What Sony needs is a PS3 ''Lite''?

  • 54 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for CAPSROGUE
CAPSROGUE

863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 CAPSROGUE
Member since 2008 • 863 Posts

You can laugh at them but the've finally gotten their games.

Metal Gear Solid 4 Guns of the Patroit - Little Big Planet - Resistance 2 - Valkyria Chronicles

And with upcoming games such as Killzone 2, White Knight Chronicles, God of War 3, FF Versus XIII things don't look too shabby. However, when I stand in the console department of a store and see a X360 for 200EU, Wii for 250EU followed by a PS3 for ...400EU, you can't really ignore thinking about the fact you can almost get a X360 and Wii for the same price. :>

So what I'm trying to say is, I think it's no longer the software that lacks, but rather the expensive hardware. Which can easily be solved by simply, just like they did with every console before, making a ''Lite'' version which can be fabricated alot cheaper, and maybe leaving out some options which aren't that important to a gamer.

Whatcha think? :>

Avatar image for darkguy_101
darkguy_101

744

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 darkguy_101
Member since 2008 • 744 Posts

So what I'm trying to say is, I think it's no longer the software that lacks, but rather the expensive hardware. Which can easily be solved by simply, just like they did with every console before, making a ''Lite'' version which can be fabricated alot cheaper, and maybe leaving out some options which aren't that important to a gamer.

Whatcha think? :>

CAPSROGUE
Like which things can they take out that are not important to a gamer?
Avatar image for W1ckedGo0se
W1ckedGo0se

1246

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#3 W1ckedGo0se
Member since 2008 • 1246 Posts
I think the PS3 is a great deal for what you get... sony has been the only company this gen that losses money on every system sold... they would be insane to loss more...
Avatar image for SynisterGamer
SynisterGamer

806

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 SynisterGamer
Member since 2008 • 806 Posts

There're still losing money for each PS3 they make, technology and production of it needs to get cheaper before we see a PS3 Lite.

But I want mine in sliver :D

Avatar image for EuroMafia
EuroMafia

7026

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#5 EuroMafia
Member since 2008 • 7026 Posts
That would be cool.
Avatar image for AHUGECAT
AHUGECAT

8967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 AHUGECAT
Member since 2006 • 8967 Posts
PS3 has only 5 good games? Even the GameCube had more, and it wasn't a $400 atrocity.
Avatar image for Lionheart08
Lionheart08

15814

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#7 Lionheart08
Member since 2005 • 15814 Posts
Good idea but what exactly should they strip to do it?
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts
Good idea but what exactly should they strip to do it?Lionheart08
theres not much more they can strip. Emotion engine chips gone, 2 usb ports gone, card readers gone they've literally taken out every extra thing they had at launch in the latest revisions, the wireless can still be taken out since they put that back in the 80 and 160 gig versions. Hell lets just face it teh 80 and 160 gig systems are just the 40 gig systems with bigger hard drives. But thats the way of sony at launch they have loads of ports and promise the world then with each revision ports are taken out and those promises are broken.
Avatar image for CAPSROGUE
CAPSROGUE

863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 CAPSROGUE
Member since 2008 • 863 Posts
I only suggested the stripping to get the production costs even lower, I'm sure they can produce the same PS3 (Lite) with cheaper components.
Avatar image for Mongo-Boss
Mongo-Boss

2108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Mongo-Boss
Member since 2008 • 2108 Posts
I thought the hard drive alone made it impossible for them to make it slim. I truly don't know what I'm talking about though so can anyone who knows about this stuff confirm it?
Avatar image for foreverflame890
foreverflame890

551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#11 foreverflame890
Member since 2008 • 551 Posts
ye i agree TC the PS3 sucks.
Avatar image for CAPSROGUE
CAPSROGUE

863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 CAPSROGUE
Member since 2008 • 863 Posts

PS3 has only 5 good games? Even the GameCube had more, and it wasn't a $400 atrocity.AHUGECAT

You should refrain from saying stupid things, makes you look bad ya know.

ye i agree TC the PS3 sucks.foreverflame890

I didn't say that.

Avatar image for AHUGECAT
AHUGECAT

8967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#13 AHUGECAT
Member since 2006 • 8967 Posts

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]PS3 has only 5 good games? Even the GameCube had more, and it wasn't a $400 atrocity.CAPSROGUE

You should refrain from saying stupid things, makes you look bad ya know.

ye i agree TC the PS3 sucks.foreverflame890

I didn't say that.

PS3 is $399 and has only 5 good games, Xbox 360 is $199 and has 30 good games.

Avatar image for Lewisite
Lewisite

511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Lewisite
Member since 2008 • 511 Posts
[QUOTE="CAPSROGUE"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

You should refrain from saying stupid things, makes you look bad ya know.

[QUOTE="foreverflame890"]ye i agree TC the PS3 sucks.AHUGECAT

I didn't say that.

PS3 is $399 and has only 5 good games, Xbox 360 is $199 and has 30 good games.

5 games YOU think are good.

30 games YOU think are good.

Seriously people around here are egomaniacs to think the opinion they hold is what the entire gaming populace holds.

Avatar image for CAPSROGUE
CAPSROGUE

863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 CAPSROGUE
Member since 2008 • 863 Posts
[QUOTE="CAPSROGUE"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

You should refrain from saying stupid things, makes you look bad ya know.

[QUOTE="foreverflame890"]ye i agree TC the PS3 sucks.AHUGECAT

I didn't say that.

PS3 is $399 and has only 5 good games, Xbox 360 is $199 and has 30 good games.

You somehow seem to lose the ability to count after 5 when counting PS3 games it seems.

Avatar image for Couth_
Couth_

10369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Couth_
Member since 2008 • 10369 Posts

Good idea but what exactly should they strip to do it?Lionheart08
They don't need to strip anything. As tech gets more advanced. They can make the same machine with a fraction of the parts, and smaller chips

http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2008/tc20081222_257990.htm?chan=technology_technology+index+page_top+stories

This is true for ANY peice of technology

Avatar image for AHUGECAT
AHUGECAT

8967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#17 AHUGECAT
Member since 2006 • 8967 Posts
[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"][QUOTE="CAPSROGUE"]

I didn't say that.

Lewisite

PS3 is $399 and has only 5 good games, Xbox 360 is $199 and has 30 good games.

5 games YOU think are good.

30 games YOU think are good.

Seriously people around here are egomaniacs to think the opinion they hold is what the entire gaming populace holds.

Most people agree with me, such as review sites and sales. The PS3 this holiday is going to sell worse than any GameCube holiday season.

PS3 has like 5 games worth buying, MGS4, Uncharted, LBP, R&C and.... that's pretty much it, for $399. No wonder it failed.

Avatar image for GodofBigMacs
GodofBigMacs

6440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 GodofBigMacs
Member since 2008 • 6440 Posts
They WILL make one sometime in the future, mark my words, but it's a little too early now, IMO. It's only been a little more than 2 years after launch. Also, not everyone who gets a PS3 is a gamer. Some get it just to watch Blu-Ray, you know...
Avatar image for T-Aldous
T-Aldous

1244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 T-Aldous
Member since 2006 • 1244 Posts
They already made a PS3 lite, it was called the 40 gig. They took out everything that made the PS3 a decent deal.
Avatar image for WilliamRLBaker
WilliamRLBaker

28915

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 WilliamRLBaker
Member since 2006 • 28915 Posts

[QUOTE="Lionheart08"]Good idea but what exactly should they strip to do it?Couth_

They don't need to strip anything. As tech gets more advanced. They can make the same machine with a fraction of the parts, and smaller chips

http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2008/tc20081222_257990.htm?chan=technology_technology+index+page_top+stories

This is true for ANY peice of technology

actually tech only shrinks to the sizes we see in slims nearly 8-10 years after the original spec is released and even then MAJOR stuff has to be removed case in point the PStwo quit a bit was removed before it was released and they removed the hardrive to get the slim.

@T-aldous
yes and thats what the 80 and 160 gig are the 40 gig but with bigger hard drives its quit sad actually.

Avatar image for foreverflame890
foreverflame890

551

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 56

User Lists: 0

#21 foreverflame890
Member since 2008 • 551 Posts

They WILL make one sometime in the future, mark my words, but it's a little too early now, IMO. It's only been a little more than 2 years after launch. Also, not everyone who gets a PS3 is a gamer. Some get it just to watch Blu-Ray, you know... GodofBigMacs

Yeah sony likes to milk there fanbase

Avatar image for Lewisite
Lewisite

511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Lewisite
Member since 2008 • 511 Posts
[QUOTE="Lewisite"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

PS3 is $399 and has only 5 good games, Xbox 360 is $199 and has 30 good games.

AHUGECAT

5 games YOU think are good.

30 games YOU think are good.

Seriously people around here are egomaniacs to think the opinion they hold is what the entire gaming populace holds.

Most people agree with me, such as review sites and sales. The PS3 this holiday is going to sell worse than any GameCube holiday season.

PS3 has like 5 games worth buying, MGS4, Uncharted, LBP, R&C and.... that's pretty much it, for $399. No wonder it failed.

It failed? Yes they totally still are not developing games and exclusives for it. Sony has decided it is time to close the factories and shut it all down!

I would name all the PS3 games I find to be good but you could just as easily counter it with "those are not good games". See that is the magic of opinion. Out of curiosity can you list the 30 360 games you are speaking of?

Also an argument of "Most people agree with me" is anecdotal evidence at best.

Compared to the 360 or heaven forbid the Wii, yes the PS3 is selling "bad". It is no where near the point of failure or ready to close up shop on its own however.

I am glad I found SW, this place is hillarious:lol:

Avatar image for T-Aldous
T-Aldous

1244

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 T-Aldous
Member since 2006 • 1244 Posts
[QUOTE="Couth_"]

[QUOTE="Lionheart08"]Good idea but what exactly should they strip to do it?WilliamRLBaker

They don't need to strip anything. As tech gets more advanced. They can make the same machine with a fraction of the parts, and smaller chips

http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2008/tc20081222_257990.htm?chan=technology_technology+index+page_top+stories

This is true for ANY peice of technology

actually tech only shrinks to the sizes we see in slims nearly 8-10 years after the original spec is released and even then MAJOR stuff has to be removed case in point the PStwo quit a bit was removed before it was released and they removed the hardrive to get the slim.

@T-aldous
yes and thats what the 80 and 160 gig are the 40 gig but with bigger hard drives its quit sad actually.

Thats why I am glad I found a good used 60 gig for $300.
Avatar image for AHUGECAT
AHUGECAT

8967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 AHUGECAT
Member since 2006 • 8967 Posts
[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"][QUOTE="Lewisite"]

5 games YOU think are good.

30 games YOU think are good.

Seriously people around here are egomaniacs to think the opinion they hold is what the entire gaming populace holds.

Lewisite

Most people agree with me, such as review sites and sales. The PS3 this holiday is going to sell worse than any GameCube holiday season.

PS3 has like 5 games worth buying, MGS4, Uncharted, LBP, R&C and.... that's pretty much it, for $399. No wonder it failed.

It failed? Yes they totally still are not developing games and exclusives for it. Sony has decided it is time to close the factories and shut it all down!

I would name all the PS3 games I find to be good but you could just as easily counter it with "those are not good games". See that is the magic of opinion. Out of curiosity can you list the 30 360 games you are speaking of?

Also an argument of "Most people agree with me" is anecdotal evidence at best.

Compared to the 360 or heaven forbid the Wii, yes the PS3 is selling "bad". It is no where near the point of failure or ready to close up shop on its own however.

I am glad I found SW, this place is hillarious:lol:

The only devs developing exclusives is Sony. There's like 3 third party exclusives for the PS3, and they aren't high profile except for MGS4. Sony can't even keep Tekken or Final Fantasy exclusive.

Dead Rising, Lost Planet, Bioshock, Halo 3, Gears of War 1 and 2, Eternal Sonata, Tales of Vesperia, Lost Odyssey, Dead or Alive 4, Kameo, PDZ, Viva Pinata, Lips, SceneIt, Braid, Ninja Gaiden II, Halo Wars, Warhammer, Supreme Commander, Crackdown,Saint's Row, Condemned, Forza MotorSport 2, Viva Pinata 2, Fable II, Infinite Undiscovery, The Last Remnant, Beautiful Katamari, Ace Combat 6, Naruto BB, PGR3 + 4, etc. etc.

Yes, actually it is. The only reason Sony still has it is because of Blu-ray. PS3 has lost tons of money, and it is selling poorly. Sony's hope in Blu-ray is the only reason it's still around.

Avatar image for Couth_
Couth_

10369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Couth_
Member since 2008 • 10369 Posts
[QUOTE="Couth_"]

[QUOTE="Lionheart08"]Good idea but what exactly should they strip to do it?WilliamRLBaker

They don't need to strip anything. As tech gets more advanced. They can make the same machine with a fraction of the parts, and smaller chips

http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2008/tc20081222_257990.htm?chan=technology_technology+index+page_top+stories

This is true for ANY peice of technology

actually tech only shrinks to the sizes we see in slims nearly 8-10 years after the original spec is released and even then MAJOR stuff has to be removed case in point the PStwo quit a bit was removed before it was released and they removed the hardrive to get the slim.

@T-aldous
yes and thats what the 80 and 160 gig are the 40 gig but with bigger hard drives its quit sad actually.

PS2 slim came out only 4 years after the original PS2. Earlier this year IBM developed a cheaper more efficient 45 NM cell processor, but sony is still using the 65 NM chip. They are probably already designing a smaller PS3 to work around the smaller chip
Avatar image for colosion
colosion

472

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 colosion
Member since 2007 • 472 Posts

The only devs developing exclusives is Sony. There's like 3 third party exclusives for the PS3, and they aren't high profile except for MGS4. Sony can't even keep Tekken or Final Fantasy exclusive.

Dead Rising, Lost Planet, Bioshock, Halo 3, Gears of War 1 and 2, Eternal Sonata, Tales of Vesperia, Lost Odyssey, Dead or Alive 4, Kameo, PDZ, Viva Pinata, Lips, SceneIt, Braid, Ninja Gaiden II, Halo Wars, Warhammer, Supreme Commander, Crackdown,Saint's Row, Condemned, Forza MotorSport 2, Viva Pinata 2, Fable II, Infinite Undiscovery, The Last Remnant, Beautiful Katamari, Ace Combat 6, Naruto BB, PGR3 + 4, etc. etc.

Yes, actually it is. The only reason Sony still has it is because of Blu-ray. PS3 has lost tons of money, and it is selling poorly. Sony's hope in Blu-ray is the only reason it's still around.

LOL, So many multiplats...
Avatar image for Lewisite
Lewisite

511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Lewisite
Member since 2008 • 511 Posts
[QUOTE="Lewisite"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

Most people agree with me, such as review sites and sales. The PS3 this holiday is going to sell worse than any GameCube holiday season.

PS3 has like 5 games worth buying, MGS4, Uncharted, LBP, R&C and.... that's pretty much it, for $399. No wonder it failed.

AHUGECAT

It failed? Yes they totally still are not developing games and exclusives for it. Sony has decided it is time to close the factories and shut it all down!

I would name all the PS3 games I find to be good but you could just as easily counter it with "those are not good games". See that is the magic of opinion. Out of curiosity can you list the 30 360 games you are speaking of?

Also an argument of "Most people agree with me" is anecdotal evidence at best.

Compared to the 360 or heaven forbid the Wii, yes the PS3 is selling "bad". It is no where near the point of failure or ready to close up shop on its own however.

I am glad I found SW, this place is hillarious:lol:

The only devs developing exclusives is Sony. There's like 3 third party exclusives for the PS3, and they aren't high profile except for MGS4. Sony can't even keep Tekken or Final Fantasy exclusive.

Dead Rising, Lost Planet, Bioshock, Halo 3, Gears of War 1 and 2, Eternal Sonata, Tales of Vesperia, Lost Odyssey, Dead or Alive 4, Kameo, PDZ, Viva Pinata, Lips, SceneIt, Braid, Ninja Gaiden II, Halo Wars, Warhammer, Supreme Commander, Crackdown,Saint's Row, Condemned, Forza MotorSport 2, Viva Pinata 2, Fable II, Infinite Undiscovery, The Last Remnant, Beautiful Katamari, Ace Combat 6, Naruto BB, PGR3 + 4, etc. etc.

Yes, actually it is. The only reason Sony still has it is because of Blu-ray. PS3 has lost tons of money, and it is selling poorly. Sony's hope in Blu-ray is the only reason it's still around.

FF versus is still exclusive. Also XIII is still exclusive PS3 in Japan. Not that I really care, I cannot stand FF type rpgs.

Anyways your list is about as I would expect it. The only game on there I have played and wanted "bad" was Dead Rising. I suppose I will be picking up on the Wii if the port is not absolutely horrid.

Also, multiple credible links that Sony is only keeping the PS3 around because of Blu-Ray? No blogs or some random fanboy rants. Real solid articles that detail what you mention.

Thanks in advance.

Avatar image for AHUGECAT
AHUGECAT

8967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 AHUGECAT
Member since 2006 • 8967 Posts
[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"][QUOTE="Lewisite"]

It failed? Yes they totally still are not developing games and exclusives for it. Sony has decided it is time to close the factories and shut it all down!

I would name all the PS3 games I find to be good but you could just as easily counter it with "those are not good games". See that is the magic of opinion. Out of curiosity can you list the 30 360 games you are speaking of?

Also an argument of "Most people agree with me" is anecdotal evidence at best.

Compared to the 360 or heaven forbid the Wii, yes the PS3 is selling "bad". It is no where near the point of failure or ready to close up shop on its own however.

I am glad I found SW, this place is hillarious:lol:

Lewisite

The only devs developing exclusives is Sony. There's like 3 third party exclusives for the PS3, and they aren't high profile except for MGS4. Sony can't even keep Tekken or Final Fantasy exclusive.

Dead Rising, Lost Planet, Bioshock, Halo 3, Gears of War 1 and 2, Eternal Sonata, Tales of Vesperia, Lost Odyssey, Dead or Alive 4, Kameo, PDZ, Viva Pinata, Lips, SceneIt, Braid, Ninja Gaiden II, Halo Wars, Warhammer, Supreme Commander, Crackdown,Saint's Row, Condemned, Forza MotorSport 2, Viva Pinata 2, Fable II, Infinite Undiscovery, The Last Remnant, Beautiful Katamari, Ace Combat 6, Naruto BB, PGR3 + 4, etc. etc.

Yes, actually it is. The only reason Sony still has it is because of Blu-ray. PS3 has lost tons of money, and it is selling poorly. Sony's hope in Blu-ray is the only reason it's still around.

FF versus is still exclusive. Also XIII is still exclusive PS3 in Japan. Not that I really care, I cannot stand FF type rpgs.

Anyways your list is about as I would expect it. The only game on there I have played and wanted "bad" was Dead Rising. I suppose I will be picking up on the Wii if the port is not absolutely horrid.

Also, multiple credible links that Sony is only keeping the PS3 around because of Blu-Ray? No blogs or some random fanboy rants. Real solid articles that detail what you mention.

Thanks in advance.

Final Fantasy VS is only an exclusive for now, and XIII will make its way into Japan. Then you have the fact Sony lost Grand Theft Auto, Assassin's Creed, Devil May Cry, Tekken, Virtua Fighter, among others.

Yeah, too bad the PS3 has the weakest line up in console history (this includes the 3DO). Uncharted is the only game worth playing on the PS3.

Don't need to post links, if Sony cared so much about gaming they wouldn't have made the PS3 so expensive. They wouldn't have lost so many exclusives. They saw the success of PS2's DVD player and tried to recreate it with Blu-ray. Because of this, the PlayStation's 2008 holiday season will be the worst holiday season since Sega's Dreamcast. But Sony doesn't seem to mind, and they aren't doing a price drop, why? Because to them they have 18 million Blu-ray players out there, not 18 million PlayStation 3's. Blu-ray is their main selling point for PS3. 85% of Blu-ray players are PS3s.

Avatar image for Lewisite
Lewisite

511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 Lewisite
Member since 2008 • 511 Posts

They are still losing money on each console made. In your obvious infinite wisdom, just how do you expect them to make a price cut at the moment?

PS3 is fine and not going anywhere, we are in the middle of this "holiday season" and the PS3 world is not ending. Yes it is still third but the games will continue to be pumped out.

Yeah, too bad the PS3 has the weakest line up in console history (this includes the 3DO). Uncharted is the only game worth playing on the PS3.AHUGECAT

There you go with opinions again.

Avatar image for dark-warmachine
dark-warmachine

3476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#30 dark-warmachine
Member since 2007 • 3476 Posts
I wonder what the slim version will be called. Anyway, I don't mind a slim version. I'd probably get one myself knowing how much lighter it will be and by then it probably be cheaper maybe around $199.
Avatar image for nervmeister
nervmeister

15377

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 nervmeister
Member since 2005 • 15377 Posts
Yeah, too bad the PS3 has the weakest line up in console history (this includes the 3DO). Uncharted is the only game worth playing on the PS3>AHUGECAT
Here is where I stopped listening.
Avatar image for AHUGECAT
AHUGECAT

8967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 AHUGECAT
Member since 2006 • 8967 Posts

They are still losing money on each console made. In your obvious infinite wisdom, just how do you expect them to make a price cut at the moment?

PS3 is fine and not going anywhere, we are in the middle of this "holiday season" and the PS3 world is not ending. Yes it is still third but the games will continue to be pumped out.

Lewisite

The console is too expensive, simple. The game's library says the system is worth $40, not $400. I guess I am used to the PlayStation brand having good line ups, I remember the PS2's 2002 year (when I first got the PS2) and I remember Vice City, Shinobi, Kingdom Hearts, Ratchet and Clank,Shut Your Mouth and others. Now Sony can't even keep its own exclusives, and the games are delayed relentlessly.

PS3 is NOT fine, at all. It is selling horribly and I doubt it's going to last much longer before Sony pulls the plug, but then Sony wants to sell more Blu-ray players so they will keep it alive for the time being.

It's not just in third, but it is selling even worse than the GameCube did. But at least the GameCube made profit, the PS3 loses too much money.

Avatar image for Solid_Snak3Xx
Solid_Snak3Xx

413

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#33 Solid_Snak3Xx
Member since 2008 • 413 Posts
PS3 Portable :D
Avatar image for Lewisite
Lewisite

511

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Lewisite
Member since 2008 • 511 Posts

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]Yeah, too bad the PS3 has the weakest line up in console history (this includes the 3DO). Uncharted is the only game worth playing on the PS3>nervmeister
Here is where I stopped listening.

Yeah I am doing talking to him about it as well. :lol:

Hard to argue with logic like that.

Avatar image for AHUGECAT
AHUGECAT

8967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#35 AHUGECAT
Member since 2006 • 8967 Posts

[QUOTE="nervmeister"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]Yeah, too bad the PS3 has the weakest line up in console history (this includes the 3DO). Uncharted is the only game worth playing on the PS3>Lewisite

Here is where I stopped listening.

Yeah I am doing talking to him about it as well. :lol:

Hard to argue with logic like that.

The thing is you have the idea the PS3 is a blazing success. If the PS3 did not have Blu-ray Sony would've dropped it by now.

Avatar image for dark-warmachine
dark-warmachine

3476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#36 dark-warmachine
Member since 2007 • 3476 Posts
[QUOTE="Lewisite"]

[QUOTE="nervmeister"]Here is where I stopped listening.AHUGECAT

Yeah I am doing talking to him about it as well. :lol:

Hard to argue with logic like that.

The thing is you have the idea the PS3 is a blazing success. If the PS3 did not have Blu-ray Sony would've dropped it by now.

You mean if it did not include Blu Ray the ps3 would had sold much better, if you want to think hypothetically, right?
Avatar image for CAPSROGUE
CAPSROGUE

863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 CAPSROGUE
Member since 2008 • 863 Posts

The thing is you have the idea the PS3 is a blazing success. If the PS3 did not have Blu-ray Sony would've dropped it by now. AHUGECAT

Why should I look at numbers? :/ I simply play what I like. With your logic it would be stupid to play games that score incredible high but sell incredibly low.

The only devs developing exclusives is Sony. There's like 3 third party exclusives for the PS3, and they aren't high profile except for MGS4. Sony can't even keep Tekken or Final Fantasy exclusive.

Dead Rising, Lost Planet, Bioshock, Halo 3, Gears of War 1 and 2, Eternal Sonata, Tales of Vesperia, Lost Odyssey, Dead or Alive 4, Kameo, PDZ, Viva Pinata, Lips, SceneIt, Braid, Ninja Gaiden II, Halo Wars, Warhammer, Supreme Commander, Crackdown,Saint's Row, Condemned, Forza MotorSport 2, Viva Pinata 2, Fable II, Infinite Undiscovery, The Last Remnant, Beautiful Katamari, Ace Combat 6, Naruto BB, PGR3 + 4, etc. etc.

Yes, actually it is. The only reason Sony still has it is because of Blu-ray. PS3 has lost tons of money, and it is selling poorly. Sony's hope in Blu-ray is the only reason it's still around.

AHUGECAT

I don't buy alot of games for my console, simply 'cause I don't have the time to play all of them since my education > spare time, atleast if you want to achieve something in life. So I'm just looking at a handfull of games.

PS3: MGS4: Guns of the Patroit - Valkyria Chronicles - Little Big Planet - Killzone 2 - Final Fantasy Versus XIII - God of War 3 - Dead Space - Resident Evil 5, that's about it.

X360:Halo 3 - Dead Space - Ninja Gaiden II - PGR4 - Resident Evil 5, that's it.

Actually the XBOX had some really cool games which would have made swing more to X360. Phantom Dust, Panzer Dragon Orta, Conker: Live & Reloaded, Unreal Championship 2: The Liandri Conflict. If they had released similar games I would have surely gone for the X360.

Avatar image for AHUGECAT
AHUGECAT

8967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#38 AHUGECAT
Member since 2006 • 8967 Posts
[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"][QUOTE="Lewisite"]

Yeah I am doing talking to him about it as well. :lol:

Hard to argue with logic like that.

dark-warmachine

The thing is you have the idea the PS3 is a blazing success. If the PS3 did not have Blu-ray Sony would've dropped it by now.

You mean if it did not include Blu Ray the ps3 would had sold much better, if you want to think hypothetically, right?

That wasn't my point, though. Sony thinks the PS3 as a Blu-ray player, not a video game system. But anyways if Sony would've went with a generic processor instead of the CELL, they still could've competed with the 360 on a pricing level.

Avatar image for tek91
tek91

1476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 tek91
Member since 2004 • 1476 Posts

The only devs developing exclusives is Sony. There's like 3 third party exclusives for the PS3, and they aren't high profile except for MGS4. Sony can't even keep Tekken or Final Fantasy exclusive.

Dead Rising, Lost Planet, Bioshock, Halo 3, Gears of War 1 and 2, Eternal Sonata, Tales of Vesperia, Lost Odyssey, Dead or Alive 4, Kameo, PDZ, Viva Pinata, Lips, SceneIt, Braid, Ninja Gaiden II, Halo Wars, Warhammer, Supreme Commander, Crackdown,Saint's Row, Condemned, Forza MotorSport 2, Viva Pinata 2, Fable II, Infinite Undiscovery, The Last Remnant, Beautiful Katamari, Ace Combat 6, Naruto BB, PGR3 + 4, etc. etc.

Yes, actually it is. The only reason Sony still has it is because of Blu-ray. PS3 has lost tons of money, and it is selling poorly. Sony's hope in Blu-ray is the only reason it's still around.

Dead Rising is not 360 exclusive neither is Bioshock that's on PS 3 lol neither is Gears of War that's on PC Viva Pinata is not exclusive either lol Saints Row is not exclusive also it's in PS 3 and PC Fable also is on PC.

Sony has the best games and quality it doesnt have a machine that scratches disks and break if it gets hot lol

e only devs developing exclusives is Sony. There's like 3 third party exclusives for the PS3, and they aren't high profile except for MGS4. Sony can't even keep Tekken or Final Fantasy exclusive.

360 can't keep Bioshock or Saints Row nor Ninja Gaiden :)

Dead Rising, Lost Planet, Bioshock, Halo 3, Gears of War 1 and 2, Eternal Sonata, Tales of Vesperia, Lost Odyssey, Dead or Alive 4, Kameo, PDZ, Viva Pinata, Lips, SceneIt, Braid, Ninja Gaiden II, Halo Wars, Warhammer, Supreme Commander, Crackdown,Saint's Row, Condemned, Forza MotorSport 2, Viva Pinata 2, Fable II, Infinite Undiscovery, The Last Remnant, Beautiful Katamari, Ace Combat 6, Naruto BB, PGR3 + 4, etc. etc.

Dead Rising is on wii Lost Planet is on PC Halo is on PC, Gears on PC Viva Pinata = PC, Braid = PC, Ninja Gaiden = PS 3, Saint's Row PS 3 that leaves the 360 with little exclusives now lets look at PS 3

METAL GEAR SOLID 4, GOD OF WAR 3, UNCHARTED 1 and 2, KILLZONE 2, RESISTANCE 2, TWISTED METAL, GRAN TURISMO 5, FINAL FANTASY VS, HAZE, SOCOM CONFRONTATION, LITTLE BIG PLANET, MOTORSTORM 1 and 2, RIDGE RACER, Red Dead Revolver 2, WIPEOUT PS 3, TIME CRISIS 4, LA NOIR, inFAMOUS and many more exclusives not on the 360 not to mention the Blue Ray and the fact that the PS 3 works and you will never have to bring it back to the stores also u wont have disks scratching on the PS 3.

so now do you see the error of what you say ?

eah, too bad the PS3 has the weakest line up in console history (this includes the 3DO). Uncharted is the only game worth playing on the PS3.

lol this makes me laugh did you forget MGS 4 is game of the year :) lol it's line up cripples the 360 and why does 360 not have games for 09 it just gave up.

Don't need to post links, if Sony cared so much about gaming they wouldn't have made the PS3 so expensive. They wouldn't have lost so many exclusives. They saw the success of PS2's DVD player and tried to recreate it with Blu-ray. Because of this, the PlayStation's 2008 holiday season will be the worst holiday season since Sega's Dreamcast. But Sony doesn't seem to mind, and they aren't doing a price drop, why? Because to them they have 18 million Blu-ray players out there, not 18 million PlayStation 3's. Blu-ray is their main selling point for PS3. 85% of Blu-ray players are PS3s.

Sony cares about it's fan because it gave us the most high tech machine available with blue ray and made sure it's product is reliable it did not rush the machine into stores to get money and screw the consumers like micrososft did instead what do you have to pay for broken scratched up disk and a whole bunch of RROD well at least you can sue microsoft and try to get your money back so you can buy a PS 3

Avatar image for ColdfireTrilogy
ColdfireTrilogy

4911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#40 ColdfireTrilogy
Member since 2005 • 4911 Posts
[QUOTE="CAPSROGUE"]

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

You should refrain from saying stupid things, makes you look bad ya know.

[QUOTE="foreverflame890"]ye i agree TC the PS3 sucks.AHUGECAT

I didn't say that.

PS3 is $399 and has only 5 good games, Xbox 360 is $199 and has 30 good games.

this is a matter of opinion. I can name more than 5 good games without breaking a sweat.... btw your avatar makes me lul
Avatar image for AHUGECAT
AHUGECAT

8967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 AHUGECAT
Member since 2006 • 8967 Posts

Dead Rising is not 360 exclusive neither is Bioshock that's on PS 3 lol neither is Gears of War that's on PC Viva Pinata is not exclusive either lol Saints Row is not exclusive also it's in PS 3 and PC Fable also is on PC.

Sony has the best games and quality it doesnt have a machine that scratches disks and break if it gets hot loltek91

Yeah those games came out years after they were on the Xbox 360, which shows that the other consoles just get sloppy seconds. Saint's Row 1 is not on the PS3 (was cancelled because no one wants to develop for the PS3).

360 can't keep Bioshock or Saints Row nor Ninja Gaiden :)tek91

Hm Bioshock came out a year after the 360 and was rumored to be on the PS3 anyways (hell GameSpot had a PS3 page for it before it was cancelled for the PS3 temporarily), and Ninja Gaiden was a remake, nothing bad really. Nothing compared to the PS3.

Dead Rising is on wii Lost Planet is on PC Halo is on PC, Gears on PC Viva Pinata = PC, Braid = PC, Ninja Gaiden = PS 3, Saint's Row PS 3 that leaves the 360 with little exclusives now lets look at PS 3tek91

They may be on the PC (years after they were on the 360) but they are still on the Xbox 360, and not on the PS3.

METAL GEAR SOLID 4, GOD OF WAR 3, UNCHARTED 1 and 2, KILLZONE 2, RESISTANCE 2, TWISTED METAL, GRAN TURISMO 5, FINAL FANTASY VS, HAZE, SOCOM CONFRONTATION, LITTLE BIG PLANET, MOTORSTORM 1 and 2, RIDGE RACER, Red Dead Revolver 2, WIPEOUT PS 3, TIME CRISIS 4, LA NOIR, inFAMOUS and many more exclusives not on the 360 not to mention the Blue Ray and the fact that the PS 3 works and you will never have to bring it back to the stores also u wont have disks scratching on the PS 3.tek91

Such a weak list, first off you named games that aren't even out, games that suck period (Ridge Racer? Please), forgettable games, and well that's it. I just named what the 360 has NOW, and didn't need to say Ridge Racer or SOCOM for it because the 360 has stronger titles. When Resistance 2 is your best shooter, you know your system is weak.

so now do you see the error of what you say ?tek91

If anything you showed me how right I am.

lol this makes me laugh did you forget MGS 4 is game of the year :) lol it's line up cripples the 360 and why does 360 not have games for 09 it just gave up.tek91

PS3 does not have any games for 09 either.

Sony cares about it's fan because it gave us the most high tech machine available with blue ray and made sure it's product is reliable it did not rush the machine into stores to get money and screw the consumers like micrososft did instead what do you have to pay for broken scratched up disk and a whole bunch of RROD well at least you can sue microsoft and try to get your money back so you can buy a PS 3

tek91

If Sony cared so much about the fans then it wouldn't have made us pay $599 for their system, especially when they aren't paying for exclusives. They just want you to buy Blu-rays, not video games.

Avatar image for ColdfireTrilogy
ColdfireTrilogy

4911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#42 ColdfireTrilogy
Member since 2005 • 4911 Posts
oh wait why are we arguing which one is better in the first place .... they are both fine, last gen you didnt see people whining about the crap job the xbox was until halo came out and then after it still took AN ENTIRE CONSOLE LIFETIME to build up to even compete with the PS2 ... so seriously ... let it die ........ both consoles are great and fun, pick one or both and play it neither sucks nor is failing.
Avatar image for ColdfireTrilogy
ColdfireTrilogy

4911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#43 ColdfireTrilogy
Member since 2005 • 4911 Posts
[QUOTE="tek91"]

Dead Rising is not 360 exclusive neither is Bioshock that's on PS 3 lol neither is Gears of War that's on PC Viva Pinata is not exclusive either lol Saints Row is not exclusive also it's in PS 3 and PC Fable also is on PC.

Sony has the best games and quality it doesnt have a machine that scratches disks and break if it gets hot lolAHUGECAT

Yeah those games came out years after they were on the Xbox 360, which shows that the other consoles just get sloppy seconds. Saint's Row 1 is not on the PS3 (was cancelled because no one wants to develop for the PS3).

360 can't keep Bioshock or Saints Row nor Ninja Gaiden :)tek91

Hm Bioshock came out a year after the 360 and was rumored to be on the PS3 anyways (hell GameSpot had a PS3 page for it before it was cancelled for the PS3 temporarily), and Ninja Gaiden was a remake, nothing bad really. Nothing compared to the PS3.

Dead Rising is on wii Lost Planet is on PC Halo is on PC, Gears on PC Viva Pinata = PC, Braid = PC, Ninja Gaiden = PS 3, Saint's Row PS 3 that leaves the 360 with little exclusives now lets look at PS 3tek91

They may be on the PC (years after they were on the 360) but they are still on the Xbox 360, and not on the PS3.

METAL GEAR SOLID 4, GOD OF WAR 3, UNCHARTED 1 and 2, KILLZONE 2, RESISTANCE 2, TWISTED METAL, GRAN TURISMO 5, FINAL FANTASY VS, HAZE, SOCOM CONFRONTATION, LITTLE BIG PLANET, MOTORSTORM 1 and 2, RIDGE RACER, Red Dead Revolver 2, WIPEOUT PS 3, TIME CRISIS 4, LA NOIR, inFAMOUS and many more exclusives not on the 360 not to mention the Blue Ray and the fact that the PS 3 works and you will never have to bring it back to the stores also u wont have disks scratching on the PS 3.tek91

Such a weak list, first off you named games that aren't even out, games that suck period (Ridge Racer? Please), forgettable games, and well that's it. I just named what the 360 has NOW, and didn't need to say Ridge Racer or SOCOM for it because the 360 has stronger titles. When Resistance 2 is your best shooter, you know your system is weak.

so now do you see the error of what you say ?tek91

If anything you showed me how right I am.

lol this makes me laugh did you forget MGS 4 is game of the year :) lol it's line up cripples the 360 and why does 360 not have games for 09 it just gave up.tek91

PS3 does not have any games for 09 either.

Sony cares about it's fan because it gave us the most high tech machine available with blue ray and made sure it's product is reliable it did not rush the machine into stores to get money and screw the consumers like micrososft did instead what do you have to pay for broken scratched up disk and a whole bunch of RROD well at least you can sue microsoft and try to get your money back so you can buy a PS 3

tek91

If Sony cared so much about the fans then it wouldn't have made us pay $599 for their system, especially when they aren't paying for exclusives. They just want you to buy Blu-rays, not video games.

WOAH WOAH WOAH ... MGS4 isnt a shooter??? we arent mentioning FPS specific here as your including gears so ... ya goty isnt mentioned ... i think we know which shooter is the superior -_-
Avatar image for Tyrant156
Tyrant156

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 Tyrant156
Member since 2004 • 737 Posts
[QUOTE="Lewisite"]

They are still losing money on each console made. In your obvious infinite wisdom, just how do you expect them to make a price cut at the moment?

PS3 is fine and not going anywhere, we are in the middle of this "holiday season" and the PS3 world is not ending. Yes it is still third but the games will continue to be pumped out.

AHUGECAT

The console is too expensive, simple. The game's library says the system is worth $40, not $400. I guess I am used to the PlayStation brand having good line ups, I remember the PS2's 2002 year (when I first got the PS2) and I remember Vice City, Shinobi, Kingdom Hearts, Ratchet and Clank,Shut Your Mouth and others. Now Sony can't even keep its own exclusives, and the games are delayed relentlessly.

PS3 is NOT fine, at all. It is selling horribly and I doubt it's going to last much longer before Sony pulls the plug, but then Sony wants to sell more Blu-ray players so they will keep it alive for the time being.

It's not just in third, but it is selling even worse than the GameCube did. But at least the GameCube made profit, the PS3 loses too much money.

Ehh? The PS3 and 360 are selling roughly at the same rate. The PS3 out sold the 360 a lot at the begining of 08 and then the price drop of the 360 gained it back at the end of 08 how is the PS3 selling worse then the gamecube? Yeah Sony is going to pull the plug and then what...make another system? this early? Thankgod you don't run a business....

Avatar image for dark-warmachine
dark-warmachine

3476

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#45 dark-warmachine
Member since 2007 • 3476 Posts
[QUOTE="dark-warmachine"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

The thing is you have the idea the PS3 is a blazing success. If the PS3 did not have Blu-ray Sony would've dropped it by now.

AHUGECAT

You mean if it did not include Blu Ray the ps3 would had sold much better, if you want to think hypothetically, right?

That wasn't my point, though. Sony thinks the PS3 as a Blu-ray player, not a video game system. But anyways if Sony would've went with a generic processor instead of the CELL, they still could've competed with the 360 on a pricing level.

I know that wasn't your point. You wanted us to think hypothetically with the situation you presented in order to suit your argument.

You say Sony thinks the ps3 as a Blu Ray player, I agree but now they have changed focus on gaming. There focusing more on first party development.

Avatar image for AHUGECAT
AHUGECAT

8967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 AHUGECAT
Member since 2006 • 8967 Posts
[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"][QUOTE="Lewisite"]

They are still losing money on each console made. In your obvious infinite wisdom, just how do you expect them to make a price cut at the moment?

PS3 is fine and not going anywhere, we are in the middle of this "holiday season" and the PS3 world is not ending. Yes it is still third but the games will continue to be pumped out.

Tyrant156

The console is too expensive, simple. The game's library says the system is worth $40, not $400. I guess I am used to the PlayStation brand having good line ups, I remember the PS2's 2002 year (when I first got the PS2) and I remember Vice City, Shinobi, Kingdom Hearts, Ratchet and Clank,Shut Your Mouth and others. Now Sony can't even keep its own exclusives, and the games are delayed relentlessly.

PS3 is NOT fine, at all. It is selling horribly and I doubt it's going to last much longer before Sony pulls the plug, but then Sony wants to sell more Blu-ray players so they will keep it alive for the time being.

It's not just in third, but it is selling even worse than the GameCube did. But at least the GameCube made profit, the PS3 loses too much money.

Ehh? The PS3 and 360 are selling roughly at the same rate. The PS3 out sold the 360 a lot at the begining of 08 and then the price drop of the 360 gained it back at the end of 08 how is the PS3 selling worse then the gamecube? Yeah Sony is going to pull the plug and then what...make another system? this early? Thankgod you don't run a business....

The PS3 sold well, but it isn't selling well. Yeah, it sold as well as the 360 in a period where no one cares, but now it is selling bad and it will not pick up. If I ran a business, the PS3 wouldn't be in the situtation it is now. But then again, I am sure Sony forced Kutaragi to put Blu-ray in the system.

Avatar image for Tyrant156
Tyrant156

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Tyrant156
Member since 2004 • 737 Posts
[QUOTE="Tyrant156"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]

The console is too expensive, simple. The game's library says the system is worth $40, not $400. I guess I am used to the PlayStation brand having good line ups, I remember the PS2's 2002 year (when I first got the PS2) and I remember Vice City, Shinobi, Kingdom Hearts, Ratchet and Clank,Shut Your Mouth and others. Now Sony can't even keep its own exclusives, and the games are delayed relentlessly.

PS3 is NOT fine, at all. It is selling horribly and I doubt it's going to last much longer before Sony pulls the plug, but then Sony wants to sell more Blu-ray players so they will keep it alive for the time being.

It's not just in third, but it is selling even worse than the GameCube did. But at least the GameCube made profit, the PS3 loses too much money.

AHUGECAT

Ehh? The PS3 and 360 are selling roughly at the same rate. The PS3 out sold the 360 a lot at the begining of 08 and then the price drop of the 360 gained it back at the end of 08 how is the PS3 selling worse then the gamecube? Yeah Sony is going to pull the plug and then what...make another system? this early? Thankgod you don't run a business....

The PS3 sold well, but it isn't selling well. Yeah, it sold as well as the 360 in a period where no one cares, but now it is selling bad and it will not pick up. If I ran a business, the PS3 wouldn't be in the situtation it is now. But then again, I am sure Sony forced Kutaragi to put Blu-ray in the system.

Yeah but in the long run Blu-ray paid off, and how could it sell in a period were nobody cared...lol do you even care now? Do you have money invested in MS or Sony stock? Cause i'm pretty sure they care whether their system is selling all the time not some of the time.

Avatar image for GodofBigMacs
GodofBigMacs

6440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#48 GodofBigMacs
Member since 2008 • 6440 Posts
PS3 does not have any games for 09 either.AHUGECAT
WAIT wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait.... What did you just say? No games? Killzone 2, what Gamespot said was probably the best game graphically they've seen? Is nothing? inFAMOUS that IGN wrote an article, saying it is a reason to get a PS3 for next spring, is nothing? Uncharted 2, sequel to a game that probably had some of the best graphics and story of its year, is nothing? MAG, 256 shooter, made by the guys who made SOCOM... is nothing? God of War 3, another sequel to a PS2 game (God of War 2) that contended against PS3 and 360 games in 2007 for Game of the Year, is nothing? Gran Turismo 5, with its prologue, PROLOGUE, having some of the best graphics this year, and probably being one of the most realistic driving sims, is nothing? I'm not even done, "sir".
Avatar image for AHUGECAT
AHUGECAT

8967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#49 AHUGECAT
Member since 2006 • 8967 Posts

[QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]PS3 does not have any games for 09 either.GodofBigMacs
WAIT wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait.... What did you just say? No games? Killzone 2, what Gamespot said was probably the best game graphically they've seen? Is nothing? inFAMOUS that IGN wrote an article, saying it is a reason to get a PS3 for next spring, is nothing? Uncharted 2, sequel to a game that probably had some of the best graphics and story of its year, is nothing? MAG, 256 shooter, made by the guys who made SOCOM... is nothing? God of War 3, another sequel to a PS2 game (God of War 2) that contended against PS3 and 360 games in 2007 for Game of the Year, is nothing? Gran Turismo 5, with its prologue, PROLOGUE, having some of the best graphics this year, and probably being one of the most realistic driving sims, is nothing? I'm not even done, "sir".

Killzone 2 is a sequel to a flop, great graphics don't mean a great game.

inFamous just has bad written all over it, Lair style.

Uncharted 2 is an exception. Just one game. MAG won't be out in 2009, and neither will God of War 3 or Gran Turismo 5.

As I said, weak line up.

Avatar image for Tyrant156
Tyrant156

737

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 Tyrant156
Member since 2004 • 737 Posts

[QUOTE="GodofBigMacs"][QUOTE="AHUGECAT"]PS3 does not have any games for 09 either.AHUGECAT

WAIT wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait wait.... What did you just say? No games? Killzone 2, what Gamespot said was probably the best game graphically they've seen? Is nothing? inFAMOUS that IGN wrote an article, saying it is a reason to get a PS3 for next spring, is nothing? Uncharted 2, sequel to a game that probably had some of the best graphics and story of its year, is nothing? MAG, 256 shooter, made by the guys who made SOCOM... is nothing? God of War 3, another sequel to a PS2 game (God of War 2) that contended against PS3 and 360 games in 2007 for Game of the Year, is nothing? Gran Turismo 5, with its prologue, PROLOGUE, having some of the best graphics this year, and probably being one of the most realistic driving sims, is nothing? I'm not even done, "sir".

Killzone 2 is a sequel to a flop, great graphics don't mean a great game.

inFamous just has bad written all over it, Lair style.

Uncharted 2 is an exception. Just one game. MAG won't be out in 2009, and neither will God of War 3 or Gran Turismo 5.

As I said, weak line up.

Lol so your argument is neither system has a great lineup in 09....man what a depressing thought.