[QUOTE="VoodooHak"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"][QUOTE="VoodooHak"][QUOTE="shungokustasu"]If Home is stupid and has nothing to do with gaming, How do you feel about XBL?shungokustasu
I'm no fanboy, but I'll answer you anyway.
XBL still comes out on top because what it does related to gaming is still above more than what PSN brings to the table.
Even something as simple as a cross-game invite. XBL's is functional in that a press of a button and a disc swap and you'll be put into your friend's session. PSN's idea of game invite is a simple text message..... and that's it.
Then you have the idea of a community that's self regulating. With gamer zones, reps and feedback, you can directly affect matchmaking.
And for the times that need hands-on intervention, there is an active team of MS employees monitoring feedback to suspend or ban offiensive players.
On top of that you have the fact that XBL is a closed, secure gaming network.
Also consider the heavy community support MS offers to indie website developers. That's why we have things like our gamercards in our sigs and 360voice.com amongst other services. Not to mention their ambassador program where they invite community leaders from popular fan sites to join MS at trade shows and game premieres. And of course, you can't forget MS seems more connected to its community than Sony does.
How's that?
You wanna know how was that? Completely useless. Not one time you mention Home.
You asked what I thought of XBL, didn't you?
I just listed a bunch of things that XBL DOES do with gaming that PSN does not. Home doesn't help it come close.
Completely useless? Why? Because I made a point and you have no idea how to counter it? That seems likely.
PSN and PS Home are different...
Ok... and my point stands.
As I said, I just listed a bunch of game-related things that XBL can do that PSN can't. Guess what. PSHome can't do them either.
What does that mean?
XBL can do things that PSN + PSHome can't do.
Log in to comment