What happened to Resident Evil

[QUOTE="SW__Troll"]

[QUOTE="lulmont"] looks at name makes sense

MLBknights58

What's wrong?

RE5 is RE4 with co-op (which tends to always increase fun), and a stomp button.

Therefore it's greater than RE4.

Leon > Chris

Also, less boulder punching in RE4

Therefore, RE4 > RE5 :P

But you get to see Jill Valentine cleavage even if there's a big, nasty wound on her chest.

Therefore

RE5 > RE4

Leon > Chris

Also, less boulder punching in RE4

Therefore, RE4 > RE5 :P

MLBknights58

Chris smashes boulders. Leon runs from boulders.

Chris > Leon

[QUOTE="MLBknights58"]

Leon > Chris

Also, less boulder punching in RE4

Therefore, RE4 > RE5 :P

FashionFreak

Chris smashes boulders. Leon runs from boulders.

Chris > Leon

Been playing REmake *Resident evil 1 incase you didn't know*on my Wii haven't played it since 2002 and this game just feels like a totally differ net franchise with the characters having the same names. Here is hoping Leon's campaign in RE6 is like classic RE.

lulmont

[QUOTE="lulmont"]

[QUOTE="SW__Troll"]

RE5 > RE4

SW__Troll

What's wrong?

RE5 is RE4 with co-op (which tends to always increase fun), and a stomp button.

Therefore it's greater than RE4.

I totally understand changing the controls because it makes sense. Not being able to shoot and run didn't make the old games scary, it made them frustrating. It's all about setting in my books. Resident Evil 4 was ok in that department, while Resident Evil 5 didn't even try. Make ammo more scarce, enemies more frightening and have it all in the right environment.

Some people wanted change, they wanted more action. Also new possible audiences where showing a tendency to prefer action so that is what happened. Also the idea that binds survival horror with clunky controls and fixed camera angles was widespread and didn't helped a lot in the eyes of many people both fans and possible future fans.

The main thing about RE4 and RE5 is that enemies dropped ammo even when they were unarmed. There's no point in conserving ammo when the game gets you plenty.

I totally understand changing the controls because it makes sense. Not being able to shoot and run didn't make the old games scary, it made them frustrating. It's all about setting in my books. Resident Evil 4 was ok in that department, while Resident Evil 5 didn't even try. Make ammo more scarce, enemies more frightening and have it all in the right environment.

SOedipus

[QUOTE="Wanderer5"]

Is the AI partner really bad in RE5?

lulmont

this, RE 5 is a must play in coop

The main thing about RE4 and RE5 is that enemies dropped ammo even when they were unarmed. There's no point in conserving ammo when the game gets you plenty.

FashionFreak

This. In 4 and 5 I had to do the unthinkable, I had to actually throw ammo away because I had so much of it of various kinds. Survival Horror my ass.

It got better (RE4) and then it got worse (RE5).

Master_ShakeXXX

This mofo right here knows what he's talking about, although in RE5's defense...it was fun co op with a bud, but the greatness of Shinji Mikami at Capcom was a great loss to Capcom and RE fans.

Lucky Capcom still has my boy Hideki Kamiya!!!! Oh wait, Capcom done F**** up that too. Lucky for us we got Platinum... ;) :P

After the best one, RE:CV, they were infiltrated & sabatoged by..

:P