was it only price that put Xbox brand ahead of playstation?

  • 86 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for rofflecopter_
rofflecopter_

591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 rofflecopter_
Member since 2008 • 591 Posts
[QUOTE="LosDaddie"]

Numerous reasons why Xbox360 has an 8M sales gap:

  • Price
  • 1yr headstart
  • Better marketing
  • Games (Halo3, Gears, etc)
  • Major multiplats (GTA IV, DMC4, FFXIII) coming to the X360
  • Better online service

The Xbox360 is already a successful product with increase sales & marketshare from last gen :)

that and the halo 3 is a masterpiece
Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#52 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts
[QUOTE="rofflecopter_"][QUOTE="LosDaddie"]

Numerous reasons why Xbox360 has an 8M sales gap:

  • Price
  • 1yr headstart
  • Better marketing
  • Games (Halo3, Gears, etc)
  • Major multiplats (GTA IV, DMC4, FFXIII) coming to the X360
  • Better online service

The Xbox360 is already a successful product with increase sales & marketshare from last gen :)

that and the halo 3 is a masterpiece

agreed
Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts

Wrong. It all has to do with being out a year early. With a year lead you get a fanbase built, that fanbase brings devs, those devs bring games, those games bring more fans, those fans hype the product, that hype brings more devs, and so on. Also, the more time a console is out, the cheaper the manufacturing costs get, the cheaper the console gets which pushes the first cycle I described. No tied has turned, LOL.PoppaGamer

Yup.. pretty much. The X360 launching a full year ahead of it's competition created a snowball effect that influenced everything else.. Games, Price, Marketing ect..

Avatar image for -Snooze-
-Snooze-

7304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 -Snooze-
Member since 2009 • 7304 Posts

If the PS3 relesed at the same time, and at the same pricem it would be miles ahead of the Xbox, to the point that MS would once again be thinking of stopping production.

Avatar image for delta3074
delta3074

20003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#55 delta3074
Member since 2007 • 20003 Posts

If the PS3 relesed at the same time, and at the same pricem it would be miles ahead of the Xbox, to the point that MS would once again be thinking of stopping production.

-Snooze-
pure speculation and opinion based on no facts whatsover, what if they had released at the same time and the 360 had still pwnd the ps3, you can't do what ifs
Avatar image for deactivated-652663614c5e5
deactivated-652663614c5e5

2271

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 deactivated-652663614c5e5
Member since 2005 • 2271 Posts

ithink halo/gears is a VERY minor cause. i think its mainly due to the year head start and the price. sure playstation has lost a few exclusives but they still have many exellent ones

Avatar image for OhSnapitz
OhSnapitz

19282

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 OhSnapitz
Member since 2002 • 19282 Posts
[QUOTE="-Snooze-"]

If the PS3 relesed at the same time, and at the same pricem it would be miles ahead of the Xbox, to the point that MS would once again be thinking of stopping production.

delta3074
pure speculation and opinion based on no facts whatsover, what if they had released at the same time and the 360 had still pwnd the ps3, you can't do what ifs

Agreed.. Who would've guessed that the Nintendo wii would be taking names right now.. :?
Avatar image for AgentA-Mi6
AgentA-Mi6

16739

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#58 AgentA-Mi6
Member since 2006 • 16739 Posts
The 360 launched first, the Ps3 had a poor library at launch, lost key exclusives to the 360 and was poorly marketed (it still is), finally price.
Avatar image for Zero5000X
Zero5000X

8314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Zero5000X
Member since 2004 • 8314 Posts
1 year head start Cheaper price Better games Better online in that order.
Avatar image for mmirza23
mmirza23

3457

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 mmirza23
Member since 2004 • 3457 Posts
Price has only been a huge factor because of the economy, the year head start got more games, xbox live being on the first xbox helped it evolve into a much better service than PSN, only now is PSN starting to catchup. Sony mismanagement from the launch of the PS3 and the first year. I could go on...
Avatar image for carljohnson3456
carljohnson3456

12489

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#61 carljohnson3456
Member since 2007 • 12489 Posts
It was a combo of both. Microsoft's initiatives and Sony's screw ups.
Avatar image for NinjaMunkey01
NinjaMunkey01

7485

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#62 NinjaMunkey01
Member since 2007 • 7485 Posts

I think its becoming more obvious that price makes a HUGE impact on sales.

Because although the ps3 has not caught up game wise, and for shooter fans, has come out in front, the 360 still sells more.

And the sales of the wii are now coming down now that the 360 is cheaper than a wii.

Price is a large factor, bigger than games almost for the average consumer...

Avatar image for mixmax5
mixmax5

2347

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 mixmax5
Member since 2006 • 2347 Posts

It definitely played some part but there are a ton of other factors that helped push the 360 forward.

Avatar image for CreepyBacon
CreepyBacon

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#64 CreepyBacon
Member since 2005 • 3183 Posts

Mostly cause it's the superior console tbh

Avatar image for k04sm02
k04sm02

1164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 k04sm02
Member since 2005 • 1164 Posts
more games that people wanted to play. it's pretty simple. For the most part, 3rd party games have been better on 360 than PS3, but that seems to be coming around. For gamers, price has more to do with it when you're looking at a 2nd or 3rd console. When you already have one or two, the PS3 looks mighty expensive, even if the whole value thing makes it cheaper in a sense.
Avatar image for rofflecopter_
rofflecopter_

591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 rofflecopter_
Member since 2008 • 591 Posts
more games that people wanted to play. it's pretty simple. For the most part, 3rd party games have been better on 360 than PS3, but that seems to be coming around. For gamers, price has more to do with it when you're looking at a 2nd or 3rd console. When you already have one or two, the PS3 looks mighty expensive, even if the whole value thing makes it cheaper in a sense.k04sm02
achievments make every 3rd mu;tiplat better on 360,also better graphics and gameplay
Avatar image for FirstDiscovery
FirstDiscovery

5508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 FirstDiscovery
Member since 2008 • 5508 Posts

Err, no. It was a poor deal with Nvidia that was the xbox's downfall. But your reasoning is even worse for MS. :lol: Let's go with yours.

PoppaGamer

You really are misinformed are you, thank you for proving youre a jealous fanboy.

The nVidia dispute happened years before, they then settled the issue and continued production. Keep trying:lol:

Avatar image for FirstDiscovery
FirstDiscovery

5508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 FirstDiscovery
Member since 2008 • 5508 Posts

[QUOTE="FirstDiscovery"][QUOTE="PoppaGamer"] And to get that headstart they screwed all Xbox owners and cut the gen short due to a horrible hardware deal. Excuse me for not praising them for their efforts. I think its weak.PAL360

So basically launching early = destined success? Right...

Thats just fanboy excuses. I dont remember Genesis, Sega Saturn and Dreamcast having any success compared to Snes, PSX and PS2 respectively

Yeah exactly. Though the Genesis was a HUGE success. They toppled Nintendo, i mean heck, they even put up SOME competition, and then went onto lead the generation up till 1994. Nintendos grasp was so strong they bound publishers with extremely restrictive agreements, the most apparent being NOT ABLE to develop for other systems. Sega launched early, and due to their excellent Arcade reputation had a few notable titles at launch unlike last-gen where they had only the scraps. For two years, they had the market to themselves, slowly increasing the library and so the userbase until eventually it was no longer a system to be ignored. The SNES came and then Sega unleashed Sonic solidifying their console effort as one equal to Nintendos. So like Sega, MS made the most of the situation and entered with a lot at hand.
Avatar image for PoppaGamer
PoppaGamer

1629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 PoppaGamer
Member since 2009 • 1629 Posts
[QUOTE="FirstDiscovery"]

[QUOTE="PoppaGamer"]Err, no. It was a poor deal with Nvidia that was the xbox's downfall. But your reasoning is even worse for MS. :lol: Let's go with yours.

You really are misinformed are you, thank you for proving youre a jealous fanboy.

The nVidia dispute happened years before, they then settled the issue and continued production. Keep trying:lol:

Really?
NVIDIA ceased production of the Xbox's GPU in August 2005, which marked the end of Xbox production and the quick release of the Xbox 360 on November 22, 2005Wiki
Though Wiki can be edited by anyone, this statement has been on its site for some time. I think I'll take its credibility over yours. But as i said, we can go with your reasoning and say it was due to devs not caring baout it anymore. Either way, its not a good thing. And quit the name-calling.
Avatar image for FirstDiscovery
FirstDiscovery

5508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 FirstDiscovery
Member since 2008 • 5508 Posts
[QUOTE="PoppaGamer"][QUOTE="FirstDiscovery"]

[QUOTE="PoppaGamer"]You really are misinformed are you, thank you for proving youre a jealous fanboy.

The nVidia dispute happened years before, they then settled the issue and continued production. Keep trying:lol:

Really?
NVIDIA ceased production of the Xbox's GPU in August 2005, which marked the end of Xbox production and the quick release of the Xbox 360 on November 22, 2005Wiki
Though Wiki can be edited by anyone, this statement has been on its site for some time. I think I'll take its credibility over yours. But as i said, we can go with your reasoning and say it was due to devs not caring baout it anymore. Either way, its not a good thing. And quit the name-calling.

It is MSs choice if they want to cease production. If MS dont order more, why produce more? They only didnt do so because they knew the rut the XBOX was at the end of its life. And fine, you decided to not do a fanboy post, and i wont namecall.
Avatar image for Senor_Kami
Senor_Kami

8529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#71 Senor_Kami
Member since 2008 • 8529 Posts
#1 Developers!!!!!! MS went out of its way to have a good relationship with developers. They made the system easy to develop for and they offer help and tools to anyone who needs help. Because they weren't in the lead, they couldn't afford for anyone to not make games for their system for any reason that they could possibly control. People complained about a lack of Japanese support last gen, so they went out of their way to bust jpn developers over the head and basically make there be no reason not to have your game on the 360 as well. Thats what really helped. Imo. Price was a factor, but not huge. That first year, MS really got to shine off of their games. They had announcements about tons of jpn developers working for them and they hyped the hell outta the fact that people who worked on Final Fantasy were gonna be on their system too. Sony went the difficult approach and that bit them on the butt. Multiplats not performing well was a horrible look. Madden being vastly inferior on the PS3 was like a nail in the coffin for alot of US gamers. I think that the 360 would be in a totally different place if it still had like no JPN support and the PS3 was easy to make games for. That $100 wouldn't cheaper price wouldn't mean too much of anything if they hadn't gone out of their way to address almost every issue that people had with them last gen.
Avatar image for PoppaGamer
PoppaGamer

1629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 PoppaGamer
Member since 2009 • 1629 Posts

[QUOTE="PoppaGamer"]Really? [QUOTE="Wiki"] NVIDIA ceased production of the Xbox's GPU in August 2005, which marked the end of Xbox production and the quick release of the Xbox 360 on November 22, 2005FirstDiscovery
Though Wiki can be edited by anyone, this statement has been on its site for some time. I think I'll take its credibility over yours. But as i said, we can go with your reasoning and say it was due to devs not caring baout it anymore. Either way, its not a good thing. And quit the name-calling.

It is MSs choice if they want to cease production. If MS dont order more, why produce more? They only didnt do so because they knew the rut the XBOX was at the end of its life. And fine, you decided to not do a fanboy post, and i wont namecall.

By your own admission, Xbox was a failure.

Now you have MS' next attempt getting creamed by Nintendo and can barely keep the sales edge it attained the year alone over the PS3 which has been "double the price".

That's not fanboy, that's reality.

Excuse me for not licking MS' boot heels.

Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts

I think it would be a well known fact by now that the 360 is ahead because of price.

Avatar image for iam2green
iam2green

13991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 iam2green
Member since 2007 • 13991 Posts
i think so. when they both launched it was $400 against 500-600. it also has to do with what games are going to be on the consoles, what are some of the features of the system has (blu-ray, DVD). and things like that.
Avatar image for PoppaGamer
PoppaGamer

1629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 PoppaGamer
Member since 2009 • 1629 Posts
[QUOTE="FirstDiscovery"]you are reverting back to your clueless fanboy ways Please stop trying, its embarrassing i feel sorry for you

/our conversation
Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

there was price, a year's head start, a few great games compared with no great games on ps3, and a system that made it easier and cheaper to develop for that made great developers naturallygravitate towards the360. All of these things made the 360 dominate the ps3.

The Wii still laughs at both of them though.

Avatar image for FirstDiscovery
FirstDiscovery

5508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 FirstDiscovery
Member since 2008 • 5508 Posts
[QUOTE="PoppaGamer"][QUOTE="FirstDiscovery"]you are reverting back to your clueless fanboy ways Please stop trying, its embarrassing i feel sorry for you

/our conversation

Failure at its finest, how about answer my question If the 360 is a failure despite becoming a primary console, selling more consoles at a higher price, selling more software per console, major growth in every territory, making profit from the 360, business selling faster in the same time, dramatically increasing the online business and etc, what does that make the PS3? The self-ownage is strong, 'oh noes he owned me so hard im going to ignore him:cry:
Avatar image for FirstDiscovery
FirstDiscovery

5508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 FirstDiscovery
Member since 2008 • 5508 Posts

there was price, a year's head start, a few great games compared with no great games on ps3, and a system that made it easier and cheaper to develop for that made great developers naturallygravitate towards the360. All of these things made the 360 dominate the ps3.

The Wii still laughs at both of them though.

Serraph105
Still, the Wii is completely different beast, and MS made some great moves. Games wise, MS didnt launch early, they had a fantastic launch-window that covered everything and then continued a good stream of games while developers made the jump to next-gen. By the time everyone was on board, MS had a 10mil unit lead and were leading, Sony on the other hand were now the ones who had to claw back support. Offcourse, saying MS is a success is licking their backsides according to some, wow some fanboys are really hurt at the situation Sony is in:lol:
Avatar image for rofflecopter_
rofflecopter_

591

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 rofflecopter_
Member since 2008 • 591 Posts
[QUOTE="FirstDiscovery"][QUOTE="Serraph105"]

there was price, a year's head start, a few great games compared with no great games on ps3, and a system that made it easier and cheaper to develop for that made great developers naturallygravitate towards the360. All of these things made the 360 dominate the ps3.

The Wii still laughs at both of them though.

Still, the Wii is completely different beast, and MS made some great moves. Games wise, MS didnt launch early, they had a fantastic launch-window that covered everything and then continued a good stream of games while developers made the jump to next-gen. By the time everyone was on board, MS had a 10mil unit lead and were leading, Sony on the other hand were now the ones who had to claw back support. Offcourse, saying MS is a success is licking their backsides according to some, wow some fanboys are really hurt at the situation Sony is in:lol:

microsoft owns the hd gaming industry
Avatar image for snakes3425
snakes3425

1508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 84

User Lists: 0

#81 snakes3425
Member since 2008 • 1508 Posts

There were a lot of reasons.

1. Loss of big name exclusives (DMC4, GTA IV, Tekken VI, FFXIII, Street Fighter IV, Resident Evil V)

2. Poor Marketing for Big Exclusives like Little Big Planet and Resistance II

3. Underestimating the Xbox's Fanbase, and the Xbox's appeal in the West

4. Too Expensive at Launch, with very little in the way of games (except Resistance 1)

5. Removing Backwards Compatibility

6. Refusal to cut the price

7. Too much focus on Blu-Ray Movies and not enough on Games

8. The Recession

9. Overconfidence on the part of Sony, after having two runaway successes with the PS1 and 2, many felt the PS3 would be a runaway hit just like they were.

10. Unable to dent Microsoft where it would hurt the most: the HALO and Gears of War Series

Avatar image for Steppy_76
Steppy_76

2858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#82 Steppy_76
Member since 2005 • 2858 Posts

[QUOTE="IronBass"][QUOTE="PoppaGamer"]As others have done here, you are using reasons tied to being out early yet list them separately. More games and price are mostly due to the year headstart.PoppaGamer
And?

And to get that headstart they screwed all Xbox owners and cut the gen short due to a horrible hardware deal. Excuse me for not praising them for their efforts. I think its weak.

That was ONE of the reasons. Another being the standard HDD, which would have had the machine continue to lose money if they wanted to compete with the pricepoints the PS2 was dropping to(ie sub 199). Unless the Xbox would have been the PS2 successwise, it was going to cost them to get established in the market. The 360 was able to take advantage of everything the Xbox laid the foundation for. Sony in their infinite wisdom chose to follow the Xbox path and MS chose to follow the PS2 path. Those things you are calling all part of being a year early are a function of several choices. MS chose to stick to more traditional hardware that they owned the IP of. Going with DVD allowed them to get the machine out earlier. Owning the IP of the machine allowed them to be the recipients of hardware production cost cuts. Not sticking in a standard HDD will allow the machine to be able to cut costs towards the end of the generation lower and still maintain profitability since the HDD will ALWAYS cost you a certain amount, it just means the capacity will increase at the rock bottom price. This is why you see the PS3 increase HDD size instead of dropping the price, because at a certain point you cut costs by going to a lower capacity. Sony's choices meant a machine that is always going to be more expensive to make, and is going to be harder to keep profitable at 200 bucks or lower.

Avatar image for NTSC-U
NTSC-U

490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 NTSC-U
Member since 2008 • 490 Posts

What it was for me is i've always had the PS1's and PS2's back then..and trying SEGA's consoles out like the Saturn and genesis and 32X and the nintendos....then xbox came out and i wanted to try something new and i digged it more or less...but within the year i plan on buying a PS3, right now i have the Wii & 360 i'd like to add that to the collection as well.

Avatar image for Lionheart08
Lionheart08

15814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#84 Lionheart08
Member since 2005 • 15814 Posts

Only a cow would agree. The 360 is succeeding because MS delivered on the games since launch, providing a way better online experience with XBLA and exclusive DLC and understanding the market better (out of the 2 , who wasbetter preparedfor Holiday Shoppng season?)

AlphaGamer469

The first half of 2008 did show that a competitively price PS3 faired just as well as the 360 so price certainly did have a factor.

Avatar image for treedoor
treedoor

7648

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 treedoor
Member since 2004 • 7648 Posts

No.


What you're forgetting is that the original Xbox had a very weak fanbase compared to the PS2, so the Xbox 360 is a complete success compared to the original. The PS3 on the otherhand is a complete failure compared to the PS2's sales.

The amount of success of the 360 is attributed to the better library it had for the first few years.

Now that the PS3 has caught up with games I assume it'll sell just as well as the 360, or more depending on whether or not they reclaim some of the old PS2 fans.

Avatar image for AlphaGamer469
AlphaGamer469

1881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 AlphaGamer469
Member since 2008 • 1881 Posts

[QUOTE="AlphaGamer469"]

Only a cow would agree. The 360 is succeeding because MS delivered on the games since launch, providing a way better online experience with XBLA and exclusive DLC and understanding the market better (out of the 2 , who wasbetter preparedfor Holiday Shoppng season?)

Lionheart08

The first half of 2008 did show that a competitively price PS3 faired just as well as the 360 so price certainly did have a factor.

It's been economically proven that the majority of sales happen during the holiday shopping season. In the 3 months of the holiday shopping season, the 260 wiped out any minor lead sony had. Do you honostly think 3 to 30 k wins for sony meant anything? You aren't going to win a sales year in June or July, Sony hasn't figured it out yet and until they do, they will continue to slip. Don't hate on MS for being shrewd and recognizing this, hate on Sony for being their atypical shortsighted...