Wait a sec??!! The PS3 version of GTA4 isn't even in 720p???!!!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for septicvirus
septicvirus

967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 septicvirus
Member since 2007 • 967 Posts

Say it ain't so... :cry:

From now on, no cow gets to claim the PS3 has superior hardware. It is obvious that Sony has lied to us all. Wasn't the PS3 teh lead platform for GTA4???

Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts
10
Avatar image for septicvirus
septicvirus

967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 septicvirus
Member since 2007 • 967 Posts

10Ragnarok1051

I think you're missing the point.

Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]10septicvirus

I think you're missing the point.

Got a 10 who cares. Only fanboys will talk about it.

Avatar image for plourdo
plourdo

222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 plourdo
Member since 2005 • 222 Posts

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]10septicvirus

I think you're missing the point.

10

Avatar image for death919
death919

4724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 92

User Lists: 0

#6 death919
Member since 2004 • 4724 Posts

10Ragnarok1051

Quoted for truth.

BTW I'll be too busy doing 3 kilometers (OK OK... I'll be "politically correct"... 1.5 miles...) of wheelies to care. XD

Avatar image for butteater86
butteater86

1306

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 butteater86
Member since 2007 • 1306 Posts

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]10septicvirus

I think you're missing the point.

Dude the game still looks amazing. Some reviewers say it's slightly better looking than the 360 version. If not being 720p actually mattered it wouldn't of gotten a 10/10 here.

Avatar image for kage_53
kage_53

12671

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#8 kage_53
Member since 2006 • 12671 Posts
If you go to beyond3d you find this


it's 630p (1120x630)
regardless PS3 media look better for me, the light and atmosphere is more real (maybe HDR vs X360 MDR, post-process...), i agree with global reviews feelings but more comparison screenshots would be good
it's interesting, it shown that number of pixel isn't enough to determine better visuals.Quaz51
Avatar image for septicvirus
septicvirus

967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 septicvirus
Member since 2007 • 967 Posts
[QUOTE="septicvirus"]

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]10Ragnarok1051

I think you're missing the point.

Got a 10 who cares. Only fanboys will talk about it.

The damage control is strong with cows. It's hardly relavent that they both got a 10. On a 0.5 scale that could literally mean that one version got a 9.8 and one got a 9.9

Really, I wouldn't expect ANY website to have a different score because of this slight difference in resolution because you probably can't really tell. HOWEVER, its the principle that counts... this is really unacceptable. Its soo funny how cows will just take anything Sony gives them.

Avatar image for navneet21
navneet21

1625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 navneet21
Member since 2003 • 1625 Posts

If you go to beyond3d you find this

[QUOTE="Quaz51"]
it's 630p (1120x630)
regardless PS3 media look better for me, the light and atmosphere is more real (maybe HDR vs X360 MDR, post-process...:), i agree with global reviews feelings but more comparison screenshots would be good
it's interesting, it shown that number of pixel isn't enough to determine better visuals.kage_53

Doing Engineering right now and worked alot with designing engineering applications such as games and other programs I can tell you that its all about how many people on system wars or in this world know nothing about graphics.

Avatar image for ocdog45
ocdog45

9072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 143

User Lists: 0

#11 ocdog45
Member since 2005 • 9072 Posts

shows how much graphic or visuals really matter IMO.

[QUOTE="septicvirus"]

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]10butteater86

I think you're missing the point.

Dude the game still looks amazing. Some reviewers say it's slightly better looking than the 360 version. If not being 720p actually mattered it wouldn't of gotten a 10/10 here.

Avatar image for blues3531
blues3531

2632

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 blues3531
Member since 2005 • 2632 Posts

10

ahh. its so great. 9.5 used to be the invariable response when people bashed all those 9.5's we had goin in 07 and then brawl

Avatar image for death919
death919

4724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 92

User Lists: 0

#13 death919
Member since 2004 • 4724 Posts
[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="septicvirus"]

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]10septicvirus

Its soo funny how cows will just take anything Sony gives them.

It got a 10. It's considered one of the top 5 games of all time by Gamespot. Do we care about a lack of pixels? Well... I suppose PC gamers do... Remind me to commit suicide if I ever become a hermit. "It got a 10, BUT..." LOL ridiculous. Just play the friggan game. Worrying about "pixel count LOL" is almost as laughable as worrying about achievements.
Avatar image for septicvirus
septicvirus

967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 septicvirus
Member since 2007 • 967 Posts

[QUOTE="kage_53"]If you go to beyond3d you find this

[QUOTE="Quaz51"]
it's 630p (1120x630)
regardless PS3 media look better for me, the light and atmosphere is more real (maybe HDR vs X360 MDR, post-process...:), i agree with global reviews feelings but more comparison screenshots would be good
it's interesting, it shown that number of pixel isn't enough to determine better visuals.navneet21

Doing Engineering right now and worked alot with designing engineering applications such as games and other programs I can tell you that its all about how many people on system wars or in this world know nothing about graphics.

The PS3 is LITERALLY not strong enough to produce the same visuals at 720p. Does that register with you?

Avatar image for sonofHWBB_basic
sonofHWBB_basic

437

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 sonofHWBB_basic
Member since 2002 • 437 Posts
Funny how cows think it's no big deal now, but nearly 3 years ago when they found that out about PGR3 they couldn't stop screaming how the 360 was not true HD.
Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts
[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="septicvirus"]

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]10septicvirus

I think you're missing the point.

Got a 10 who cares. Only fanboys will talk about it.

The damage control is strong with cows. It's hardly relavent that they both got a 10. On a 0.5 scale that could literally mean that one version got a 9.8 and one got a 9.9

Really, I wouldn't expect ANY website to have a different score because of this slight difference in resolution because you probably can't really tell. HOWEVER, its the principle that counts... this is really unacceptable. Its soo funny how cows will just take anything Sony gives them.

Sounds like you are damage controlling for this game being "better" on the PS3. It got a 10 for both consoles seriously who cares.

Avatar image for -hells-
-hells-

1027

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 -hells-
Member since 2008 • 1027 Posts

taken from ign review

For those wanting to know which version looks better, the edge goes to the PS3. The textures and framerate are comparable, but the PS3 has far less pop-in. The 360 has richer colors, but the PS3 has better anti-aliasing making it look a little cleaner. Because GTA IV can preload onto the PS3 hard drive, the in-game loads are faster. Don't worry Xbox owners, the load times are rarely more than 30 seconds and don't occur very often. The slight visual edge goes to PS3, but the 360 is no slouch. Either version will do you proud.

Shove it

Avatar image for I_Helios_I
I_Helios_I

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 I_Helios_I
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts
[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="septicvirus"]

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]10septicvirus

I think you're missing the point.

Got a 10 who cares. Only fanboys will talk about it.

The damage control is strong with cows. It's hardly relavent that they both got a 10. On a 0.5 scale that could literally mean that one version got a 9.8 and one got a 9.9

Really, I wouldn't expect ANY website to have a different score because of this slight difference in resolution because you probably can't really tell. HOWEVER, its the principle that counts... this is really unacceptable. Its soo funny how cows will just take anything Sony gives them.

Dude are you kidding me? From the majority of reviews that I have read they have given the PS3 the visual edge every time. It got a 10 which is quite frankly amazing so accept that as fact and know that you being the lemming only gets you the minutely inferior version visually.

Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]10septicvirus

Its soo funny how cows will just take anything Sony gives them.

You're saying this and MS has the worst built console ever on the market?

Avatar image for septicvirus
septicvirus

967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 septicvirus
Member since 2007 • 967 Posts
[QUOTE="septicvirus"][QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="septicvirus"]

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]10I_Helios_I

I think you're missing the point.

Got a 10 who cares. Only fanboys will talk about it.

The damage control is strong with cows. It's hardly relavent that they both got a 10. On a 0.5 scale that could literally mean that one version got a 9.8 and one got a 9.9

Really, I wouldn't expect ANY website to have a different score because of this slight difference in resolution because you probably can't really tell. HOWEVER, its the principle that counts... this is really unacceptable. Its soo funny how cows will just take anything Sony gives them.

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="septicvirus"]

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]10septicvirus

I think you're missing the point.

Got a 10 who cares. Only fanboys will talk about it.

The damage control is strong with cows. It's hardly relavent that they both got a 10. On a 0.5 scale that could literally mean that one version got a 9.8 and one got a 9.9

Really, I wouldn't expect ANY website to have a different score because of this slight difference in resolution because you probably can't really tell. HOWEVER, its the principle that counts... this is really unacceptable. Its soo funny how cows will just take anything Sony gives them.

Dude are you kidding me? From the majority of reviews that I have read they have given the PS3 the visual edge every time. It got a 10 which is quite frankly amazing so accept that as fact and know that you being the lemming only gets you the minutely inferior version visually.

:lol:

Avatar image for LordoftheVacas
LordoftheVacas

718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 LordoftheVacas
Member since 2008 • 718 Posts

taken from ign review

For those wanting to know which version looks better, the edge goes to the PS3. The textures and framerate are comparable, but the PS3 has far less pop-in. The 360 has richer colors, but the PS3 has better anti-aliasing making it look a little cleaner. Because GTA IV can preload onto the PS3 hard drive, the in-game loads are faster. Don't worry Xbox owners, the load times are rarely more than 30 seconds and don't occur very often. The slight visual edge goes to PS3, but the 360 is no slouch. Either version will do you proud.

Shove it

-hells-


We are on gamespot fanboy.

If you're wondering about differences between the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 versions of Grand Theft Auto IV, the truth is that there aren't many. The PS3 version can only be played after a mandatory install that takes around 10 minutes, and its load times are a little shorter and less frequent as a result. The visuals, which don't always hold up to close scrutiny but are impressive during typical gameplay, are comparable and feature the same quirks (shadows that flicker, for example) on both consoles.


shove it.
Avatar image for septicvirus
septicvirus

967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 septicvirus
Member since 2007 • 967 Posts
[QUOTE="-hells-"]

taken from ign review

For those wanting to know which version looks better, the edge goes to the PS3. The textures and framerate are comparable, but the PS3 has far less pop-in. The 360 has richer colors, but the PS3 has better anti-aliasing making it look a little cleaner. Because GTA IV can preload onto the PS3 hard drive, the in-game loads are faster. Don't worry Xbox owners, the load times are rarely more than 30 seconds and don't occur very often. The slight visual edge goes to PS3, but the 360 is no slouch. Either version will do you proud.

Shove it

LordoftheVacas



We are on gamespot fanboy.

If you're wondering about differences between the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 versions of Grand Theft Auto IV, the truth is that there aren't many. The PS3 version can only be played after a mandatory install that takes around 10 minutes, and its load times are a little shorter and less frequent as a result.The visuals, which don't always hold up to close scrutinybut are impressive during typical gameplay, are comparable and feature the same quirks (shadows that flicker, for example) on both consoles.


shove it.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::cry:

Ohhh, teh irony!!! I guess Gamespot were the first reviewer NOT to get fooled by the resolution trick...

Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts
I've got to go study for an exam but before I go I have to ask, why is my last post being ignored?
Avatar image for SrgtSaggy101
SrgtSaggy101

1956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 SrgtSaggy101
Member since 2004 • 1956 Posts
Guess some one dont remember; how bad the ps2 hardware failure, was att release.
[QUOTE="septicvirus"]

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]10Ragnarok1051

Its soo funny how cows will just take anything Sony gives them.

You're saying this and MS has the worst built console ever on the market?

Avatar image for Ragnarok1051
Ragnarok1051

20238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Ragnarok1051
Member since 2007 • 20238 Posts
Guess some one dont remember; how bad the ps2 hardware failure, was att release.[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="septicvirus"]

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]10SrgtSaggy101

Its soo funny how cows will just take anything Sony gives them.

You're saying this and MS has the worst built console ever on the market?

And yet you could fix the problem yourself with a DVD cleaner, and the problem with RROD is still pretty bad and you have to send it in. Just saying.

Avatar image for I_Helios_I
I_Helios_I

1220

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 I_Helios_I
Member since 2007 • 1220 Posts
[QUOTE="-hells-"]

taken from ign review

For those wanting to know which version looks better, the edge goes to the PS3. The textures and framerate are comparable, but the PS3 has far less pop-in. The 360 has richer colors, but the PS3 has better anti-aliasing making it look a little cleaner. Because GTA IV can preload onto the PS3 hard drive, the in-game loads are faster. Don't worry Xbox owners, the load times are rarely more than 30 seconds and don't occur very often. The slight visual edge goes to PS3, but the 360 is no slouch. Either version will do you proud.

Shove it

LordoftheVacas



We are on gamespot fanboy.

If you're wondering about differences between the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 versions of Grand Theft Auto IV, the truth is that there aren't many. The PS3 version can only be played after a mandatory install that takes around 10 minutes, and its load times are a little shorter and less frequent as a result. The visuals, which don't always hold up to close scrutiny but are impressive during typical gameplay, are comparable and feature the same quirks (shadows that flicker, for example) on both consoles.


shove it.

True but if GS isn't going to go in depth with the visual differences and IGN, 1UP and Gamespy do then they should be used as references.

shove it!! ahahahaha owned by those three sites!! lmao

Avatar image for AvIdGaMeR444
AvIdGaMeR444

7031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 AvIdGaMeR444
Member since 2004 • 7031 Posts
Who cares? CoD4 is 600p and looks amazing.
Avatar image for septicvirus
septicvirus

967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 septicvirus
Member since 2007 • 967 Posts
[QUOTE="LordoftheVacas"][QUOTE="-hells-"]

taken from ign review

For those wanting to know which version looks better, the edge goes to the PS3. The textures and framerate are comparable, but the PS3 has far less pop-in. The 360 has richer colors, but the PS3 has better anti-aliasing making it look a little cleaner. Because GTA IV can preload onto the PS3 hard drive, the in-game loads are faster. Don't worry Xbox owners, the load times are rarely more than 30 seconds and don't occur very often. The slight visual edge goes to PS3, but the 360 is no slouch. Either version will do you proud.

Shove it

I_Helios_I



We are on gamespot fanboy.

If you're wondering about differences between the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 versions of Grand Theft Auto IV, the truth is that there aren't many. The PS3 version can only be played after a mandatory install that takes around 10 minutes, and its load times are a little shorter and less frequent as a result. The visuals, which don't always hold up to close scrutiny but are impressive during typical gameplay, are comparable and feature the same quirks (shadows that flicker, for example) on both consoles.


shove it.

True but if GS isn't going to go in depth with the visual differences and IGN, 1UP and Gamespy do then they should be used as references.

shove it!! ahahahaha owned by those three sites!! lmao

IGN, 1UP, and Gamespy must not have looked at the graphics very closely... must have been busy trying to rush out a review for teh fanboys!!!

Avatar image for EmperorSupreme
EmperorSupreme

7686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#29 EmperorSupreme
Member since 2006 • 7686 Posts
The majority of reviewers are saying the PS3 version looks better. I care more about the end result then a few pixels.
Avatar image for wallpaper42
wallpaper42

4127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 wallpaper42
Member since 2005 • 4127 Posts
[QUOTE="LordoftheVacas"][QUOTE="-hells-"]

taken from ign review

For those wanting to know which version looks better, the edge goes to the PS3. The textures and framerate are comparable, but the PS3 has far less pop-in. The 360 has richer colors, but the PS3 has better anti-aliasing making it look a little cleaner. Because GTA IV can preload onto the PS3 hard drive, the in-game loads are faster. Don't worry Xbox owners, the load times are rarely more than 30 seconds and don't occur very often. The slight visual edge goes to PS3, but the 360 is no slouch. Either version will do you proud.

Shove it

septicvirus



We are on gamespot fanboy.

If you're wondering about differences between the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 versions of Grand Theft Auto IV, the truth is that there aren't many. The PS3 version can only be played after a mandatory install that takes around 10 minutes, and its load times are a little shorter and less frequent as a result.The visuals, which don't always hold up to close scrutinybut are impressive during typical gameplay, are comparable and feature the same quirks (shadows that flicker, for example) on both consoles.


shove it.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::cry:

Ohhh, teh irony!!! I guess Gamespot were the first reviewer NOT to get fooled by the resolution trick...

Haven't you noticed that Gamespot is overall the most inaccurate when it comes to reviewing? Go look at all the reviews from Gamespot, IGN, Gametrailers, etc. And then check out gamerankings.

Avatar image for II6FUII-CauT1oN
II6FUII-CauT1oN

178

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#31 II6FUII-CauT1oN
Member since 2008 • 178 Posts
[QUOTE="I_Helios_I"][QUOTE="septicvirus"][QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="septicvirus"]

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]10septicvirus

I think you're missing the point.

Got a 10 who cares. Only fanboys will talk about it.

The damage control is strong with cows. It's hardly relavent that they both got a 10. On a 0.5 scale that could literally mean that one version got a 9.8 and one got a 9.9

Really, I wouldn't expect ANY website to have a different score because of this slight difference in resolution because you probably can't really tell. HOWEVER, its the principle that counts... this is really unacceptable. Its soo funny how cows will just take anything Sony gives them.

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"][QUOTE="septicvirus"]

[QUOTE="Ragnarok1051"]10septicvirus

I think you're missing the point.

Got a 10 who cares. Only fanboys will talk about it.

The damage control is strong with cows. It's hardly relavent that they both got a 10. On a 0.5 scale that could literally mean that one version got a 9.8 and one got a 9.9

Really, I wouldn't expect ANY website to have a different score because of this slight difference in resolution because you probably can't really tell. HOWEVER, its the principle that counts... this is really unacceptable. Its soo funny how cows will just take anything Sony gives them.

Dude are you kidding me? From the majority of reviews that I have read they have given the PS3 the visual edge every time. It got a 10 which is quite frankly amazing so accept that as fact and know that you being the lemming only gets you the minutely inferior version visually.

:lol:

nerd, go put ur pimple medicine on, and let the big boys enjoy their gta, kthnxbye.
Avatar image for LordoftheVacas
LordoftheVacas

718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 LordoftheVacas
Member since 2008 • 718 Posts
[QUOTE="I_Helios_I"][QUOTE="LordoftheVacas"][QUOTE="-hells-"]

taken from ign review

For those wanting to know which version looks better, the edge goes to the PS3. The textures and framerate are comparable, but the PS3 has far less pop-in. The 360 has richer colors, but the PS3 has better anti-aliasing making it look a little cleaner. Because GTA IV can preload onto the PS3 hard drive, the in-game loads are faster. Don't worry Xbox owners, the load times are rarely more than 30 seconds and don't occur very often. The slight visual edge goes to PS3, but the 360 is no slouch. Either version will do you proud.

Shove it

septicvirus



We are on gamespot fanboy.

If you're wondering about differences between the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 versions of Grand Theft Auto IV, the truth is that there aren't many. The PS3 version can only be played after a mandatory install that takes around 10 minutes, and its load times are a little shorter and less frequent as a result. The visuals, which don't always hold up to close scrutiny but are impressive during typical gameplay, are comparable and feature the same quirks (shadows that flicker, for example) on both consoles.


shove it.

True but if GS isn't going to go in depth with the visual differences and IGN, 1UP and Gamespy do then they should be used as references.

shove it!! ahahahaha owned by those three sites!! lmao

IGN, 1UP, and Gamespy must not have looked at the graphics very closely... must have been busy trying to rush out a review for teh fanboys!!!




[QUOTE="LordoftheVacas"][QUOTE="-hells-"]

taken from ign review

For those wanting to know which version looks better, the edge goes to the PS3. The textures and framerate are comparable, but the PS3 has far less pop-in. The 360 has richer colors, but the PS3 has better anti-aliasing making it look a little cleaner. Because GTA IV can preload onto the PS3 hard drive, the in-game loads are faster. Don't worry Xbox owners, the load times are rarely more than 30 seconds and don't occur very often. The slight visual edge goes to PS3, but the 360 is no slouch. Either version will do you proud.

Shove it

I_Helios_I



We are on gamespot fanboy.

If you're wondering about differences between the PlayStation 3 and Xbox 360 versions of Grand Theft Auto IV, the truth is that there aren't many. The PS3 version can only be played after a mandatory install that takes around 10 minutes, and its load times are a little shorter and less frequent as a result. The visuals, which don't always hold up to close scrutiny but are impressive during typical gameplay, are comparable and feature the same quirks (shadows that flicker, for example) on both consoles.


shove it.

True but if GS isn't going to go in depth with the visual differences and IGN, 1UP and Gamespy do then they should be used as references.

shove it!! ahahahaha owned by those three sites!! lmao



In my book a huge game like GTA4 running at 720p is a big achivement,and the 360 is maxed out :roll: , the ps3 that is suppose to be more powerfull can't even run the game in 720p that the devs needed to downgrade the resolution.