XXXXXX

120 results
1
2
3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

26023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Riverwolf007

Member since 2005 • 26023 Posts

This is for anyone picking up this game. PS3 has motion control but no online. 360 has online but no motion control.

Which one do you feel is more important motion control or online play?

18 years ago

3933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#2 Vampyronight

Member since 2002 • 3933 Posts

Online, I'd say. Unless the motion control was absolutely superb.

18 years ago

1208

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 advertise_this

Member since 2006 • 1208 Posts

ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.

18 years ago

194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 194 Posts

online>motion contol

18 years ago

3635

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 3635 Posts

...they look the same to me.

I don't see how anyone could justify motion over online, especially in a tennis game where online rankings add so much to the replay value. I don't even see how motion could be used well in tennis game unless it's wii-style.

18 years ago

22814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2003 • 22814 Posts

Online is definitely more important in this type of game.

18 years ago

2015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2007 • 2015 Posts

Agreed. Online is more important. I don't mind missing out on that too much though because I'm sure I'd be atrocious at this kind of game and just get abused constantly ;)

18 years ago

4949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 poopinloop32

Member since 2006 • 4949 Posts

Im not ganna change my theory for the PS3
Online>Motion Control

18 years ago

27139

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 25

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 27139 Posts

Online.

18 years ago

4884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 4884 Posts

My friend's xbox 360 doesn't even have access to play online anymore. That being said I'd get the PS3 version because I don't have a 360. Don't like tennis a whole lot either way. VF5 ftw.

18 years ago

1143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 1143 Posts

Agreed. Online is more important. I don't mind missing out on that too much though because I'm sure I'd be atrocious at this kind of game and just get abused constantly ;)asmallchild

you know they have ranked games, where you can play with someone who's just as crappy at it as you are. What you do is you play the player matches and when you get real good at it you play ranked games, and destroy the noobs. Ranked games ftw.

18 years ago

4884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 4884 Posts

[QUOTE="asmallchild"]Agreed. Online is more important. I don't mind missing out on that too much though because I'm sure I'd be atrocious at this kind of game and just get abused constantly ;)carsales

you know they have ranked games, where you can play with someone who's just as crappy at it as you are. What you do is you play the player matches and when you get real good at it you play ranked games, and destroy the noobs. Ranked games ftw.

PS3 has ranked games also, only they're actually hosted on Sony servers (thank the lord)

18 years ago

8681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Darth_Stalin

Member since 2005 • 8681 Posts

Online is way better. How is motion sense going to work for the six-axis?

18 years ago

1143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 1143 Posts

[QUOTE="carsales"][QUOTE="asmallchild"]Agreed. Online is more important. I don't mind missing out on that too much though because I'm sure I'd be atrocious at this kind of game and just get abused constantly ;)KeyWii

you know they have ranked games, where you can play with someone who's just as crappy at it as you are. What you do is you play the player matches and when you get real good at it you play ranked games, and destroy the noobs. Ranked games ftw.

PS3 has ranked games also, only they're actually hosted on Sony servers (thank the lord)

can you play vf5 on those servers? How about virtua tennis?

Thank the lord.

18 years ago

2795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 2795 Posts

Online anyday

18 years ago

8681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Darth_Stalin

Member since 2005 • 8681 Posts

[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="carsales"][QUOTE="asmallchild"]Agreed. Online is more important. I don't mind missing out on that too much though because I'm sure I'd be atrocious at this kind of game and just get abused constantly ;)carsales

you know they have ranked games, where you can play with someone who's just as crappy at it as you are. What you do is you play the player matches and when you get real good at it you play ranked games, and destroy the noobs. Ranked games ftw.

PS3 has ranked games also, only they're actually hosted on Sony servers (thank the lord)

can you play vf5 on those servers? How about virtua tennis?

Thank the lord.

VF5 has no online play at all, apparently.

18 years ago

10715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2002 • 10715 Posts

[QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

18 years ago

3703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 3703 Posts

[QUOTE="carsales"]
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="carsales"][QUOTE="asmallchild"]Agreed. Online is more important. I don't mind missing out on that too much though because I'm sure I'd be atrocious at this kind of game and just get abused constantly ;)Tulak_Hord

you know they have ranked games, where you can play with someone who's just as crappy at it as you are. What you do is you play the player matches and when you get real good at it you play ranked games, and destroy the noobs. Ranked games ftw.

PS3 has ranked games also, only they're actually hosted on Sony servers (thank the lord)

can you play vf5 on those servers? How about virtua tennis?

Thank the lord.

VF5 has no online play at all, apparently.

chances are the 360 version will. i know they said no, but it's the 360. and most everyone knows the 360 is about online. even sega.

18 years ago

8681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Darth_Stalin

Member since 2005 • 8681 Posts

[QUOTE="Tulak_Hord"][QUOTE="carsales"]
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="carsales"][QUOTE="asmallchild"]Agreed. Online is more important. I don't mind missing out on that too much though because I'm sure I'd be atrocious at this kind of game and just get abused constantly ;)akuma303x

you know they have ranked games, where you can play with someone who's just as crappy at it as you are. What you do is you play the player matches and when you get real good at it you play ranked games, and destroy the noobs. Ranked games ftw.

PS3 has ranked games also, only they're actually hosted on Sony servers (thank the lord)

can you play vf5 on those servers? How about virtua tennis?

Thank the lord.

VF5 has no online play at all, apparently.

chances are the 360 version will. i know they said no, but it's the 360. and most everyone knows the 360 is about online. even sega.

Sega was saying, online play will ruin VF5......

18 years ago

3703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 3703 Posts

[QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

were you once a sony fanboy? honest and humble Q. and yes the 360 is even better at running games in 1080p. but the ps3 has hdmi wich just looks much cleaner. so the result is games that are more detailed in texure's on 360 , but more cleaner and crisp looking games on ps3.

18 years ago

354

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2003 • 354 Posts

Online adds replayability. Motion control....not so much.

18 years ago

2795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 2795 Posts

This is for anyone picking up this game. PS3 has motion control but no online. 360 has online but no motion control.
Which one do you feel is more important motion control or online play?
Riverwolf007

hey can you tell me which Hands-on preview says that the PS3 version wont have online whilst the X360 version will...I'm dont mean to question you, but this is system wars...and well, you cant take anything at face value here....

18 years ago

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

This is for anyone picking up this game. PS3 has motion control but no online. 360 has online but no motion control.
Which one do you feel is more important motion control or online play?
Riverwolf007

Online by a landslide. I've already read that using the sixaxis motion control with this game sucks. Multiplayer against anyone is the world is definitely the way to go.

18 years ago

8681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Darth_Stalin

Member since 2005 • 8681 Posts

By the way, how the hel does motion sensing work on the PS3? If it were the will I would understand......but the ps3? For this game ie.

18 years ago

10318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 10318 Posts

:lol: Is this a real question?

Online >>>>>> Motion Control

18 years ago

4884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 4884 Posts

[QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

PS3's ram is faster than Xbox 360's. PS3 has HDMI. PS3 has Cell processor. PS3 has Blu-Ray. No way is the 360 hardware better for games, thats a bold faced lie.

18 years ago

10715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2002 • 10715 Posts

[QUOTE="akuma303x"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

were you once a sony fanboy? honest and humble Q. and yes the 360 is even better at running games in 1080p. but the ps3 has hdmi wich just looks much cleaner. so the result is games that are more detailed in texure's on 360 , but more cleaner and crisp looking games on ps3.

nope....furthest thing from it.

18 years ago

3703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 3703 Posts

[QUOTE="akuma303x"][QUOTE="Tulak_Hord"][QUOTE="carsales"]
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="carsales"][QUOTE="asmallchild"]Agreed. Online is more important. I don't mind missing out on that too much though because I'm sure I'd be atrocious at this kind of game and just get abused constantly ;)Tulak_Hord

you know they have ranked games, where you can play with someone who's just as crappy at it as you are. What you do is you play the player matches and when you get real good at it you play ranked games, and destroy the noobs. Ranked games ftw.

PS3 has ranked games also, only they're actually hosted on Sony servers (thank the lord)

can you play vf5 on those servers? How about virtua tennis?

Thank the lord.

VF5 has no online play at all, apparently.

chances are the 360 version will. i know they said no, but it's the 360. and most everyone knows the 360 is about online. even sega.

Sega was saying, online play will ruin VF5......

im telling you, it will happen. dev's say all types of things. nintendo said people didnt want to play online just last gen. we now how that ended up. even sony said it was a second thought situation. now they have changed their stance also. all im saying is it will be that "extra" feature that will warrant the purchase of the game again. and once sony gets it's netwotk up and running im sure more games will be utilized for it. and even port for all, if you would.

18 years ago

23576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

Member since 2002 • 23576 Posts

[QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]
This is for anyone picking up this game. PS3 has motion control but no online. 360 has online but no motion control.
Which one do you feel is more important motion control or online play?
Viviath

hey can you tell me which Hands-on preview says that the PS3 version wont have online whilst the X360 version will...I'm dont mean to question you, but this is system wars...and well, you cant take anything at face value here....

There you go.

http://www.gamersreports.com/news/3970/virtua-tennis-3-drops-online-play-for-ps3-version/

http://www.firingsquad.com/news/newsarticle.asp?searchid=14217

http://www.digg.com/gaming_news/Virtua_Tennis_3_to_be_NATIVE_1080p_on_X360_and_online_play_will_X360_ONLY

18 years ago

8681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Darth_Stalin

Member since 2005 • 8681 Posts

[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

PS3's ram is faster than Xbox 360's. PS3 has HDMI. PS3 has Cell processor. PS3 has Blu-Ray. No way is the 360 hardware better for games, thats a bold faced lie.

But no its not.......the RAM is divided :? By the way, the 360 has a better GPU.

18 years ago

10715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2002 • 10715 Posts

[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

PS3's ram is faster than Xbox 360's. PS3 has HDMI. PS3 has Cell processor. PS3 has Blu-Ray. No way is the 360 hardware better for games, thats a bold faced lie.

ahhhh....good old KeyWii in denial yet once again. :lol: your just like the typical cow. I bet you still believe that the PS3 can do dual display 1080p and 120fps. :lol:

18 years ago

3703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 3703 Posts

[QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="akuma303x"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

were you once a sony fanboy? honest and humble Q. and yes the 360 is even better at running games in 1080p. but the ps3 has hdmi wich just looks much cleaner. so the result is games that are more detailed in texure's on 360 , but more cleaner and crisp looking games on ps3.

nope....furthest thing from it.

ok. sorry man, just wonderin.

18 years ago

10715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2002 • 10715 Posts

[QUOTE="akuma303x"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="akuma303x"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

were you once a sony fanboy? honest and humble Q. and yes the 360 is even better at running games in 1080p. but the ps3 has hdmi wich just looks much cleaner. so the result is games that are more detailed in texure's on 360 , but more cleaner and crisp looking games on ps3.

nope....furthest thing from it.

ok. sorry man, just wonderin.

no worries here :)

18 years ago

2795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 2795 Posts

[QUOTE="Viviath"][QUOTE="Riverwolf007"]
This is for anyone picking up this game. PS3 has motion control but no online. 360 has online but no motion control.
Which one do you feel is more important motion control or online play?
blackace

hey can you tell me which Hands-on preview says that the PS3 version wont have online whilst the X360 version will...I'm dont mean to question you, but this is system wars...and well, you cant take anything at face value here....

There you go.

http://www.gamersreports.com/news/3970/virtua-tennis-3-drops-online-play-for-ps3-version/

http://www.firingsquad.com/news/newsarticle.asp?searchid=14217

http://www.digg.com/gaming_news/Virtua_Tennis_3_to_be_NATIVE_1080p_on_X360_and_online_play_will_X360_ONLY

thanx! :D you just saved me alot of money, well $60...I was gonna get it for PS3 but now i think i'll get it for my X360..thanx alot :D

18 years ago

4884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 4884 Posts

[QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

PS3's ram is faster than Xbox 360's. PS3 has HDMI. PS3 has Cell processor. PS3 has Blu-Ray. No way is the 360 hardware better for games, thats a bold faced lie.

ahhhh....good old KeyWii in denial yet once again. :lol: your just like the typical cow. I bet you still believe that the PS3 can do dual display 1080p and 120fps. :lol:

I never said that. I said PS3's hardware is clearly better, and anyone saying the Xbox 360 is better for games is just lying. Even Bill Gates knows it, thats why he uses the excuse, "Well, we'll always be 1 year ahead of them in development time"

18 years ago

2370

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 2370 Posts

Online FTW!! Easily

18 years ago

10715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2002 • 10715 Posts

[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

PS3's ram is faster than Xbox 360's. PS3 has HDMI. PS3 has Cell processor. PS3 has Blu-Ray. No way is the 360 hardware better for games, thats a bold faced lie.

ahhhh....good old KeyWii in denial yet once again. :lol: your just like the typical cow. I bet you still believe that the PS3 can do dual display 1080p and 120fps. :lol:

I never said that. I said PS3's hardware is clearly better, and anyone saying the Xbox 360 is better for games is just lying.

how so when it's already been proven? :|

18 years ago

3703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 3703 Posts

[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

PS3's ram is faster than Xbox 360's. PS3 has HDMI. PS3 has Cell processor. PS3 has Blu-Ray. No way is the 360 hardware better for games, thats a bold faced lie.

xbox 360's ram is better suited for games. it lets dev's not only use the memory how they choose, but allocate it as much as they need for any one given task. faster ram, not better ram. ps3 has hdmi. it rocks. cell is for streaming video. it is not an intelligent cpu for a game console. cell is ment for a pc. strictly as a game cpu, it is a mistake. blu-ray. i like it. needs faster read speed's, other than that, im game. but your wrong in a couple area's.

18 years ago

10715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2002 • 10715 Posts

[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

PS3's ram is faster than Xbox 360's. PS3 has HDMI. PS3 has Cell processor. PS3 has Blu-Ray. No way is the 360 hardware better for games, thats a bold faced lie.

ahhhh....good old KeyWii in denial yet once again. :lol: your just like the typical cow. I bet you still believe that the PS3 can do dual display 1080p and 120fps. :lol:

I never said that. I said PS3's hardware is clearly better, and anyone saying the Xbox 360 is better for games is just lying. Even Bill Gates knows it, thats why he uses the excuse, "Well, we'll always be 1 year ahead of them in development time"

NM.....just saw that you're only 19. Wouldn't expect you to actually think for yourself yet....:lol:

18 years ago

4884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 4884 Posts

[QUOTE="akuma303x"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

PS3's ram is faster than Xbox 360's. PS3 has HDMI. PS3 has Cell processor. PS3 has Blu-Ray. No way is the 360 hardware better for games, thats a bold faced lie.

xbox 360's ram is better suited for games. it lets dev's not only use the memory how they choose, but allocate it as much as they need for any one given task. faster ram, not better ram. ps3 has hdmi. it rocks. cell is for streaming video. it is not an intelligent cpu for a game console. cell is ment for a pc. strictly as a game cpu, it is a mistake. blu-ray. i like it. needs faster read speed's, other than that, im game. but your wrong in a couple area's.

More lies. Developers can allocate PS3's ram however they choose also. At least you acknowledge HDMI and Blu-Ray. You are clueless about the Cell (as usual) what kool-aid drinking website did you get that off of? Cell is excellent for physics and AI processing in Games. It can even do some graphical rendering of it's own.

18 years ago

949

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 949 Posts

I hate motion control on ps3 anyway. .GIMICK! If you want motion buy wii, if you want everthing else buy 360. I would take 360 rumble over ps3 motion anyday!

18 years ago

3703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 3703 Posts

[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="akuma303x"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

PS3's ram is faster than Xbox 360's. PS3 has HDMI. PS3 has Cell processor. PS3 has Blu-Ray. No way is the 360 hardware better for games, thats a bold faced lie.

xbox 360's ram is better suited for games. it lets dev's not only use the memory how they choose, but allocate it as much as they need for any one given task. faster ram, not better ram. ps3 has hdmi. it rocks. cell is for streaming video. it is not an intelligent cpu for a game console. cell is ment for a pc. strictly as a game cpu, it is a mistake. blu-ray. i like it. needs faster read speed's, other than that, im game. but your wrong in a couple area's.

More lies. Developers can allocate PS3's ram however they chose also. At least you acknowledge HDMI and Blu-Ray. You are clueless about the Cell (as usual)

i use point and term in my debate's. you use grade school banter. your alone on your thoughts. face it, you know less than everyone else.

18 years ago

10318

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 57

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 10318 Posts

[QUOTE="akuma303x"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.KeyWii

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

PS3's ram is faster than Xbox 360's. PS3 has HDMI. PS3 has Cell processor. PS3 has Blu-Ray. No way is the 360 hardware better for games, thats a bold faced lie.

xbox 360's ram is better suited for games. it lets dev's not only use the memory how they choose, but allocate it as much as they need for any one given task. faster ram, not better ram. ps3 has hdmi. it rocks. cell is for streaming video. it is not an intelligent cpu for a game console. cell is ment for a pc. strictly as a game cpu, it is a mistake. blu-ray. i like it. needs faster read speed's, other than that, im game. but your wrong in a couple area's.

More lies. Developers can allocate PS3's ram however they choose also. At least you acknowledge HDMI and Blu-Ray. You are clueless about the Cell (as usual) what kool-aid drinking website did you get that off of? Cell is excellent for physics and AI processing in Games. It can even do some graphical rendering of it's own.

:lol: @ cows in denial. :lol:

Multiplatform games scoring higher on the Xbox360 prove that cow wrong.

18 years ago

204

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2005 • 204 Posts

[QUOTE="akuma303x"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

were you once a sony fanboy? honest and humble Q. and yes the 360 is even better at running games in 1080p. but the ps3 has hdmi wich just looks much cleaner. so the result is games that are more detailed in texure's on 360 , but more cleaner and crisp looking games on ps3.

But for those who don't have HDTVs it doesn't really matter u know...

18 years ago

10715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2002 • 10715 Posts

[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="akuma303x"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

PS3's ram is faster than Xbox 360's. PS3 has HDMI. PS3 has Cell processor. PS3 has Blu-Ray. No way is the 360 hardware better for games, thats a bold faced lie.

xbox 360's ram is better suited for games. it lets dev's not only use the memory how they choose, but allocate it as much as they need for any one given task. faster ram, not better ram. ps3 has hdmi. it rocks. cell is for streaming video. it is not an intelligent cpu for a game console. cell is ment for a pc. strictly as a game cpu, it is a mistake. blu-ray. i like it. needs faster read speed's, other than that, im game. but your wrong in a couple area's.

More lies. Developers can allocate PS3's ram however they choose also. At least you acknowledge HDMI and Blu-Ray. You are clueless about the Cell (as usual)

still doesn't help them for gaming seeing how there's less RAM solely devoted to the GPU. The cell has been proven to be great for multimedia applications, but less powerful in terms of gaming. Accept the facts kid. The 360's CPU and GPU combined offer more potential to developers than the PS3's. Games like Gears of War could never be done on the PS3 (at least at the same level of detail as on the 360) regardless of how much of the RAM was applied to the game. There's something called a bottleneck, and the PS3 has plenty of those.

18 years ago

4884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 4884 Posts

[QUOTE="akuma303x"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="akuma303x"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

PS3's ram is faster than Xbox 360's. PS3 has HDMI. PS3 has Cell processor. PS3 has Blu-Ray. No way is the 360 hardware better for games, thats a bold faced lie.

xbox 360's ram is better suited for games. it lets dev's not only use the memory how they choose, but allocate it as much as they need for any one given task. faster ram, not better ram. ps3 has hdmi. it rocks. cell is for streaming video. it is not an intelligent cpu for a game console. cell is ment for a pc. strictly as a game cpu, it is a mistake. blu-ray. i like it. needs faster read speed's, other than that, im game. but your wrong in a couple area's.

More lies. Developers can allocate PS3's ram however they chose also. At least you acknowledge HDMI and Blu-Ray. You are clueless about the Cell (as usual)

i use point and term in my debate's. you use grade school banter. your alone on your thoughts. face it, you know less than everyone else.

You can't refute what I said about PS3's ram. You said Cell was only good for video streaming. That is an abject lie. It excels at physics processing and AI processing in games.

18 years ago

4884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 4884 Posts

[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="akuma303x"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.LosDaddie

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

PS3's ram is faster than Xbox 360's. PS3 has HDMI. PS3 has Cell processor. PS3 has Blu-Ray. No way is the 360 hardware better for games, thats a bold faced lie.

xbox 360's ram is better suited for games. it lets dev's not only use the memory how they choose, but allocate it as much as they need for any one given task. faster ram, not better ram. ps3 has hdmi. it rocks. cell is for streaming video. it is not an intelligent cpu for a game console. cell is ment for a pc. strictly as a game cpu, it is a mistake. blu-ray. i like it. needs faster read speed's, other than that, im game. but your wrong in a couple area's.

More lies. Developers can allocate PS3's ram however they choose also. At least you acknowledge HDMI and Blu-Ray. You are clueless about the Cell (as usual) what kool-aid drinking website did you get that off of? Cell is excellent for physics and AI processing in Games. It can even do some graphical rendering of it's own.

:lol: @ cows in denial. :lol:

Multiplatform games scoring higher on the Xbox360 prove that cow wrong.

Thats because the PS3 multi-plats are held to their own standard, not Xbox 360's.

18 years ago

10715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

Member since 2002 • 10715 Posts

[QUOTE="LosDaddie"]
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="akuma303x"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.KeyWii

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

PS3's ram is faster than Xbox 360's. PS3 has HDMI. PS3 has Cell processor. PS3 has Blu-Ray. No way is the 360 hardware better for games, thats a bold faced lie.

xbox 360's ram is better suited for games. it lets dev's not only use the memory how they choose, but allocate it as much as they need for any one given task. faster ram, not better ram. ps3 has hdmi. it rocks. cell is for streaming video. it is not an intelligent cpu for a game console. cell is ment for a pc. strictly as a game cpu, it is a mistake. blu-ray. i like it. needs faster read speed's, other than that, im game. but your wrong in a couple area's.

More lies. Developers can allocate PS3's ram however they choose also. At least you acknowledge HDMI and Blu-Ray. You are clueless about the Cell (as usual) what kool-aid drinking website did you get that off of? Cell is excellent for physics and AI processing in Games. It can even do some graphical rendering of it's own.

:lol: @ cows in denial. :lol:

Multiplatform games scoring higher on the Xbox360 prove that cow wrong.

Thats because the PS3 multi-plats are held to their own standard, not Xbox 360's.

so the standards of a steady framerate and HD textures don't apply to the PS3 now? :lol:

18 years ago

4884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

Member since 2006 • 4884 Posts

[QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="akuma303x"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

PS3's ram is faster than Xbox 360's. PS3 has HDMI. PS3 has Cell processor. PS3 has Blu-Ray. No way is the 360 hardware better for games, thats a bold faced lie.

xbox 360's ram is better suited for games. it lets dev's not only use the memory how they choose, but allocate it as much as they need for any one given task. faster ram, not better ram. ps3 has hdmi. it rocks. cell is for streaming video. it is not an intelligent cpu for a game console. cell is ment for a pc. strictly as a game cpu, it is a mistake. blu-ray. i like it. needs faster read speed's, other than that, im game. but your wrong in a couple area's.

More lies. Developers can allocate PS3's ram however they choose also. At least you acknowledge HDMI and Blu-Ray. You are clueless about the Cell (as usual)

still doesn't help them for gaming seeing how there's less RAM solely devoted to the GPU. The cell has been proven to be great for multimedia applications, but less powerful in terms of gaming. Accept the facts kid. The 360's CPU and GPU combined offer more potential to developers than the PS3's. Games like Gears of War could never be done on the PS3 (at least at the same level of detail as on the 360) regardless of how much of the RAM was applied to the game. There's something called a bottleneck, and the PS3 has plenty of those.

A game like Gears of War could never be done on the PS3? Another lie. Please, just stop.

18 years ago

3703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

Member since 2004 • 3703 Posts

[QUOTE="LosDaddie"]
[QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="akuma303x"][QUOTE="KeyWii"][QUOTE="Nedemis"][QUOTE="advertise_this"]ps3 version also looks slightly better. but yah i'd say online too.KeyWii

doubt it, both support 1080p, but the 360's hardware is better suited for games looking better. wonderful, wonderful RAM....:P

PS3's ram is faster than Xbox 360's. PS3 has HDMI. PS3 has Cell processor. PS3 has Blu-Ray. No way is the 360 hardware better for games, thats a bold faced lie.

xbox 360's ram is better suited for games. it lets dev's not only use the memory how they choose, but allocate it as much as they need for any one given task. faster ram, not better ram. ps3 has hdmi. it rocks. cell is for streaming video. it is not an intelligent cpu for a game console. cell is ment for a pc. strictly as a game cpu, it is a mistake. blu-ray. i like it. needs faster read speed's, other than that, im game. but your wrong in a couple area's.

More lies. Developers can allocate PS3's ram however they choose also. At least you acknowledge HDMI and Blu-Ray. You are clueless about the Cell (as usual) what kool-aid drinking website did you get that off of? Cell is excellent for physics and AI processing in Games. It can even do some graphical rendering of it's own.

:lol: @ cows in denial. :lol:

Multiplatform games scoring higher on the Xbox360 prove that cow wrong.

Thats because the PS3 multi-plats are held to their own standard, not Xbox 360's.

the ps3 had better start doing better. i just got the westinghouse lvm 37w3 1080p hdtv and i gotta tell you, my 360 looks much better at 1080p than my ps3. but both are equal at 720p. intresting isnt it.

18 years ago

120 results
1
2
3

Jump to Top

Please Log In to post.

Use your keyboard!

ESC

Log in to comment