@mrbojangles25 said:
I would argue most game series beyond five installments probably started off well enough but devolved into "cash cow" status.
Assassin's Creed, Far Cry, Call of Duty, Battlefield, and so on.
There might still be a bit oBf magic left and they obviously sell well enough, but to say they are still interesting games would be misguided I think.
Yep, totally agree with these.
Not so much with Assassin's Creed, think it was basically bad from the start and had a more competent sequel that is really, very overrated.
Far Cry is more interesting, I love the first game, has some shit sections but it's proto-Crysis. Far Cry 2, lots of great ideas, poorly executed. Far Cry 3, far less ambitious, actually fun compared to 2.
Then, usual Ubisoft spam it until you dislike it.
Call Of Duty and Battlefield first 1-2 entries felt mind-blowing at the time, though still hugely popular can see a lot of the original players such as myself just fed up with them.
A lot of it as well is just, the shady as **** business practices. Feels less like games and more like watching people partake in a Activision/EAs pyramid schemes.
Fear/Crysis also come to mind as great franchises that almost immediately became "meh".
Both Fear 2 and Crysis 2 are practically reboots for consoles. They were (perhaps understandably) after bigger $$$, but that didn't bode well for the actual gameplay.
Log in to comment