What is the Point? (the direction Nintendo is taking)

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Lisandro_v22
Lisandro_v22

1319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#1 Lisandro_v22
Member since 2005 • 1319 Posts

why the h**k did they have to "widen the market" when nintendo expanded the market the quality of their games went obviously went deep down, with a majority of casuals that  participate in the gaming market without knowledge about games, it comes as no surprise why they direct the market, I mean it's not only that there are lots of them but the fact they are easy to satisfy with low budget games with those kind of guys directing the offer is obvious why Wii doesn't get good games.

I know the objective of any company is to make money and in the end to stay alive I understand the only way Nintendo could make profit, because it didn't had the economic resources the competence had, was to create a new market, but the new guys that joined the market have a lot less demands the olders have and they are driving N games to ruin, couldn't Nintendo just fade away with dignity like Sega did (and that it retains till today even when they have ruined their main franchise) , what is the point of a system with almost no third party games?, what's the point of that?, doesn't anyone realise that if they just become software devs we shouldn't have to get a wii just to play Zelda? and even so first party games aren't as good as they used to be and don't really justify getting a Wii, they are being recicled over and over again and there doesn't seem to be a point on continuing I mean if you just make an Ocarina of Time with good graphics you get a game that not only hasn't got anything to envy TP but it is 100 times better. 

It amkes me sad to see Nintendo in such state, I hope the Wii was just a temporary solution to the impossibility to compete, I don't have any doubt that they will continue to develop casual games as I didn't had when I got it, but I thought they would continue to make quality titles along them but they haven't, I'm sad to say it but I hope they have to stick to software so I get to play their games in the future in a PS or an Xbox

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
It does make me glad to have fresh blood entering the gaming scene. Too bad the Wii is pretty lame at the moment, though. Still, though, I approve, overall.
Avatar image for Vyyral
Vyyral

386

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Vyyral
Member since 2007 • 386 Posts

I agree. Expanding the market the way Sony did the last two gens is the way to do it, imo. Who cares if the size of the market grows if all the new gamers want to play are mini game collections?

Avatar image for deactivated-5f24e9d9ab22f
deactivated-5f24e9d9ab22f

530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 deactivated-5f24e9d9ab22f
Member since 2004 • 530 Posts
You talk about Nintendo's own games dropping in quality but games they've put out for Wii like Mario Kart, Mario Galaxy, Brawl, Twilight Princess and Wii Sports are some of the best games ever. You live in some alternate reality mate.
Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
You talk about Nintendo's own games dropping in quality but games they've put out for Wii like Mario Kart, Mario Galaxy, Brawl, Twilight Princess and Wii Sports are some of the best games ever. You live in some alternate reality mate.RABicle
Mario Kart? Was there anything in Mario Kart or Brawl that was really and different? Galaxy and Twilight Princess and Wii Sports were pretty badass. Too bad they're all super old.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f24e9d9ab22f
deactivated-5f24e9d9ab22f

530

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 deactivated-5f24e9d9ab22f
Member since 2004 • 530 Posts
Mario Kart mightn't've done much new but it didn't drop in quality to abysmally low levels like the OP is suggesting. Mario Galaxy might be ancient in your world but it's still selling. I also notice the new casuals aren't flocking to Ubisoft shovelware either.
Avatar image for Tylendal
Tylendal

14681

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#7 Tylendal
Member since 2006 • 14681 Posts

TC. I'm not reading your post until you decide to use punctuation, but in response to your topic title.

All industries need to expand.  Without a fresh flow of new consumers, any industry will collapse.  Nintendo has taken the path that they're on because there is a large untapped market, and within that market there is potential for not just expansion, but for growth of the core market.  

Also, has Nintendo's quality really gone down at all?  3rd parties may be making cash-ins, but that has always happened.  Nintendo themself are still working hard. 

Avatar image for deactivated-5e836a855beb2
deactivated-5e836a855beb2

95573

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 deactivated-5e836a855beb2
Member since 2005 • 95573 Posts
The new casuals aren't stupid. Meanwhile I could look at a certain other console's top ten chart and see an ABBA karaoke game in the same slot as Mario.RABicle
wat? I'm sure that was very relevant. Too bad I don't pay attention to bad games.
Avatar image for SemiMaster
SemiMaster

19011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 81

User Lists: 0

#10 SemiMaster
Member since 2006 • 19011 Posts

Stick with Sony and Microsoft for better games and gaming platforms. Let Nintendo make their money while people figure out what games suck after an entire generation of them. The nostalgia will wear off in a generation.

Casuals will get jaded and realize there is more to gaming than "Carnival Games Party 17". 

Avatar image for Rahnyc4
Rahnyc4

6660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Rahnyc4
Member since 2005 • 6660 Posts

Stick with Sony and Microsoft for better games and gaming platforms. Let Nintendo make their money while people figure out what games suck after an entire generation of them. The nostalgia will wear off in a generation.

Casuals will get jaded and realize there is more to gaming than "Carnival Games Party 17". 

SemiMaster

Stick with Sony and Microsoft for better games and gaming platforms. Let Nintendo make their money while people figure out what games suck after an entire generation of them. The nostalgia will wear off in a generation.

Casuals will get jaded and realize there is more to gaming than "Carnival Games Party 17". 

SemiMaster
why should he stick with 2 companies thats clones of them selves?
Avatar image for SemiMaster
SemiMaster

19011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 81

User Lists: 0

#12 SemiMaster
Member since 2006 • 19011 Posts
[QUOTE="SemiMaster"]

Stick with Sony and Microsoft for better games and gaming platforms. Let Nintendo make their money while people figure out what games suck after an entire generation of them. The nostalgia will wear off in a generation.

Casuals will get jaded and realize there is more to gaming than "Carnival Games Party 17".

Rahnyc4

why should he stick with 2 companies thats clones of them selves?

Wiggle waggle with last generation technology does not = innovation if that's what you're getting at. 

Avatar image for siafni
siafni

629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 siafni
Member since 2005 • 629 Posts

Nintendo did what needed to be done in order to survive. There's a few economic strategies that explain what they did and why (The new president of NOA indeed brought some fresh air at Nintendo's), but this is not the point, here.

Unfortunately, there's consequences for "traditional" gamers. Nintendo's focus is now on the casual gamer, like it or not. Besides making games a core gamer will likely not be attracted to, they will keep milking the old franchises (let's be honest, ok?), and that will be done thinking of the "new customer."

I am sorry for Nintendo loyals and lifetime supporters, but your support to Nintendo is not enough for the company to thrive. They were close to being put out of the market during the last 2 generations, and have now found gold.

I think M$ and $ony have learnt Nintendo's lesson, and I'm afraid we will not like the future systems as the old ones. I guess we'll all become hermits, ten years from now...

Avatar image for SemiMaster
SemiMaster

19011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 81

User Lists: 0

#14 SemiMaster
Member since 2006 • 19011 Posts

Nintendo did what needed to be done in order to survive. There's a few economic strategies that explain what they did and why (The new president of NOA indeed brought some fresh air at Nintendo's), but this is not the point, here.

Unfortunately, there's consequences for "traditional" gamers. Nintendo's focus is now on the casual gamer, like it or not. Besides making games a core gamer will likely not be attracted to, they will keep milking the old franchises (let's be honest, ok?), and that will be done thinking of the "new customer."

I am sorry for Nintendo loyals and lifetime supporters, but your support to Nintendo is not enough for the company to thrive. They were close to being put out of the market during the last 2 generations, and have now found gold.

I think M$ and $ony have learnt Nintendo's lesson, and I'm afraid we will not like the future systems as the old ones. I guess we'll all become hermits, ten years from now...

siafni
Apologizing for them being a good business doesn't excuse the fact that the vast majority of their software are crappy games.
Avatar image for Rahnyc4
Rahnyc4

6660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Rahnyc4
Member since 2005 • 6660 Posts
[QUOTE="Rahnyc4"][QUOTE="SemiMaster"]

Stick with Sony and Microsoft for better games and gaming platforms. Let Nintendo make their money while people figure out what games suck after an entire generation of them. The nostalgia will wear off in a generation.

Casuals will get jaded and realize there is more to gaming than "Carnival Games Party 17".

SemiMaster

why should he stick with 2 companies thats clones of them selves?

Wiggle waggle with last generation technology does not = innovation if that's what you're getting at.

oh yeah a new way of playing tired game genres is a bad thing, i feel you. that wiggle waggle is owning your high definition systems, so it cant be bad. maybe next gen nintendo will buy sony and microsoft, so they can actually come up with new ideas.
Avatar image for SemiMaster
SemiMaster

19011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 81

User Lists: 0

#16 SemiMaster
Member since 2006 • 19011 Posts
[QUOTE="SemiMaster"][QUOTE="Rahnyc4"]why should he stick with 2 companies thats clones of them selves? Rahnyc4

Wiggle waggle with last generation technology does not = innovation if that's what you're getting at.

oh yeah a new way of playing tired game genres is a bad thing, i feel you. that wiggle waggle is owning your high definition systems, so it cant be bad. maybe next gen nintendo will buy sony and microsoft, so they can actually come up with new ideas.

Why don't you read the bolded point and figure out why what you said hurt your arguement more than it helped it...

Don't want to? Tired game genres = Mario, Zelda, Metroid etc... Disguising Wiggle Waggle as another button = fail.

Don't fix what ain't broken.

Avatar image for Rahnyc4
Rahnyc4

6660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Rahnyc4
Member since 2005 • 6660 Posts
[QUOTE="siafni"]

Nintendo did what needed to be done in order to survive. There's a few economic strategies that explain what they did and why (The new president of NOA indeed brought some fresh air at Nintendo's), but this is not the point, here.

Unfortunately, there's consequences for "traditional" gamers. Nintendo's focus is now on the casual gamer, like it or not. Besides making games a core gamer will likely not be attracted to, they will keep milking the old franchises (let's be honest, ok?), and that will be done thinking of the "new customer."

I am sorry for Nintendo loyals and lifetime supporters, but your support to Nintendo is not enough for the company to thrive. They were close to being put out of the market during the last 2 generations, and have now found gold.

I think M$ and $ony have learnt Nintendo's lesson, and I'm afraid we will not like the future systems as the old ones. I guess we'll all become hermits, ten years from now...

SemiMaster
Apologizing for them being a good business doesn't excuse the fact that the vast majority of their software are crappy games.

sorry, whats crappy to you isnt whats crappy to others. the idea of crappy, can only be ones opinion. the games you play may be crappy to someone, who gets tired of the same old game types. i mean i see RPG temp in your sig, which i may believe that most would call that crappy. im going to assume youre into japanese RPG's, which 80% of those consist of turnbase action. theres a large debate going on all the time about how crappy turnbase games are. next time you call, or think a game like wiifit is crappy, maybe you should think about what you play and what other people may think of your preference in games.
Avatar image for Rahnyc4
Rahnyc4

6660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Rahnyc4
Member since 2005 • 6660 Posts
[QUOTE="Rahnyc4"][QUOTE="SemiMaster"]

Wiggle waggle with last generation technology does not = innovation if that's what you're getting at.

SemiMaster

oh yeah a new way of playing tired game genres is a bad thing, i feel you. that wiggle waggle is owning your high definition systems, so it cant be bad. maybe next gen nintendo will buy sony and microsoft, so they can actually come up with new ideas.

Why don't you read the bolded point and figure out why what you said hurt your arguement more than it helped it...

Don't want to? Tired game genres = Mario, Zelda, Metroid etc... Disguising Wiggle Waggle as another button = fail.

Don't fix what ain't broken.

why dont you think about what i wrote. im talking about tired game genres, thats been over saturating this gen. im talking about first person shooters played with dual analogs, i mean you can play those games so much, before you start feeling deja vu. I had these times a few time playng some of these first person shooters, which are thought to be fun. the waggle you call bad is actually bringing fun and enjoyment to people who shun gaming as a whole. i see nothing wrong with that. the waggle is also bringing back genres thats thought to be dead. point and click action games are coming back, you have on rail shooters, which once were dead coming back. i mean the waggle you attack is actually going to be your future, so why dont you just embrace it.
Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts
Casuals have always directed the gaming market for consoles. They are the biggest population who buy the consoles so naturally the console developers would go after them because they want the biggest money return on their product. Nintendo is still coming out with your Mario's and Metroids and Zeldas. The only reason why they have so much more throwaway games this gen is because, like the PS2 of last gen, they are the biggest selling console so naturally game developers want the greatest return so they make their products for the console with the largest user base.
Avatar image for Blackbond
Blackbond

24516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Blackbond
Member since 2005 • 24516 Posts

That money money yeah yeah that money money yeah yeah

Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18235 Posts
why expand the market? well its very simple.....to continue this relentless pace of technical excellence at the hardware and software level (lets leave aside creative thinking in game design, that has effectively been put to the sword at the high end of the market. its too risky now due to high costs.), the industry simply has to expand to support it. ppl in here will not tolerate 2d, sprites, games that lack polish or blocky graphics. hell most dont even tolerate PS2 graphics today. fine but ure going to pay for it. ure going to pay more money for it and ure going to have to accept that more ppl have to be buying and playing games. if more ppl dont enter then ure going to be paying a hell of alot more for it. that road leads to nothing but disaster and misery. the industries costs are going up and the market is not expanding nearly as fast enough to accomodate it.
Avatar image for SemiMaster
SemiMaster

19011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 81

User Lists: 0

#22 SemiMaster
Member since 2006 • 19011 Posts
[QUOTE="SemiMaster"][QUOTE="Rahnyc4"] oh yeah a new way of playing tired game genres is a bad thing, i feel you. that wiggle waggle is owning your high definition systems, so it cant be bad. maybe next gen nintendo will buy sony and microsoft, so they can actually come up with new ideas. Rahnyc4

Why don't you read the bolded point and figure out why what you said hurt your arguement more than it helped it...

Don't want to? Tired game genres = Mario, Zelda, Metroid etc... Disguising Wiggle Waggle as another button = fail.

Don't fix what ain't broken.

why dont you think about what i wrote. im talking about tired game genres, thats been over saturating this gen. im talking about first person shooters played with dual analogs, i mean you can play those games so much, before you start feeling deja vu. I had these times a few time playng some of these first person shooters, which are thought to be fun. the waggle you call bad is actually bringing fun and enjoyment to people who shun gaming as a whole. i see nothing wrong with that. the waggle is also bringing back genres thats thought to be dead. point and click action games are coming back, you have on rail shooters, which once were dead coming back. i mean the waggle you attack is actually going to be your future, so why dont you just embrace it.

The two functions of a Wiimote are this... A mouse, point and click. Nothing new or innovative there. Hell, PCs have been at that for years. Something like Wii sports doesn't take into account which way you swing. Hell you can swing the wiimote straight down, any acceleration swings the bat. All of this true motion and realistic gameplay is nothing more than if you feel an acceleration, you essentially do a button press. It's not gaming, it's a gimmick.
Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts
It's not gaming, it's a gimmick.SemiMaster
Who cares if it's a gimmick? Gimmicks are what sell. This 'gimmick' will be on the Nintendo for as long as it lsts. Therefor for someone enjoying this gimmick they will enjoy the gimmick for the life of their console making their purchase decision a good one. People say the word gimmick as if it's a bad thing.
Avatar image for Lisandro_v22
Lisandro_v22

1319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#24 Lisandro_v22
Member since 2005 • 1319 Posts
You talk about Nintendo's own games dropping in quality but games they've put out for Wii like Mario Kart, Mario Galaxy, Brawl, Twilight Princess and Wii Sports are some of the best games ever. You live in some alternate reality mate.RABicle
excuse me but I admit mario galaxy is nice but the reason I like portable zeldas is that they always go for creativity but creating Mario Kart, Brawl and TP must be pretty frustrating for game designers probably they just don't have that job they are probably called something more like "graphic upgraders" or something anyway Nintendo base all their games on the phrase: "if it's not broken why don't we just release it again"
Avatar image for Lisandro_v22
Lisandro_v22

1319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#25 Lisandro_v22
Member since 2005 • 1319 Posts
[QUOTE="SemiMaster"]It's not gaming, it's a gimmick.BumFluff122
Who cares if it's a gimmick? Gimmicks are what sell. This 'gimmick' will be on the Nintendo for as long as it lsts. Therefor for someone enjoying this gimmick they will enjoy the gimmick for the life of their console making their purchase decision a good one. People say the word gimmick as if it's a bad thing.

I don't I agree with either of you though I'm not sure what BumFluff is pointing with that, I think the Wiimote is pointless it's just an attraction to casuals, but I don't think it's a gimmick, great games can be made using it as we can notice by playing Zack & Wiki, Okami and RE4 the problem is that no games aside from those were made because it's just easier and more profitable to develop crap mini party games, and anyway "" and "" are just ports, if you look at titles like Super Smash, Mario Galaxy and TP (the titles Wii fans use to defend their system) they don't really use the wiimote but have some weird function (like shooting stars in Mario galaxy) to justify it, Mario Kart is the exception to this, but I have to say that graphics are terrible, when I bought a wii I knew it didn't have the power of the other systems but I didn't know that Nintendo would release games that don't use even half that power, and the excuse: we focus on gameplay is just stupid, it's not really expensive or time consuming or anything to "focus on gaming" so I don't see how it should affect other aspects of a game
Avatar image for SemiMaster
SemiMaster

19011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 81

User Lists: 0

#26 SemiMaster
Member since 2006 • 19011 Posts
[QUOTE="SemiMaster"]It's not gaming, it's a gimmick.BumFluff122
Who cares if it's a gimmick? Gimmicks are what sell. This 'gimmick' will be on the Nintendo for as long as it lsts. Therefor for someone enjoying this gimmick they will enjoy the gimmick for the life of their console making their purchase decision a good one. People say the word gimmick as if it's a bad thing.

Gimmick indicates no substance, which is exactly what the Wii lacks, substance.
Avatar image for Rumble_Stud
Rumble_Stud

111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Rumble_Stud
Member since 2008 • 111 Posts
I dunno I've gotten used to the idea that Nintendo is trying to make money off of cheap hardware and "innovation". It's what they've been doing the last 2 gens what with the N64 holdin on to the outdated cartridge format for dear life and the Gamecube having those wierd little mini pancake diskettes, The only difference this time around is that they finally nailed the formula. But with that being said I'm really anxious to see what they do next gen seein as they have all this capital and wonderin if they're just gonna sit on their money or develop a console that will not only make casuals happy, but the hardcores as well. hmmm????
Avatar image for Bigboi500
Bigboi500

35550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#28 Bigboi500
Member since 2007 • 35550 Posts

Nintendo's casual stage is now over, Wii Music was the last Nintendo casual game to be released by first party. The next batch of Nintendo games will start to move up the sophistication stage. Bashers act like the Wii has ZERO good games and we all know that is just stupidity. 2009 is almost here folks.

If you really want to know what Nintendo is doing, educate yourselves by doing some research. If not then continue trolling about Nintendo on game forums as you are.

Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts

"and even so first party games aren't as good as they used to be"

looks like someone didn't play SMG.

That easily ranks up among nintendo's best classics.

Avatar image for druggyjoe3000
druggyjoe3000

1523

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#30 druggyjoe3000
Member since 2006 • 1523 Posts
Expanding the market=good
devloping bad games=bad
Avatar image for thegoldenpoo
thegoldenpoo

5136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#31 thegoldenpoo
Member since 2005 • 5136 Posts

Expanding the market=good
devloping bad games=bad
druggyjoe3000

indeed sir!

I like what the wii is trying to do, but making every game casual focused and waggle-tastic is a mistake. Wii music isn't a good game, its not that its just a casual game, its just not a good game. the same is true for alot of these 'casual' games. i guarentee it, in nintendo puts out softwear that is freindly to the wider market but still actually GOOD they will reap more benfits than just selling crap to idiots.

third party is woeful, which is odd for the leading console, but they HAVE widened the market. now nintendo, PLEASE show all those cauals what a real game is. bowl us gamers and cauals over alike, don't just rehash your previous titles with gimmicky control or, in the case of mario kart wii, sacrifice the depth and level of skill you can achive for over simplified gameplay.

you talk about innovation so INNOVATE!

Avatar image for InfinityMugen
InfinityMugen

3905

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#32 InfinityMugen
Member since 2007 • 3905 Posts
What I've been hearing was that Nintendo focused on the casuals to generate cash and then focus on the "core" games later on. I believe this will manifest until the end of the Wii's life cycle or until the release of "Wii 2"
Avatar image for Shinobishyguy
Shinobishyguy

22928

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#34 Shinobishyguy
Member since 2006 • 22928 Posts
[QUOTE="Lisandro_v22"][QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]

"and even so first party games aren't as good as they used to be"

looks like someone didn't play SMG.

That easily ranks up among nintendo's best classics.

hey just make a list of good games from nintendo and good games for other systems, and anyway your sign and your profile image come on. go to the wii forum I know it's system wars but I don't want another stupid debate between fans, please no fanboys allowed...

you're the one claiming that nintendo's first party games are not as good as they used to despite the fact that they are met with critical acclaim. And the fact that you're attack my sig and avatar shows how weak your argument really is. Sure nintendo is spending alot of time dicking around and appealing to casuals, sure the wii's library is pathetic...but the few gems they have produced for the wii are damn awesome games.
Avatar image for manziny
manziny

252

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 manziny
Member since 2003 • 252 Posts

Stick with Sony and Microsoft for better games and gaming platforms. Let Nintendo make their money while people figure out what games suck after an entire generation of them. The nostalgia will wear off in a generation.

Casuals will get jaded and realize there is more to gaming than "Carnival Games Party 17".

SemiMaster
Wrong answer. I Consider to be both hardcore and casual type of gamer depending on what the game as to offer and my mood and certainly the Wii does offer that and so does the DS if you care too look at the titles in the catalogue, not all the games on the xbox360 and ps3 are that good. If you are an FPS Fan than im afraid you are missing out on other Genre's which are much fun to play its not always about blood and guts.
Avatar image for Lisandro_v22
Lisandro_v22

1319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#37 Lisandro_v22
Member since 2005 • 1319 Posts
[QUOTE="Lisandro_v22"][QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]

"and even so first party games aren't as good as they used to be"

looks like someone didn't play SMG.

That easily ranks up among nintendo's best classics.

Shinobishyguy
hey just make a list of good games from nintendo and good games for other systems, and anyway your sign and your profile image come on. go to the wii forum I know it's system wars but I don't want another stupid debate between fans, please no fanboys allowed...

you're the one claiming that nintendo's first party games are not as good as they used to despite the fact that they are met with critical acclaim. And the fact that you're attack my sig and avatar shows how weak your argument really is. Sure nintendo is spending alot of time dicking around and appealing to casuals, sure the wii's library is pathetic...but the few gems they have produced for the wii are damn awesome games.

OK I don't see the critical acclaim anywhere what are you talking about? about super smash and mario galaxy? those are 2 games TWO and TP only got a decent score cause there are way too much fanboys that don't want to realise that the last good Zelda game was Ocarina of Time and the project has become so commercial and massive that doesn't allow any kind of creativity, thank god for the portable Zeldas. and believe me when I say I'm a zelda fan, I may have not finished all but I played every one of them since the first one, even while some of them feel awefully repetitive but OoT is in my opinion the best game ever made
Avatar image for LittleHands134
LittleHands134

1176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 LittleHands134
Member since 2008 • 1176 Posts
I would like the Wii more if it supported a larger TV. It's so disgusting and blurry on my HD, doesn't even fill the entire screen.
Avatar image for Lisandro_v22
Lisandro_v22

1319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#39 Lisandro_v22
Member since 2005 • 1319 Posts
[QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"][QUOTE="Lisandro_v22"][QUOTE="Shinobishyguy"]

"and even so first party games aren't as good as they used to be"

looks like someone didn't play SMG.

That easily ranks up among nintendo's best classics.

hey just make a list of good games from nintendo and good games for other systems, and anyway your sign and your profile image come on. go to the wii forum I know it's system wars but I don't want another stupid debate between fans, please no fanboys allowed...

you're the one claiming that nintendo's first party games are not as good as they used to despite the fact that they are met with critical acclaim. And the fact that you're attack my sig and avatar shows how weak your argument really is. Sure nintendo is spending alot of time dicking around and appealing to casuals, sure the wii's library is pathetic...but the few gems they have produced for the wii are damn awesome games.

oh, and I did play SMG and I loved it that doesn't change the fact that It doesn't change the fact that the wiimote is pointless, the same happens with Super Smash, no good things have came out from the addition of a wiimote with the exception of Z&W. yeahthere are a few great games but they don't use the wiimote and the whole system is based all around it, so we can all agree the Wiimote is only a marketing tool but it doesn't really adds anything to the experience and so I don't see the point of buying a wii to play 2 or 3 games, that even while they are good they are pretty limited because the fact they are for everyone. (I don't mean that I want blood or anything, I don't even like shooters) but the thing is I like toy story and shrek a kid enjoys it and so do I and I also like woody allen, brian de palma, tarantino, kurosawa etc the people that get a wii are like the people that only watch pixar and disney movies
Avatar image for CPM_basic
CPM_basic

4247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#40 CPM_basic
Member since 2002 • 4247 Posts
Nintendo is out of touch with real gamers and they proved at it e3. They had the worst showing ever. When Reggie said they had "hardcore" games he immediately showed Wii Sports 2... :|
Avatar image for EuroMafia
EuroMafia

7026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#41 EuroMafia
Member since 2008 • 7026 Posts
Most of the people complaining wouldn't have bought a Wii anyway. It could very well end up as successful as the DS games wise, or again it will just be up to Nintendo to dish out the best hardcore games.
Avatar image for AdmiralBison
AdmiralBison

3970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 AdmiralBison
Member since 2008 • 3970 Posts
[QUOTE="Lisandro_v22"]

why the h**k did they have to "widen the market" when nintendo expanded the market the quality of their games went obviously went deep down, with a majority of casuals that participate in the gaming market without knowledge about games, it comes as no surprise why they direct the market, I mean it's not only that there are lots of them but the fact they are easy to satisfy with low budget games with those kind of guys directing the offer is obvious why Wii doesn't get good games.

I know the objective of any company is to make money and in the end to stay alive I understand the only way Nintendo could make profit, because it didn't had the economic resources the competence had, was to create a new market, but the new guys that joined the market have a lot less demands the olders have and they are driving N games to ruin, couldn't Nintendo just fade away with dignity like Sega did (and that it retains till today even when they have ruined their main franchise) , what is the point of a system with almost no third party games?, what's the point of that?, doesn't anyone realise that if they just become software devs we shouldn't have to get a wii just to play Zelda? and even so first party games aren't as good as they used to be and don't really justify getting a Wii, they are being recicled over and over again and there doesn't seem to be a point on continuing I mean if you just make an Ocarina of Time with good graphics you get a game that not only hasn't got anything to envy TP but it is 100 times better.

It amkes me sad to see Nintendo in such state, I hope the Wii was just a temporary solution to the impossibility to compete, I don't have any doubt that they will continue to develop casual games as I didn't had when I got it, but I thought they would continue to make quality titles along them but they haven't, I'm sad to say it but I hope they have to stick to software so I get to play their games in the future in a PS or an Xbox

I think Nintendo made a brilliant move and I think deeply it may actually have helped the video game industry from crashing. It has expanded the market and introduced gaming to an audience not traditionally know or are familiar to play video games. there several things we have to consider though Nintendo may not appeal to this forums demographic is has potentially increased this core audience well in to the future. Nintendo's games have always been fun, quality consistent throughout the years and generally very accessible they really havn't strayed that far from their early 80's roots. It's just with the 80's gamers and key audiences having grownup and tastes have become a little more sophisticated and mature that these games may no longer appeal to said audience and they turn their attention to Microsoft and Sony. But their will always be a younger generation who have not played games yet and I think this is where Nintendo shines best. Think about it not everyone can play FPS games lkike Gears of War , Call of Duty , Resistence, Crysis 'cause they can be quite sophisticated and intimidating to new comers. You don't introduce a game like that to a casual person who has not had the years of exposure to more and more increasingly sophisticated games- they need to be introduced to the worl dof games on a more lighter, simpler and fun level. I can't be bothereed trying to make this clear, and I think everyone should understand Nintendo has not changed only yopu have. When everyone was really young people bought a bike to get around. then their first car that was pretty basic then a premuim car whic was more expensive, and sophisticated then a family car when they got older and married then a wheelchair so they can pushed into the family on the way to the retirement home. The point is maybe you've outgron Nintendo and it's time for the next generation to enjoy playing videogames on the same level you did when you were young or naive about games sorry if this post seems sentimental, but I still rememeber having so much fun when I had a Snes....but now my tastes have changed. Everyone gets this point right?
Avatar image for Nomad0404
Nomad0404

1111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#43 Nomad0404
Member since 2004 • 1111 Posts

Nintendo aren't out of touch - they just aren't making games that you want to play - fine don't play them then.

However, the 40million wii-sports players out there are all fairly happy bowling their balls or swinging their rackets.

So lets review that again, 40million Wii Sports vs 8.5million Halo 3s.

And you wonder why they are making Wii Sports Resort?

I think it's the 3rd party devs you really need to blame and they are slowly coming onboard but lets face it you are never going to get Gears of War on the Wii.

But we will get Madworld and hopefully many other games that bring a touch of different style to the board.

Phil

Avatar image for Nomad0404
Nomad0404

1111

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#44 Nomad0404
Member since 2004 • 1111 Posts
The point is maybe you've outgron Nintendo and it's time for the next generation to enjoy playing videogames on the same level you did when you were young or naive about games sorry if this post seems sentimental, but I still rememeber having so much fun when I had a Snes....but now my tastes have changed. Everyone gets this point right?AdmiralBison

That's a great point well made!!!

Avatar image for Bread_or_Decide
Bread_or_Decide

29761

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 Bread_or_Decide
Member since 2007 • 29761 Posts
Money Money Money Money. MOooonnnneeeyyy.
Avatar image for hiphops_savior
hiphops_savior

8535

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 2

#46 hiphops_savior
Member since 2007 • 8535 Posts
Dismissing Nintendo as irrelevent...how low can you get, then again, this is System Wars.
Avatar image for haziqonfire
haziqonfire

36392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#47 haziqonfire
Member since 2005 • 36392 Posts
[QUOTE="RABicle"]You talk about Nintendo's own games dropping in quality but games they've put out for Wii like Mario Kart, Mario Galaxy, Brawl, Twilight Princess and Wii Sports are some of the best games ever. You live in some alternate reality mate.Jandurin
Mario Kart? Was there anything in Mario Kart or Brawl that was really and different? Galaxy and Twilight Princess and Wii Sports were pretty badass. Too bad they're all super old.

This is true, I haven't played much of Brawl or Mario Kart -- instead I moved onto things like De Blob and Boom Blox.