Was the Xbox One X A failure and a very bad buy for consumers?

  • 71 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for kingtito
kingtito

11775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 kingtito
Member since 2003 • 11775 Posts

@gifford38 said:
@kingtito said:

@gifford38: The S was NOT more powerful than the PS4. It had a UDH player and maybe slightly higher clock I believe but it was still weaker. Please get your facts straight

ow yeah i had to look it up. but in the end was it the power of the ps4 that won this generation or was it the ps4 exclusive games?

if xbox had better games this gen that beat sony first party even being weaker do you think xbox would of won this gen? yes or would of been much closer.

ps3 had bad ports and in the end the ps3 won. you know why because of the games not that the fact third party games was worse. in fact the weakest one won the wii. if sony did not have the games to back up the ps3 the 360 would of won by a land slide.

same with the ps2 it was weaker than the xbox and still sold 150 consoles. because of games

games is what wins generations not power or relying on third party games looking better.

ps4 just had all three at first power, better third party, and better exclusive games.

this is how they got 120 million sold while xbox 40 million sold.

next gen sony will have the games and have better looking exclusives at first.

xbox if the games that are coming in 2022 are up to sony level exclusives we will see a closer number in sales because of the games not power.

Who gives a shit. That's not what this conversation is about. You sure you're not el tormenteds alt?

BTW the PS3 didn't win. It lost the most market share, had the worst looking multiplats, took 8 years to catch the 360 and lost to Nintendo . What exactly did they win?

Stop being el tormented respond to the actual post not some made up argument like what el tormented does

Avatar image for kingtito
kingtito

11775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52  Edited By kingtito
Member since 2003 • 11775 Posts
@BenjaminBanklin said:
@kingtito said:

Yep, and cows continually promoted that power from the PS4s reveal to the time the X1X launched. Then power didn't matter anymore.

It was for games to run and perform better and it accomplished just that. The sales difference wasn't going to shrink but it did provide those that wanted a better performing console.

So my point is why do you even care if they stopped making the X1X since it'll continue to run all the same games as the X1S with better performance? I mean it makes absolute sense why they'd discontinue it except of course for cows. Your blind hate prohibits from you thinking logically.

Power never matters because power never, EVER won a generation. It's a nice bonus to have, but it doesn't mean anything without the software to back it up. It's great to have better performing games, and that's what the mid-gen refreshes were for. But Xbox never really truly pushed why you needed another $500 box from them when the old one had trouble selling for the same reasons.

Then MS went and started blowing smoke up people's asses telling them these consoles would be supported with software for two years into the Series console life cycle. And then the game conference left them with a nasty surprise. You're the ones that should be caring about a bad precedent being set.

Again what does that have to do with that I said? Did I say power wins gens? Did I say anything about sales and power? No, I said cows(you) made a big deal about power, until the X1X released. Then power didn't matter.

Once again, what does your response have to do with the 1X being discontinued and why cows even matter since the games are still going to work on all existing 1X consoles? Why do cows care about a console that will still be viable years from now?

Avatar image for Telekill
Telekill

12061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#53 Telekill
Member since 2003 • 12061 Posts

I would actually say that those with an X1X... especially the editions that have "Scorpio" on them... keep your systems. They'll be considered collectors items much quicker than most systems due to the short lifespan and minimal amount of them on the market.

Avatar image for Telekill
Telekill

12061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#54 Telekill
Member since 2003 • 12061 Posts

@kingtito: Wii unfortunately won the last gen. I don't say that to spite Nintendo but because I despise motion controls. Nintendo isn't even really counted as a direct competitor anymore. They don't have actual generations anymore. They took some odd path and now stand alone. It could bite them in the ass but so far Switch is pretty successful after the abysmal failure of the Wii-U.

PS3 won over 360 in overall sales. Thus, it "won" in SW.

Avatar image for kingtito
kingtito

11775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 kingtito
Member since 2003 • 11775 Posts

@Telekill: By the time it caught the 360 the 9th gen launched so did it really "win"? Anyway I don't really care because sales has no affect on me I don't own stock nor do I get paid by MS or Sony.

Nintendo doesn't care about "gens" and rightfully so. "Gens" are only for fanboy bragging rights while doing what PCs do on a regular basis, get upgraded. So aside from the upgrades these "gens" are only good for fanboys to grief others about sales.

Avatar image for Telekill
Telekill

12061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#56 Telekill
Member since 2003 • 12061 Posts

@kingtito: I disagree. I've always enjoyed the generational model. Hoping to see it continue on Playstation.

Avatar image for kingtito
kingtito

11775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 kingtito
Member since 2003 • 11775 Posts

@Telekill: I mean upgrades are the only real positive to the generational model. What Nintendo is doing is coming up with upgrades they're just not doing it in sync with MS and Sony.

Avatar image for Heil68
Heil68

60833

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 Heil68
Member since 2004 • 60833 Posts

@Telekill said:

@kingtito: I disagree. I've always enjoyed the generational model. Hoping to see it continue on Playstation.

Me too, it also is a marvel to see what they can come up with and how gaming evolves.

Avatar image for gifford38
Gifford38

7910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#59 Gifford38
Member since 2020 • 7910 Posts

@kingtito said:
@gifford38 said:
@kingtito said:

@gifford38: The S was NOT more powerful than the PS4. It had a UDH player and maybe slightly higher clock I believe but it was still weaker. Please get your facts straight

ow yeah i had to look it up. but in the end was it the power of the ps4 that won this generation or was it the ps4 exclusive games?

if xbox had better games this gen that beat sony first party even being weaker do you think xbox would of won this gen? yes or would of been much closer.

ps3 had bad ports and in the end the ps3 won. you know why because of the games not that the fact third party games was worse. in fact the weakest one won the wii. if sony did not have the games to back up the ps3 the 360 would of won by a land slide.

same with the ps2 it was weaker than the xbox and still sold 150 consoles. because of games

games is what wins generations not power or relying on third party games looking better.

ps4 just had all three at first power, better third party, and better exclusive games.

this is how they got 120 million sold while xbox 40 million sold.

next gen sony will have the games and have better looking exclusives at first.

xbox if the games that are coming in 2022 are up to sony level exclusives we will see a closer number in sales because of the games not power.

Who gives a shit. That's not what this conversation is about. You sure you're not el tormenteds alt?

BTW the PS3 didn't win. It lost the most market share, had the worst looking multiplats, took 8 years to catch the 360 and lost to Nintendo . What exactly did they win?

Stop being el tormented respond to the actual post not some made up argument like what el tormented does

it took sony 8 years to catch up because 360 had great games until they decided toward the end to sell all there studios and said single player games are dead. then they decided to rely on third party. then it took them until the end of this gen to realize they needed to buy back first party studios.

it also took 8 years because the ps3 was 600 dollars and the ps3 came out one year later than the 360. so for over two years xbox had a price of 400 while the ps3 first year had a 600 price tag and 360 great first party games and had better third party ports.

ow and im no alt tomato. im me and only me.

look i will buy xbox for fable but there is no reason to get a xbox until after 2022 when the big hitters like evowed, fable comes. again xbox has no true next gen titles until 2022. the only game at launch that looks good is gunk. stalker 2 got delayed until close to 2022 aswell.

phil needs to sell me xbox not gamepass.

besides this is system wars we talk about or system of choice not candy land were we all tell each other I love you lol. we all find the positives about each console and we go to war lol.

Avatar image for kingtito
kingtito

11775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 kingtito
Member since 2003 • 11775 Posts

@gifford38: It would help if you addressed the actual post not interject some argument only you're interested in. I could couldn't care less about sales except to give cows like el tormented a hard time. Same goes for graphics.

Avatar image for davillain
DaVillain

58737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#61 DaVillain  Moderator
Member since 2014 • 58737 Posts

@louixiii said:

The Xbox One X itself wasn't the fail, it was Microsoft's lack of exclusives that failed the console. From what I've seen, history is about to repeat itself

To me, it was basically "too late" when it release and the damage was already done to the brand itself. Xbox One X is what it should have been on launch day. And I totally agree the lack of heavyweight exclusives really hurt the console the most.

Fortunate for me, I'll be playing MS exclusives through the PC and no longer care for Xbox consoles in the future.

Avatar image for louixiii
LouiXIII

10052

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 LouiXIII
Member since 2015 • 10052 Posts

@davillain- said:
@louixiii said:

The Xbox One X itself wasn't the fail, it was Microsoft's lack of exclusives that failed the console. From what I've seen, history is about to repeat itself

To me, it was basically "too late" when it release and the damage was already done to the brand itself. Xbox One X is what it should have been on launch day. And I totally agree the lack of heavyweight exclusives really hurt the console the most.

Fortunate for me, I'll be playing MS exclusives through the PC and no longer care for Xbox consoles in the future.

Absolutely. That should've been their launch system much like Pro should've been Sony's. It sad really because even after the launch drama, they couldn't get it together. In my opinion, Phil hasn't done much to help them survive another console race. It's over at this point.

Avatar image for ps5rulez
ps5rulez

456

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#63 ps5rulez
Member since 2020 • 456 Posts

xbox one x will have support for 2 more years bro lol

2017-2022 isnt all that bad.

Avatar image for landcrab
LandCrab

49

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#64 LandCrab
Member since 2020 • 49 Posts

No it was worlds strongest console till the series x comes out.

Avatar image for KBFloYd
KBFloYd

22714

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#65 KBFloYd
Member since 2009 • 22714 Posts

i think its a success. its been living for free for 5 years in your head.

Avatar image for phlop_spencer
Phlop_Spencer

1476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#66 Phlop_Spencer
Member since 2020 • 1476 Posts

@KBFloYd said:

i think its a success. its been living for free for 5 years in your head.

Just like you live rent free in your mother’s basement?

Avatar image for deactivated-60bf765068a74
deactivated-60bf765068a74

9558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 deactivated-60bf765068a74
Member since 2007 • 9558 Posts

@KBFloYd said:

i think its a success. its been living for free for 5 years in your head.

@phlop_spencer said:

Just like you live rent free in your mother’s basement?

KBFloyds room

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts

@ProtossRushX said:
@KBFloYd said:

i think its a success. its been living for free for 5 years in your head.

@phlop_spencer said:

Just like you live rent free in your mother’s basement?

KBFloyds room

That's a pretty cool place

Avatar image for my_user_name
my_user_name

1625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#69 my_user_name
Member since 2019 • 1625 Posts

I'm happy with my X. I got a decent deal on a trade in.

Got performance mode on a few games , better load times and also some 360 games got X enhanced patch.

However MS really needs to do a better job incentivizing getting a Series X, because if you own a decent pc then it's damn near pointless to upgrade.

Avatar image for shellcase86
shellcase86

6890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 shellcase86
Member since 2012 • 6890 Posts

@ProtossRushX said:

Here are some of those games that might not be on the xbox one x.

XBOX SERIES X / WINDOWS PC

  • State of Decay 3 - optimized for Series X, first party
  • Forza Motorsport - optimized for Series X, first party
  • Fable - optimized for Series X, first party
  • Avowed - optimized for Series X, first party
  • As Dusk Falls - optimized for Series X, first party
  • Everwild - optimized for Series X, first party
  • Stalker 2 - optimized for Series X, console launch exclusive
  • Warhammer 40,000 Darktide - optimized for Series X, console launch exclusive
  • The Medium - optimized for Series X, console launch exclusive

This wording "optimized for Series X" is a possible indicator those games will also be playable on the One and One X.

They wouldn't use the words optimized, if that was the Series X was the only Xbox console that would get it.

There of course is the rumored Series S. But that hasn't even been revealed/confirmed. So this wording points to the One and One X getting the same content.

Avatar image for Mozelleple112
Mozelleple112

11293

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#71 Mozelleple112
Member since 2011 • 11293 Posts

Although the PS4 and PS4 Pro win for having a vastly superior library of games. The One X made way more sense than the Pro.

X1 ran games at a shitty 1600x900p = 1,440,000 resolution

PS4 ran games at a decent 1920x1080p = 2,073,600 (or so) resolution

PS4 Pro hardly differentiates from PS4 as it runs a 2560x1400p ≈ 4 million pixel resolution. 2.2x the GPU power for less than twice the pixels. Meh.

X1X on the other hand was a huge improvement over the crappy X1, and offers typically a 3200x1800 = 6 million pixel resolution, which is more than 4x the pixels of X1.

1.3 Tflops --> 6 Tflops = HUGE upgrade, a generational leap

1.84 Tflops --> 4.2 Tflops = minor upgrade.

Avatar image for Martin_G_N
Martin_G_N

2124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Martin_G_N
Member since 2006 • 2124 Posts

I think both the Xbox one X and the PS4 Pro is a failure, sort of. They added a few extra million consoles sold, but if the profit per unit is less, then it's not a whole lot of difference. I assume a lot of those Pro buyers were late to the party and were getting a PS4 anyways.