Wow. From reading all of these comments it seems like you guys could find the changes you're looking for by simply playing MAG, Battlefield: Bad Company 2, or Killzone 2.
Just sayin', that's all.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
if they are really going to make a third one, they need actually make a new engine.. (which, would take longer) or heavily modified the one they are using now. To everyone, but CoD fanboys (which is 85% of all CoD games...) MW2 is almost the same looking visually as MW.
Wow. From reading all of these comments it seems like you guys could find the changes you're looking for by simply playing MAG, Battlefield: Bad Company 2, or Killzone 2.
Just sayin', that's all.
Ryan_Som
Well I think some people get hooked on one brand one name and forget there are other titles out there that might fill their needs. This is one thing that hurts "single console gamers"
Unfortuntely the game will be almost exaclty like the previous games, they're not going to change it, but if they did this is what they should change:
1. No killstreaks (or maybe just one, not 3)
2. Less nooby or new engine
3. No stupid perks
p2250
I thought perks were a great idea.. They add a kind of customization and pre planning that seldom exists in other fps's.
[QUOTE="Ryan_Som"]
Wow. From reading all of these comments it seems like you guys could find the changes you're looking for by simply playing MAG, Battlefield: Bad Company 2, or Killzone 2.
Just sayin', that's all.
VanDammFan
Well I think some people get hooked on one brand one name and forget there are other titles out there that might fill their needs. This is one thing that hurts "single console gamers"
True. Even if you strip exclusives out of the equation, I still have to say that I feel with a great degree of certainty that Bad Company 2 will easily be better than MW2 and probably any upcoming COD game if they keep heading the direction they're going. Who knows. Maybe some of the other upcoming multiplatform offerings will negate the need for it as well. Brink is looking pretty good.
To total outlaw . The most idiotic talents ever OF RUNNIN CONSTATNLY AND USING THAT STUPID DOUBLE shotgun with Daggering everything in between !!!!
[QUOTE="p2250"]
Unfortuntely the game will be almost exaclty like the previous games, they're not going to change it, but if they did this is what they should change:
1. No killstreaks (or maybe just one, not 3)
2. Less nooby or new engine
3. No stupid perks
sSubZerOo
I thought perks were a great idea.. They add a kind of customization and pre planning that seldom exists in other fps's.
Weapon load outs that fit your playing sty|e should be enough of a perk.
Magic abilities like running silent, never running out of breath, reloading like the Flash, and jumping out of windows for no damage shouldn't exist in a "modern" "realistic" setting.
Or the infamous pull a grenade from my ass even though I threw the 3 I'm "allowed" to carry.
Perks, especially the ones in COD4, WAW, and MW2 are ****ing dumb as hell.
I want the OP kill streak rewards gone, or limited somehow. I want recoil. I want better maps. I'd like aim assist gone too. And I want a better net code, everything else is peachy.
1. A quality, well tested game prior to launch!!!
2. Perks need to be gone. You choose a class that fits your play style and you can open up different loadouts based on that. But to think that I can all of a sudden run 150 mph and never run out of breath seems a bit unrealistic to me!IW wants their series to be "realistic", then get rid of perks or atleast the ones that simply wouldnt ever possibly exist!
3. Killstreaks need to be reworked and toned down....Nuke=gone. Care packages should contain AC 130, Chopper Gunner or Pavelow. Anyone can get 4 kills in a row and to reword that with a devistating Chopper Gunner is just plain stupid! Yes I know its random, but still the option is stupid.
4. Better variety of maps. There needs to be a better balance of close quarters and large scale maps!
5. Destructible environments. Seriously, you're going to tell me that a Gnade isn't going to put a hole in that wall a sniper is hiding behind? BFBC 2 does this like it should be!!
6. Recoil on guns!!
7. Killcam = GONE
8. Did I mention having a beta period for quality control!!!
More of the same.
That way, when people will get bored, they will finally realize that I was right about the MW games all along.
Hell, freaking CoD3 had that feature...there's no reason to not have it again.All I want is for 2 or 4 people on one console to be able to go online together. I would like COD MW 2 so much more if they had that in it, they have it in Halo 3 and it is insanely fun.
fabz_95
[QUOTE="dakan45"]Yup i want a mw3 not a cod vietnam. What i want is a game wtih the IW quality and story just like cod4 and mw2 and not a waw treyarch style cheap rip off.Verge_6Accusing the Treyarch games of being ripoffs and praising IW's MW2...that's rich.
I hate when people do that. Call of Duty has been copied and pasted since CoD 2. It's just now it has "modern" paint. It's exactly the damn same. I remember seeing users post about how they hate the WW2 weapons because they are "old and rusty." :| Well those "old and rusty" guns function EXACTLY the same as the modern ones. You have your submachine guns, your heavy machines guns, your pistols, your shotguns. They're all behaving in exactly the same way.
Accusing the Treyarch games of being ripoffs and praising IW's MW2...that's rich.[QUOTE="Verge_6"][QUOTE="dakan45"]Yup i want a mw3 not a cod vietnam. What i want is a game wtih the IW quality and story just like cod4 and mw2 and not a waw treyarch style cheap rip off.organic_machine
I hate when people do that. Call of Duty has been copied and pasted since CoD 2. It's just now it has "modern" paint. It's exactly the damn same. I remember seeing users post about how they hate the WW2 weapons because they are "old and rusty." :| Well those "old and rusty" guns function EXACTLY the same as the modern ones. You have your submachine guns, your heavy machines guns, your pistols, your shotguns. They're all behaving in exactly the same way.
This assuming that CoD titles in the first place aren't rehashes from one another.
Longer/more believeable campaign, and better online maps. Seriously, maps like Derail and Estate are so imbalanced, whoever holds the central houses wins. That, and to remove akimbos. The Model 1887 akimbo, even after being nerfed, is still overpowered.
It's coming this Fall soo.... I wouldn't change anything,i liked it as it is.For it to not exist.
powerman91
I want my money back for mw2 that's what I want... Oh wait I already did that. Traded that piece of halo generation crap back to the store and bought real fps games bioshock 2 and Stalker:cop --- games that focus more on the single player and less on "pawnin nubz." If anything I am more looking forward to Treyarchs game as Waw was a great game. If they do a Vietnam game i will be happy. I don't want another modern shooter. modern crap is boring imo. Give me either history or futuristic...imo.I don't think that COD 7 or ( the vietnam one ) will nessesarily reinvent the wheel of COD, but MW3 could certainly, but my question is what do you want from it because MW2 has pretty much everything satisfied for me..
Megaman5364
I want it to sell even more and be even more nooby, and unbalanced. I want Kotick to brag to everyone about how amazing it is even though he sold it 20$ above the average price, or it had subscription. Why? Because it's funny to hear SWs reaction. CoD isn't as bad as peope make it.
+1+2(I'm with you guys).[QUOTE="ferret-gamer"][QUOTE="siLVURcross"]I DON'T want it.mitu123
Agreed. After the crap that was MW2, I have no interest any more COD games made by IW. For a new 'modern warfare' game, I'm hoping MOH and BC2 will be much better (BC2 already is judging from the beta).
Oh yeah and midnightshade, you basically just described Stalker lol.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment