This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="EggHeadMan"]how do you know critics arent good enough at fighting games? :? ...Seriously? not really the answer I was expecting[QUOTE="DarkLink77"] If you're not going to provide an argument other than "B-b-but teh critics liked it!" you might as well not bother. Most critics aren't good enough at fighting games to determine whether or not they're competitive games.DarkLink77
...Seriously? not really the answer I was expecting I would think the answer to that question would have been obvious to anyone who thought about it.[QUOTE="DarkLink77"][QUOTE="EggHeadMan"] how do you know critics arent good enough at fighting games? :?
EggHeadMan
Guys, L4D 2 is completely unrealistic in terms of blood and gore. You want realism? The first Soldier of Fortune.
I'd probably say Left 4 Dead 2 or Dead Rising, zombie games tend to have a little more research in them for that stuff, though it is odd they'd be so weak a single guitar hit can decapitate (in both games).If a guitar could decapitate a human I'd agree, but Zombies are rotten, and perhaps quite soft.. L4D2 is probably the game that makes bodies break in the most realistic fashion I've seen. Other than that, Soldier of Fortune crossed my mind. Old game, and I don't really remember how it looked, but I remember having lots of fun breaking bodies in that one.SPYDER0416
World at War's was really great. I remember in one of the missions picking up an LMG and hip firing it into a crowd of Japanese soldiers, it was pretty insane seeing legs and heads just coming off. Mortal Kombat's is definitely the most in depth and could be the most realistic except that they obviously wanted to make their kills over the top. Left 4 Dead 2's is also ridiculously detailed and there's tons of stuff that you can blow off the zombies, still remember the first time I shot a hole through a zombies stomach and saw it run after me with its guts trailing behind it.I would have to say Call of Duty: World at War. If you get shotgunned in the stomach, your intestines wouldn't be intact.
flashn00b
I thought fear had some really good blood effects. As far as how realistic that is, I don't know I never have seen anything that bloody before lol
Fight night Champions has some pretty cool blood/bruising effects.
Its realistic and satisfying. Not too extreme but worth spamming a hook to the same eye to see it blow :shock:
Realistic blood certainly does not go to any console or console port that uses blood that is animated like the blood is in a zero g environment and clings together. My opinion is blood like in this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MZik7WgX0CQ looks better. I think the blood we got used to in games is consoles not having enough ram and/or gpu power and having to use cheap tricks like hdr lighting to try to make it realistic. My tv shows blood perfect in movies yet in games it looks like scheiße. This is purely my opinion but I think blood looked better in games before stuff like fear 2 came out. I still prefer the blood in pc games or at least pc games first and then ported to console later. Hopefully this will change with ps4 and xbox one.
You mean realistic as in anatomically correct, or just as in the amount? Because Dead Space isn't entirely realistic (I don't think a normal human body can be severed with a single boot stomp).
I'd probably say Left 4 Dead 2 or Dead Rising, zombie games tend to have a little more research in them for that stuff, though it is odd they'd be so weak a single guitar hit can decapitate (in both games).
ya left 4 dead is good. another one i would say is red dead redemption. everything from the blood splatter on walls to the bullet holes in bodies to the pool of blood that slowly seeps out. atleast i imagine it being somewhat realistic cuz iv never seen someone shot before lol The blood in RDR is good.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment