What FPS does the 360 have to counter Resistance 2?

  • 95 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for TMontana1004
TMontana1004

4537

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#51 TMontana1004
Member since 2007 • 4537 Posts
Every amazing FPS it got last year. It doesn't need anymore FPS games atm.
Avatar image for Zoso-8
Zoso-8

2047

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Zoso-8
Member since 2008 • 2047 Posts
Gears 2 will be good, but how many people can play in an online game again? :lol:
Avatar image for heretrix
heretrix

37881

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#53 heretrix
Member since 2004 • 37881 Posts

Gears 2 will be good, but how many people can play in an online game again? :lol:Zoso-8

More players doesn't make it better. It didn't help Resistance did it?

Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

Gears 2 will be good, but how many people can play in an online game again? :lol:Zoso-8

Gears of War with 8 player multi and winning GOTY over RFOM and its 40 players tell you a games quality isn't about its massive numbers of players. Its what you can accomplish with them.

Avatar image for dday2121
dday2121

1000

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 dday2121
Member since 2007 • 1000 Posts
Brothers In Arms : Hells Highway
Avatar image for bigevil_rashek
bigevil_rashek

882

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#56 bigevil_rashek
Member since 2006 • 882 Posts

the 360 doesnt need a game, it already has one, its called halo 3, and its going to be a hell of a long time till a console fps beats it.

as for your silly "no system sellers" comment , the 360 has a ton load, i know loads of people who are buying the console when fable 2 comes out, gears 2? red alert 3? infinite undiscovery? left for dead? too human? banjo 3?

infact quite a few people have come and brought a 360 from my shop over the past week just for ninja gaiden 2

scottiescott238

Are you kidding me? Halo 3 is a crappy game that looks like a cartoon. Even resistance 1 is better looking than halo 3. So far there isn't any exclusive FPS game on the 360 this year so people will be looking on the PS3 for FPSD action. And this is going to increase even more when killzone 2(the best graphical game on consoles) hits, which is going to push even more consoles as it has no competition, let alone any game that can compare with its graphics and animations on the 360.

Avatar image for xXHackettXx
xXHackettXx

3560

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#57 xXHackettXx
Member since 2006 • 3560 Posts
Yeah PS3 still doesnt have an exclusive FPS to counter Halo 3.
Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#58 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
It might sound silly, but i'm not expecting Resistance 2 to be of COD4 or Halo 3 quality... so you could argue that it doesn't even need countering.
Avatar image for wallpaper42
wallpaper42

4127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 wallpaper42
Member since 2005 • 4127 Posts
I don't think the 360 can handle a 40 player online FPS, let alone a 60 player online one... Hooray XBL?
Avatar image for george999819
george999819

413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 george999819
Member since 2007 • 413 Posts

I don't think the 360 can handle a 40 player online FPS, let alone a 60 player online one... Hooray XBL?wallpaper42

I guess that's just like how the PS3 can't manage to run any multiplatform game anywhere near as well as the 360.

Avatar image for ogvampire
ogvampire

9210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 ogvampire
Member since 2008 • 9210 Posts
[QUOTE="scottiescott238"]

the 360 doesnt need a game, it already has one, its called halo 3, and its going to be a hell of a long time till a console fps beats it.

as for your silly "no system sellers" comment , the 360 has a ton load, i know loads of people who are buying the console when fable 2 comes out, gears 2? red alert 3? infinite undiscovery? left for dead? too human? banjo 3?

infact quite a few people have come and brought a 360 from my shop over the past week just for ninja gaiden 2

bigevil_rashek

Are you kidding me? Halo 3 is a crappy game that looks like a cartoon. Even resistance 1 is better looking than halo 3. So far there isn't any exclusive FPS game on the 360 this year so people will be looking on the PS3 for FPSD action. And this is going to increase even more when killzone 2(the best graphical game on consoles) hits, which is going to push even more consoles as it has no competition, let alone any game that can compare with its graphics and animations on the 360.

please tell me you are being sarcastic :|

Avatar image for Floppy_Jim
Floppy_Jim

25933

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#62 Floppy_Jim
Member since 2007 • 25933 Posts

I don't think the 360 can handle a 40 player online FPS, let alone a 60 player online one... Hooray XBL?wallpaper42

I think Frontlines had 50 players but apparently it sucked.

Avatar image for cosmostein77
cosmostein77

7043

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 102

User Lists: 0

#63 cosmostein77
Member since 2004 • 7043 Posts
If I am going to play a shooter, I would opt for Gears II over Resistance II
Avatar image for TheRealMC01
TheRealMC01

995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 TheRealMC01
Member since 2007 • 995 Posts

I don't think the 360 can handle a 40 player online FPS, let alone a 60 player online one... Hooray XBL?wallpaper42

But how about 100 vs. 100?

http://www.xbox360fanboy.com/2006/05/06/cross-platform-huxley-to-support-100-vs-100-battles/

Avatar image for wallpaper42
wallpaper42

4127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 wallpaper42
Member since 2005 • 4127 Posts

[QUOTE="wallpaper42"]I don't think the 360 can handle a 40 player online FPS, let alone a 60 player online one... Hooray XBL?Floppy_Jim

I think Frontlines had 50 players but apparently it sucked.

It had 32

Avatar image for wallpaper42
wallpaper42

4127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 wallpaper42
Member since 2005 • 4127 Posts

[QUOTE="wallpaper42"]I don't think the 360 can handle a 40 player online FPS, let alone a 60 player online one... Hooray XBL?TheRealMC01

But how about 100 vs. 100?

http://www.xbox360fanboy.com/2006/05/06/cross-platform-huxley-to-support-100-vs-100-battles/

Oh yeah, forgot all about Huxley. I guess I'll believe that when the game comes out.

Avatar image for Disturbed_One98
Disturbed_One98

1171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Disturbed_One98
Member since 2006 • 1171 Posts
Left 4 Dead, Huxley, Postal III and possibly Quake Arena Arcade are some exciting ones to look out for. I'm sure there will be a blockbuster FPS announced at E3 though.
Avatar image for mtron32
mtron32

4450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#68 mtron32
Member since 2006 • 4450 Posts

[QUOTE="wallpaper42"]I don't think the 360 can handle a 40 player online FPS, let alone a 60 player online one... Hooray XBL?Floppy_Jim

I think Frontlines had 50 players but apparently it sucked.

60 player online isnt a plus. Do you really have 29 friends you can forma team with that all have headsets and copies of the game and are on at the same time you are? 5 on 5 is enough

Avatar image for death919
death919

4724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 92

User Lists: 0

#69 death919
Member since 2004 • 4724 Posts

If Gears of War 2 cannot be considered a system seller than neither can Resistance 2.

BTW the first Resistance I didn't like, I downloaded the demo and wasn't too impressed, I will not be purchasinig Resistance 2 this holiday season.

Avatar image for TheRealMC01
TheRealMC01

995

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 TheRealMC01
Member since 2007 • 995 Posts

And you can say "what does X have to counter X?" for just about anything. Like what 3rd person shooter does the ps3 have to counter GeoW 2? Or what platformer can counter Banjo 3? Or what RPG can counter Fable 2?

Just because the 360 doesn't have any FPS (and we can't be sure of that yet) being released at the exact moment that Resistence 2 is, doesn't mean that Halo 3 and past FPS games don't count. It's because of huge games like Halo 3 that the 360 is seen as mainly a FPS console.

Avatar image for wallpaper42
wallpaper42

4127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 wallpaper42
Member since 2005 • 4127 Posts
[QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]

[QUOTE="wallpaper42"]I don't think the 360 can handle a 40 player online FPS, let alone a 60 player online one... Hooray XBL?mtron32

I think Frontlines had 50 players but apparently it sucked.

60 player online isnt a plus. Do you really have 29 friends you can forma team with that all have headsets and copies of the game and are on at the same time you are? 5 on 5 is enough

Why does your team have to only be your friends? I just like huge maps and massive battles. But I guess 60 player online wouldn't be very awesome for XBL unless you mute the voice recieve volume. There would probably be at least 15 children on your team screaming profanity at the top of their lungs.

Avatar image for thegoldenpoo
thegoldenpoo

5136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#72 thegoldenpoo
Member since 2005 • 5136 Posts
oh just Gears of War 2. nothing major.....
Avatar image for EuroMafia
EuroMafia

7026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#73 EuroMafia
Member since 2008 • 7026 Posts
Question is qhat does PS3 have to answer Halo 3. And it's not Resistance 2.
Avatar image for karram
karram

1682

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 karram
Member since 2006 • 1682 Posts
Gears 2 will be good, but how many people can play in an online game again? :lol:Zoso-8
Having more players online doesn't mean its better.
Avatar image for wallpaper42
wallpaper42

4127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 wallpaper42
Member since 2005 • 4127 Posts

[QUOTE="Zoso-8"]Gears 2 will be good, but how many people can play in an online game again? :lol:ma7moud93
Having more players online doesn't mean its better.

Well it sure makes it a hell of a lot better.

Avatar image for thegoldenpoo
thegoldenpoo

5136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#76 thegoldenpoo
Member since 2005 • 5136 Posts

[QUOTE="ma7moud93"][QUOTE="Zoso-8"]Gears 2 will be good, but how many people can play in an online game again? :lol:wallpaper42

Having more players online doesn't mean its better.

Well it sure makes it a hell of a lot better.

it obviously dosen't, more does not = better. it = more. was the first resistance better than all other games with less players online like CoD4, halo3 and GeoW? no? then its not better!

Avatar image for ogvampire
ogvampire

9210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 ogvampire
Member since 2008 • 9210 Posts

[QUOTE="ma7moud93"][QUOTE="Zoso-8"]Gears 2 will be good, but how many people can play in an online game again? :lol:wallpaper42

Having more players online doesn't mean its better.

Well it sure makes it a hell of a lot better.

'better' is still just opinion.

thats like saying that in the game of Tennis, 2v2 is better than 1v1 cause there's more people. sorry, but that sounds stupid.

Avatar image for mtron32
mtron32

4450

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#78 mtron32
Member since 2006 • 4450 Posts
[QUOTE="mtron32"][QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]

[QUOTE="wallpaper42"]I don't think the 360 can handle a 40 player online FPS, let alone a 60 player online one... Hooray XBL?wallpaper42

I think Frontlines had 50 players but apparently it sucked.

60 player online isnt a plus. Do you really have 29 friends you can forma team with that all have headsets and copies of the game and are on at the same time you are? 5 on 5 is enough

Why does your team have to only be your friends? I just like huge maps and massive battles. But I guess 60 player online wouldn't be very awesome for XBL unless you mute the voice recieve volume. There would probably be at least 15 children on your team screaming profanity at the top of their lungs.

precisely my point, and why play a team game if you CANT hear your teamates? Massive battles are fun for about 10 minutes and then its just silliness, getting killed seconds after you spawn is never fun even if you're really good. Also, I never play team games with strangers, only with my friends otherwise, whats the point?

Avatar image for CreepyBacon
CreepyBacon

3183

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#79 CreepyBacon
Member since 2005 • 3183 Posts

[QUOTE="ma7moud93"][QUOTE="Zoso-8"]Gears 2 will be good, but how many people can play in an online game again? :lol:wallpaper42

Having more players online doesn't mean its better.

Well it sure makes it a hell of a lot better.

And yet gears of war is the more popular game and has the larger online community, even after all this time. I suppose that doesn't matter because your opinion is right huh?

The 360 needs no FPS, gears 2 will do what Gears 1 did and steal the spotlight, Sonys about a year late to the FPS party.

Avatar image for wallpaper42
wallpaper42

4127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 wallpaper42
Member since 2005 • 4127 Posts
[QUOTE="wallpaper42"]

[QUOTE="ma7moud93"][QUOTE="Zoso-8"]Gears 2 will be good, but how many people can play in an online game again? :lol:CreepyBacon

Having more players online doesn't mean its better.

Well it sure makes it a hell of a lot better.

And yet gears of war is the more popular game and has the larger online community, even after all this time. I suppose that doesn't matter because your opinion is right huh?

The 360 needs no FPS, gears 2 will do what Gears 1 did and steal the spotlight, Sonys about a year late to the FPS party.

I didn't mean that the number of players online was the only thing that mattered to rating how good a game is. But it is definitely a factor. Don't you think Gears would be more fun if the online supported more than 8 players?! And if it had some larger maps so that it wasn't complete chaos, but still more intense and hectic?!

Avatar image for ogvampire
ogvampire

9210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 ogvampire
Member since 2008 • 9210 Posts
[QUOTE="CreepyBacon"][QUOTE="wallpaper42"]

[QUOTE="ma7moud93"][QUOTE="Zoso-8"]Gears 2 will be good, but how many people can play in an online game again? :lol:wallpaper42

Having more players online doesn't mean its better.

Well it sure makes it a hell of a lot better.

And yet gears of war is the more popular game and has the larger online community, even after all this time. I suppose that doesn't matter because your opinion is right huh?

The 360 needs no FPS, gears 2 will do what Gears 1 did and steal the spotlight, Sonys about a year late to the FPS party.

I didn't mean that the number of players online was the only thing that mattered to rating how good a game is. But it is definitely a factor. Don't you think Gears would be more fun if the online supported more than 8 players?! And if it had some larger maps so that it wasn't complete chaos, but still more intense and hectic?!

have you played Gears?

cause if you have, you would know its not that type of game

Avatar image for wallpaper42
wallpaper42

4127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 wallpaper42
Member since 2005 • 4127 Posts
[QUOTE="wallpaper42"][QUOTE="mtron32"][QUOTE="Floppy_Jim"]

[QUOTE="wallpaper42"]I don't think the 360 can handle a 40 player online FPS, let alone a 60 player online one... Hooray XBL?mtron32

I think Frontlines had 50 players but apparently it sucked.

60 player online isnt a plus. Do you really have 29 friends you can forma team with that all have headsets and copies of the game and are on at the same time you are? 5 on 5 is enough

Why does your team have to only be your friends? I just like huge maps and massive battles. But I guess 60 player online wouldn't be very awesome for XBL unless you mute the voice recieve volume. There would probably be at least 15 children on your team screaming profanity at the top of their lungs.

precisely my point, and why play a team game if you CANT hear your teamates?Massive battles are fun for about 10 minutes and then its just silliness, getting killed seconds after you spawn is never fun even if you're really good.Also, I never play team games with strangers, only with my friends otherwise, whats the point?

Why do you need to hear your teammates to have fun?

Not if the maps are large.

The convenience of playing against other humans without having to wait for your friends and meeting people on the game.

Avatar image for istreakforfood
istreakforfood

7781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#83 istreakforfood
Member since 2004 • 7781 Posts
[QUOTE="CreepyBacon"][QUOTE="wallpaper42"]

[QUOTE="ma7moud93"][QUOTE="Zoso-8"]Gears 2 will be good, but how many people can play in an online game again? :lol:wallpaper42

Having more players online doesn't mean its better.

Well it sure makes it a hell of a lot better.

And yet gears of war is the more popular game and has the larger online community, even after all this time. I suppose that doesn't matter because your opinion is right huh?

The 360 needs no FPS, gears 2 will do what Gears 1 did and steal the spotlight, Sonys about a year late to the FPS party.

I didn't mean that the number of players online was the only thing that mattered to rating how good a game is. But it is definitely a factor. Don't you think Gears would be more fun if the online supported more than 8 players?! And if it had some larger maps so that it wasn't complete chaos, but still more intense and hectic?!

One of the things what I noticed about big team games it's harder to work as a team especially with random player. Communication will not always be there and with the mechanics of gears I think having minimal of 8-10 players is perfect.

Avatar image for insanewolfninja
insanewolfninja

4919

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#84 insanewolfninja
Member since 2005 • 4919 Posts
Gears 2.
Avatar image for istreakforfood
istreakforfood

7781

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#85 istreakforfood
Member since 2004 • 7781 Posts

Why do you need to hear your teammates to have fun?

Not if the maps are large.

The convenience of playing against other humans without having to wait for your friends and meeting people on the game.

wallpaper42

I rather play team games where I can work as a team with others even with strangers. I use to do this a lot, but I haven't in a while. In gears and RSV when playing team games I would be scout and tell my other teamates where I died or tell them what the other team is doing if I was able to spot them.

Even in some big team games it is better to be organized and personally I prefer people that talk. Example when playing Ground War in COD4 when playing Domination a game type where you have to capture the points and try to hold against the opposing team instead of trying to get the most kills. The team that is able to communicate and work as a team will do better than the team where there is no communication.

Avatar image for Coyo7e
Coyo7e

3672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 Coyo7e
Member since 2005 • 3672 Posts

Left 4 Dead this year and Bioshock 2 next year. I doubt either game will be as good as Resistance 2, but we'll see.

Edit: Are you pulling a PS_John? It looks like you own a 360 but all you ever do is criticise it.

Floppy_Jim

Resistance 2 looks really cool, I will buy it. However, I also think Resistance FOM is really over rated. I think the only reason it got so much attention is because, especially at the time, there are so few good game worth mentioning on the ps3.

Aside from the fact that the 360 is getting Left4Dead from Valve. A shooter that has been in development for at least a few years now. It shares the game with the PC but even if it's not a system seller I am anticipating that a lot.

I will buy it for both platforms but the 360 first. Just because I have a few friends who do not PC game that I want to co-op the game with.

But Gears and Fable could both sell 360's. There may be more then a few PC gamers who love gears, or really want to test the Fable hype, that do not feel like waiting for PC ports. Especially if there is a price drop.

'

Avatar image for VladTheImpaler
VladTheImpaler

1028

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 VladTheImpaler
Member since 2005 • 1028 Posts
The 1st resistance was nothing speacial, and I am not really looking forward to the second one. I was hyping the 1st one big time. I think it has a great plot and it looked promising. Well then I played it. It does not suck, but it was just. Meh.
Avatar image for gamer620
gamer620

3367

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 gamer620
Member since 2004 • 3367 Posts
Why do you need to hear your teammates to have fun?

wallpaper42

You should play a game of TF2 once on a team with players with out headsets and once on a team of players with headsets. You will end up having a lot more fun AND winning(or atleast keeping it close) Ive played CAL games in TF2 with a close group of friends on Vent and then playing in Pubs with people you dont know, and who never talk. its a different game. Pubs are so retarded that they sap the fun out of the game for me, unless there are people I know in it.

This goes for any team based mode for any game, minus Team Deathmatch. You need no coordination for Team Deathmatch. But seriously, you should try playing TF2 or Enemy Territory, or any real team based game play mode like CTF both with and without players with headsets, and you tell me which is more enjoyable.

Avatar image for wittinator
wittinator

217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#89 wittinator
Member since 2007 • 217 Posts
[QUOTE="-GhostMLD-"]

And again, Gears will smack around resistence like the little ***** it is.

-GhostMLD-

I didnt say R2 is garbage.

Rofl...you must have some sort of mental Handicap...

Avatar image for Vaasman
Vaasman

15879

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#90 Vaasman
Member since 2008 • 15879 Posts
Halo 3 counters resistance 1 and probably 2 at the same time, plus you act like gears won't do the trick. It's not exactly the same genre but it's close enough.
Avatar image for glitchgeeman
glitchgeeman

5638

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#91 glitchgeeman
Member since 2005 • 5638 Posts
Gears 2 is not a FPS, but you can be certain that the two will be compared when they're released, and I can also be certain that Gears 2 will trample Resistance 2 easily. Besides, I'm pretty sure the 360 is already called "the shooter console" so I really don't see why the 360 would need even more shooters then it already has.
Avatar image for matisrock
matisrock

679

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#92 matisrock
Member since 2007 • 679 Posts

Wow, really?

I don't even own a 360, but I thought of Gears of War 2 the second I saw the thread name.

Avatar image for lawlessx
lawlessx

48753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#93 lawlessx
Member since 2004 • 48753 Posts

so...the 360 NEEDS to have an FPS game to counter Resistance 2?

does the ps3 have an RPG to counter the 360's 360 lineup this year?

Avatar image for patrickjw333
patrickjw333

809

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 patrickjw333
Member since 2004 • 809 Posts

You can move 3 million of the sales Halo 3 achieved last year into 08 to counter resistence 2.

dont worry, Halo can spare the sales.

-GhostMLD-

yea and the system was still outsold last year by the ps3 with has ( according to lems ) absolutley no good games. :lol:

nice try buddee

Avatar image for Coyo7e
Coyo7e

3672

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 Coyo7e
Member since 2005 • 3672 Posts
[QUOTE="-GhostMLD-"]

You can move 3 million of the sales Halo 3 achieved last year into 08 to counter resistence 2.

dont worry, Halo can spare the sales.

patrickjw333

yea and the system was still outsold last year by the ps3 with has ( according to lems ) absolutley no good games. :lol:

nice try buddee

It makes sense to me that a system in its first year will see more sales then a system in it's second year. The 360 being released a year early will also peak sooner then a system released a year later.

MGS4 will see a big spike in sales for the system ( I think but do not know obviously) as gamers who were holding out for a reason to get he system will now do so.

But even with such a great game hitting the system as an exclusive it does not deserve to pass the 360 in sales. The 360 line up over all still stomps the ps3. If games like Fable 2 and Gears 2 live up to the hype these glory days will soon be forgotten,