Vita needed a gimmick like the 3DS.

  • 77 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for simomate
simomate

1875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#51 simomate
Member since 2011 • 1875 Posts
[QUOTE="simomate"][QUOTE="starjet905"]I would buy Revelations again if it came out on the Vita. The huge high definition TV isn't portable.starjet905
You aren't the vast majority. The vast majority dont even go on this forum.

Did I say the huge majority would buy? I couldn't care less who else would buy. I just responded to your "who would want to buy" comment. I would buy, and I wouldn't care whether others bought or not. I don't let others decide what I buy. I just buy what I feel is worthy. :)

Okay then :P But I said "I dont know who" and I remain true to that since I dont count randon accounts on gamespot as people I know xD
Avatar image for starjet905
starjet905

2079

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 starjet905
Member since 2005 • 2079 Posts

[QUOTE="starjet905"][QUOTE="Heirren"]

Wha?! You don't NEED a 16gig card for the 3DS, that's the thing. A bigger card is necessary for Vita because a lot of full fledged titles will be PSN exclusive--Gravity Crash, for example. I stand by what I said and my comparison is completely valid.

Heirren

And is Gravity Crash 16GB?

That isn't the point. The point is that many proper games will be released on psn. A larger card will be necessary, and cheaper in the long run.

We don't know whether many proper games would be released on PSN. I don't think Sony is going to make that much of a mistake by making many good games go DD only. There are many people (and by that I mean a very significant portion of the PlayStation user base) who will not have access to DD. Yes, it will be cheaper in the long run anyway, but that's beside the point. The fact is that, the Vita does NOT require more than a $20 4GB card to start playing. So the Vita costs a whopping $270. That's it. Add a game and $330. Sure, it may not be worth it to someone who already has a 3DS. But for some others who prefer Sony's titles, this price is okay. Not that I wouldn't like a price cut, though.
Avatar image for starjet905
starjet905

2079

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 starjet905
Member since 2005 • 2079 Posts
[QUOTE="simomate"] Okay then :P But I said "I dont know who" and I remain true to that since I dont count randon accounts on gamespot as people I know xD

Whether you know me or not, there still is a market for ports of console games. Just that it isn't big as those who want games exclusive to their handheld.
Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

[QUOTE="starjet905"]And is Gravity Crash 16GB?starjet905

That isn't the point. The point is that many proper games will be released on psn. A larger card will be necessary, and cheaper in the long run.

We don't know whether many proper games would be released on PSN. I don't think Sony is going to make that much of a mistake by making many good games go DD only. There are many people (and by that I mean a very significant portion of the PlayStation user base) who will not have access to DD. Yes, it will be cheaper in the long run anyway, but that's beside the point. The fact is that, the Vita does NOT require more than a $20 4GB card to start playing. So the Vita costs a whopping $270. That's it. Add a game and $330. Sure, it may not be worth it to someone who already has a 3DS. But for some others who prefer Sony's titles, this price is okay. Not that I wouldn't like a price cut, though.

Considering Sony has already voiced the smartphone cheap game competition, and couple that with them trying to combat the used game market, I'd say it is a very fair bet.

Avatar image for starjet905
starjet905

2079

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 starjet905
Member since 2005 • 2079 Posts

Considering Sony has already voiced the smartphone cheap game competition, and couple that with them trying to combat the used game market, I'd say it is a very fair bet.

Heirren
Do you remember what happened to their DD only handheld?
Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

Considering Sony has already voiced the smartphone cheap game competition, and couple that with them trying to combat the used game market, I'd say it is a very fair bet.

starjet905

Do you remember what happened to their DD only handheld?

That wasn't in the age of the smartphone. The market is different today.

Avatar image for starjet905
starjet905

2079

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 starjet905
Member since 2005 • 2079 Posts

[QUOTE="starjet905"][QUOTE="Heirren"]

Considering Sony has already voiced the smartphone cheap game competition, and couple that with them trying to combat the used game market, I'd say it is a very fair bet.

Heirren

Do you remember what happened to their DD only handheld?

That wasn't in the age of the smartphone. The market is different today.

The PSP Go came out in October 2009. Roughly two years ago. Internet infrastructure hasn't increased much within those two years. Smartphone games don't require 1GB+ downloads usually. Those games are small, and that's why they succeed in a download-only setup.
Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

[QUOTE="starjet905"]Do you remember what happened to their DD only handheld?starjet905

That wasn't in the age of the smartphone. The market is different today.

The PSP Go came out in October 2009. Roughly two years ago. Internet infrastructure hasn't increased much with.in those two years. Smartphone games don't require 1GB+ downloads usually. Those games are small, and that's why they succeed in a download-only setup.

It's a different story now, sorry. Sony knows they must offer smaller, more budget titles in addition to the big ones like Uncharted. It is a rather good approach, imo. A device that offers music, movies, pick up and play games, AND in depth games like Uncharted? In this respect I just don't see how a 4 gig card is sufficient. Knowing myself I'll probably get suckered into buying a Vita if it lands on all these accounts--especially if the music aspect is intuitive like an ipod.

***it is a darn shame this thing doesn't have phone functionality. Imo, Sony missed a big opportunity. The Vita should have been a tablet with bluetooth phone functions.

Avatar image for PraetorianMan
PraetorianMan

2073

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 PraetorianMan
Member since 2011 • 2073 Posts
About the grossly overpriced memory cards. It sucks and I see no reason for Sony to gouge the price like that, but if you take into account how downloading games through PSN entails a discount, you're really not THAT badly off in the end. It still sucks, but there's.... compensation?
Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
About the grossly overpriced memory cards. It sucks and I see no reason for Sony to gouge the price like that, but if you take into account how downloading games through PSN entails a discount, you're really not THAT badly off in the end. It still sucks, but there's.... compensation? PraetorianMan
They price gouged because they're losing a decent amount of money of each PS Vita they sale. Given the billions of dollars they lost on the PS3, Sony isn't going to just take losses everywhere. I do think they should've came up with something else but I don't work for Sony.
Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

[QUOTE="PraetorianMan"]About the grossly overpriced memory cards. It sucks and I see no reason for Sony to gouge the price like that, but if you take into account how downloading games through PSN entails a discount, you're really not THAT badly off in the end. It still sucks, but there's.... compensation? FlamesOfGrey
They price gouged because they're losing a decent amount of money of each PS Vita they sale. Given the billions of dollars they lost on the PS3, Sony isn't going to just take losses everywhere. I do think they should've came up with something else but I don't work for Sony.

I'm not so sure about that. It is certainly possible, but Sony has always priced their products a bit higher than everybody else.

Avatar image for helwa1988
helwa1988

2157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 helwa1988
Member since 2007 • 2157 Posts

[QUOTE="ugoo18"]It is nearly $400 if you include a game as well, who is going to buy a handheld without buying any games for it and that's just the wifi version the 3G version based on those prices is already $400 without a game.

CajunShooter

How about this: Nintendo 3DS = $170. You gotta get a memory card with that 3DS so a 2GB one cost you $13. Then you NEED the 3DS starter Kit for $30 because you have to have a carry case and car charger for your on the go gaming. You also will be using the screen protectors and cleaning cloth. Like you said who buys a handheld without games so you need to get all those great Nintendo first party games like Mario Land, Mario Kart, Starfox and Zelda so that is another $160. Plus you need a travel case to store all your games so that's another $10.

Holy Smokes the 3DS cost $383!

You do realize the 2gb is including with the 3ds free of charge right? And you do not need a starter kit. I carried my 3ds in my purse just fine. And i still do not have s screen protector and no scratches.
Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="PraetorianMan"]About the grossly overpriced memory cards. It sucks and I see no reason for Sony to gouge the price like that, but if you take into account how downloading games through PSN entails a discount, you're really not THAT badly off in the end. It still sucks, but there's.... compensation? Heirren

They price gouged because they're losing a decent amount of money of each PS Vita they sale. Given the billions of dollars they lost on the PS3, Sony isn't going to just take losses everywhere. I do think they should've came up with something else but I don't work for Sony.

I'm not so sure about that. It is certainly possible, but Sony has always priced their products a bit higher than everybody else.

The prices of these cards are insane though. It's obvious they're trying to offset the PS Vita loss on each unit with the idea of knowing most core gamers aren't going to settle for a 4 or 8 GB card. The 4 gig would probably only last a few months and the 8 gig wouldn't even last a year for most core gamers.
Avatar image for MFDOOM1983
MFDOOM1983

8465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 MFDOOM1983
Member since 2010 • 8465 Posts
Its gimmick is powerful hardware. They reel consumers in with powerful hardware(because they lack system sellers like nintendo) and the promise that amazing games will utilize it in the future. It took ps3 18 months to get that game(mgs4), I wonder how long vita will take.
Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] They price gouged because they're losing a decent amount of money of each PS Vita they sale. Given the billions of dollars they lost on the PS3, Sony isn't going to just take losses everywhere. I do think they should've came up with something else but I don't work for Sony.FlamesOfGrey

I'm not so sure about that. It is certainly possible, but Sony has always priced their products a bit higher than everybody else.

The prices of these cards are insane though. It's obvious they're trying to offset the PS Vita loss on each unit with the idea of knowing most core gamers aren't going to settle for a 4 or 8 GB card. The 4 gig would probably only last a few months and the 8 gig wouldn't even last a year for most core gamers.

I'm inclined to agree, and I've shared the same view and posted such on this forum. I forget the prices--how much is the 32gig card? Do we have 'set in stone' US dollar amounts? Because the last I read it was a conversion from yen to dollar, which never turns out to be accurate. I guess I'm just pointing out that they aren't that much more than a typical "sony" line of product.

*any idea what the max acceptable card is?

Avatar image for FlamesOfGrey
FlamesOfGrey

7511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 FlamesOfGrey
Member since 2009 • 7511 Posts
[QUOTE="Heirren"]

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="Heirren"]

I'm not so sure about that. It is certainly possible, but Sony has always priced their products a bit higher than everybody else.

The prices of these cards are insane though. It's obvious they're trying to offset the PS Vita loss on each unit with the idea of knowing most core gamers aren't going to settle for a 4 or 8 GB card. The 4 gig would probably only last a few months and the 8 gig wouldn't even last a year for most core gamers.

I'm inclined to agree, and I've shared the same view and posted such on this forum. I forget the prices--how much is the 32gig card? Do we have 'set in stone' US dollar amounts? Because the last I read it was a conversion from yen to dollar, which never turns out to be accurate. I guess I'm just pointing out that they aren't that much more than a typical "sony" line of product.

*any idea what the max acceptable card is?

4GB - $20 8GB - $30 16 GB - I forgot 32GB - $100 Those are the final prices for the U.S.
Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] The prices of these cards are insane though. It's obvious they're trying to offset the PS Vita loss on each unit with the idea of knowing most core gamers aren't going to settle for a 4 or 8 GB card. The 4 gig would probably only last a few months and the 8 gig wouldn't even last a year for most core gamers.FlamesOfGrey

I'm inclined to agree, and I've shared the same view and posted such on this forum. I forget the prices--how much is the 32gig card? Do we have 'set in stone' US dollar amounts? Because the last I read it was a conversion from yen to dollar, which never turns out to be accurate. I guess I'm just pointing out that they aren't that much more than a typical "sony" line of product.

*any idea what the max acceptable card is?

4GB - $20 8GB - $30 16 GB - I forgot 32GB - $100 Those are the final prices for the U.S.

I'm guessing the 16gig is probably $70, then. Yeah, those are ridiculous, and people are defending this?! Sony makes good products, but with prices like that--even in trying to recoup losses like you said--simply CANNOT be good for the system. It really alienates part of the market, which is children/young teens with no jobs. The consumer is much smarter these days, and if a parent is going to buy their sons/daughters a portable console and sees these prices? Yeah, no. Not only will they go, "wtf?" but what also factors in is that they simply don't want them carrying around a device worth $400+.

Wow, $100?! Even for myself I just can't bring myself to spend that amount. I've been looking at vita as something to replace my ipod and play games when I'm away from home. At those prices I'm better off buying an Ipad.

Avatar image for bjvill
bjvill

152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 15

User Lists: 0

#68 bjvill
Member since 2011 • 152 Posts
It's still very early for the vita. I think it does have all sorts of fancy "gimmicks" like the powerful graphic tech, fancy touch input, and some kind of interface with the PS3. So it doesn't need anything but the eventual price drop and library expansion. The 3D gimmick wasn't really what sold the 3DS for most, it was price drop+library expansion possibly timed perfectly in anticipation of the vita. "VITA. It only does... 3DS marketing."
Avatar image for red12355
red12355

1251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 red12355
Member since 2007 • 1251 Posts

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"][QUOTE="Heirren"]

I'm inclined to agree, and I've shared the same view and posted such on this forum. I forget the prices--how much is the 32gig card? Do we have 'set in stone' US dollar amounts? Because the last I read it was a conversion from yen to dollar, which never turns out to be accurate. I guess I'm just pointing out that they aren't that much more than a typical "sony" line of product.

*any idea what the max acceptable card is?

Heirren

4GB - $20 8GB - $30 16 GB - I forgot 32GB - $100 Those are the final prices for the U.S.

I'm guessing the 16gig is probably $70, then. Yeah, those are ridiculous, and people are defending this?! Sony makes good products, but with prices like that--even in trying to recoup losses like you said--simply CANNOT be good for the system. It really alienates part of the market, which is children/young teens with no jobs. The consumer is much smarter these days, and if a parent is going to buy their sons/daughters a portable console and sees these prices? Yeah, no. Not only will they go, "wtf?" but what also factors in is that they simply don't want them carrying around a device worth $400+.

Wow, $100?! Even for myself I just can't bring myself to spend that amount. I've been looking at vita as something to replace my ipod and play games when I'm away from home. At those prices I'm better off buying an Ipad.

How does the Vita cost $400? If parents didn't want their kids carrying around a $400 system, then they would get the $250 system+$20 4gb card. I have no idea why you are saying that everybody has to spend $400 on the system. Does an xbox 360 cost $500 because you can buy another $300 worth of accessories?
Avatar image for tjricardo089
tjricardo089

7429

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 tjricardo089
Member since 2010 • 7429 Posts

Vita needed to be cheaper. Take a look at the 3DS, the price of it dropped like 60-70€ in my country.

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#71 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts
you mean like a touchpad on its back?
Avatar image for GunSmith1_basic
GunSmith1_basic

10548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#72 GunSmith1_basic
Member since 2002 • 10548 Posts

you mean like a touchpad on its back?BrunoBRS

3D- everyone wants to see it pop out at you

Back touchpad- ???????????????????? (seriously what is it for?)

Avatar image for theuncharted34
theuncharted34

14529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 theuncharted34
Member since 2010 • 14529 Posts

Other than being a handheld on the bleeding edge of technology, nothing.

Avatar image for deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
deactivated-57ad0e5285d73

21398

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 deactivated-57ad0e5285d73
Member since 2009 • 21398 Posts

[QUOTE="Heirren"]

[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"] 4GB - $20 8GB - $30 16 GB - I forgot 32GB - $100 Those are the final prices for the U.S.red12355

I'm guessing the 16gig is probably $70, then. Yeah, those are ridiculous, and people are defending this?! Sony makes good products, but with prices like that--even in trying to recoup losses like you said--simply CANNOT be good for the system. It really alienates part of the market, which is children/young teens with no jobs. The consumer is much smarter these days, and if a parent is going to buy their sons/daughters a portable console and sees these prices? Yeah, no. Not only will they go, "wtf?" but what also factors in is that they simply don't want them carrying around a device worth $400+.

Wow, $100?! Even for myself I just can't bring myself to spend that amount. I've been looking at vita as something to replace my ipod and play games when I'm away from home. At those prices I'm better off buying an Ipad.

How does the Vita cost $400? If parents didn't want their kids carrying around a $400 system, then they would get the $250 system+$20 4gb card. I have no idea why you are saying that everybody has to spend $400 on the system. Does an xbox 360 cost $500 because you can buy another $300 worth of accessories?

Do you buy a new system without a game? The large majority of buyers are probably going to buy at least two games, plus a memory card. Even with just one game and the measly 4gig card, that is close to $350. Not everybody has to spend $400, but in reality it makes far more sense to buy a bigger card for the system.

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#76 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts

[QUOTE="Digital_DJ_00"]

[QUOTE="Super_MooRio"]It is way to expensive. Nearly $400 if you include memory.ugoo18



Uh, no? $250 base price, 32GB $100 prce = $350. Nice try. I'm sure you convinced the Vita haters tho.

It is nearly $400 if you include a game as well, who is going to buy a handheld without buying any games for it and that's just the wifi version the 3G version based on those prices is already $400 without a game.

For $250 you can get a 3DS (With a 2GB SD card already) + 2 games

For $350 you can get a 3DS (With a 2GB SD card already) + 4 games and still have $20 left over for a quick meal

People have a choice, they could get a smaller card for cheaper. Either way it would be more expensive than a 3DS so...

Avatar image for glimpus
glimpus

2306

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#77 glimpus
Member since 2004 • 2306 Posts

Play Super Mario 3D Land and tell me its just a gimmick.