What does Halo 3 have over Crysis besides its on 360??

topic.

cant sleep now... amuse me guys:lol:

topic.

cant sleep now... amuse me guys:lol:

WatsonC

It can run on every 360? Seems viable since 80% of the PC's on the market probably will have trouble running Crysis on Max settings.

Other then that, Sales. I'd wait for both to release to really compare them as games...otherwise you're just shooting in the dark.

[QUOTE="WatsonC"]

topic.

cant sleep now... amuse me guys:lol:

rybe1025

[QUOTE="WatsonC"]

topic.

cant sleep now... amuse me guys:lol:

rybe1025

That it is better in everything except sales and hype.

I can run it at max settings? sorry, got nothing.myke2010

hahahaha:lol: good one

[QUOTE="rybe1025"][QUOTE="WatsonC"]

topic.

cant sleep now... amuse me guys:lol:

JJ_1

That it is better in everything except sales and hype.

[QUOTE="WatsonC"]

topic.

cant sleep now... amuse me guys:lol:

rybe1025

[QUOTE="rybe1025"][QUOTE="WatsonC"]

topic.

cant sleep now... amuse me guys:lol:

Infinatey

A million pre orders and a proven developer.TemplaerDude

Problems with your post: Crytek is an extremely proven and respected developer.

[QUOTE="TemplaerDude"]A million pre orders and a proven developer.Redfingers

Problems with your post: Crytek is an extremely proven and respected developer.

Crytek is an 8 year old developer with one game released that, according to some people, was nothing more than a tech demo for a fancy graphics engine.

[QUOTE="Redfingers"]

[QUOTE="TemplaerDude"]A million pre orders and a proven developer.TemplaerDude

Problems with your post: Crytek is an extremely proven and respected developer.

Crytek is an 8 year old developer with one game released that, according to some people, was nothing more than a tech demo for a fancy graphics engine.

Does 9.2 mean anything to you?

I think Halo is an awful game, and so do some other people. Does that mean Bungie is an unproven developer?

[QUOTE="TemplaerDude"][QUOTE="Redfingers"]

[QUOTE="TemplaerDude"]A million pre orders and a proven developer.Redfingers

Problems with your post: Crytek is an extremely proven and respected developer.

Crytek is an 8 year old developer with one game released that, according to some people, was nothing more than a tech demo for a fancy graphics engine.

Does 9.2 mean anything to you?

I think Halo is an awful game, and so do some other people. Does that mean Bungie is an unproven developer?

You would have a point if Halo had been the only game Bungie has made. Bungie has developed 3 very acclaimed series of games and has proven that is capable of creating excellent game after excellent game.

Crytek has Far Cry which is a good game to some and a tech demo to some. It has proven nothing other than engine building capabilities.

This isn't an observation of Crysis; Crysis could be an excellent game and would prove Cryteks development prowess. But right now they riding on the wave of a single disputed game. That is proves they are neither a storied developer or a particularily good one.

[QUOTE="TemplaerDude"][QUOTE="Redfingers"]

[QUOTE="TemplaerDude"]A million pre orders and a proven developer.Redfingers

Problems with your post: Crytek is an extremely proven and respected developer.

Crytek is an 8 year old developer with one game released that, according to some people, was nothing more than a tech demo for a fancy graphics engine.

Does 9.2 mean anything to you?

I think Halo is an awful game, and so do some other people. Does that mean Bungie is an unproven developer?

Does 9.7 and 9.4 mean anything to you?

[QUOTE="Redfingers"][QUOTE="TemplaerDude"][QUOTE="Redfingers"]

[QUOTE="TemplaerDude"]A million pre orders and a proven developer.user_nat

Problems with your post: Crytek is an extremely proven and respected developer.

Crytek is an 8 year old developer with one game released that, according to some people, was nothing more than a tech demo for a fancy graphics engine.

Does 9.2 mean anything to you?

I think Halo is an awful game, and so do some other people. Does that mean Bungie is an unproven developer?

Does 9.7 and 9.4 mean anything to you?

No. How about 7.0?

Yeah, FYI, Templaer, Bungie is extremely disputed. Practically the only game completely immune from dispute is Marathon.

Far Cry still scored well at most publications and so did it's Xbox port. I see that as a vote of confidence, whereas I see the port of Halo 2 Vista as a vote of no confidence.

[QUOTE="rybe1025"][QUOTE="WatsonC"]

topic.

cant sleep now... amuse me guys:lol:

Dualshockin

Show me a video to that innovative gameplay, Bioshock looks WAY better and its not even THAT innovative.

um lets see... a vide and picture recording system, 4 player online coop, 4 player local split screen multiplayer for use with lan parties... I only play video games with my friends online... wouldnt be caught dead playing crysis at home alone.

topic.

cant sleep now... amuse me guys:lol:

WatsonC

um lets see... a vide and picture recording system, 4 player online coop, 4 player local split screen multiplayer for use with lan parties... I only play video games with my friends online... wouldnt be caught dead playing crysis at home alone.

[QUOTE="WatsonC"]

topic.

cant sleep now... amuse me guys:lol:

Bdking57

Does Crysis have Co-op (serious question, I'm not sure)?TyrantDragon55

Does Crysis have Co-op (serious question, I'm not sure)?TyrantDragon55

Far Cry had 4 player co-op onine (sp story), or you could play the Assualt co-op mod, with up to 16 mates I think.

[QUOTE="user_nat"][QUOTE="Redfingers"][QUOTE="TemplaerDude"][QUOTE="Redfingers"]

[QUOTE="TemplaerDude"]A million pre orders and a proven developer.Redfingers

Problems with your post: Crytek is an extremely proven and respected developer.

Crytek is an 8 year old developer with one game released that, according to some people, was nothing more than a tech demo for a fancy graphics engine.

Does 9.2 mean anything to you?

I think Halo is an awful game, and so do some other people. Does that mean Bungie is an unproven developer?

Does 9.7 and 9.4 mean anything to you?

No. How about 7.0?

Yeah, FYI, Templaer, Bungie is extremely disputed. Practically the only game completely immune from dispute is Marathon.

Far Cry still scored well at most publications and so did it's Xbox port. I see that as a vote of confidence, whereas I see the port of Halo 2 Vista as a vote of no confidence.

Halo

xbox:

Halo CE 9.7

Halo 2 9.4

PC:

Halo CE 9.0

Halo 2 7.0

Average: 8.775

Far Cry

PC: 9.2

Instincts (xbox): 9.2

Evolution (xbox): 8.0

Predator (360): 7.9

Vengeance (Wii): 5.5

Average: 7.96

And notice how both Far Cry and Halo 2 got lower scores when rated against higher standards? (Halo 2 - PC, Far Cry - 360)

And Bungie did not port Halo 2 to pc and Crytek did not port Far Cry to anything either.

So I would say that so far.. Halo has proven itself to be better, however Crysis definently could change that.

notice how both Far Cry and Halo 2 got lower scores when rated against higher standards? (Halo 2 - PC, Far Cry - 360) user_nat

so your supporting the fact that crysis is a garbage half game that the developers didnt even finish and need others to finish their work... when I speak of party, I mean a real part with your friends in real life... in the same room, not a computer geeks online friends.

I wanna know if this game is so great.. how come on top of the line everything PCs at E3 it wouldnt even run correctly? You people are dreaming thinking your gonna make this game for under $1200 at launch. Crytek couldnt even do it on their own game!.. let not forget, it failed against COD4 and bioshock for best graphics or best PC game.

[QUOTE="Bdking57"]

um lets see... a vide and picture recording system, 4 player online coop, 4 player local split screen multiplayer for use with lan parties... I only play video games with my friends online... wouldnt be caught dead playing crysis at home alone.

[QUOTE="WatsonC"]

topic.

cant sleep now... amuse me guys:lol:

Vandalvideo

[QUOTE="user_nat"]notice how both Far Cry and Halo 2 got lower scores when rated against higher standards? (Halo 2 - PC, Far Cry - 360) Vandalvideo

True.

But whats to say that if Halo 2 wasn't a striaght port and actually was update in say graphics (more then it was), that it wouldn't have scored higher? But honestly we don't know.

so your supporting the fact that crysis is a garbage half game that the developers didnt even finish and need others to finish their work... when I speak of party, I mean a real part with your friends in real life... in the same room, not a computer geeks online friends.I wanna know if this game is so great.. how come on top of the line everything PCs at E3 it wouldnt even run correctly? You people are dreaming thinking your gonna make this game for under $1200 at launch. Crytek couldnt even do it on their own game!.. let not forget, it failed against COD4 and bioshock for best graphics or best PC game Bdking57

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="user_nat"]notice how both Far Cry and Halo 2 got lower scores when rated against higher standards? (Halo 2 - PC, Far Cry - 360) user_nat

True.

But whats to say that if Halo 2 wasn't a striaght port and actually was update in say graphics (more then it was), that it wouldn't have scored higher? But honestly we don't know.

[QUOTE="user_nat"]

[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="user_nat"]notice how both Far Cry and Halo 2 got lower scores when rated against higher standards? (Halo 2 - PC, Far Cry - 360) Vandalvideo

True.

But whats to say that if Halo 2 wasn't a striaght port and actually was update in say graphics (more then it was), that it wouldn't have scored higher? But honestly we don't know.

It literally changed a few textures.. not exactly a new game. Wasn't really all that different over Halo 2 on the 360.

It literally changed a few textures.. not exactly a new game. Wasn't really all that different over Halo 2 on the 360. user_nat

It can run on every 360? Seems viable since 80% of the PC's on the market probably will have trouble running Crysis on Max settings.

Other then that, Sales. I'd wait for both to release to really compare them as games...otherwise you're just shooting in the dark.

Puckhog04

I'd say that less than 1% of PCs will be able to run Crysis on Max settings, and I wouldn't be wrong.

But it was a substantial improvement that should have upped the score, instead of lowering it. :oVandalvideo

3 years later a small change is not going to improve a score. And even I acknowledge that PC standards are higher, because PC shooters are better (which doesn't make sense, seeing as Halo is my favorite shooter..). Anyhow this is going off topic :P