VF 5 developed on PS3 but is graphically superior on X360, whats the excuses?

"After all that "only PS3 can do Virtua Fighter 5" talk, 360 fans are proud to say the 360 version is graphically superior - by some margin, in fact. Truthfully, the 360 sheen is so apparent in a direct HDMI cable switch comparison, it's like looking at Soul Calibur 2 on Xbox compared to PS2. VF5's here, online, and all is right with the world".

http://www.gamesradar.com/us/xbox360/game/reviews/article.jsp?sectionId=1000&articleId=2007102993539670086&releaseId=2006122111543685040

I can't wait to read the excuses on this one.

But but the Killzone!

I mean plenty of developers have 30 mil laying around...:roll:

The excuse lemmings use for Oblivion. 1 year later! Even though its not quite been a year.JiveT

there isnt much difference between oblivion ps3 and 360 version

6-8 months of extra development time had nothing to do with it for sure, so throw that out the window.

I think its because the 360 was sent down by God. That's it God made VF5 better because he, himself, blessed it

The excuse lemmings use for Oblivion. 1 year later! Even though its not quite been a year.JiveT

[QUOTE="JiveT"]The excuse lemmings use for Oblivion. 1 year later! Even though its not quite been a year.mingo123

there isnt much difference between oblivion ps3 and 360 version

LOL :lol:

The excuse lemmings use for Oblivion. 1 year later! Even though its not quite been a year.JiveT

Just like when oblivion came out a year later on PS3, and was better on PS3. Bu But a year later! :cry:

I hated this game on PS3, and ill hate it just as much on 360.

6-8 months of extra development time had nothing to do with it for sure, so throw that out the window.

I think its because the 360 was sent down by God. That's it God made VF5 better because he, himself, blessed it

-D3MO-

"After all that "only PS3 can do Virtua Fighter 5" talk, 360 fans are proud to say the 360 version is graphically superior - by some margin, in fact. Truthfully, the 360 sheen is so apparent in a direct HDMI cable switch comparison, it's like looking at Soul Calibur 2 on Xbox compared to PS2. VF5's here, online, and all is right with the world".

http://www.gamesradar.com/us/xbox360/game/reviews/article.jsp?sectionId=1000&articleId=2007102993539670086&releaseId=2006122111543685040

I can't wait to read the excuses on this one.

Danthegamingman

More dev time, just like Oblivion.BillGreen68

Bingooooo.

[QUOTE="JiveT"]The excuse lemmings use for Oblivion. 1 year later! Even though its not quite been a year.Danthegamingman

More dev time, just like Oblivion.BillGreen68

[QUOTE="mingo123"]

[QUOTE="JiveT"]The excuse lemmings use for Oblivion. 1 year later! Even though its not quite been a year.-D3MO-

there isnt much difference between oblivion ps3 and 360 version

LOL :lol:

its true

Edit: Gamespot review only mentioned that PS3 versionhas a bit better draw distance then 360 version and thats all, they also mentioned its not the best version because it doesnt have DLC like on 360

[QUOTE="Danthegamingman"][QUOTE="JiveT"]The excuse lemmings use for Oblivion. 1 year later! Even though its not quite been a year.Tnasty11

The extra development time didn't help FEAR on the PS3...buuzer0

The people using the "extra development time" excuse are totally missing the point.Yellow_Rose

Then maybe you would kindly enlighten us as to what the "point" is. Unless it is bashing the PS3 because most of us can already guess that.

there isnt much difference between oblivion ps3 and 360 version

mingo123

You're right cause I've had EXTENSIVE play time with both console versions to make that call. Other then a bit more loading in spots on 360 and everything fitting on the Blu-Ray the games are identical.

hmmm how about the fact that 360 has better graphics than the ps3 - for cheaper?vickissv2

I wouldn't say better but the same.

there are even games that were released late on ps3 yet they look WORSE then 360 version that was released earlier

[QUOTE="Tnasty11"][QUOTE="Danthegamingman"][QUOTE="JiveT"]The excuse lemmings use for Oblivion. 1 year later! Even though its not quite been a year.Danthegamingman

Plus on-line play yikes !

So much for PSN is teh Free . :lol:

The people using the "extra development time" excuse are totally missing the point.Yellow_Rose

And what point would that be? It's a completely valid argument to use. The fact that a game, running on SEGA's proprietary multi-platform graphics engine, can be successfully ported from the PS3 to the 360 relatively easily gives the developer some extra time to improve the graphics beyond their original level.

[QUOTE="Yellow_Rose"]The people using the "extra development time" excuse are totally missing the point.GIJames248

Then maybe you would kindly enlighten us as to what the "point" is. Unless it is bashing the PS3 because most of us can already guess that.

The PS3 is suppose to be "the superior console". The fact that with "extra development time" you can make a 360 game look better than the original PS3 version pretty much shoots that belief straight to hell, now doesn't it?

[QUOTE="Yellow_Rose"]The people using the "extra development time" excuse are totally missing the point.GIJames248

Then maybe you would kindly enlighten us as to what the "point" is. Unless it is bashing the PS3 because most of us can already guess that.

His point is that if the PS3 was so much more powerful than the 360 (like many cows still believe) then a game that was made for it first and then later ported over to the 360 would not look better, regardless of extra development time.

[QUOTE="JiveT"]The excuse lemmings use for Oblivion. 1 year later! Even though its not quite been a year.mingo123

there isnt much difference between oblivion ps3 and 360 version

I take it u havent played the PS3 version...and same could be said about VF5 for X360.

More dev time, just like Oblivion.BillGreen68

:lol:

PS3s hardware is too awkward actually, nice try though.

okay... so the characters are a more shiny. woot!

from what i've seen so far, it reminds me of xbox,s DOA.:|

[QUOTE="mingo123"]

[QUOTE="JiveT"]The excuse lemmings use for Oblivion. 1 year later! Even though its not quite been a year.-Serpahim-

there isnt much difference between oblivion ps3 and 360 version

I take it u havent played the PS3 version...and same could be said about VF5 for X360.

[QUOTE="GIJames248"]

[QUOTE="Yellow_Rose"]The people using the "extra development time" excuse are totally missing the point.TyrantDragon55

Then maybe you would kindly enlighten us as to what the "point" is. Unless it is bashing the PS3 because most of us can already guess that.

His point is that if the PS3 was so much more powerful than the 360 (like many cows still believe) then a game that was made for it first and then later ported over to the 360 would not look better, regardless of extra development time.

[QUOTE="GIJames248"]

[QUOTE="Yellow_Rose"]The people using the "extra development time" excuse are totally missing the point.Yellow_Rose

Then maybe you would kindly enlighten us as to what the "point" is. Unless it is bashing the PS3 because most of us can already guess that.

The PS3 is suppose to be "the superior console". The fact that with "extra development time" you can make a 360 game look better than the original PS3 version pretty much shoots that belief straight to hell, now doesn't it?

Unless of course the game wasn't a particular powerhouse in the first place. I doubt that Virtua Fighter was best looking game on PS3 considering it came out only half a year after the console launched. Anyway, this is mostly academic since we will have to wait a few years to really see what the PS3 and 360 can do.

[QUOTE="-Serpahim-"][QUOTE="mingo123"]

[QUOTE="JiveT"]The excuse lemmings use for Oblivion. 1 year later! Even though its not quite been a year.zero9167

there isnt much difference between oblivion ps3 and 360 version

I take it u havent played the PS3 version...and same could be said about VF5 for X360.

Gamespot says:

"The graphics are slightly better, the load times are shorter, and there is a bit of new content in the form of the Knights of the Nine add-on..."

Sadly, though, that commentary is there at all is just another sign that the series has reached a crossroads. VF has become so hardcore, it's impossible to market to anyone new. This is the culmination of over a decade of evolution, and likely what Yu Suzuki had in his head when he dreamed up the 1993 original. But while fans will adore it, treasure it and possibly dedicate love poems to it, it's quite possibly going to leave a lot of gamers pretty bored.GamesRadar

buyer beware. If you're not a VF fan already, this game may run you off with your tail between your legs.

[QUOTE="zero9167"][QUOTE="-Serpahim-"][QUOTE="mingo123"]

[QUOTE="JiveT"]The excuse lemmings use for Oblivion. 1 year later! Even though its not quite been a year.-Serpahim-

there isnt much difference between oblivion ps3 and 360 version

I take it u havent played the PS3 version...and same could be said about VF5 for X360.

Gamespot says:

"The graphics are slightly better, the load times are shorter, and there is a bit of new content in the form of the Knights of the Nine add-on..."

1. that add-on is downloadable on 360, no big deal , atleast 360 owners get the add-on, VF5 on ps3 wont get online
2. "The PlayStation 3 version of The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion is every bit as impressive as the Xbox 360 and PC versions. However, this isn't necessarily the best version of the game. This version does come with the Knights of the Nine add-on, which will add about 10 hours of gameplay to the already lengthy game, but it doesn't come with any of the other downloadable additions made available on the Xbox 360."

[QUOTE="TyrantDragon55"][QUOTE="GIJames248"]

[QUOTE="Yellow_Rose"]The people using the "extra development time" excuse are totally missing the point.Tnasty11

Then maybe you would kindly enlighten us as to what the "point" is. Unless it is bashing the PS3 because most of us can already guess that.

His point is that if the PS3 was so much more powerful than the 360 (like many cows still believe) then a game that was made for it first and then later ported over to the 360 would not look better, regardless of extra development time.

Did I claim the 360 was more powerful than the PS3?

[QUOTE="GIJames248"]

[QUOTE="Yellow_Rose"]The people using the "extra development time" excuse are totally missing the point.Yellow_Rose

Then maybe you would kindly enlighten us as to what the "point" is. Unless it is bashing the PS3 because most of us can already guess that.

The PS3 is suppose to be "the superior console". The fact that with "extra development time" you can make a 360 game look better than the original PS3 version pretty much shoots that belief straight to hell, now doesn't it?

he walked right into that one.

[QUOTE="GamesRadar"]Sadly, though, that commentary is there at all is just another sign that the series has reached a crossroads. VF has become so hardcore, it's impossible to market to anyone new. This is the culmination of over a decade of evolution, and likely what Yu Suzuki had in his head when he dreamed up the 1993 original. But while fans will adore it, treasure it and possibly dedicate love poems to it, it's quite possibly going to leave a lot of gamers pretty bored.Dreams-Visions

buyer beware. If you're not a VF fan already, this game may run you off with your tail between your legs.

6-8 months of extra development time had nothing to do with it for sure, so throw that out the window.

I think its because the 360 was sent down by God. That's it God made VF5 better because he, himself, blessed it

-D3MO-

yay i used to work at gamestop. i hated those signs lol.