What looks better, Killzone 2, MGS4, Kameo, Fable 2 or Lost Odyssey ?

My primary gaming TV is unfortunatly a Standard definition one,

And I can safely say

MGS4 looks by far the worse, which is weird becasue on a HDTV its probably the best.

I refuse to play it on my TV :(

More

More

[ obamanian

man those look terrible:?

More

obamanian

Are you effin kidding me? look at the sky, the mountain to his right, the grass and the vegetation? Look at the textures LOL... You're talking about emptiness. Now THATS empty. I'm realy thinking that:

a: This is a joke thread

b: You're some kind of Ultra, Mega fanboy, blind and deaf to anything you don't want to see or hear

or

c: 3-9 years old

Seriously, you are the laughing stock of the entire system wars, even other Lemmings are shaking their heads. Just stop this now for your own good, you're making a fool out of yourself. In anyway, I enjoy your posts, they make me laugh so hard.

[QUOTE="obamanian"]

More

[ ps3_owns_360Wii

man those look terrible:?

No kidding, you would think he would actually post gifs that look...good?

Anyways this is what he always does, while everyone tells him how silly his argument is he just continues to post a bunch of gifs and pictures with lots of green and blue in em.

[QUOTE="ps3_owns_360Wii"][QUOTE="obamanian"]

More

[ Lewisite

man those look terrible:?

No kidding, you would think he would actually post gifs that look...good?

Anyways this is what he always does, while everyone tells him how silly his argument is he just continues to post a bunch of gifs and pictures with lots of green and blue in em.

More obamanian

Just leave him be, i like to see his self ownage, i mean, just look at those GIF he posted, thats self ownage right there.

Seriously, you just completely lost me with the Gifs. The Fable 2 screenshots at least look decent but those are just terrible.

Wait, why am I arguing with the guy that thinks 360 games are 99% the same as their PC versions?

[QUOTE="Szminsky"][QUOTE="obamanian"]

More obamanian

Are you effin kidding me? look at the sky, the mountain to his right, the grass and the vegetation? Look at the textures LOL... You're talking about emptiness. Now THATS empty. I'm realy thinking that:

a: This is a joke thread

b: You're some kind of Ultra, Mega fanboy, blind and deaf to anything you don't want to see or hear

or

c: 3-9 years old

Seriously, you are the laughing stock of the entire system wars, even other Lemmings are shaking their heads. Just stop this now for your own good, you're making a fool out of yourself. In anyway, I enjoy your posts, they make me laugh so hard.

Hahaha, what a stupid damage control, look at the below gif, the world is 10x bigger and with 10x more detail than KZ2, at least, all the damage control in the world won't save you from that obvious fact

too bad the textures look flat

[QUOTE="obamanian"]

More Vaasman

2 late 4 that:P

Your not fooling anybody who has actually played MGS4 on their own TV. So just keep posting those really horrible captures. People who have played it know how good it looks and people who haven't really can't say which game looks the best out of them because they haven't played them all.

Basically we have to somehow take your word for it that those pictures you post are exactly 100% what each one of those games looks like every minute you play the game.

[QUOTE="obamanian"][QUOTE="Szminsky"]

Are you effin kidding me? look at the sky, the mountain to his right, the grass and the vegetation? Look at the textures LOL... You're talking about emptiness. Now THATS empty. I'm realy thinking that:

a: This is a joke thread

b: You're some kind of Ultra, Mega fanboy, blind and deaf to anything you don't want to see or hear

or

c: 3-9 years old

Seriously, you are the laughing stock of the entire system wars, even other Lemmings are shaking their heads. Just stop this now for your own good, you're making a fool out of yourself. In anyway, I enjoy your posts, they make me laugh so hard.

ps3_owns_360Wii

Hahaha, what a stupid damage control, look at the below gif, the world is 10x bigger and with 10x more detail than KZ2, at least, all the damage control in the world won't save you from that obvious fact

too bad the textures look flat

Now you got it, KZ2 textures look flat and blurry 99% of the time

[QUOTE="Vaasman"][QUOTE="obamanian"]

More Al3x_n90

2 late 4 that:P

[QUOTE="obamanian"][QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Your not fooling anybody who has actually played MGS4 on their own TV. So just keep posting those really horrible captures. People who have played it know how good it looks and people who haven't really can't say which game looks the best out of them because they haven't played them all.

Basically we have to somehow take your word for it that those pictures you post are exactly 100% what each one of those games looks like every minute you play the game.

DealRogers

On a TV looks better, ALL games look better on a TV you know

You got more color and contast, that is why it looks better, happens with all games you know, all those pics look worst than on a TV

Well I'm about 100% certain he won't stop I just wanted him to know how we all felt. As a fan of the 360 myself, I can easily say Fable 2 is one of the worst looking and playing big budget exclusives out.Vaasman

Hahaha, you are a fan of 360 ? Sure, ok

If the below pics are the worst looking, can you post the ... best looking ?

Someone in this thread things vibrant colors and overuse of bloom = better graphics......

Nothing about Kameo & Fable 2 are technically more impressive than MGS4 and KZ2. Nothing. I rented Fable 2, own Kameo and own MGS4....and I can say MGS4 in motion with your own eyes demolishes those 2 games, with ease.

The problem is that you posted the best screens for Fable 2, Lost Odyssey, Kameo and the worse screens for MGS4, ala fanboy.

[QUOTE="Al3x_n90"][QUOTE="Vaasman"]Please stop you're just making a fool of yourself.

Vaasman

2 late 4 that:P

Yup, no chance he will stop, onlu if somebody cuts the power to his home:twisted: now where was that chainsaw...

Someone in this thread things vibrant colors and overuse of bloom = better graphics......

Nothing about Kameo & Fable 2 are technically more impressive than MGS4 and KZ2. Nothing. I rented Fable 2, own Kameo and own MGS4....and I can say MGS4 in motion with your own eyes demolishes those 2 games, with ease.

Uptown

The scale and detail around/forests etc are vastly more impressive than the tiny empty KZ2 and MGS4 stages by default

The problem is that you posted the best screens for Fable 2, Lost Odyssey, Kameo and the worse screens for MGS4, ala fanboy.

Nolakk

Give me any MGS4 in game 720p pic, i will post it right away

[QUOTE="Uptown"]

Someone in this thread things vibrant colors and overuse of bloom = better graphics......

Nothing about Kameo & Fable 2 are technically more impressive than MGS4 and KZ2. Nothing. I rented Fable 2, own Kameo and own MGS4....and I can say MGS4 in motion with your own eyes demolishes those 2 games, with ease.

obamanian

The scale and detail around/forests etc are vastly more impressive than the tiny empty KZ2 and MGS4 stages by default

[QUOTE="obamanian"][QUOTE="Uptown"]

Someone in this thread things vibrant colors and overuse of bloom = better graphics......

Nothing about Kameo & Fable 2 are technically more impressive than MGS4 and KZ2. Nothing. I rented Fable 2, own Kameo and own MGS4....and I can say MGS4 in motion with your own eyes demolishes those 2 games, with ease.

Uptown

The scale and detail around/forests etc are vastly more impressive than the tiny empty KZ2 and MGS4 stages by default

what looks best ? Killzone 2 71% [147] MGS4 15% [32] Fable 2 5% [10] Kameo 5% [11] Lost Odyssey 3% [7] 179 people voted for 2 PS3 titles, and 28 people voted for 3 360 titles.....I think your question is answered and you're totally bias, need to stop wasting your own energy sir. Move along. end of thread long ago.

Hiding behind votes to support your opinion ?

In Fable 2 i see a huge world filled with forests, grass, trees

In MGS4 is see tiny levels with almost nothing inside them

Guess what is obviously 100x better looking

So, why is MGS4 better looking exactly, do you even have an argument ?

Hiding behind votes to support your opinion ? In Fable 2 i see a huge world filled with forests, grass, trees In MGS4 is see tiny levels with almost nothing inside them Guess what is obviously 100x better lookingobamanian

[QUOTE="obamanian"]Hiding behind votes to support your opinion ? In Fable 2 i see a huge world filled with forests, grass, trees In MGS4 is see tiny levels with almost nothing inside them Guess what is obviously 100x better lookingVandalvideo

If you did not find Oakfield huge, then you have OBVIOUSLY never played the game, you get a huge open area to see and walk on whole

Sorry if you do not have a 360 to know that, ask anyone that has one though

[QUOTE="obamanian"]Hiding behind votes to support your opinion ? In Fable 2 i see a huge world filled with forests, grass, trees In MGS4 is see tiny levels with almost nothing inside them Guess what is obviously 100x better lookingVandalvideo

[QUOTE="Nolakk"]

The problem is that you posted the best screens for Fable 2, Lost Odyssey, Kameo and the worse screens for MGS4, ala fanboy.

obamanian

Give me any MGS4 in game 720p pic, i will post it right away

OK

There you go.

And i have more if you want so can you just shut up now?

If you did not find Oakfield huge, then you have OBVIOUSLY never played the game, you get a huge open area to see and walk on whole Sorry if you do not have a 360 to know that, ask anyone that has one thoughobamanian

[QUOTE="obamanian"][QUOTE="Nolakk"]

The problem is that you posted the best screens for Fable 2, Lost Odyssey, Kameo and the worse screens for MGS4, ala fanboy.

Nolakk

Give me any MGS4 in game 720p pic, i will post it right away

There you go.

And i have more if you want so can you just shut up now?

Those are ... in game .... 720p ... pics ?

Sorry, i do not post downscaled bullshots, those are neither in game nor 720p pics

You either have real gameplay pics or not

[QUOTE="Vaasman"]Well I'm about 100% certain he won't stop I just wanted him to know how we all felt. As a fan of the 360 myself, I can easily say Fable 2 is one of the worst looking and playing big budget exclusives out.obamanian

Hahaha, you are a fan of 360 ? Sure, ok

If the below pics are the worst looking, can you post the ... best looking ?

Below are some real screen caps from the game, pulled straight from this website. If you can show me another platinum selling 360 exclusive that looks as bad with gamespot pics I'll be amazed.

These are all pretty generous too, actually playing the game you realise the lighting is the only highpoint. The water, textures, characters, and motion blur are garbage.

Hiding behind votes to support your opinion ?

In Fable 2 i see a huge world filled with forests, grass, trees

In MGS4 is see tiny levels with almost nothing inside them

Guess what is obviously 100x better looking

So, why is MGS4 better looking exactly, do you even have an argument ?

obamanian

So in Obamanian's world, the 1st pic is 100x better than the 2nd because it's more colorful, anyone agree? ;)

These are all pretty generous too, actually playing the game you realise the lighting is the only highpoint. The water, textures, characters, and motion blur are garbage.Vaasman

Took you long enough to find the worst looking pics i guess ?

You will have to explain why the below look 1000x better then too

MGS4's character models are miles better than fables

[QUOTE="Vaasman"]These are all pretty generous too, actually playing the game you realise the lighting is the only highpoint. The water, textures, characters, and motion blur are garbage.obamanian

Took you long enough to find the worst looking pics i guess ?

You will have to explain why the below look 1000x better then too

[QUOTE="Vaasman"]These are all pretty generous too, actually playing the game you realise the lighting is the only highpoint. The water, textures, characters, and motion blur are garbage.obamanian

Took you long enough to find the worst looking pics i guess ?

You will have to explain why the below look 1000x better then too

Those really arnt that great, character animations are awful

Hiding behind votes to support your opinion ?

In Fable 2 i see a huge world filled with forests, grass, trees

In MGS4 is see tiny levels with almost nothing inside them

Guess what is obviously 100x better looking

So, why is MGS4 better looking exactly, do you even have an argument ?

[QUOTE="c1o2d3y"]

MGS4's character models are miles better than fables

And Fable isnt really all the nonlinear, there are pathways that always show you were to go obamanian

And Fable 2 environments are miles bigger, more varied, filled with vastly more detail and huge forests than MGS4 by millions of miles

Also Fable 2 is free roaming, in most places you can go everywhere, jump from bridges to water, leave the paths and move in forests, fields etc etc

You should play the game first, you know how ignorant what you just posted is, right ? Well, you don't, since you have no idea how Fable 2 world is

You simply cannot compare the two, what If I said UO has better graphics because the environments are miles bigger, more varied, filled with vastly more detail and huge forests even though it is that Fable obliviously looks better graphicly

[QUOTE="obamanian"]

Hiding behind votes to support your opinion ?

In Fable 2 i see a huge world filled with forests, grass, trees

In MGS4 is see tiny levels with almost nothing inside them

Guess what is obviously 100x better looking

So, why is MGS4 better looking exactly, do you even have an argument ?

clone01

I am just trying to see how anyone supports that MGS4 looks better than Fable 2, that is all

Iti s a genuine question too, i just do not see anything in MGS4 that is even comparable to Fable 2 visually, not a single thing, apart maybe the animation and the chacrater models, though Fable 2 has 10x more NPC's on screen

Apparently, how good a game looks is measured by the trees. And how far you can pointlessly frolic around those trees.inertk

Aparently, that is why Crysis destroys any other game

I am just trying to see how anyone supports that MGS4 looks better than Fable 2, that is all

Iti s a genuine question too, i just do not see anything in MGS4 that is even comparable to Fable 2 visually, not a single thing, apart maybe the animation and the chacrater models, though Fable 2 has 10x more NPC's on screen

obamanian

[QUOTE="obamanian"][QUOTE="c1o2d3y"]

MGS4's character models are miles better than fables

And Fable isnt really all the nonlinear, there are pathways that always show you were to go c1o2d3y

And Fable 2 environments are miles bigger, more varied, filled with vastly more detail and huge forests than MGS4 by millions of miles

Also Fable 2 is free roaming, in most places you can go everywhere, jump from bridges to water, leave the paths and move in forests, fields etc etc

You should play the game first, you know how ignorant what you just posted is, right ? Well, you don't, since you have no idea how Fable 2 world is

You simply cannot compare the two, what If I said UO has better graphics because the environments are miles bigger, more varied, filled with vastly more detail and huge forests even though it is that Fable obliviously looks better graphicly

What is UO, and if it has a next gen lighting engine like Fable 2, as much detail around and bigger scale, will obviously look better

Can we have a picture of that game ?