they gave best technical graphics to MGS4 in 2008, which had some of the worst graphics of its time
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Baranga"][QUOTE="GeneralShowzer"] Then why wasn't a Wii game nominated, because MH3, Metrioid, Goldeneye, look very good for that outdated hardware, don't you think. I'm calling it here, double standards! GeneralShowzer
Because no Wii game was that impressive. In the expanded Reader's Choice category they included a PSP game though. Also note how the PC version of Just Cause 2 was nominated.
Just Cause II preformance was poor, the FPS gets down when you're in cities, it requires a really good rig to look that good, how does it make sense that it was nominated?It only does that if you have vsync on.
Played the first few minutes of Metro 2033 and took some screens. The quality of these images has been impacted due to compression, afterall, each image was over a few MBs and now less than a few hundred KB. Did that to conserve space and not to overload imageshack. lol Anyways, enjoy.
Anyone want MOAR?
Stevo_the_gamer
Is your GPU seriously running at 92 degrees? :| That's ridiculous.
Pretty standard for the GTX 480. I like my space heater though. It eats everything I throw at it.Is your GPU seriously running at 92 degrees? :| That's ridiculous.
Guppy507
Pretty standard for the GTX 480. I like my space heater though. It eats everything I throw at it.[QUOTE="Guppy507"]
Is your GPU seriously running at 92 degrees? :| That's ridiculous.
Stevo_the_gamer
Mine only goes up to 72 degrees. What brand do you have?
I'm also using EVGA precision though, which adjusts the fan speed to correlate with how hot it's getting. Do you ever change the fan speed?
Pretty standard for the GTX 480. I like my space heater though. It eats everything I throw at it. Still ridiculous. :P My room heats up enough from my computer as it is, and my GPU runs at 65 degrees maximum.[QUOTE="Guppy507"]
Is your GPU seriously running at 92 degrees? :| That's ridiculous.
Stevo_the_gamer
Unfortunately, I think they omitted it because it's a multiplat that only looks great on one platform. If it had only been released for PC I think it may have made it. Then again, the awards tend to cater to console gaming so...
[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Pretty standard for the GTX 480. I like my space heater though. It eats everything I throw at it. Still ridiculous. :P My room heats up enough from my computer as it is, and my GPU runs at 65 degrees maximum.[QUOTE="Guppy507"]
Is your GPU seriously running at 92 degrees? :| That's ridiculous.
Guppy507
You guys using liquid cooling or something crazy? My card averages the mid 70's in demanding games.
Seriously? Besides Crysis, what looked so great in 2008 that made MGS4 have "some of the worst graphics of its time"?they gave best technical graphics to MGS4 in 2008, which had some of the worst graphics of its time
washd123
You have a GTX 480? And it only gets up to 72? Hmm. That's interesting. Mine is EVGA.Mine only goes up to 72 degrees. What brand do you have?
I'm also using EVGA precision though, which adjusts the fan speed to correlate with how hot it's getting. Do you ever change the fan speed?
DragonfireXZ95
Pretty standard for the GTX 480. I like my space heater though. It eats everything I throw at it. I think I've never seen my GPU get much higher then 60 degrees C. O.o[QUOTE="Guppy507"]
Is your GPU seriously running at 92 degrees? :| That's ridiculous.
Stevo_the_gamer
[QUOTE="washd123"]Seriously? Besides Crysis, what looked so great in 2008 that made MGS4 have "some of the worst graphics of its time"?they gave best technical graphics to MGS4 in 2008, which had some of the worst graphics of its time
jalexbrown
MGS 4 had great graphics. Still, It should have went to banjo nuts and bolts or gears of war 2.
I think I've never seen my GPU get much higher then 60 degrees C. O.ohexashadow13The GTX 480 and 470 are renowned for getting super hot. The newer GTX 500 series did some changes to the design to alleviate some of the heat complaints, but even that still hits the 80s; lots of power driving that heat.
The GTX 480 and 470 are renowned for getting super hot. The newer GTX 500 series did some changes to the design to alleviate some of the heat complaints, but even that still hits the 80s; lots of power driving that heat.[QUOTE="hexashadow13"] I think I've never seen my GPU get much higher then 60 degrees C. O.oStevo_the_gamer
You need to get a cooler master HAF case :P
[QUOTE="Espada12"]So how did Crysis win in 2007?Obviously because metro ran pretty badly.
Stevo_the_gamer
It only ran badly because the cards were not strong enough. Metro runs badly because it was coded by monkeys :P
Yeah, it totally should have gone to Gears of War 2 and Banjo instead of Crysis Warhead... Wait a minute.MGS 4 had great graphics. Still, It should have went to banjo nuts and bolts or gears of war 2.
theuncharted34
Meh, I already have a Cosmos 1000 -- and she's a beauty, but I wouldn't mind investing into the HAF X. $200 is a it pricey, could always sell the PS3. Hmm.You need to get a cooler master HAF case :P
theuncharted34
[QUOTE="jalexbrown"][QUOTE="washd123"]
they gave best technical graphics to MGS4 in 2008, which had some of the worst graphics of its time
Seriously? Besides Crysis, what looked so great in 2008 that made MGS4 have "some of the worst graphics of its time"?MGS 4 had great graphics. Still, It should have went to banjo nuts and bolts or gears of war 2.
Both of those games do look great, but I think all of the nominees beat them in terms of technical prowless.Yeah, it totally should have gone to Gears of War 2 and Banjo instead of Crysis Warhead... Wait a minute.[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]
MGS 4 had great graphics. Still, It should have went to banjo nuts and bolts or gears of war 2.
Stevo_the_gamer
well, GS gives the graphics awards out based on the hardware they are running on, And since the ps3 and 360 are very close in power, and those 2 games looking better than MGS 4, leads me to conclude that one of those 2 games should have won :D
[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]
MGS 4 had great graphics. Still, It should have went to banjo nuts and bolts or gears of war 2.
Yeah, it totally should have gone to Gears of War 2 and Banjo instead of Crysis Warhead... Wait a minute.Meh, I already have a Cosmos 1000 -- and she's a beauty, but I wouldn't mind investing into the HAF X. $200 is a it pricey, could always sell the PS3. Hmm.Just when the PS3 is hitting its stride?[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]
You need to get a cooler master HAF case :P
Stevo_the_gamer
The GTX 480 and 470 are renowned for getting super hot. The newer GTX 500 series did some changes to the design to alleviate some of the heat complaints, but even that still hits the 80s; lots of power driving that heat. My gtx 285 gets up to mid 70's on a taxing game and I have a antec 900 case fans going full blast.[QUOTE="hexashadow13"] I think I've never seen my GPU get much higher then 60 degrees C. O.oStevo_the_gamer
You actually take the awards and reviews on this site seriously? Black ops and Reach should've scored no higher than a 7.5 for being generic run of the mill shooters but sites need to put up good reviews to keep fans happy. Metro is the greatest looking game i've ever played, even on my mid-range rig. It deserves the reward, but gamespot employees are too busy playing mainstream console games that aren't even fun.coolmonkeykidI guess that explains why the user average on Reach is 8.9. :? Opinions are cool things, eh?
Still ridiculous. :P My room heats up enough from my computer as it is, and my GPU runs at 65 degrees maximum.[QUOTE="Guppy507"][QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Pretty standard for the GTX 480. I like my space heater though. It eats everything I throw at it.
topgunmv
You guys using liquid cooling or something crazy? My card averages the mid 70's in demanding games.
No, but I have a mid range GPU (9800 GTX) and a case with very good air flow. I've seen mine get up to 70, but the fan keeps it in the 60's usually.What stride?[QUOTE="spookykid143"]Just when the PS3 is hitting its stride?
Stevo_the_gamer
the games list for 2011.
What stride? EDIT: Okay, I guess I took what you were saying here a touch out of context. :P[QUOTE="spookykid143"]Just when the PS3 is hitting its stride?
Stevo_the_gamer
2011 hasn't started yet, and thus no stride has begun. In fact, the PS3 went down a cliff after May this year. I'm sure the PS3 will get plenty of quality games next year, but lists are only nice when they interest you. And the PS3's list doesn't have many things that interest me.the games list for 2011.
theuncharted34
Wow PS3 wins best graphics 3 years straight:D
The problem with Metro is that its an unoptimised disaster (It even runs poorly on an i7 for pete's sake). It was clearly rushed to compete with Crysis on who can make the worst badly coded, graphic hungry mess the most.
Adamantium4k2
>Implying the processor has to do with 3d rendering
>Implying Metro 2033 didn't use an x-ray derived engine, which originated in the late 90s
>Implying Crysis is badly coded and not a techanical marvel
>Implying you aren't a fanatical cow who has never played either game
cool story bro
2011 hasn't started yet, and thus no stride has begun. In fact, the PS3 went down a cliff after May this year. I'm sure the PS3 will get plenty of quality games next year, but lists are only nice when they interest you. And the PS3's list doesn't have many things that interest me.[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]
the games list for 2011.
Stevo_the_gamer
what jalexbrown said.
EDIT: hooray for technicality's and taking things out of context. :P
[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Yeah, it totally should have gone to Gears of War 2 and Banjo instead of Crysis Warhead... Wait a minute.[QUOTE="theuncharted34"]
MGS 4 had great graphics. Still, It should have went to banjo nuts and bolts or gears of war 2.
jalexbrown
Now I'm confused, out of the loop and missed the out of context comment. Cruel, I'll say. Very Cruel!what jalexbrown said.
EDIT: hooray for technicality's and taking things out of context. :P
theuncharted34
Seriously? Besides Crysis, what looked so great in 2008 that made MGS4 have "some of the worst graphics of its time"?jalexbrown
it has nothing to do with what looked better. games can looked great and still have poor or mediocre graphics
uncharted, gears of war 2, HL2:ep2, far cry 2, STALKER clear skies, all had better graphics than MGS4. not to mention factually crysis warhead had the best graphics of that year.
MGS4 was a technical mess
poor static lighting
poor textures
sub hd resolution
poor shadows
poor AA
if they want to say it looked the best thats great thats their opinion. but to make a catagory called best graphics (which refers to techto begin with) technical, and give the award to a game that factually doesnt have the best graphics, but in reality has some of the worst? that insulting to gamers and anyone with an ounce of intelligence
I'm sure the PS3 will get plenty of quality games next year, but lists are only nice when they interest you. And the PS3's list doesn't have many things that interest me.
Stevo_the_gamer
Well what's coming for 360? Neither console has many games that interest me either, but I'd say Gears 3 is the only non-multiplat I'm aware of for 360 that I'll be getting for sure next year.
Funny part about first post is it implies 2033 is just a 1080p game :lol:
Try running it on a 25x16 Dell Ultra Sharp 30" monitor.
This site is a joke and pushes console games for the money. No way GoW3 compares to 2033 graphically...
They also think Demon's Souls is a better RPG than Dragon Age Origins.
Shoaka
If you're gonna knock the GotY Awards try not to make them look right in the future...
[QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]
I'm sure the PS3 will get plenty of quality games next year, but lists are only nice when they interest you. And the PS3's list doesn't have many things that interest me.
psn8214
Well what's coming for 360? Neither console has many games that interest me either, but I'd say Gears 3 is the only non-multiplat I'm aware of for 360 that I'll be getting for sure next year.
Nothing I'm interested in either.Demon's Souls was a better game than DA:O, however Dragon Age was probably a better RPG. But Demon's Souls still counts as an RPG, so therefore, it won the award.The whole awards are a joke, Red Dead Redemption has better writing and voice acting than Mass Effect 2?
I wouldn't take any awards seriously from this place. They also think Demon's Souls is a better RPG than Dragon Age Origins.
Shoaka
[QUOTE="jalexbrown"][QUOTE="Stevo_the_gamer"]Yeah, it totally should have gone to Gears of War 2 and Banjo instead of Crysis Warhead... Wait a minute.
demons souls is a good game but it hardly seems like a RPG to me and I am 22hrs in.The whole awards are a joke, Red Dead Redemption has better writing and voice acting than Mass Effect 2?
I wouldn't take any awards seriously from this place. They also think Demon's Souls is a better RPG than Dragon Age Origins.
Shoaka
agreed.. metro 2033 is amazing.. however i think because its on the 360 they left it out.. because it looks like crap on 360 compared to PC... i mean w/out pushing directx to its limits and using the physics engine, its just not the same, so i think thats why they just overlooked it..God of War III's graphics are JOKE, a laughing stock, compared to PC Metro 2033. How is PS3's 5 year old crappy graphics chip running at lame 720P resolutions going to compare with PC's with DX 11 HD 5700/5800/6800/6900/GTX 400/500 graphics chips running games @ FULL HD 1080P. I didn't realize that the PS3 was made of magic that it can somehow gererate better graphics then PC Metro 2033. God War III doesn't even have DX 11 effects, tesselation, the list goes on and on that it's quite pathetic. Goes to show Gamespot editors don't know JACK about graphics or either that they run all their games on Intel Integrated graphics. LOL. Metro 2033 pwns God War III in graphics that it's not even funny.
Yearly Best Awards used to have merit now it's a laughing stock. I remember back in the day when the best graphics actually won like PC's Unreal Tournament 2003 in the year 2002. Now it's just a sad joke. Any idiot with a half a brain can see that Metro 2033 is the 2ND best looking game in the world right now after Crysis. Gamespot editors are so much fail.
Xtasy26
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment