Waiting badly for current gen consoles to die !

  • 62 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for zaigham_riaz
zaigham_riaz

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 zaigham_riaz
Member since 2005 • 61 Posts

So I'm a hardcore PC gamer; had good experience with PSP and old consoles like Sega mega drive.

I have a good PC setup and I play all the multiplats with 3D glasses at almost everything maxed out with 2*1680*1050 resolution for 99% of the games. That is just unmatched experience to any of the consoles. I have a good joypad and a wii style motion sensing remote, but I only use them with driving games or games made with a controller in mind. So I'm very happy with my PC game experience so far.

Now I am thinking about gaming on consoles along with my PC. Problem is current gen consoles are obsolete now by technology standards and I don't want to buy something with so old hardware. Continuous release of new console-based hardware like kinect, move and 3D is clearly to make the life of these consoles longer. These new hardware are definitly impressive but unfortunately the console hardware won't support it at reasonable resolutions and graphics details, so they are not worth it. Because of so old hardware, now the graphics on consoles have come to all-look-similar point; they can't be improved anymore and its been a long time. They don't even support more than DX9. Similarly better AI implementation and physics are impossible. With multi-plats, many times PC gamers have to bear the low level obsolete-technology based games.

I don't know why Microsoft and Sony realize that it's time for something new now. How about a console that has built-in everything like blue ray, 3D, motion sensing controls, keyboard, mouse, camera and all with decent hardware based on the latest PC graphics card series and decent multicore CPU. Another feature that I want, maybe not much feasible, would be upgradable memory, GPU and CPU. Upgradable parts can be based on the same family of hardware, so that the developers still get the same architecture for uniform development and optimizations. If such a console comes, I will happily stop playing PC games; just hoping for now.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62035 Posts

It's coming up to a new console cycle, as this one's been around for almost 5 years now. However it may be slower to move on, as it seems all of the big 3 are digging in their heels.

Still, the current consoles are excellent, offer great graphics (though obviously lacking compared to certain PC games) and offer fantastic games. It's a shame you're not willing to experience that.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#3 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

You have a long wait buddy.:P

Avatar image for IAMSERIAL
IAMSERIAL

261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 IAMSERIAL
Member since 2010 • 261 Posts
The graphical differences are so minimal between console and pc. It's nothing like HL2 vs last gen console graphics.
Avatar image for J-WOW
J-WOW

3105

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 J-WOW
Member since 2010 • 3105 Posts
You sir need to loosen up a bit
Avatar image for BPoole96
BPoole96

22818

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 BPoole96
Member since 2008 • 22818 Posts

Hope you're patient

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62035 Posts

The graphical differences are so minimal between console and pc. It's nothing like HL2 vs last gen console graphics.IAMSERIAL

So the difference between the best console games and Crysis/Metro 2033 running at max, with resolutions upwards of 1080p is "minimal"?

Avatar image for IAMSERIAL
IAMSERIAL

261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 IAMSERIAL
Member since 2010 • 261 Posts

[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"]The graphical differences are so minimal between console and pc. It's nothing like HL2 vs last gen console graphics.lundy86_4

So the difference between the best console games and Crysis/Metro 2033 running at max, with resolutions upwards of 1080p is "minimal"?

Quite. Though HL2 was not the best looking pc game back then so nice try.

EDIT: I was mostly talking about multiplats anyway. I remember back then the pc version was so obviously the better version that it was worth to actually upgrade. It's no longer the case.

Avatar image for FIipMode
FIipMode

10850

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#9 FIipMode
Member since 2009 • 10850 Posts

The graphical differences are so minimal between console and pc. It's nothing like HL2 vs last gen console graphics.IAMSERIAL
http://s4.tinypic.com/104kzsy_th.jpg

This is going to be a fun thread.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#10 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62035 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"]The graphical differences are so minimal between console and pc. It's nothing like HL2 vs last gen console graphics.IAMSERIAL

So the difference between the best console games and Crysis/Metro 2033 running at max, with resolutions upwards of 1080p is "minimal"?

Quite. Though HL2 was not the best looking pc game back then so nice try.

I didn't say anything about HL2, you did. I didn't even touch on that part of your post.

Have you played either of those games at upwards of 1080p on max details?

Edit: It seems you changed your argument to focus on multiplats. Whilst yes, many multiplats do use the sam/similar assets, the added resolution and performance goes a long way.

Avatar image for IAMSERIAL
IAMSERIAL

261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 IAMSERIAL
Member since 2010 • 261 Posts

[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

So the difference between the best console games and Crysis/Metro 2033 running at max, with resolutions upwards of 1080p is "minimal"?

lundy86_4

Quite. Though HL2 was not the best looking pc game back then so nice try.

I didn't say anything about HL2, you did. I didn't even touch on that part of your post.

Have you played either of those games at upwards of 1080p on max details?

Meh, you're comparing the best looking game to consoles. Anyway, I was specifically talking about multiplats anyway.
Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#12 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts

So I'm a hardcore PC gamer; had good experience with PSP and old consoles like Sega mega drive.

I have a good PC setup and I play all the multiplats with 3D glasses at almost everything maxed out with 2*1680*1050 resolution for 99% of the games. That is just unmatched experience to any of the consoles. I have a good joypad and a wii style motion sensing remote, but I only use them with driving games or games made with a controller in mind. So I'm very happy with my PC game experience so far.

Now I am thinking about gaming on consoles along with my PC. Problem is current gen consoles are obsolete now by technology standards and I don't want to buy something with so old hardware. Continuous release of new console-based hardware like kinect, move and 3D is clearly to make the life of these consoles longer. These new hardware are definitly impressive but unfortunately the console hardware won't support it at reasonable resolutions and graphics details, so they are not worth it. Because of so old hardware, now the graphics on consoles have come to all-look-similar point; they can't be improved anymore and its been a long time. They don't even support more than DX9. Similarly better AI implementation and physics are impossible. With multi-plats, many times PC gamers have to bear the low level obsolete-technology based games.

I don't know why Microsoft and Sony realize that it's time for something new now. How about a console that has built-in everything like blue ray, 3D, motion sensing controls, keyboard, mouse, camera and all with decent hardware based on the latest PC graphics card series and decent multicore CPU. Another feature that I want, maybe not much feasible, would be upgradable memory, GPU and CPU. Upgradable parts can be based on the same family of hardware, so that the developers still get the same architecture for uniform development and optimizations. If such a console comes, I will happily stop playing PC games; just hoping for now.

zaigham_riaz
They are making too much $$ off of them now, so they are going to milk it for a while. As far as the console experience for me, I love it, and hope it sticks around this gen for at least 2 more years. The library for all of them is pretty well established, so it should keep people gaming for a long time, not to mention keeping servers up for certain online games, which I would presume would dry up once a new console was released.I think Microsoft will be the first one out of the gate again, with a new console, and hopefully it will have a next gen format attached. I think it will have Bluray, simply because it would probably be too risky for them to venture into another format, which will have to compete directly with Bluray, and that is already established pretty hefty right now. I was reading that GE had a holographic disc, which could hold almost a terabyte of data! Thats impressive! I was thinking that Microsoft may go that route, just for gaming, but most people would've probably invested in a bunch of Bluray movies by then, and would rather have a system that is already capable of playing Bluray movies.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#13 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62035 Posts

Meh, you're comparing the best looking game to consoles. Anyway, I was specifically talking about multiplats anyway.IAMSERIAL

Why wouldn't I compare the best looking games to the consoles best looking games? It's what makes the most sense.

You didn't specify multiplats, which kinda makes it seem like you're backpedaling.

Avatar image for IAMSERIAL
IAMSERIAL

261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 IAMSERIAL
Member since 2010 • 261 Posts

[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"]Meh, you're comparing the best looking game to consoles. Anyway, I was specifically talking about multiplats anyway.lundy86_4

Why wouldn't I compare the best looking games to the consoles best looking games? It's what makes the most sense.

You didn't specify multiplats, which kinda makes it seem like you're backpedaling.

Nobody is backpedaling. PC graphic differences are too minimal these days to give a rats ass about.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62035 Posts

Nobody is backpedaling. PC graphic differences are too minimal these days to give a rats ass about.IAMSERIAL

You didn't state multiplats in your initial point, and then included it after I stated about running Metro2033/Crysis on max details at a res above 1080p.

You also didn't answer my question about whether you played either of those games at max settings. So, did you?

Avatar image for IAMSERIAL
IAMSERIAL

261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 IAMSERIAL
Member since 2010 • 261 Posts

[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"] Nobody is backpedaling. PC graphic differences are too minimal these days to give a rats ass about.lundy86_4

You didn't state multiplats in your initial point, and then included it after I stated about running Metro2033/Crysis on max details at a res above 1080p.

You also didn't answer my question about whether you played either of those games at max settings. So, did you?

I have Crysis and Crysis Warhead and I had Metro. I was able to play both on max settings. Crysis does look better than any other game and was the main reason why I upgraded my pc...however Metro 2033 looks great sometimes but ugly other times. Just because I didn't include multiplat in my initial post doesn't mean I didn't have that in mind. I don't have to be so descriptive about it. Multiplats is mostly what pc has these days so of course I had that in mind.
Avatar image for Mystic-G
Mystic-G

6462

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Mystic-G
Member since 2006 • 6462 Posts

The graphical differences are so minimal between console and pc. It's nothing like HL2 vs last gen console graphics.IAMSERIAL

Because most games are developed with consoles heavily in mind.

When developers go no-holds-barred development for PC, the difference becomes quite huge. Shogun 2: Total War being the latest example.

Shogun 2 will have more detailed real-time battle units than ever; some troops will have as many as 1,000 polygons (the highest polycount in the entire series). The game itself will be able to render some 56,000 units onscreen at once.Gamespot

Graphic mods also show what PC is capable of aswell...

But you're right... this could be running on the 360 for all I know.

Avatar image for mitu123
mitu123

155290

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#18 mitu123
Member since 2006 • 155290 Posts

The graphical differences are so minimal between console and pc. It's nothing like HL2 vs last gen console graphics.IAMSERIAL
I blame consoles...

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62035 Posts

I have Crysis and Crysis Warhead and I had Metro. I was able to play both on max settings. Crysis does look better than any other game and was the main reason why I upgraded my pc...however Metro 2033 looks great sometimes but ugly other times. Just because I didn't include multiplat in my initial post doesn't mean I didn't have that in mind. I don't have to be so descriptive about it. Multiplats is mostly what pc has these days so of course I had that in mind.IAMSERIAL

Interesting, because they look considerably better than console games.

Now, you may have had it in mind, but I simply said:

You didn't specify multiplats, which kinda makes it seem like you're backpedaling.

lundy86_4

Which it does. Including it after I stated something disproving your point makes it seem like you were trying to alter the argument in your favour. That's what I was stating.

If it's mostly what PC has, explain why PC has nigh on 200 exclusives that are reviewed here on GS... If you would like to do an actual exclusive vs. multiplat count, I would very much like to see it -- seems as you were making the statement, proof would be nice.

Avatar image for IAMSERIAL
IAMSERIAL

261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 IAMSERIAL
Member since 2010 • 261 Posts

[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"]The graphical differences are so minimal between console and pc. It's nothing like HL2 vs last gen console graphics.mitu123

I blame consoles...

Lots of things to blame really. I particularly blame piracy and the cost of developing a game these days.
Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#21 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"] Nobody is backpedaling. PC graphic differences are too minimal these days to give a rats ass about.IAMSERIAL

You didn't state multiplats in your initial point, and then included it after I stated about running Metro2033/Crysis on max details at a res above 1080p.

You also didn't answer my question about whether you played either of those games at max settings. So, did you?

Multiplats is mostly what pc has these days so of course I had that in mind.

Yup,all multiplats in here...

Avatar image for IAMSERIAL
IAMSERIAL

261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 IAMSERIAL
Member since 2010 • 261 Posts
Exactly how many of those games can ONLY be done and played on pc? Some of those games are even from last gen.
Avatar image for jedikevin2
jedikevin2

5263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#24 jedikevin2
Member since 2004 • 5263 Posts

Exactly how many of those games can ONLY be done and played on pc? Some of those games are even from last gen.IAMSERIAL

Um you might wanna take a relook at that pic again Iamserial. Witcher 2 is the only game semi multiplatform (coming out months after PC release) and rest should ALL be within this generation. Only ones to debate would be the shumps which actually didn't get completely finished or semi brought over to Europe/ America till well into this generation. Civ 4 came out right in the release of the 360 so it was included into the pic.

Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#25 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts
Exactly how many of those games can ONLY be done and played on pc? Some of those games are even from last gen.IAMSERIAL
I believe all those games are PC only,and the oldest one I see there is Civ 4 from 2005...
Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

Yes long life cycles are a bad thing.:roll:

Avatar image for godzillavskong
godzillavskong

7904

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#27 godzillavskong
Member since 2007 • 7904 Posts
[QUOTE="mitu123"]

[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"]The graphical differences are so minimal between console and pc. It's nothing like HL2 vs last gen console graphics.IAMSERIAL

I blame consoles...

Lots of things to blame really. I particularly blame piracy and the cost of developing a game these days.

I think you can blame who you want,but there are millions of console gamers,who are happy with the state of gaming, which severly out weighs the few upset PC gamers,who are a little disappointed in the lack of PC support. I think the way consoles are setup is a very smart marketing, and business ploy. They get high end stuff at the time, sell it for about cost, establish a huge install base, then make most of their money primarily off the royalties for the software. Then once the cost of production decreases, they drop the price, continue to sell, and prepare to repeat the cycle. I prefer the console over the PC. I couldn't see myself buying a gaming PC, or buying a cheaper one, then buying different bit and pieces to upgrade it, and sitting at my cpu desk for hours at a time. I know most tvs have PC hookups now, but keyboard mouse gaming vs the controller, and having a console that was built primarily for gaming wins it for me. I don't knock people who enjoy PC gaming, but I get a little sick of how some, not all,PC gamers diss the console market, saying how it is holding back PC development, or ruining gaming with it's inferior hardware! Gaming is gaming, so what ever your preference is, just sit back and enjoy it. The games will come.
Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts
I'm enjoying the length of this gen, still got lots of games to play.
Avatar image for oldkingallant
oldkingallant

4958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 oldkingallant
Member since 2010 • 4958 Posts

[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"]The graphical differences are so minimal between console and pc. It's nothing like HL2 vs last gen console graphics.Mystic-G

Because most games are developed with consoles heavily in mind.

When developers go no-holds-barred development for PC, the difference becomes quite huge. Shogun 2: Total War being the latest example.

Shogun 2 will have more detailed real-time battle units than ever; some troops will have as many as 1,000 polygons (the highest polycount in the entire series). The game itself will be able to render some 56,000 units onscreen at once.Gamespot

Graphic mods also show what PC is capable of aswell...

But you're right... this could be running on the 360 for all I know.

The issue with using Shogun 2 as an example is you're using a picture from a cutscene :P. But the Crysis point makes a good point, although I do think some Hermits exaggerate the graphical disparity.

Avatar image for IAMSERIAL
IAMSERIAL

261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 IAMSERIAL
Member since 2010 • 261 Posts
[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"]Exactly how many of those games can ONLY be done and played on pc? Some of those games are even from last gen.Arach666
I believe all those games are PC only,and the oldest one I see there is Civ 4 from 2005...

That's not what I meant.
Avatar image for Arach666
Arach666

23285

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: -1

User Lists: 0

#31 Arach666
Member since 2009 • 23285 Posts

[QUOTE="Arach666"][QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"]Exactly how many of those games can ONLY be done and played on pc? Some of those games are even from last gen.IAMSERIAL
I believe all those games are PC only,and the oldest one I see there is Civ 4 from 2005...

That's not what I meant.

Be as that as it may,they are all exclusives,and you stated before that the PC is mostly multiplats these days.

It´s not. Far from it actually.

Avatar image for soulitane
soulitane

15091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 soulitane
Member since 2010 • 15091 Posts
[QUOTE="Arach666"][QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"]Exactly how many of those games can ONLY be done and played on pc? Some of those games are even from last gen.IAMSERIAL
I believe all those games are PC only,and the oldest one I see there is Civ 4 from 2005...

That's not what I meant.

Does it really matter if the pc isn't the only system that can do those games? It can play all of them and while they might not have the best graphics that really doesn't matter(although maybe to the TC it does).
Avatar image for magnax1
magnax1

4605

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#33 magnax1
Member since 2007 • 4605 Posts

Its been 5 years since the beggining of the gen, but I still think it'll go on for another 2 years. Technology just hasn't advanced as far as it usually does before they push out a new console, and neither have sales.

Avatar image for GhoX
GhoX

6267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#34 GhoX
Member since 2006 • 6267 Posts
Shogun 2 - the game which I may have to break the "4GB rule" for.
Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"][QUOTE="Arach666"] I believe all those games are PC only,and the oldest one I see there is Civ 4 from 2005...Arach666

That's not what I meant.

Be as that as it may,they are all exclusives,and you stated before that the PC is mostly multiplats these days.

It´s not. Far from it actually.

What? A lot of the games on that pic are multiplatform. I see Sacred 2, twice(which is sad), which is also on consoles. I see Team Fortress 2, which, again, is a multiplat title. Burnout Paradise? Come on.

Avatar image for GhoX
GhoX

6267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#36 GhoX
Member since 2006 • 6267 Posts

[QUOTE="Arach666"]

[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"] That's not what I meant.waltefmoney

Be as that as it may,they are all exclusives,and you stated before that the PC is mostly multiplats these days.

It´s not. Far from it actually.

What? A lot of the games on that pic are multiplatform. I see Sacred 2, twice(which is sad), which is also on consoles. I see Team Fortress 2, which, again, is a multiplat title. Burnout Paradise? Come on.

You named 3.. out of how many? That's not "a lot".
Avatar image for EdenProxy
EdenProxy

1561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 EdenProxy
Member since 2010 • 1561 Posts

[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"]The graphical differences are so minimal between console and pc. It's nothing like HL2 vs last gen console graphics.lundy86_4

So the difference between the best console games and Crysis/Metro 2033 running at max, with resolutions upwards of 1080p is "minimal"?

compared to last gen yes
Avatar image for EdenProxy
EdenProxy

1561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 EdenProxy
Member since 2010 • 1561 Posts

[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"][QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

You didn't state multiplats in your initial point, and then included it after I stated about running Metro2033/Crysis on max details at a res above 1080p.

You also didn't answer my question about whether you played either of those games at max settings. So, did you?

Arach666

Multiplats is mostly what pc has these days so of course I had that in mind.

Yup,all multiplats in here...

I dislike that photo. I could do the same thing with ps3 by throwing in pictures of haze and lair :roll: . At SW we compare the best of the best, not just any random mediocre game. Pc gaming isnt as good as it use to be and ppl need to stop saying other wise. IMO

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#39 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62035 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]

[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"]The graphical differences are so minimal between console and pc. It's nothing like HL2 vs last gen console graphics.EdenProxy

So the difference between the best console games and Crysis/Metro 2033 running at max, with resolutions upwards of 1080p is "minimal"?

compared to last gen yes

Compared to last gen, I agree. Though the seperation is still quite large.

Avatar image for waltefmoney
waltefmoney

18030

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 waltefmoney
Member since 2010 • 18030 Posts

[QUOTE="waltefmoney"]

[QUOTE="Arach666"] Be as that as it may,they are all exclusives,and you stated before that the PC is mostly multiplats these days.

It´s not. Far from it actually.

GhoX

What? A lot of the games on that pic are multiplatform. I see Sacred 2, twice(which is sad), which is also on consoles. I see Team Fortress 2, which, again, is a multiplat title. Burnout Paradise? Come on.

You named 3.. out of how many? That's not "a lot".

MKay, I'll name a few more. Half Life 2 Episode 2 is now on consoles. Age of Conan is being ported to the 360, The Sims 3 is coming to consoles. The Witcher 2 was also announced to be ported to consoles. Torchlight II will also be coming to consoles. Most of the Sam & Max games were released on consoles.

Avatar image for tubbyc
tubbyc

4004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 tubbyc
Member since 2005 • 4004 Posts

"Continuous release of new console-based hardware like kinect, move and 3D is clearly to make the life of these consoles longer. These new hardware are definitly impressive but unfortunately the console hardware won't support it at reasonable resolutions and graphics details."

Killzone 3 shows that there won't be an issue with that.Besides, why would you think you need to play only systems with cutting-edge processing power for them to be worth while? Do you only play the most power-hungry games like Crysis and Arma 2? Of course not. MS and Sony don't want to rush into bringing out new consoles because they want to make money from their console business, not lose money. Their consoles aren't obsolete because they're still selling.

Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#42 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts

The single problem with next-gen consoles will still be heat - cases and fans would need vast improvements.

Avatar image for Eggimannd
Eggimannd

1734

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Eggimannd
Member since 2009 • 1734 Posts

[QUOTE="Arach666"]

[QUOTE="IAMSERIAL"] Multiplats is mostly what pc has these days so of course I had that in mind.EdenProxy

Yup,all multiplats in here...

I dislike that photo. I could do the same thing with ps3 by throwing in pictures of haze and lair :roll: . At SW we compare the best of the best, not just any random mediocre game. Pc gaming isnt as good as it use to be and ppl need to stop saying other wise. IMO

Except that the list of games in that pic are far from mediocre. There are many AA in that list and a couple of AAA. I don't think any game in that list scored below an A on gamespot.

So no you wouldn't be able to throw in pictures of Haze or Lair.

Avatar image for metalgear-solid
metalgear-solid

7001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#44 metalgear-solid
Member since 2004 • 7001 Posts

It's coming up to a new console cycle, as this one's been around for almost 5 years now. However it may be slower to move on, as it seems all of the big 3 are digging in their heels.

Still, the current consoles are excellent, offer great graphics (though obviously lacking compared to certain PC games) and offer fantastic games. It's a shame you're not willing to experience that.

lundy86_4

The PS3 was released worldwide less than 3 and a 1/2 years ago. It's definitely not time for next-gen. Even Microsoft's console is 5 years old.
It'll be a good 3-4 years before anything starts to happen.

And TC, if it's the graphics that bother you, then I'm sorry for you.

Avatar image for zaigham_riaz
zaigham_riaz

61

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 zaigham_riaz
Member since 2005 • 61 Posts
It's not only about the graphics; it's about the combination of everything. Better graphics, better AI, big game worlds and the support of new gadgets built into the hardware. Sure the new gadgets will support some mediocre looking games with good fps or some good looking games downgraded to low resolutions and textures but it's just impossible to play a game with decent FPS, good graphics at high resolutions and advanced game features with 3D glasses and/or kinect/move because hardware is obsolete. Current gen consoles are not obsolete, but their hardware definitely is which doesn't allow for better games. I will wait for the next gen system, that supports all these features but with decent hardware that can support better AI, better physics, better FPS with advanced graphic features at higher resolution, and a ground up support for keyboard and mouse. Is it anything difficult or ground breaking? Not at all; totally simple. Just depends for how long these companies want to milk the customers. Sony is already working on it's next gen hardware and Nintendo's 3DS seems like a good promise; let's hope for the best. Finally people who say, for multiplats the graphical difference is minimal; they should see those games running at maximum graphical settings at 2048*1536 resolutions with better physics, and then talk. It's just another world coming from 1024*768 resolution with low resolution textures and mediocre graphics settings, and poor physics.
Avatar image for AiurProtoss
AiurProtoss

1080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 AiurProtoss
Member since 2010 • 1080 Posts
The graphical differences are so minimal between console and pc. It's nothing like HL2 vs last gen console graphics.IAMSERIAL
Crysis says hi, and every multiplat out there.
Avatar image for fabz_95
fabz_95

15425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#47 fabz_95
Member since 2006 • 15425 Posts
I'm the opposite, I'm hoping these current generation consoles last as long as they can. I have spent a lot of money on games and consoles this generation and I don't fancy spending more on consoles any time soon.
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#48 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

It's really alarming how people can't just enjoy what they like instead of wishing that something that other people like would fail. IF PC gaming is so awesome then just enjoy it and don't play anything else.

I think 3D gaming is pure nonsense but I don't wish it to fail, it's just something I will probably never participate in.

Avatar image for jedikevin2
jedikevin2

5263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#49 jedikevin2
Member since 2004 • 5263 Posts

(In reference to the pic earlier in thread).... I dislike that photo. I could do the same thing with ps3 by throwing in pictures of haze and lair :roll: . At SW we compare the best of the best, not just any random mediocre game. Pc gaming isnt as good as it use to be and ppl need to stop saying other wise. IMO

EdenProxy

Could I ask what you were trying to prove on your statement?

No one was saying PC was "as good as it use to be". Please read what the members said in this thread about "ALL pc games are multiplats". That is exactly what that pic was refuting. Sorry you upset to see many exclusive PC games. Outside of that, over 95% of those games have 7 or higher on gamespot and the other 5% aren't even reviewed here (5 or so shump games).

Throw your pictures out. This is system wars where pictures pop higher then words and apparently it touched a nerve in you as you made a statement that had nothing to do with the context of the picture. I like that you stereotyped SW as comparing "best of the best" which is not even close to what gets debated. What is subjective "best" means nothing here. We debate everything on SW including best, high exclusives, genre's, platform vs platform, and countless other things.

Avatar image for SaltyMeatballs
SaltyMeatballs

25165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#50 SaltyMeatballs
Member since 2009 • 25165 Posts
You will have to wait 2 or 3 more years. At least. A while ago I would have thought this gen would end at Q4 2012 the latest, but now I am not so sure. Games like Rage will continue to push the current consoles, and that's coming late 2011. Developers still have a lot they can do with current consoles. I can see why PC gamers would be upset, seeing as many developers are multiplatform now, you would want the best of the best. But that's not to say the current consoles, on out dated hardware, can't provide amazing experiences.