We need more 2~3 hours long games.

  • 53 results
  • 1
  • 2
Avatar image for uninspiredcup
uninspiredcup

62534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 2

#51 uninspiredcup
Member since 2013 • 62534 Posts

Agreed, as long as they are reasonably priced and have you actually doing something. i.e. not ze art, shitty walking simulator....

Nintendo seems to be the only of the big 3 who make fast 10-20 minutes instant gratification games.

It's nice to play a game that doesn't have 40 minute tutorial;ls.

Avatar image for that_old_guy
That_Old_Guy

1233

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

#52 That_Old_Guy
Member since 2018 • 1233 Posts

Some people want different things, and that’s fine.

But if there is a 2-3 hour game that shit better not be over $20.

Avatar image for Alucard_Prime
Alucard_Prime

10107

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#53 Alucard_Prime
Member since 2008 • 10107 Posts

Personally I have enough of those, that is why I love Roguelike games like Binding of Isaac and Dead cells, as well as indies.

Avatar image for JustPlainLucas
JustPlainLucas

80441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 226

User Lists: 0

#54 JustPlainLucas
Member since 2002 • 80441 Posts

@rafaelmsoares said:

Not everything needs to be a 60 hours epic, developers need to do a few more bite sized games. This weekend I was able to finish 3 games (Lara Croft and the Temple of Osiris, Skylar and Plux and Stories: Path of Destinies), after having spent more than two weeks with Dragon Quest XI.

What I mean is both games have an audience and developers shouldn't focus only on RDR2 like games.

If appropriately priced, yes, but no 2-3 hour game should ever be 60 bucks.