexicangordo
mexicangordo

8687

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 mexicangordo
Member since 2005 • 8687 Posts

[QUOTE="mexicangordo"]

[QUOTE="Maroxad"]

Don't think I am viewing this in Black and white. The original creator should have taken steps to avoid this, Icefrog has his justifications for doing this, it may not be very nice, but he certainly has his justifications for doing this. Also, I don't think he ever gave him the IP, just permission to continue updating the map and in my honest opinion at this rate he deserves the map a lot more than the original creator does. However with that said, he does should not have the right making the sequel, sure he can make a spiritual sequel but not an actual sequel using the IP. Making the sequel should be reserved to him.

I mentioned this in my edit, but as it is right now the ones that really have the right to the IP is none other than Blizzard/Activision. Their EULA stated that any maps and such that were created using Blizzard's map editor belongs to them. Concepts don't, however the IP pretty much does. Don't get me wrong, I am mostly happy that the game is made the only thing I don't like about it is the fact that it is using the DotA IP.

To summarize: Make the game, just change the IP being used.

P.S: I don't know if LoL flopped, quality wise it was not that good but it certainly is popular. Icefrog not only proved himself to be the superior developer when he made the map popular, but also when LoL showed up to be not nearly as good as the game. Unfortunately, all my friends moved over from DotA to LoL meaning that if I want to play with them I will have to play that :cry: (I can rant about the game all day complaining about bad design choices in LoL)

hexashadow13

I totally agree with that. I think using Dota as the offical name is going to lead into a huge legal issue. Unless if its really called Dota 2 and not Defence of the Ancients then I can see them having rights to that since Dota is only an abbreviation. But I'm really hoping Blizzard or Activision step in to stop this.

And LoL is not that popular. I think your thinking of Heores of Neworth which is very popular since it is some what like the recent dota except with better graphics and faster gameplay. I still only play dota because it is by far the most balanced out of the 3, but HoN is gaining a lot of popularity. To bad they continue copying the Icefrogs ideas and refuse to fix major problems with the map.

LoL has a larger base then HoN. That sort of comes with being free.

I was pretty sure that it was the other way around. Doesnt HoN have around 2 million while LoL has barely around 1 million (active) users. Let me do some snooping.

Avatar image for ice144
ice144

3350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 ice144
Member since 2005 • 3350 Posts
People are bashing icefrog? Any fan should be praising him for making(and keeping) the game popular and successful and joining with Valve will do nothing but add to this.
Avatar image for Meowmixxvi
Meowmixxvi

2243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#67 Meowmixxvi
Member since 2008 • 2243 Posts
People are bashing icefrog? Any fan should be praising him for making(and keeping) the game popular and successful and joining with Valve will do nothing but add to this.ice144
anime in your sig please? anyways hope it tops LoL xD
Avatar image for deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a

26108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#68 deactivated-5d6e91f5c147a
Member since 2008 • 26108 Posts
Hope it's free...
Avatar image for shureshot24
shureshot24

319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#70 shureshot24
Member since 2009 • 319 Posts

cool

Avatar image for Maroxad
Maroxad

25309

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Maroxad
Member since 2007 • 25309 Posts

I totally agree with that. I think using Dota as the offical name is going to lead into a huge legal issue. Unless if its really called Dota 2 and not Defence of the Ancients then I can see them having rights to that since Dota is only an abbreviation. But I'm really hoping Blizzard or Activision dont step in to stop this.

And LoL is not that popular. I think your thinking of Heores of Neworth which is very popular since it is some what like the recent dota except with better graphics and faster gameplay. I still only play dota because it is by far the most balanced out of the 3, but HoN is gaining a lot of popularity. To bad they continue copying the Icefrogs ideas and refuse to fix major problems with the map.

mexicangordo

I think we agree with more than we think we do. Personally, my only real concern are legal issues. If he wanted to trademark the IP he should have done it ages ago, but still a bit of shame on Icefrog. Either way, I am mostly gray in this subject with some slight as in minor, resentment against Icefrog.

I didn't know HoN was more popular than LoL. Probably got a bit confused with all my friends switching to LoL, which I am not a big fan of. Stay in DotA people that way you can play with all heroes without having to buy them first. The only redeeming thing about LoL is this guy

Emo tanks ftw.

Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts

Yeah Im sorry but all this drama is silly. If the previous "owners" of DotA chose not to do anything more with the idea it is their choice and their loss. Just as it was incredible stupid for no big developer to pick this idea up for so long. I have absolutely no idea what Blizzard were thinking. I am happy that Valve is going to release DotA2 and I am happy that the man that has made DotA what it is today is behind it. Why arent people complainging that HoN is pay to play when the DotA idea is not wholly owned by the developers? To me right now there is only LoL for my DotA needs becouse the communities of Allstars and HoN could be in the guisness book for being the most hostile communities in the history of gaming.

Avatar image for Episode_Eve
Episode_Eve

16986

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Episode_Eve
Member since 2004 • 16986 Posts

Thanks for posting those concept pictures siddhu :), the links weren't loading for me.

I've never heard of DOTA until now, but this seems like it could be good. Valve is good at using others' ideas and work, and capitalizing on them...

Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#74 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts
Weird thinking people haven't heard of DoTA before. Even I have and I haven't played it.
Avatar image for bonzibuddyxxx
bonzibuddyxxx

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 bonzibuddyxxx
Member since 2004 • 118 Posts

Yeah Im sorry but all this drama is silly. If the previous "owners" of DotA chose not to do anything more with the idea it is their choice and their loss. Just as it was incredible stupid for no big developer to pick this idea up for so long. I have absolutely no idea what Blizzard were thinking. I am happy that Valve is going to release DotA2 and I am happy that the man that has made DotA what it is today is behind it. Why arent people complainging that HoN is pay to play when the DotA idea is not wholly owned by the developers? To me right now there is only LoL for my DotA needs becouse the communities of Allstars and HoN could be in the guisness book for being the most hostile communities in the history of gaming.

rzepak

The creators of dota chose to leave it with the community and keep a DotA a free to play game. They took their ideas and made LoL to make money. I would be more understanding if Icefrog made Dota2 free but I'm having doubts because of Valve...

Why do Dota/Hon communities get so much hate?? Is it because noobs are not tolerated? If you're a noob playing a team game, it only makes sense for your teammates to call you out. Anyways these games aren't even that hard to master.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#76 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

Wow... I just lost so much respect for Valve it's not even funny.

Avatar image for Zanoh
Zanoh

6942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#77 Zanoh
Member since 2006 • 6942 Posts

Wow... I just lost so much respect for Valve it's not even funny.

DarkLink77

4 words, Valve...

Half-Life 2 Episode 3

Avatar image for nethernova
nethernova

5721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 nethernova
Member since 2008 • 5721 Posts
LoL has a larger base then HoN. That sort of comes with being free.hexashadow13
That's why Runes of Magic has a larger base than WoW?
Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts

[QUOTE="rzepak"]

Yeah Im sorry but all this drama is silly. If the previous "owners" of DotA chose not to do anything more with the idea it is their choice and their loss. Just as it was incredible stupid for no big developer to pick this idea up for so long. I have absolutely no idea what Blizzard were thinking. I am happy that Valve is going to release DotA2 and I am happy that the man that has made DotA what it is today is behind it. Why arent people complainging that HoN is pay to play when the DotA idea is not wholly owned by the developers? To me right now there is only LoL for my DotA needs becouse the communities of Allstars and HoN could be in the guisness book for being the most hostile communities in the history of gaming.

bonzibuddyxxx

The creators of dota chose to leave it with the community and keep a DotA a free to play game. They took their ideas and made LoL to make money. I would be more understanding if Icefrog made Dota2 free but I'm having doubts because of Valve...

Why do Dota/Hon communities get so much hate?? Is it because noobs are not tolerated? If you're a noob playing a team game, it only makes sense for your teammates to call you out. Anyways these games aren't even that hard to master.

"but I'm having doubts because of Valve..." You mean the company that released Alien Swarm with dev tools for free, and recently began testing micro transaction in TF2? There is a huge chance that DotA2 could be free.

To answer your question why the communities get so much hate its not becouse people call out the noobs. Its becouse the people abuse noobs for whole games and half the time screw up becouse of their spit spewing hate rants. Its also becouse the communities are elitist, its as simple as that. There is only .... (insert name of DotA game) and nothing else. Everyone and everything else is garbage. I always like to point out that if LoL a free game has a better community than HoN, then there is something seriously wrong with HoNs community.

Avatar image for shakmaster13
shakmaster13

7138

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#80 shakmaster13
Member since 2007 • 7138 Posts
This is very bad news unless it is free.
Avatar image for hexashadow13
hexashadow13

5157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 hexashadow13
Member since 2010 • 5157 Posts
[QUOTE="hexashadow13"]LoL has a larger base then HoN. That sort of comes with being free.nethernova
That's why Runes of Magic has a larger base than WoW?

Doesn't change the fact that LoL still has more players.
Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts

Wow... I just lost so much respect for Valve it's not even funny.

DarkLink77
http://icefrogtruth.blogspot.com/ Not really Valve's fault.
Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts

[QUOTE="hexashadow13"]LoL has a larger base then HoN. That sort of comes with being free.nethernova
That's why Runes of Magic has a larger base than WoW?

Dont think we have any official numbers for LoL vs HoN. Registerd players doesnt really mean anything. I guess you could look at Xfire/Raptr numbers, where LoL has a few times more players/play time but only a small percent of players use these programs. Then again DotA games are pretty niche and hour tracking programs are mostly used by the more niche crowd for all sorts of online games.

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#84 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

That´s....erm....I don´t even know how I feel about this...

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#85 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts
[QUOTE="DarkLink77"]

Wow... I just lost so much respect for Valve it's not even funny.

SAGE_OF_FIRE
http://icefrogtruth.blogspot.com/ Not really Valve's fault.

Yeah, it is. If they had any kind of respect for anyone else's work or any kind of decency, they would have fired the guy when they discovered this and then scraped the game. So yes, it IS their fault. Coming from one of the most prolific developers in the industry, this is absolutely pathetic.
Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts

That´s....erm....I don´t even know how I feel about this...

Arach666

Only good can come of this=) Like maybe an Orange box 2 with HL3, CS2 and DotA2...a man can dream.

Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts

[QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"][QUOTE="DarkLink77"]

Wow... I just lost so much respect for Valve it's not even funny.

DarkLink77

http://icefrogtruth.blogspot.com/ Not really Valve's fault.

Yeah, it is. If they had any kind of respect for anyone else's work or any kind of decency, they would have fired the guy when they discovered this and then scraped the game. So yes, it IS their fault. Coming from one of the most prolific developers in the industry, this is absolutely pathetic.

And once more you do realise that both HoN and LoL are making a ton of money on the DotA gametype yes? and that Demigod has already made dota into a full retail game yes?

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#88 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"] http://icefrogtruth.blogspot.com/ Not really Valve's fault. rzepak

Yeah, it is. If they had any kind of respect for anyone else's work or any kind of decency, they would have fired the guy when they discovered this and then scraped the game. So yes, it IS their fault. Coming from one of the most prolific developers in the industry, this is absolutely pathetic.

And once more you do realise that both HoN and LoL are making a ton of money on the DotA gametype yes?

It doesn't change the fact that it's morally wrong, but whatever, they can do whatever they want.

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#89 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

[QUOTE="Arach666"]

That´s....erm....I don´t even know how I feel about this...

rzepak

Only good can come of this=) Like maybe an Orange box 2 with HL3, CS2 and DotA2...a man can dream.

If we have to wait for the release of HL3 and CS2 to make a new Orange box then we´re doomed! :o Valve´s pacing this gen makes me believe that I would have to wait at least a decade for an OB2 to come out. :lol: Hypotetically speaking,of course.
Avatar image for deactivated-58b6232955e4a
deactivated-58b6232955e4a

15594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 deactivated-58b6232955e4a
Member since 2006 • 15594 Posts

[QUOTE="rzepak"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] Yeah, it is. If they had any kind of respect for anyone else's work or any kind of decency, they would have fired the guy when they discovered this and then scraped the game. So yes, it IS their fault. Coming from one of the most prolific developers in the industry, this is absolutely pathetic.DarkLink77

And once more you do realise that both HoN and LoL are making a ton of money on the DotA gametype yes?

It doesn't change the fact that it's morally wrong, but whatever, they can do whatever they want.

The only complaint anybody has about Valve making a dota game is using the dota name.
Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts

[QUOTE="rzepak"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] Yeah, it is. If they had any kind of respect for anyone else's work or any kind of decency, they would have fired the guy when they discovered this and then scraped the game. So yes, it IS their fault. Coming from one of the most prolific developers in the industry, this is absolutely pathetic.DarkLink77

And once more you do realise that both HoN and LoL are making a ton of money on the DotA gametype yes?

It doesn't change the fact that it's morally wrong, but whatever, they can do whatever they want.

Its no more wrong than the other things I have listed. Valve with Icefrog has more moral right to make a DotA game than the S2 crew for example, who as far as I remember had very little or nothing to do with DotA. They got the blessing to make HoN from Icefrog and thats it. Also its not like Riot games has gone and attacked Valve for hiring Icefrog and begining work on a dota game. They said that they are excited to see what a big developer will do with the game...

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#92 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts
[QUOTE="DarkLink77"]

[QUOTE="rzepak"]

And once more you do realise that both HoN and LoL are making a ton of money on the DotA gametype yes?

SAGE_OF_FIRE

It doesn't change the fact that it's morally wrong, but whatever, they can do whatever they want.

The only complaint anybody has about Valve making a dota game is using the dota name.

I just wish Valve would developer their own crap every once in a while. The only thing they have EVER done by themselves is Half-Life.
Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#93 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts

[QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"][QUOTE="DarkLink77"] It doesn't change the fact that it's morally wrong, but whatever, they can do whatever they want.

DarkLink77

The only complaint anybody has about Valve making a dota game is using the dota name.

I just wish Valve would developer their own crap every once in a while. The only thing they have EVER done by themselves is Half-Life.

What do you understand by Valve? Valve has been a number of teams for years...its not new. They are known for hiring modders and talented people from the community.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#94 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="SAGE_OF_FIRE"] The only complaint anybody has about Valve making a dota game is using the dota name. rzepak

I just wish Valve would developer their own crap every once in a while. The only thing they have EVER done by themselves is Half-Life.

What do you understand by Valve? Valve has been a number of teams for years...its not new. They are known for hiring modders and talented people from the community.

And every game besides Half-Life has been one that they either: 1. Bought the modders who made the mod and slapped the Valve logo on it. 2. Bought the studio making the game, and slapped the Valve name on it.
Avatar image for Ravensmash
Ravensmash

13862

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 Ravensmash
Member since 2010 • 13862 Posts

Thanks for posting those concept pictures siddhu :), the links weren't loading for me.

I've never heard of DOTA until now, but this seems like it could be good. Valve is good at using others' ideas and work, and capitalizing on them...

Episode_Eve
And leaving existing franchises unfinished. Half Life anyone?
Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#96 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts
[QUOTE="killab2oo5"]*AI bots take over disconnected players Lol...free feeding for the opposing team!

yeah really it's better to have the disconnects at base not stealing your laning exp.
Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts

[QUOTE="rzepak"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] I just wish Valve would developer their own crap every once in a while. The only thing they have EVER done by themselves is Half-Life.DarkLink77

What do you understand by Valve? Valve has been a number of teams for years...its not new. They are known for hiring modders and talented people from the community.

And every game besides Half-Life has been one that they either: 1. Bought the modders who made the mod and slapped the Valve logo on it. 2. Bought the studio making the game, and slapped the Valve name on it.

So good buisness is bad now? Do you think those modders who were hired were all doom and gloom becouse of it? or maybe they were happy they had actually made it into the game biz and are still there today making highly acclaimed games for a well respected parent company.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#98 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="rzepak"]

What do you understand by Valve? Valve has been a number of teams for years...its not new. They are known for hiring modders and talented people from the community.

rzepak

And every game besides Half-Life has been one that they either: 1. Bought the modders who made the mod and slapped the Valve logo on it. 2. Bought the studio making the game, and slapped the Valve name on it.

So good buisness is bad now? Do you think those modders who were hired were all doom and gloom becouse of it? or maybe they were happy they had actually made it into the game biz and are still there today making highly acclaimed games for a well respected parent company.

Good for the modders. The point is that Valve doesn't have any of their own ideas. They just absorb people that do and call it a Valve game. Sure, the quality is there, but the originality isn't.
Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts

[QUOTE="rzepak"]

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] And every game besides Half-Life has been one that they either: 1. Bought the modders who made the mod and slapped the Valve logo on it. 2. Bought the studio making the game, and slapped the Valve name on it.DarkLink77

So good buisness is bad now? Do you think those modders who were hired were all doom and gloom becouse of it? or maybe they were happy they had actually made it into the game biz and are still there today making highly acclaimed games for a well respected parent company.

Good for the modders. The point is that Valve doesn't have any of their own ideas. They just absorb people that do and call it a Valve game. Sure, the quality is there, but the originality isn't.

I just dont see what you exprct. The days of one man being behind all ideas in a company like Moleneux in the olden days are gone. Im happy that Valve operates the way it does. If it didnt Portal would not have happend. Sure we would still have Nerbacular Drop but I am sorry its not Portal and it would have never made it big.

Avatar image for DarkLink77
DarkLink77

32731

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#100 DarkLink77
Member since 2004 • 32731 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="rzepak"]

So good buisness is bad now? Do you think those modders who were hired were all doom and gloom becouse of it? or maybe they were happy they had actually made it into the game biz and are still there today making highly acclaimed games for a well respected parent company.

rzepak

Good for the modders. The point is that Valve doesn't have any of their own ideas. They just absorb people that do and call it a Valve game. Sure, the quality is there, but the originality isn't.

I just dont see what you exprct. The days of one man being behind all ideas in a company like Moleneux in the olden days are gone. Im happy that Valve operates the way it does. If it didnt Portal would not have happend. Sure we would still have Nerbacular Drop but I am sorry its not Portal and it would have never made it big.

I just expect them to actually make some of their own games. That's all.