I was going to say it's clearly prerendered, but I'm thinking that beard was added on in MS paint.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
It's the 5th best looking console game not bad for a 2 year old game.FlamesOfGreyNo...U3, KZ3, R3, GOW3, KZ2, U2, etc, etc all look much, much better than Gears 2, especially considering Gears 2 was based off the original UE3 engine (Which is average at best)
[QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"]It's the 5th best looking console game not bad for a 2 year old game.Anastasia1997No...U3, KZ3, R3, GOW3, KZ2, U2, etc, etc all look much, much better than Gears 2, especially considering Gears 2 was based off the original UE3 engine (Which is average at best) His opinion has as much weight as yours you know.
[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"]It's the 5th best looking console game not bad for a 2 year old game.soulitaneNo...U3, KZ3, R3, GOW3, KZ2, U2, etc, etc all look much, much better than Gears 2, especially considering Gears 2 was based off the original UE3 engine (Which is average at best) His opinion has as much weight as yours you know. Not to mentioned he's bringing in unreleased games. I'm sure GEOW 3 will look better then Resistance 3 and on par or slightly better then Killzone 3.
[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"][QUOTE="FlamesOfGrey"]It's the 5th best looking console game not bad for a 2 year old game.soulitaneNo...U3, KZ3, R3, GOW3, KZ2, U2, etc, etc all look much, much better than Gears 2, especially considering Gears 2 was based off the original UE3 engine (Which is average at best) His opinion has as much weight as yours you know. Im talking about technical, which has nothing to do with opinon...
[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="Anastasia1997"] No...U3, KZ3, R3, GOW3, KZ2, U2, etc, etc all look much, much better than Gears 2, especially considering Gears 2 was based off the original UE3 engine (Which is average at best)Anastasia1997His opinion has as much weight as yours you know. Im talking about technical, which has nothing to do with opinon... If you're talking about technical qualities then you obviously must know all about the ins and outs of the games, so please explain to me how they are technically better.
[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="Anastasia1997"] No...U3, KZ3, R3, GOW3, KZ2, U2, etc, etc all look much, much better than Gears 2, especially considering Gears 2 was based off the original UE3 engine (Which is average at best)FlamesOfGreyHis opinion has as much weight as yours you know. Not to mentioned he's bringing in unreleased games. I'm sure GEOW 3 will look better then Resistance 3 and on par or slightly better then Killzone 3. Yeah, I've never understood the fascination with judging a games graphics before release.
[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="Anastasia1997"] No...U3, KZ3, R3, GOW3, KZ2, U2, etc, etc all look much, much better than Gears 2, especially considering Gears 2 was based off the original UE3 engine (Which is average at best)FlamesOfGreyHis opinion has as much weight as yours you know. Not to mentioned he's bringing in unreleased games. I'm sure GEOW 3 will look better then Resistance 3 and on par or slightly better then Killzone 3.
O Rly?
KZ3 in-game image
Gears 3 bullshot
KZ3 looks much betetr than Gears 3
So does
R3
KZ2
U2
GOW3
TLG
And last but not least, U3
The U3 images are probably in-engine though, regardless, U3 still looks much better as well
The U3 images are probably in-engine though, regardless, U3 still looks much better as wellSo you're comparing mostly unreleased game screen shots, that may not even be indicative of how the title actually plays ingame, with TWO year old ingame screen shots to prove what exactly? The imminent progression of technology? Because if so, you certainly did, good form.Anastasia1997
[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"]The U3 images are probably in-engine though, regardless, U3 still looks much better as well
So you're comparing mostly unreleased game screen shots, that may not even be indicative of how the title actually plays ingame, with TWO year old ingame screen shots to prove what exactly? The imminent progression of technology? Because if so, you certainly did, good form. The in-engine process of ND uses the same textures, character models, weapon models, etc that of the campaign, Its just that ND adds more AA and AF, and a cinematic filter. For U3, it seems they dont need to add more AA, since the gameplay looks like they use MLAA[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"]O Rly?soulitaneSo a bunch of bullshots tells you if one games graphics are technically better than another? ....BS? Ya, of Gears 3, the rest are in-game....Play U2, KZ2, GOW3, and youll see those gameplay segments in the game. For KZ3, TLG and R3, you see gameplay of those segments of those levels and itll be obvious. For U3, the in-engine process of ND uses the same textures, character models, weapon models, etc that of the campaign, Its just that ND adds more AA and AF, and a cinematic filter, but it seems they dont need to add more AA, since the gameplay looks like they use MLAA
[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="Anastasia1997"]O Rly?Anastasia1997So a bunch of bullshots tells you if one games graphics are technically better than another? ....BS? Ya, of Gears 3, the rest are in-game....Play U2, KZ2, GOW3, and youll see those gameplay segments in the game. For KZ3, TLG and R3, you see gameplay of those segments of those levels and itll be obvious. For U3, the in-engine process of ND uses the same textures, character models, weapon models, etc that of the campaign, Its just that ND adds more AA and AF, and a cinematic filter, but it seems they dont need to add more AA, since the gameplay looks like they use MLAAEven if you don't think they are bullshots you didn't actually answer my question.
[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"]The U3 images are probably in-engine though, regardless, U3 still looks much better as well
So you're comparing mostly unreleased game screen shots, that may not even be indicative of how the title actually plays ingame, with TWO year old ingame screen shots to prove what exactly? The imminent progression of technology? Because if so, you certainly did, good form. The in-engine process of ND uses the same textures, character models, weapon models, etc that of the campaign, Its just that ND adds more AA and AF, and a cinematic filter. For U3, it seems they dont need to add more AA, since the gameplay looks like they use MLAAYou have no idea what you are saying do you? You are just repeating what you read on forums. Just because it is in engine doesnt mean that cant add things to pretty the game up..........which they do. The Reach trailer is a more recent example of this, so are the GT5 bullshots and trailers. In engine can still mean that it is pre rendered and not real time. Just because it uses assets FROM the game doesnt mean the PS3 is rendering it in real time. http://www.gametrailers.com/video/halo-reach-spike-tv/59813[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"][QUOTE="soulitane"] So a bunch of bullshots tells you if one games graphics are technically better than another?soulitane....BS? Ya, of Gears 3, the rest are in-game....Play U2, KZ2, GOW3, and youll see those gameplay segments in the game. For KZ3, TLG and R3, you see gameplay of those segments of those levels and itll be obvious. For U3, the in-engine process of ND uses the same textures, character models, weapon models, etc that of the campaign, Its just that ND adds more AA and AF, and a cinematic filter, but it seems they dont need to add more AA, since the gameplay looks like they use MLAAEven if you don't think they are bullshots you didn't actually answer my question. First, they arent BS...Play U2, KZ2, GOw3 and youll see that those images are from GAMEPLAY segments. Watch some videos of KZ3, R3, and TLG and youll see those images are from GAMEPLAY segments (With the exception of 1 of the R3 images with capelli's wife). Ive already explained for U3. About the tecnical, you need nothing more than to know the fact that Gears 3 is being created from an average graphics engine known as the UE3.5 engine
I saw this pic come up a long time ago.
I don't even have a 360 and I can tell that all of the textures have not loaded in that pic yet.
Out of curiosity, how does the old Gears 1 models on PC hold up to the sequels?
[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="Anastasia1997"] ....BS? Ya, of Gears 3, the rest are in-game....Play U2, KZ2, GOW3, and youll see those gameplay segments in the game. For KZ3, TLG and R3, you see gameplay of those segments of those levels and itll be obvious. For U3, the in-engine process of ND uses the same textures, character models, weapon models, etc that of the campaign, Its just that ND adds more AA and AF, and a cinematic filter, but it seems they dont need to add more AA, since the gameplay looks like they use MLAAAnastasia1997Even if you don't think they are bullshots you didn't actually answer my question. First, they arent BS...Play U2, KZ2, GOw3 and youll see that those images are from GAMEPLAY segments. Watch some videos of KZ3, R3, and TLG and youll see those images are from GAMEPLAY segments (With the exception of 1 of the R3 images with capelli's wife). Ive already explained for U3. About the tecnical, you need nothing more than to know the fact that Gears 3 is being created from an average graphics engine known as the UE3.5 engine So you can't, please then what makes UE3.5 average? At least on PC (not sure about consoles) the engine is better than anything that either of the HD consoles. could even hope of doing.
[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"] The in-engine process of ND uses the same textures, character models, weapon models, etc that of the campaign, Its just that ND adds more AA and AF, and a cinematic filter. For U3, it seems they dont need to add more AA, since the gameplay looks like they use MLAAdeadesaSo you admit ND adds morphologic anti-aliasing to pretty up supposed in game images? Or that the actually game engine does?? No, I mean ND probably only adds AF and a movie-like cinematic filter in U3, since they probably use morphological anti aliasing for U3
Doesnt look quite alot better than the Gears 2 image TBHAnastasia1997
Given that Gears 2 will be using upgraded assets, I wasn't thinking along the terms of it looking better, more how the res and such helps it hold up.
[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"][QUOTE="soulitane"]Even if you don't think they are bullshots you didn't actually answer my question.soulitaneFirst, they arent BS...Play U2, KZ2, GOw3 and youll see that those images are from GAMEPLAY segments. Watch some videos of KZ3, R3, and TLG and youll see those images are from GAMEPLAY segments (With the exception of 1 of the R3 images with capelli's wife). Ive already explained for U3. About the tecnical, you need nothing more than to know the fact that Gears 3 is being created from an average graphics engine known as the UE3.5 engine So you can't, please then what makes UE3.5 average? At least on PC (not sure about consoles) the engine is better than anything that either of the HD consoles. could even hope of doing. ....How? UE has always been an average at best engine, with the only reason the PC version being that much better than ONLY the console version of UE 3.5 is becuase its on PC. PC games are the graphics king though
[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"]Doesnt look quite alot better than the Gears 2 image TBHAnnoyedDragon
Given that Gears 2 will be using upgraded assets, I wasn't thinking along the terms of it looking better, more how the res and such helps it hold up.
Ya, its much clearer, since its on PC obviouslytextures still loading...
Also gears 2 looks great. It's still in the top 10 looking console games.
That'll change in 2011 though.
[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="Anastasia1997"] First, they arent BS...Play U2, KZ2, GOw3 and youll see that those images are from GAMEPLAY segments. Watch some videos of KZ3, R3, and TLG and youll see those images are from GAMEPLAY segments (With the exception of 1 of the R3 images with capelli's wife). Ive already explained for U3. About the tecnical, you need nothing more than to know the fact that Gears 3 is being created from an average graphics engine known as the UE3.5 engineAnastasia1997So you can't, please then what makes UE3.5 average? At least on PC (not sure about consoles) the engine is better than anything that either of the HD consoles. could even hope of doing. ....How? UE has always been an average at best engine, with the only reason the PC version being that much better than ONLY the console version of UE 3.5 is becuase its on PC. PC games are the graphics king though UE3 has only ever been an average at best engine? You need a very serious reality check.
[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"][QUOTE="soulitane"] So you can't, please then what makes UE3.5 average? At least on PC (not sure about consoles) the engine is better than anything that either of the HD consoles. could even hope of doing.ferret-gamer....How? UE has always been an average at best engine, with the only reason the PC version being that much better than ONLY the console version of UE 3.5 is becuase its on PC. PC games are the graphics king though UE3 has only ever been an average at best engine? You need a very serious reality check.
lol seriously... Unreal is one of the best multiplatform engines.
[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"][QUOTE="soulitane"] So you can't, please then what makes UE3.5 average? At least on PC (not sure about consoles) the engine is better than anything that either of the HD consoles. could even hope of doing.ferret-gamer....How? UE has always been an average at best engine, with the only reason the PC version being that much better than ONLY the console version of UE 3.5 is becuase its on PC. PC games are the graphics king though UE3 has only ever been an average at best engine? You need a very serious reality check.he's a cow, so it's pretty much expected that he doesn't like the UE3 engine seeing as how it has a history of running poorly on the PS3 and it's the engine behind the 360's best looking game
[QUOTE="soulitane"][QUOTE="Anastasia1997"] First, they arent BS...Play U2, KZ2, GOw3 and youll see that those images are from GAMEPLAY segments. Watch some videos of KZ3, R3, and TLG and youll see those images are from GAMEPLAY segments (With the exception of 1 of the R3 images with capelli's wife). Ive already explained for U3. About the tecnical, you need nothing more than to know the fact that Gears 3 is being created from an average graphics engine known as the UE3.5 engineAnastasia1997So you can't, please then what makes UE3.5 average? At least on PC (not sure about consoles) the engine is better than anything that either of the HD consoles. could even hope of doing. ....How? UE has always been an average at best engine, with the only reason the PC version being that much better than ONLY the console version of UE 3.5 is becuase its on PC. PC games are the graphics king though Stating something over and over again doesn't make it fact, I asked you for facts and all I've gotten so far is a bunch of opinions.
UE3 has only ever been an average at best engine? You need a very serious reality check.he's a cow, so it's pretty much expected that he doesn't like the UE3 engine seeing as how it has a history of running poorly on the PS3 and it's the engine behind the 360's best looking game[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"][QUOTE="Anastasia1997"] ....How? UE has always been an average at best engine, with the only reason the PC version being that much better than ONLY the console version of UE 3.5 is becuase its on PC. PC games are the graphics king thoughohthemanatee
Is gears of war 2 really the best looking 360 game still?
I'm not so sure about that. what about red dead redemption and arkham assylum? Or Alan Wake or Halo reach?
he's a cow, so it's pretty much expected that he doesn't like the UE3 engine seeing as how it has a history of running poorly on the PS3 and it's the engine behind the 360's best looking game[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"]
[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"] UE3 has only ever been an average at best engine? You need a very serious reality check.theuncharted34
Is gears of war 2 really the best looking 360 game still?
I'm not so sure about that. what about red dead redemption and arkham assylum? Or Alan Wake or Halo reach?
Haven't played red dead redemption, can't comment on it
Halo reach is impressive due to how big the levels are, the A.I. and the number of enemies on screen, but it's doesn't look better then Gears 2 imo, maybe it if were a corridor shooter with few enemies like Gears 2 is then it would most likely look better then Gears 2
Alan Wake does not look good....period
[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"][QUOTE="soulitane"] So you can't, please then what makes UE3.5 average? At least on PC (not sure about consoles) the engine is better than anything that either of the HD consoles. could even hope of doing.ferret-gamer....How? UE has always been an average at best engine, with the only reason the PC version being that much better than ONLY the console version of UE 3.5 is becuase its on PC. PC games are the graphics king though UE3 has only ever been an average at best engine? You need a very serious reality check. On CONSOLES. sorry if I didnt specify, but yes, on consoles
[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"][QUOTE="Anastasia1997"] ....How? UE has always been an average at best engine, with the only reason the PC version being that much better than ONLY the console version of UE 3.5 is becuase its on PC. PC games are the graphics king thoughAnastasia1997UE3 has only ever been an average at best engine? You need a very serious reality check. On CONSOLES. sorry if I didnt specify, but yes, on consoles
the gears of war series disagree, so do games like Batman: AA
UE3 has only ever been an average at best engine? You need a very serious reality check.he's a cow, so it's pretty much expected that he doesn't like the UE3 engine seeing as how it has a history of running poorly on the PS3 and it's the engine behind the 360's best looking game If I am a cow, then your definately a lemming without question...BTW, im sorry if I didnt specify, on CONSOLES UE3 is average at best[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"][QUOTE="Anastasia1997"] ....How? UE has always been an average at best engine, with the only reason the PC version being that much better than ONLY the console version of UE 3.5 is becuase its on PC. PC games are the graphics king thoughohthemanatee
he's a cow, so it's pretty much expected that he doesn't like the UE3 engine seeing as how it has a history of running poorly on the PS3 and it's the engine behind the 360's best looking game[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"]
[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"] UE3 has only ever been an average at best engine? You need a very serious reality check.theuncharted34
Is gears of war 2 really the best looking 360 game still?
I'm not so sure about that. what about red dead redemption and arkham assylum? Or Alan Wake or Halo reach?
I'd say RE5 looks better than gears.[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"]he's a cow, so it's pretty much expected that he doesn't like the UE3 engine seeing as how it has a history of running poorly on the PS3 and it's the engine behind the 360's best looking game If I am a cow, then your definately a lemming without question...BTW, im sorry if I didnt specify, on CONSOLES UE3 is average at besti'm more of a hermit then a lemming actually[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"] UE3 has only ever been an average at best engine? You need a very serious reality check.Anastasia1997
it's just that I'm too fond of sony's fanboys
[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]
[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"]he's a cow, so it's pretty much expected that he doesn't like the UE3 engine seeing as how it has a history of running poorly on the PS3 and it's the engine behind the 360's best looking game
ohthemanatee
Is gears of war 2 really the best looking 360 game still?
I'm not so sure about that. what about red dead redemption and arkham assylum? Or Alan Wake or Halo reach?
Haven't played red dead redemption, can't comment on it
Halo reach is impressive due to how big the levels are, the A.I. and the number of enemies on screen, but it's doesn't look better then Gears 2 imo, maybe it if were a corridor shooter with few enemies like Gears 2 is then it would most likely look better then Gears 2
Alan Wake does not look good....period
Alan Wake looks great :? yeah I guess it is still gears 2.
But come 2011, Crysis 2 and RAGE will be the best looking 360 games. God they are shaping up nicely 8)
Crysis 2 on consoles will probably look better than Uncharted 2 :)
[QUOTE="ohthemanatee"]
[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]
Is gears of war 2 really the best looking 360 game still?
I'm not so sure about that. what about red dead redemption and arkham assylum? Or Alan Wake or Halo reach?
theuncharted34
Haven't played red dead redemption, can't comment on it
Halo reach is impressive due to how big the levels are, the A.I. and the number of enemies on screen, but it's doesn't look better then Gears 2 imo, maybe it if were a corridor shooter with few enemies like Gears 2 is then it would most likely look better then Gears 2
Alan Wake does not look good....period
Alan Wake looks great :? yeah I guess it is still gears 2.
But come 2011, Crysis 2 and RAGE will be the best looking 360 games. God they are shaping up nicely 8)
Crysis 2 on consoles will probably look better than Uncharted 2 :)
yeah, my money's on crysis 2
anway, I really can't say that Alan wake looks good, sure, his jacket and the foliage look great, but the game is blurry due to a low resolution, very jaggy and the character models look like robots on the cutscenes
On CONSOLES. sorry if I didnt specify, but yes, on consoles[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"][QUOTE="ferret-gamer"] UE3 has only ever been an average at best engine? You need a very serious reality check.ohthemanatee
the gears of war series disagree, so do games like Batman: AA
....That image of Gears 2 doesnt agree :P. Besides, Gears has always had poor physics, terrible ragdolls, average at best animations, average character models, extremely low poly count textures, etc etc. Halo Reach looks substantially better[QUOTE="theuncharted34"][QUOTE="ohthemanatee"]he's a cow, so it's pretty much expected that he doesn't like the UE3 engine seeing as how it has a history of running poorly on the PS3 and it's the engine behind the 360's best looking game
soulitane
Is gears of war 2 really the best looking 360 game still?
I'm not so sure about that. what about red dead redemption and arkham assylum? Or Alan Wake or Halo reach?
I'd say RE5 looks better than gears.eh. It does look pretty good but I'd give it to gears.
[QUOTE="Anastasia1997"][QUOTE="ohthemanatee"]he's a cow, so it's pretty much expected that he doesn't like the UE3 engine seeing as how it has a history of running poorly on the PS3 and it's the engine behind the 360's best looking game
If I am a cow, then your definately a lemming without question...BTW, im sorry if I didnt specify, on CONSOLES UE3 is average at besti'm more of a hermit then a lemming actuallyit's just that I'm too fond of sony's fanboys
Fond? What do you mean?Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment