Were Halo 1-2 considered exclusive?

  • 87 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#51 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

Exclusive to Microsoft.

If a game is exclusive to one company's OS and or console, then it is exclusive. Exclusive as in competitors are excluded.

No one here seems to know or to be able to understand this, but when your product is only available through you, it is an exclusive product; Otherwise, it is non-exclusive and available through other means.

A game published only for MS systems is a MS exclusive. Platforms cannot be the deciding factor for exclusivity, as a company may own more than one platform.

farrell2k

Good thing I was playing it on my sony vaio huh?

Avatar image for brennan7777
brennan7777

3253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 brennan7777
Member since 2005 • 3253 Posts

[QUOTE="farrell2k"]

Exclusive to Microsoft.

If a game is exclusive to one company's OS and or console, then it is exclusive. Exclusive as in competitors are excluded.

No one here seems to know or to be able to understand this, but when your product is only available through you, it is an exclusive product; Otherwise, it is non-exclusive and available through other means.

A game published only for MS systems is a MS exclusive. Platforms cannot be the deciding factor for exclusivity, as a company may own more than one platform.

Espada12

Good thing I was playing it on my sony vaio huh?

I was going to say this...even though i dont have a vaio.

Avatar image for SparkyProtocol
SparkyProtocol

7680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

#53 SparkyProtocol
Member since 2009 • 7680 Posts

[QUOTE="farrell2k"]

Exclusive to Microsoft.

If a game is exclusive to one company's OS and or console, then it is exclusive. Exclusive as in competitors are excluded.

No one here seems to know or to be able to understand this, but when your product is only available through you, it is an exclusive product; Otherwise, it is non-exclusive and available through other means.

A game published only for MS systems is a MS exclusive. Platforms cannot be the deciding factor for exclusivity, as a company may own more than one platform.

Espada12

Good thing I was playing it on my sony vaio huh?

Do you really game on that POS or are you trying to make a point? :P
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#54 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="farrell2k"]

Exclusive to Microsoft.

If a game is exclusive to one company's OS and or console, then it is exclusive. Exclusive as in competitors are excluded.

No one here seems to know or to be able to understand this, but when your product is only available through you, it is an exclusive product; Otherwise, it is non-exclusive and available through other means.

A game published only for MS systems is a MS exclusive. Platforms cannot be the deciding factor for exclusivity, as a company may own more than one platform.

SparkyProtocol

Good thing I was playing it on my sony vaio huh?

Do you really game on that POS or are you trying to make a point? :P

LOL just making a point hahahah.

Avatar image for MassMayham57_
MassMayham57_

465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 MassMayham57_
Member since 2009 • 465 Posts

so since LBP is on the PS3 and PSP is it not considered exclusive or is it different?

Avatar image for SparkyProtocol
SparkyProtocol

7680

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

#56 SparkyProtocol
Member since 2009 • 7680 Posts

[QUOTE="SparkyProtocol"][QUOTE="Espada12"]

Good thing I was playing it on my sony vaio huh?

Espada12

Do you really game on that POS or are you trying to make a point? :P

LOL just making a point hahahah.

Lol Windows 7 commercial has nothing but Vaios in it. Well, it had a Sony TV :P
Avatar image for Silverbond
Silverbond

16130

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Silverbond
Member since 2008 • 16130 Posts

so since LBP is on the PS3 and PSP is it not considered exclusive or is it different?

MassMayham57_

LBP is exclusive.

Avatar image for Cherokee_Jack
Cherokee_Jack

32198

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 2

#58 Cherokee_Jack
Member since 2008 • 32198 Posts

so since LBP is on the PS3 and PSP is it not considered exclusive or is it different?

MassMayham57_
It was never released on the PSP. There's a PSP game based on LBP, but it's not the same as LBP on the PS3.
Avatar image for Skittles_McGee
Skittles_McGee

9136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Skittles_McGee
Member since 2008 • 9136 Posts

so since LBP is on the PS3 and PSP is it not considered exclusive or is it different?

MassMayham57_
Its a different game. Different level editor, different levels, different gameplay, different, different, different.
Avatar image for Evz0rz
Evz0rz

4624

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 Evz0rz
Member since 2006 • 4624 Posts

Before they were released for PC, yes. Then the "definitive versions" were released and made the Xbox versions defunct.

foxhound_fox
Maybe for Halo 1, that was amazing on PC! Halo 2, not so much...
Avatar image for RobbRipken
RobbRipken

263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#61 RobbRipken
Member since 2003 • 263 Posts

God of War 1 and 2 don't anymore since they've gone to another system. Ocarina of Time, Majora's Mask, and virtually every nintendo game evermade aren't exclusive either.

Avatar image for DontBeHatin1983
DontBeHatin1983

1044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 DontBeHatin1983
Member since 2008 • 1044 Posts

Exclusive to Microsoft.

If a game is exclusive to one company's OS and or console, then it is exclusive. Exclusive as in competitors are excluded.

No one here seems to know or to be able to understand this, but when your product is only available through you, it is an exclusive product; Otherwise, it is non-exclusive and available through other means.

A game published only for MS systems is a MS exclusive. Platforms cannot be the deciding factor for exclusivity, as a company may own more than one platform.

farrell2k

Sony makes PC?

Avatar image for dachase
dachase

808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 dachase
Member since 2005 • 808 Posts

[QUOTE="farrell2k"]

Exclusive to Microsoft.

If a game is exclusive to one company's OS and or console, then it is exclusive. Exclusive as in competitors are excluded.

No one here seems to know or to be able to understand this, but when your product is only available through you, it is an exclusive product; Otherwise, it is non-exclusive and available through other means.

A game published only for MS systems is a MS exclusive. Platforms cannot be the deciding factor for exclusivity, as a company may own more than one platform.

shutdown_202

How can it be 'company exclusive' if its also available on the Mac?

http://uk.gamespot.com/mac/action/halo/index.html?tag=result;title;2

*Sits back and waits for a newdefinition of exclusiveto be made*

Ouch that was a deep burn.....the ownage is strong in this one

Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#64 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
[QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Until they were released on PC, yes.aaronmullan
This. Not anymore.

I think there should be a time limit, so that after a certain time, a game has "exclusivity immunity" meaning, it can't lose it's exclusivity. For instance, technically since you can play Zelda OoT legally on the Wii, it's no longer exclusive, but considering the amount of time that's passed, it should have immunity. Maybe any port released 3+ years after a game, cannot affect the exclusivity of the game. Or maybe a port or re-release of a game in a different gen can't tarnish exclusivity. Just my thoughts.
Avatar image for VendettaRed07
VendettaRed07

14012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#65 VendettaRed07
Member since 2007 • 14012 Posts

They are spiritual exclusives. Imo if something is exclusive for more than 2 1/2 years then its a spiritual exclusive. Kind like sonic is an exclusive genesis game, it was released on like a milllion consoles since but its still pretty much an exclusive.

Avatar image for Gxgear
Gxgear

10425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Gxgear
Member since 2003 • 10425 Posts

They are spiritual exclusives. Imo if something is exclusive for more than 2 1/2 years then its a spiritual exclusive. Kind like sonic is an exclusive genesis game, it was released on like a milllion consoles since but its still pretty much an exclusive.

VendettaRed07

That's pretty out there. Worse than teh console exclusives.

Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#67 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts

They are spiritual exclusives. Imo if something is exclusive for more than 2 1/2 years then its a spiritual exclusive. Kind like sonic is an exclusive genesis game, it was released on like a milllion consoles since but its still pretty much an exclusive.

VendettaRed07

that's what im saying. I think any port/re-release that occurs 3 or more years after the original (or in a different gen than the original?) cannot affect the exclusivity of the original.

Avatar image for topgunmv
topgunmv

10880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#68 topgunmv
Member since 2003 • 10880 Posts

Both the xbox and pc versions of halo1 got about equal mileage out of me. I loved it online.

[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]

Before they were released for PC, yes. Then the "definitive versions" were released and made the Xbox versions defunct.

Evz0rz

Maybe for Halo 1, that was amazing on PC! Halo 2, not so much...

Avatar image for Blade8Aus
Blade8Aus

1819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Blade8Aus
Member since 2006 • 1819 Posts

[QUOTE="farrell2k"]

Exclusive to Microsoft.

If a game is exclusive to one company's OS and or console, then it is exclusive. Exclusive as in competitors are excluded.

No one here seems to know or to be able to understand this, but when your product is only available through you, it is an exclusive product; Otherwise, it is non-exclusive and available through other means.

A game published only for MS systems is a MS exclusive. Platforms cannot be the deciding factor for exclusivity, as a company may own more than one platform.

Zero_epyon

I can play Halo 1 on my Mac.

thats what i thought.

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

They were games that could not be played a playstation 2

Avatar image for Vadamee
Vadamee

1195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Vadamee
Member since 2009 • 1195 Posts

Before they were released for PC, yes. Then the "definitive versions" were released and made the Xbox versions defunct.

foxhound_fox

If you have a PC and an Xbox then yes. But if you only had an Xbox, I don't see how it pertains to those owners. Come to think of it: No local co-op = Not definitive version. Only reason I played Combat Evolved was because of the co-op. Then again the PC version did have online MP. I guess there is some degree of subjectivity on this matter.

Doesn't really matter to argue the exclusivity of Halo CE... It was such a revolutionary FPS for consoles, and one that challenge the best PC FPS that the after shock alone has yet to be duplicated on the opposing console platforms. So there is still a degree of exclusivity if you look beyond petty semantics and realize that Halo and Xbox are synonymous... Nevermind the fact that it was built for the Xbox and then ported to PC by GearBox.

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#72 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50174 Posts
[QUOTE="MassMayham57_"]

so since LBP is on the PS3 and PSP is it not considered exclusive or is it different?

Skittles_McGee
Its a different game. Different level editor, different levels, different gameplay, different, different, different.

Different singleplayer levels, everything else though is actually remarkable pretty much the same. Many reviewers have noted such. :)
Avatar image for Ibacai
Ibacai

14459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#73 Ibacai
Member since 2006 • 14459 Posts
[QUOTE="aaronmullan"][QUOTE="PannicAtack"]Until they were released on PC, yes.II_Seraphim_II
This. Not anymore.

I think there should be a time limit, so that after a certain time, a game has "exclusivity immunity" meaning, it can't lose it's exclusivity. For instance, technically since you can play Zelda OoT legally on the Wii, it's no longer exclusive, but considering the amount of time that's passed, it should have immunity. Maybe any port released 3+ years after a game, cannot affect the exclusivity of the game. Or maybe a port or re-release of a game in a different gen can't tarnish exclusivity. Just my thoughts.

That point of that would be????
Avatar image for xscrapzx
xscrapzx

6636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 xscrapzx
Member since 2007 • 6636 Posts
[QUOTE="SparkyProtocol"]

[QUOTE="farrell2k"]

[QUOTE="_BlueDuck_"]Let's say for example we take the top ten games on PS3 and the top ten games on Xbox 360. Let's say for the sake of argument that all 10 Xbox 360 games are only company exclusive because they are on both 360 and PC. Now let's say all PS3 games are on PS3 only. In this case, the fact is that to play all of the 360's best games, I don't need to own a 360. The fact that the other platform is still a Microsoft platform is irrelevant to me, because if I have a PC I have absolutely no reason to buy a 360, and that is a strong argument against the 360. On the other hand, if I want to play the PS3's best games, I need to buy a PS3, no other way around it.

You still aren't telling me how the games are not exclusive.

We do not follow the real definition of exclusive here, either. :P

I know it isn't particularly on topic, but I've always found this funny

Why do you find this funny? At the time this game out that was the case, you could not get it on the PS3. Unless you are just looking at the present.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62042

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#75 lundy86_4
Member since 2003 • 62042 Posts

Exclusive to Microsoft.

If a game is exclusive to one company's OS and or console, then it is exclusive. Exclusive as in competitors are excluded.

No one here seems to know or to be able to understand this, but when your product is only available through you, it is an exclusive product; Otherwise, it is non-exclusive and available through other means.

A game published only for MS systems is a MS exclusive. Platforms cannot be the deciding factor for exclusivity, as a company may own more than one platform.

farrell2k

Realistically, yes. In System Wars, then no.

It was exclusive until released on PC.

Avatar image for vashxsk8erx12
vashxsk8erx12

264

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 vashxsk8erx12
Member since 2004 • 264 Posts

[QUOTE="shutdown_202"]

[QUOTE="farrell2k"]

Exclusive to Microsoft.

If a game is exclusive to one company's OS and or console, then it is exclusive. Exclusive as in competitors are excluded.

No one here seems to know or to be able to understand this, but when your product is only available through you, it is an exclusive product; Otherwise, it is non-exclusive and available through other means.

A game published only for MS systems is a MS exclusive. Platforms cannot be the deciding factor for exclusivity, as a company may own more than one platform.

dachase

How can it be 'company exclusive' if its also available on the Mac?

http://uk.gamespot.com/mac/action/halo/index.html?tag=result;title;2

*Sits back and waits for a newdefinition of exclusiveto be made*

Ouch that was a deep burn.....the ownage is strong in this one

Lol, thanks for the laugh of the day. Guy got owned/rocked/pwned/destroyed/mutilated/humuliated

Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#77 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
[QUOTE="Ibacai"][QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"][QUOTE="aaronmullan"] This. Not anymore.

I think there should be a time limit, so that after a certain time, a game has "exclusivity immunity" meaning, it can't lose it's exclusivity. For instance, technically since you can play Zelda OoT legally on the Wii, it's no longer exclusive, but considering the amount of time that's passed, it should have immunity. Maybe any port released 3+ years after a game, cannot affect the exclusivity of the game. Or maybe a port or re-release of a game in a different gen can't tarnish exclusivity. Just my thoughts.

That point of that would be????

To stop SW riots :P Some people here will claim that perfect dark is no longer exclusive as soon as it comes out on X360. Sure so much time has passed that it's practically irrelevant, but don't put it beyond any SW users. I imagine that if SE decided to bring out FF 10-12 in a boxset out for X360, there would be people claiming that FFX-FFXII are no longer exclusive, even though the PS2 gen is long over.
Avatar image for BiggGaming
BiggGaming

345

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 BiggGaming
Member since 2009 • 345 Posts

Exclusive to Microsoft.

If a game is exclusive to one company's OS and or console, then it is exclusive. Exclusive as in competitors are excluded.

No one here seems to know or to be able to understand this, but when your product is only available through you, it is an exclusive product; Otherwise, it is non-exclusive and available through other means.

A game published only for MS systems is a MS exclusive. Platforms cannot be the deciding factor for exclusivity, as a company may own more than one platform.

farrell2k

This will be the post that should end any and all exclusivity discussion.

*stands and applauds*

Avatar image for DivineSword
DivineSword

15840

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 DivineSword  Moderator
Member since 2007 • 15840 Posts

They were before it was released on the PC, but after that they are just consider time exclusive!

Avatar image for mirriorman
mirriorman

1946

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#80 mirriorman
Member since 2009 • 1946 Posts

[QUOTE="farrell2k"]

Exclusive to Microsoft.

If a game is exclusive to one company's OS and or console, then it is exclusive.

No one here seems to know or to be able to understand this, but when your product is only available through you, it is an exclusive product; Otherwise, it is non-exclusive and available through other means.

A game published only for MS systems is a MS exclusive. Platforms cannot be the deciding factor for exclusivity, as a company may own more than one platform.

II-FBIsniper-II

System Wars, not Company Wars.

fanboys wars who discount fact if it doesnt agree with their views not system wars

Avatar image for 13C
13C

1024

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 13C
Member since 2010 • 1024 Posts

Exclusive to Microsoft.

If a game is exclusive to one company's OS and or console, then it is exclusive. Exclusive as in competitors are excluded.

No one here seems to know or to be able to understand this, but when your product is only available through you, it is an exclusive product; Otherwise, it is non-exclusive and available through other means.

A game published only for MS systems is a MS exclusive. Platforms cannot be the deciding factor for exclusivity, as a company may own more than one platform.

farrell2k

omg ppl company exclusive now.

console exclusive

platform (business model) exclusive

company exclusive

:roll:

If you have to put a word in front of exclusive its not really exclusive.

Avatar image for 789shadow
789shadow

20195

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#83 789shadow
Member since 2006 • 20195 Posts

For a time.

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#84 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

The only exclusive that really matter in the real world is company exclusive, where it's only available to to the customers of one company. Anything else is just ignorance of the meaning of the world perpetuated by those who have absolutely zero understanding of even the very basics of video game publishing. This isn't surprising, as I wold venture a guess that most of the people who visit this site are between the age of 12-22, and are still wet behind the ears when it comes to understanding and having experienced how the world really works.

farrell2k

What does your post have to do with your statement? It's not exclusive to MS especially when it can be played on the competition's hardware and one of the competition's software.

Avatar image for Modern_Unit
Modern_Unit

1511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 Modern_Unit
Member since 2010 • 1511 Posts

[QUOTE="MassMayham57_"]

so since LBP is on the PS3 and PSP is it not considered exclusive or is it different?

Skittles_McGee

Its a different game. Different level editor, different levels, different gameplay, different, different, different.

So i guess GRAW is 360 exclusive

Avatar image for Avian005
Avian005

4112

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 51

User Lists: 0

#86 Avian005
Member since 2009 • 4112 Posts

[QUOTE="Skittles_McGee"][QUOTE="MassMayham57_"]

so since LBP is on the PS3 and PSP is it not considered exclusive or is it different?

Modern_Unit

Its a different game. Different level editor, different levels, different gameplay, different, different, different.

So i guess GRAW is 360 exclusive

That's what Gamespot says.

Avatar image for Ibacai
Ibacai

14459

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#87 Ibacai
Member since 2006 • 14459 Posts
[QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"][QUOTE="Ibacai"][QUOTE="II_Seraphim_II"] I think there should be a time limit, so that after a certain time, a game has "exclusivity immunity" meaning, it can't lose it's exclusivity. For instance, technically since you can play Zelda OoT legally on the Wii, it's no longer exclusive, but considering the amount of time that's passed, it should have immunity. Maybe any port released 3+ years after a game, cannot affect the exclusivity of the game. Or maybe a port or re-release of a game in a different gen can't tarnish exclusivity. Just my thoughts.

That point of that would be????

To stop SW riots :P Some people here will claim that perfect dark is no longer exclusive as soon as it comes out on X360. Sure so much time has passed that it's practically irrelevant, but don't put it beyond any SW users. I imagine that if SE decided to bring out FF 10-12 in a boxset out for X360, there would be people claiming that FFX-FFXII are no longer exclusive, even though the PS2 gen is long over.

But then you would have backlash the other way with fanboys trying to hold originals over ports heads. Bioshock? SO4? It just messes with a simple word, exclusive. It is what it is.